The Official Supreme Court Decision on forging A Court Document
Posted in the Banking Forum
#1 Mar 28, 2014
Read this: 370 US 650 - US Supreme Court Decisions - Justia
supreme.justia.com ›...› Gilbert v. United States - 370 US 650‎
(a) On the record in this case, including the judge's instructions, the jury's verdict ...(b) The word "forges" in § 495 was intended to have its common law ... and denied that they ever authorized petitioner orally or in writing to receive or ... his own, as agent, when in fact he has no such authority, is guilty of forgery under § 495.
Few lawyers dare to step in to the arena and file suits against A Federal Judge to forge and completely alter his own Court Document issued in 2012...
Then all my civil suits filed since 2010 against Citibank and e-Bay at US District Court of Western New York District in Buffalo, NY are like what Alice has seen in Wonder Land or at least having the same experience!!
The tyrannical and lawless Judge was so vocal and deliberating his Court Orders like it is his own Court with Citibank and e-Bay as his own clients..
In several written Court Orders, he defamed and accused my legally established Evidence of Proofs as false and derogatory..The Problem: The Defendants were shy and stayed mum thru out the entire period of time...In one occasion, the Lawyer hired by Citibank sent in the overnight Express urging him to do more using Judge Richard J. Arcara's own words.. It is like A Circus with A Jester on the side to inflame and to excite the Clown for A Historic Legal Scandal!!
Sadly, to Judge Richard J. Arcara, it became my strongest piece of evidence to establish his guilt of Forgery with intended Corruption!!!
Soon, he ordered: I, the Pro Se could not file any civil suits in his court without his written permission...The queer nature of his ruling is: His order would ban and officially prohibit me, A Pro Se to file any case in his court forever!!! He stripped me the liberty and the right to file a civil suit in his court in this life...
I thought that is the Right guaranteed by the US Constitution!!! How dare him!
Then, his Court Order appeared in Justia US Law sounded an entirely different tune: Judge Richard J. Arcara said in the Court Document 23 of US District Court of Western New York District in Buffalo, NY - He has no jurisdiction over any and all my filed civil cases against Citibank..It implies that he has no right to rule on my complaint against e-Bay either!!
My point: Why not say so earlier..He has no jurisdiction on any filed Complaints of Fraud, Period!!! More specifically, he could not understand the Legal Term of Fraud at all...
I will pursue this "complex" case of Fraud and Corruption involving A Federal Judge to no end...So, other residents don't have to suffer the similar fate in this land!!!
Add your comments below
|I will buy Chinese bonds NOW (Sep '13)||11 min||Watcher||89|
|To look widely not just to believe those highly...||1 hr||The Dumb Cheever||3|
|It is about time to construct a permanent Club ...||1 hr||The Filthy Cheever||3|
|Japan has more Girls in college than you will ...||1 hr||The Poor Cheever||6|
|All those Wall Street Cheaters China can go wit...||3 hr||China needs to do...||1|
|Skretny stepping down as chief federal judge, t... (May '14)||4 hr||Above the Law||7|
|UK Wins ECB Euro Clearing Court Fight||13 hr||jeffry||1|
Find what you want!
Search Banking Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC