|
SuzieQ
|
There is no mention of his background. Was he an illegal alien or is this being covered up once again?
|
|
Evans
AOL
|
Just a sad,sad,sad story, all around.
|
|
Racists
|
Judged:
1
SuzieQ wrote: There is no mention of his background. Was he an illegal alien or is this being covered up once again? His picture was in the paper, he's a white guy you dumb racist redneck.
|
|
Felix
|
Judged:
1
8-time convicted felon and he's roaming the streets. Nice job in the "justice" system.
|
|
Fotoguy
|
Judged:
1
Felix wrote: 8-time convicted felon and he's roaming the streets. Nice job in the "justice" system. Yeah, I agree. How the hell is this allowed to happen. A well deserved & well placed needle in his arm would prevent any further havoc from this piece of garbage
|
|
steel violet
|
does any one know if he is originally from medford?
|
|
Amazing
|
He'll get away with this and continue to murder.
|
|
Evans
AOL
|
Amazing wrote: He'll get away with this and continue to murder. I think the buck stopped here.
|
|
micky62
|
Judged:
1
Don't try to make it sound as if this guy was some kind of loose cannon. Obviously he was involved in two bit petty stuff. He freaked out when confronted by cops. No way could anyone predict what would happen next. To say he should have been locked up is wrong. Up to that point he had not done anything serious enough to send him to prison for any lenth of time. Now, he goes.
|
|
wow
|
Driving under the influence of drugs not serious enough? Burglary not serious enough? 5 prior drug offenses not serious enough? A combination of all these not serious enough? Thinking like that is the reason that horrible stuff like this happens. Way to go judicial system... micky62 wrote: Don't try to make it sound as if this guy was some kind of loose cannon. Obviously he was involved in two bit petty stuff. He freaked out when confronted by cops. No way could anyone predict what would happen next. To say he should have been locked up is wrong. Up to that point he had not done anything serious enough to send him to prison for any lenth of time. Now, he goes.
|
|
micky62
|
No, it's not enough. So, you would lock people up for things they may do in the future? Are you nuts? You are sentenced for a crime you have commited. You can't give some guy 25 years for a bag of pot. A string of petty offenses and you get life? Your logic stinks.
|
|
Justice
|
micky62 wrote: Don't try to make it sound as if this guy was some kind of loose cannon. Obviously he was involved in two bit petty stuff. He freaked out when confronted by cops. No way could anyone predict what would happen next. To say he should have been locked up is wrong. Up to that point he had not done anything serious enough to send him to prison for any lenth of time. Now, he goes. Liberals like you make it possible for guys like this to cause such pain.
|
|
upstate bob
|
what happened to the 3 strike rule?
|
|
TJS
|
"John Licausi should not have been driving at all, let alone driving while high on drugs, law enforcement officials said of the man charged with leading Suffolk police on a high-speed chase that ended in a crash and the death of a father of three."
THANKS NEWSDAY & LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS FOR POINTING OUT THE OBVIOUS! IT'S ALL CLEAR NOW.
|
|
TJS
|
Judged:
1
1
"Indeed, a warrant was issued for Licausi's arrest on May 6 - two days before the crash - on a charge of petit larceny." IF THEY DID THEIR JOB & ARRESTED HIM THAT POOR MAN WOULD STILL BE ALIVE!
|
|
Stop your crying
|
steel violet wrote: does any one know if he is originally from medford? Probably Mastic, Shirley or one of the other "choice" towns.
|
|
wow
|
Micky I think he was doing these actions in the present not the future. Thats why the officer attempted to catch up to the fleeing offender. Are you nuts? You want officers only to take actions for things that happened in the past? Not offences that are occuring. That logic stinks. Who said anything about 25 years for a bag of pot? micky62 wrote: No, it's not enough. So, you would lock people up for things they may do in the future? Are you nuts? You are sentenced for a crime you have commited. You can't give some guy 25 years for a bag of pot. A string of petty offenses and you get life? Your logic stinks.
|
|
Prince of Mastic Beach
AOL
|
Judged:
1
Give the guy a break. Everyone makes mistakes. We have all been there.
|
|
Michelle
|
micky62 wrote: No, it's not enough. So, you would lock people up for things they may do in the future? Are you nuts? You are sentenced for a crime you have commited. You can't give some guy 25 years for a bag of pot. A string of petty offenses and you get life? Your logic stinks. Ignore this guy!! He's a far left liberal loon. I'm sure he would be singing a different toon if this scumbag murdered one of his loved ones. Get real mickey!!!!!!
|
|
Bewildered
|
wow wrote: Micky I think he was doing these actions in the present not the future. Thats why the officer attempted to catch up to the fleeing offender. Are you nuts? You want officers only to take actions for things that happened in the past? Not offences that are occuring. That logic stinks. Who said anything about 25 years for a bag of pot?
<quoted text> 48 hours later is not a fleeing offender. It seems to me that people always want to blame the "judicial system"... This country is founded upon a government "of the people." If you are dissatisfied with the state of the law then, by all means, contact your legislator.
|
Judge it!
