Prejudice w/o Cause in Court: Judge RJA needs to explain...

Posted in the Banking Forum

A Justday

Buffalo, NY

#1 Jul 18, 2013
Prejudice w/o Cause in Court: Judge RJA needs to explain -

Major Neglects + Mistakes if not intentional Prejudice were discovered in the December 7, 2012 Decision and Order issued by Judge Richard J. Arcara on the Civil Case 12-CV-1034A as follows:

1) On Page 1 - DISCUSSION: The DECISION AND ORDER ON 12-CV-1034-A is entered w/ the erroneous Caption The Plaintiff is THOMAS T. LEE, PERIOD;
2) On Page 2 - INTRODUCTION: The First Claim never mentioned the Date of October 16, 2002..As A Matter of Fact, Vikram Pandit was not even hired at that time;
3) On Page 3 - INTRODUCTION: To deny the United States Marshals Service to serve the Summons is to deny the Dual Process of Law - Why not let the Defendants to tell their side of stories? And See Part 7 + Part 8 later;
4) On Page 3 - INTRODUCTION: When Judge Richard J. Arcara declared Sanctions w/ Monetary and other Unspecified Penalties in his Previous Dismissal Order relating to the Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566A on October 25, 2012, His exact words are as follows: The Plaintiff is advised and cautioned that if he continues to file lawsuits in this Court that raise claims that the Court does not have subject jurisdiction over and /or frivolous and or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, he will be subject to significant sanctions, including but not limited to monetary fines and an order precluding any future filings in This Court and Other Courts...; The Other Courts????
5) Since I have amended my filing on October 27, 2012 and provided all the Facts + Law in my Motions to the Court to satisfy Judge Richard J. Arcara's requests as Stated above on Part 3), Judge can not deny all those Motions and then dismissed the Case;
6) On Page 4 - DISCUSSION: A. Recusal is fully justified in view of the Part 3)+ Part 4);
7) On Page 6 - DISCUSSION: The Judge defended the case against me, the Plaintiff w/o any material evidence / written reply from the Defendants...It creates the apparent illusions that the Judge may be working on behalf of the Defendants, An alleged concern if not accusation at this time; Why not let the Defendants speak for themselves???
8) On Pages 6-17 -DISCUSSION: Judge Richard J. Arcara presented his views amply and forcibly when he deleted and denied all my Motions plus Letters of Reply/ Request to the Court..I need the Judges at United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to review all the Facts + Law!

This piece of evidence is provided for the Senate Judiciary Committee to
judge after the Recess in September, 2013!!!

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#2 Jul 18, 2013
Tell me. How does this crap benefit the members of this great forum? Your problems are self caused and we are much smarter that you. Take your self serving posts somewhere else.
A Justday wrote:
Prejudice w/o Cause in Court: Judge RJA needs to explain -
Major Neglects + Mistakes if not intentional Prejudice were discovered in the December 7, 2012 Decision and Order issued by Judge Richard J. Arcara on the Civil Case 12-CV-1034A as follows:
1) On Page 1 - DISCUSSION: The DECISION AND ORDER ON 12-CV-1034-A is entered w/ the erroneous Caption The Plaintiff is THOMAS T. LEE, PERIOD;
2) On Page 2 - INTRODUCTION: The First Claim never mentioned the Date of October 16, 2002..As A Matter of Fact, Vikram Pandit was not even hired at that time;
3) On Page 3 - INTRODUCTION: To deny the United States Marshals Service to serve the Summons is to deny the Dual Process of Law - Why not let the Defendants to tell their side of stories? And See Part 7 + Part 8 later;
4) On Page 3 - INTRODUCTION: When Judge Richard J. Arcara declared Sanctions w/ Monetary and other Unspecified Penalties in his Previous Dismissal Order relating to the Civil Case No. 12-CV-0566A on October 25, 2012, His exact words are as follows: The Plaintiff is advised and cautioned that if he continues to file lawsuits in this Court that raise claims that the Court does not have subject jurisdiction over and /or frivolous and or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, he will be subject to significant sanctions, including but not limited to monetary fines and an order precluding any future filings in This Court and Other Courts...; The Other Courts????
5) Since I have amended my filing on October 27, 2012 and provided all the Facts + Law in my Motions to the Court to satisfy Judge Richard J. Arcara's requests as Stated above on Part 3), Judge can not deny all those Motions and then dismissed the Case;
6) On Page 4 - DISCUSSION: A. Recusal is fully justified in view of the Part 3)+ Part 4);
7) On Page 6 - DISCUSSION: The Judge defended the case against me, the Plaintiff w/o any material evidence / written reply from the Defendants...It creates the apparent illusions that the Judge may be working on behalf of the Defendants, An alleged concern if not accusation at this time; Why not let the Defendants speak for themselves???
8) On Pages 6-17 -DISCUSSION: Judge Richard J. Arcara presented his views amply and forcibly when he deleted and denied all my Motions plus Letters of Reply/ Request to the Court..I need the Judges at United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to review all the Facts + Law!
This piece of evidence is provided for the Senate Judiciary Committee to
judge after the Recess in September, 2013!!!
A Justday

Buffalo, NY

#3 Jul 18, 2013
David Cheever wrote:
Tell me. How does this crap benefit the members of this great forum? Your problems are self caused and we are much smarter that you. Take your self serving posts somewhere else.
<quoted text>
Judge used Prejudice in so many of his past Orders...Now, he is facing the charge of Prejudice w/o Cause...The US court of Appeals for the Second Circuit will judge on this Merit...

And the Senate Judiciary Committees may review this great phony Order once for all...Time will tell!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Banking Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Bank of America chief sees economyslowly workin... (May '13) 1 hr fayebryant00 2
Financial Giant Wells Fargo Shows Proud Support... (Jun '13) 1 hr williamscharles71 4
Financial Business Review: Discover Wants Some ... (Jul '12) 2 hr dariusrickard 31
Princeton firm buys four NEPA properties for $1... 10 hr Great White Hunter 1
"Do you think Citigroup should be broken up, or... 11 hr charlespickens1 3
My Letter to Chief Mitterhoff about Judge Arcar... 15 hr Cheever the Bank ... 1
buy automatic ssd solution chemical (May '12) 17 hr Cheever the Bank ... 14
More from around the web