Flight attendants authorize strike fo...

Flight attendants authorize strike for US Airways Express

There are 8 comments on the Examiner.com story from Aug 21, 2012, titled Flight attendants authorize strike for US Airways Express. In it, Examiner.com reports that:

Piedmont Airlines flight attendants, represented by the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA , today sent a loud and clear message that if management fails to negotiate a new agreement; a strike could result at the airline.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Examiner.com.


Houston, TX

#1 Aug 21, 2012
And WHAT exactly do you think you will get out of this strike? NOTHIG but pink slips!
Bryan Manzullo

Midlothian, TX

#2 Aug 24, 2012
This is the same airline that AA pilots and F/A's want to be a part of.
Be careful what you wish for.
um no

New York, NY

#3 Aug 24, 2012
this is a US Airways Express operation. This has nothing to do with US Airways. Before you start bashing up on US know your facts. AA is dealing with the US Airways NOT Piedmont.
Fuzzy Wuzzy

Phoenix, AZ

#4 Nov 26, 2012
Piedmont is a wholly owned subsidiary of US Airways.

Bremerton, WA

#5 Dec 20, 2012
But has its own management.

Bedford, VA

#6 Dec 21, 2012
Piedmont's management takes their orders from airways. They submit requests to airways for aircraft acquisitions and other high dollar purchases,and while Piedmont has said for years they are looking for more aircraft,dash-8's, so far nothing. I think airways is looking to shut down Piedmont and what better way to do so that letting the employee's do it themselves. Airways has put very little into Piedmont but has added new CRJ's to PSA, another wholly owed regional carrier.
The dash-8's are very old and the availability of parts for the dash-8-100, an aircraft out of production for many years are getting hard to come by.
Piedmont's only growing portion of the company is contract ground handling for other airlines in non Piedmont stations such as some cities in California. We may be witnessing the decline and fall of Piedmont airlines and the Piedmont name.

Bremerton, WA

#7 Dec 23, 2012
Utter nonsense.

Bedford, VA

#8 Dec 24, 2012
exmidex wrote:
Utter nonsense.
Having worked for Piedmont airlines for years, I can say that the Piedmont management were told when to jump and how high. Just being management of a wholly OWNED subsidiary does not mean they make all the decisions. Piedmont exists for one reason, to feed the mainline flights at their hubs, CLT,and PHL.
You think just because Piedmont has a set of managers that they act independently of airways, that's not the way it works. Years ago airways merged Allegheny into Piedmont because they both flew the dash-8, and several maintenance bases were closed such as Norfolk and Jacksonville.
All these moves were made by airways management, not Piedmont's. Many dash-8's were returned to the leasing companies over the past years and they fleet today with both the Piedmont and Allegheny aircraft number less than the number of aircraft Piedmont airlines had before the merger. Guess who made that decision?
Its utter nonsense to think that the tail wags the dog.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Airlines Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Are Horizon and JetBlue merging Mar 21 Both fly jungle ... 7
News Allegiant Air adds more low-cost flights (Dec '13) Mar 12 Brr 6
Boeing acknowledges MOM growing too big! Mar 7 797 Updater 10
News Northwest Flight Attendants Reject Cuts (Jun '06) Mar 1 Brown Sugar 38,809
News Woman sues Delta, says she was groped on flight Feb 28 CaptJoe767 1
News Which airline offers most nonstop destinations ... (Dec '13) Feb 27 Prospective Pax 5
News Emotional support dog bites child on Southwest ... Feb 23 CaptJoe767 1