BP Holdings: BPís Bully Propoganda
Posted in the Business News Forum
#1 Jul 29, 2013
Source link: http://mobile.legalexaminer.com/toxic-substan...
Iíve spoken with a couple of individuals and businesspeople recently who said that filing a BP claim might be wrong, and that they have seen on the news that one of the claims adjusterís lawyers committed fraud. Itís a ďone bad appleĒ scenario, but enough to support BPís media campaign to scare off potential claimants from filing.
While in discussion over the BP settlement in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill suit recently, I heard about the letter Bobo Cunningham wrote to to the editor of a local paper concerning the settlement BP agreed to pay. Mr. Cunninghamís letter was apparently prompted by a letter BPís lawyers were disseminating to lawyers and individuals who filed claims under the settlement. BP was threatening lawsuits against everyone filing claims, and promised plaintiff lawyers it would sue to take back money firms were paying their clients out of the claims proceeds BP set aside for such purpose. Though written by BPís lawyers, the blustering and posturing letter was like its arguments before the trial court, a propaganda campaign entirely without merit.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently heard BPís appeal seeking to stop payment of claims under the settlement it both authored and agreed to, which the trial court judge has repeatedly refused to do. Prior to that New Orleansí Judge Barbier had denied BPís motion for an injunction without a written opinion, but said in open court that he was offended by BPís personal attack on the lawyer administering the claims process.
The main problem underlying the position BP has taken recently is that they agreed to the ambiguous language in the settlement that governs the accountancy principles used to calculate claims. Iíve written about ambiguity in contracts before, because it is important to know that allowing any ambiguity in a contract when drafting it can lead to unanticipated and undesired results. BP and its legal team knew better. Had BP wanted the claims paid in a different manner, with different accounting processes, the time to make that known was during the drafting period, not after thousands of claims have been paid. You canít unring that bell and there is no law that says BP can renege on their settlement agreement and reclaim moneys paid under it for valid claims.
Add your comments below
|will the loblaw warehouse in ottawa close its d... (Sep '09)||2 hr||calm down||120|
|Casual Dating in Your Area||17 hr||travis||19|
|This Is What European Investors Get For Investi...||Sun||FASCIST Ukraine||2|
|Mr. Currys India Restaurant, Downtown St. Louis...||Sun||Dave Karakat||1|
|Loblaw in talks with Atlas Logistics to run Aja... (Sep '07)||Sun||In the Know||4,621|
|Reports say Comcast plans to drop $45 billion T...||Apr 24||Your Ex||9|
|Texas Energy Exploration LLC - Geology||Apr 24||kar3nbaker||1|
Find what you want!
Search Business News Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC