5 scientific breakthroughs that haven...

5 scientific breakthroughs that haven't won a Nobel Prize

Posted in the Business News Forum

Since: Jul 13

Hurstville, Australia

#1 Oct 8, 2013

STOCKHOLM, Sweden -- The announcements of this year's Nobel Prize winners will start Monday with the medicine award and continue with physics, chemistry, literature, peace and economics. The secretive award committees never give away any hints in advance of who could win, but here's a look at five big scientific breakthroughs that haven't yet received a Nobel prize.

The Higgs particle

Scientists had searched for the elusive "God particle" for decades when its existence was finally confirmed at the European particle physics laboratory CERN in July last year. Nobel prizes tend to go to ideas that stand the test of time and last year's breakthrough was too recent to be considered for the 2012 award. Belgian physicist Francoise Englert and British scientist Peter Higgs both theorized about the existence of the particle in the 1960s although Englert was reportedly first. There are also a handful of people at CERN that have contributed to the discovery, including Italian scientist Fabiola Gianotti, German Rolf Heuer, Brit Tejinder Virdee and American Joseph Incandela. A Nobel prize can be split between a maximum of three people and are often shared between theorists and those conducting the practical experiments, according to Ulrika Bjorksten, who heads a science program at Radio Sweden.

The human genome project

The effort to decode the human DNA constitutes one of the largest scientific endeavours in history. Headed by Eric S. Lander, Craig Venter and Francis Collins, the project was completed in 2003 and revealed in intimate detail just what makes up a human being. It has helped scientists understand a vast range of mystery diseases that had baffled doctors for years. However, despite its size and importance it lacks some of the key characteristics of a Nobel Prize winner. The Nobel committee likes to award original scientific ideas or radical approaches and give the prizes to individuals rather than projects. When the project started, some genomes had already been successfully mapped so it didn't break any new ground. Also, in 2002, three scientists who made early contributions to gene research won the Nobel Prize in medicine or physiology so the Nobel committee may feel it has already covered the area.

See more:

Since: Jul 13

Hurstville, Australia

#2 Oct 8, 2013
Easy to need methods that obviously affair, gain again!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Business News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News J.C. Penney Announces Accelerated Expansion Int... Fri HOWSthat 15
What abounding hunters abort to iks-sh Chipper ... Thu lindsayrobin 1
Heat Exchanger, Stainless Steel Storage Tank, T... Thu dfctank 1
Global Nose Radome Market Professional Survey R... Apr 20 noseradomemarket 1
2017 Professional Survey Report On Global TIG T... Apr 20 marketanlysis 1
Market Analysis on Global Aquiculture Feed Sale... Apr 20 QYRtina 1
News Trump Has Used the Same Visa Program He Now Loo... Apr 19 Rico from East Lo... 2
More from around the web