Comments
21 - 40 of 673 Comments Last updated Apr 3, 2013

“Born Again Heathen”

Since: Jun 07

washington dc

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Jul 13, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Tony17 wrote:
You know, from my studies of the Bible, It seems that God DID NOT intend for the races to mix. I know this will cause quite a bit of controversy but I can prove it. For example, if an Israelite mixes with a Gentile and they produce offspring ( called MAMSER) the offspring (s) are considered a contaminated species till the TENTH generation. The number ten indicates ORDINAL PERFECTION in spiritual numerics. Hence the TENTH GENERATION.
Your studies of the bible. Who are you fooling? No one but your self. You are just a waste of space. I don't recall anything about Mamsers in any bible I've read. Chapters and verses please.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Jul 13, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rose wood wrote:
<quoted text> I am naturally familiar w/ it. I can handle it, but I believe it's a waste of time. Just remember there are two parts of the Bible. Notice you said, "originally" God did not intend for races to mix. That was indeed because Gentiles would draw Jews away from the truth and "what has light to do w/ dark?" Don't you remember Solomon? However, in the New Testament God told Peter metaphorically and symbolically that everyone He's made was clean. Our sins are washed away through the blood of Christ and now Gentiles were accepting God. again, I don't plan to discuss this w/ you, because it will change nothing.
Good grief. The scriptures in the hands of a novice can be a very dangerous thing. Sweetheart the vision that Peter had concerning clean and unclean meats had nothing to do with interracial relationships. It was referring to "salvation" being offered to GENTILES now. Gentiles were considered to be unclean and even they even were not allowed BY GOD to enter into the inner courts of the sanctuary. Bu after Christ died, salvation was now offered to all,and not just the Israelites. Hell even in the OT, when Isaac and Jacob were of age to marry, it was ordered that they not be allowed to take a wife from another race but to find a wife from their own people. BUT WHY? Do you understand anythign about Christ's lineage according to the flesh? Christ bloodline had to be pure. WHY? Noah was chosen to build the ark because it was said that "HE WAS PERFECT IN HIS GENERATIONS." Know what that means when you break it down? It means that his PEDIGREE was pure in that his family had not intermixed with the other races. Baby I can make you look like a blooming idiot biblically but I am giving you a chance to walk away before I really embarrass you as you have accused me of not knowing what I'm talking about. I take that accusation very seriously but I'll allow you to save face. IF YOU SO DESIRE.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Jul 13, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

shiki wrote:
<quoted text>
Your studies of the bible. Who are you fooling? No one but your self. You are just a waste of space. I don't recall anything about Mamsers in any bible I've read. Chapters and verses please.
Yet another one that is BIBLICALLY ILLITERATE. Go to Deuteronomy 23:2 and take this word "BASTARD" as it is utilized there and Get a Hebrew and Greek concordance (preferrably one by Dr. Strong) and look up this word and you will see that it means MAMZER which means a child born of the mixing of a JEWISH AND A GENTILE parentage. Now I can go on but I can tell that this beyond your level of Biblical training too so why waste my time since I am a waste of time according to you. You must have been talking to yourself.
Rose wood

Saint Augustine, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Jul 14, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>Good grief. The scriptures in the hands of a novice can be a very dangerous thing. Sweetheart the vision that Peter had concerning clean and unclean meats had nothing to do with interracial relationships. It was referring to "salvation" being offered to GENTILES now. Gentiles were considered to be unclean and even they even were not allowed BY GOD to enter into the inner courts of the sanctuary. Bu after Christ died, salvation was now offered to all,and not just the Israelites. Hell even in the OT, when Isaac and Jacob were of age to marry, it was ordered that they not be allowed to take a wife from another race but to find a wife from their own people. BUT WHY? Do you understand anythign about Christ's lineage according to the flesh? Christ bloodline had to be pure. WHY? Noah was chosen to build the ark because it was said that "HE WAS PERFECT IN HIS GENERATIONS." Know what that means when you break it down? It means that his PEDIGREE was pure in that his family had not intermixed with the other races. Baby I can make you look like a blooming idiot biblically but I am giving you a chance to walk away before I really embarrass you as you have accused me of not knowing what I'm talking about. I take that accusation very seriously but I'll allow you to save face. IF YOU SO DESIRE.
I already stated I don't want to get into a discussion. Obviously you are a novice. When God was talking to Peter He was using the unclean food as a SYMBOLIC example. Then He told Peter to spread the word to everyone, because they (at the time) still were not associating w/ the Gentiles. If you didn't know that, then no wonder you're so confused. Gentiles were considered unclean, as was pork and other meats. God was using it as an example. Peter even knew HIMSELF God didn't mean for him to eat those meats. Many people (like yourself) misinterpret and misread those verses.

“Born Again Heathen”

Since: Jun 07

washington dc

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Jul 14, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>Sweetie, I am not gonna get into a deep discussion with you on this as I can tell you cannot go to the level on this that I can ( the third level). There are three levels in the Bible form which things are taught. The first level is for babes and novices of which you are. The third level s for those that are more advanced and can handle the MEAT of the Bible as opposed to milk and there are very few that can go there including most so called Th.D's. I will not embarrass you unless you insist.
oh man I laughed out loud on this one. You are either a COMPLETE nut or a freakin comic Genius. Hilarious!
P Diggs

Durham, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Jul 14, 2007
 
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>Yet another one that is BIBLICALLY ILLITERATE. Go to Deuteronomy 23:2 and take this word "BASTARD" as it is utilized there and Get a Hebrew and Greek concordance (preferrably one by Dr. Strong) and look up this word and you will see that it means MAMZER which means a child born of the mixing of a JEWISH AND A GENTILE parentage. Now I can go on but I can tell that this beyond your level of Biblical training too so why waste my time since I am a waste of time according to you. You must have been talking to yourself.
Well for thoes who dont choose to find extra meanings of all the words in the Bible they would be better know as Samaritans. Now this is where i have the issue, because man has put their own two cents into the Word of God and has taken the spritual aspect away. Dr. Strong, as intelligent as he was, is one who has helped many people study the Bible and it meanings. The fact is people of all races take the Bible for what they "think" it means instead of what the spirit of God impresses upon their heart about its meaning. There is no proof you can give me that that states people where supposed to be divided by race. The fact is, that unlike the Jews the Gentiles had pagen Gods that some of them worshiped. God never wanted his choosen people to be influenced by thoes Gods and pagens so as it was simply put dont mix with them. Peolpe like yourself put the race issue in there not God. I know God is so tired of people like you twisting his words and then trying to feed it to others. If you can prove it had to do with race i am all eyes and ready to study anything you can put on here to prove that fact. I garantee it will bring me to the same conclusion.
P Diggs

Durham, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Jul 14, 2007
 
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>Yet another one that is BIBLICALLY ILLITERATE. Go to Deuteronomy 23:2 and take this word "BASTARD" as it is utilized there and Get a Hebrew and Greek concordance (preferrably one by Dr. Strong) and look up this word and you will see that it means MAMZER which means a child born of the mixing of a JEWISH AND A GENTILE parentage. Now I can go on but I can tell that this beyond your level of Biblical training too so why waste my time since I am a waste of time according to you. You must have been talking to yourself.
Not only does that word men the mixing of Jew and gentiles, it has to do with people of higher status mixing with thoes of lower status. Race and status separation, all man made ideas.

“i am the party”

Since: Jun 07

Awesome, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Jul 14, 2007
 

Judged:

3

2

2

my mom is black and my dad is white and says their mad because white men are taking all the good black chicks

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Jul 14, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rose wood wrote:
<quoted text> I already stated I don't want to get into a discussion. Obviously you are a novice. When God was talking to Peter He was using the unclean food as a SYMBOLIC example. Then He told Peter to spread the word to everyone, because they (at the time) still were not associating w/ the Gentiles. If you didn't know that, then no wonder you're so confused. Gentiles were considered unclean, as was pork and other meats. God was using it as an example. Peter even knew HIMSELF God didn't mean for him to eat those meats. Many people (like yourself) misinterpret and misread those verses.
Obviously what I posted was way above your head. You merely restated what I posted about the purpoose of that vision of those unclean meats. You just did a badder job than I did of explaining it. There are those such as yourself that will not hear Gods word or endure sound doctrine. Even if I presented you scripture upon scripture, your eyes will still remain shut till God opens them . But tell me this, why was it necessary that Christ's geneology/pedigree be pure and not be mixed with all different types of bloodlines? I guarantee you that you are not familiar with this are you? Are you even familiar with the scripture that tells us that God has made of one BLOOD ( which should have been accurately translated as ONE DUST)all nations to dwell on the face of the earth and He set the "BOUNDS" OF THEIR HABITATION.(I paraphrase here) Does that too go right over your head? I knwo you're trying to appear that you know what you're talking about but trust me, on this you're outclassed but give it your best shot.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Jul 14, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

P Diggs wrote:
<quoted text>
Well for thoes who dont choose to find extra meanings of all the words in the Bible they would be better know as Samaritans. Now this is where i have the issue, because man has put their own two cents into the Word of God and has taken the spritual aspect away. Dr. Strong, as intelligent as he was, is one who has helped many people study the Bible and it meanings. The fact is people of all races take the Bible for what they "think" it means instead of what the spirit of God impresses upon their heart about its meaning. There is no proof you can give me that that states people where supposed to be divided by race. The fact is, that unlike the Jews the Gentiles had pagen Gods that some of them worshiped. God never wanted his choosen people to be influenced by thoes Gods and pagens so as it was simply put dont mix with them. Peolpe like yourself put the race issue in there not God. I know God is so tired of people like you twisting his words and then trying to feed it to others. If you can prove it had to do with race i am all eyes and ready to study anything you can put on here to prove that fact. I garantee it will bring me to the same conclusion.
I'm sorry sweetheart but you're just not as familiar with the Bivle as you think you are. When you've studied the scriptures as long and in-depth as I have then come back to me and we'll rumble,KAY! Till then, I won't "cast my pearls before swine!" Tell you what though, I'll make it easy for you to win this so you'll be happy. I will "SIMPLY SAY' that you're right and I'm wrong. There now, You won the debate.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Jul 14, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

shiki wrote:
<quoted text>
oh man I laughed out loud on this one. You are either a COMPLETE nut or a freakin comic Genius.
I'll be whatever makes you happiest,LOL but it still won't change the facts that I presented. And you've never heard the word MAMZER and you're laughing at me. Are you laughing in an effort to try to not appear so stupid and unlearned after you put your foot in your mouth. You are the one that challenged me on the word MAMZER remember, so when I try to take you to a deeper level, you're too addlepated to handle it. Sweetheart, trust me when I say that you're not in my class when it comes to the DEEPER studies of the Bible, BELIEVE ME on this. I know that sounds rather arrogant and I'm not trying to be but it's a fact. When I see these little novices with the scriptuires, such as yourself trying to challenge me on things they have had little or NO TRAINING at all in it makes me say things like that. A little bit of Bible knowledge to an imbecile can be a dangerous thing.
Rose wood

Saint Augustine, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Jul 14, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>Obviously what I posted was way above your head. You merely restated what I posted about the purpoose of that vision of those unclean meats. You just did a badder job than I did of explaining it. There are those such as yourself that will not hear Gods word or endure sound doctrine. Even if I presented you scripture upon scripture, your eyes will still remain shut till God opens them . But tell me this, why was it necessary that Christ's geneology/pedigree be pure and not be mixed with all different types of bloodlines? I guarantee you that you are not familiar with this are you? Are you even familiar with the scripture that tells us that God has made of one BLOOD ( which should have been accurately translated as ONE DUST)all nations to dwell on the face of the earth and He set the "BOUNDS" OF THEIR HABITATION.(I paraphrase here) Does that too go right over your head? I knwo you're trying to appear that you know what you're talking about but trust me, on this you're outclassed but give it your best shot.
You can say what you will, but I've stated several times I do not wish to get into a debate. It's not, because I've afraid to be wrong, but it's pointless. Anyway I know a main factor about you that makes me feel you're disillusioned anyway. Good bye and have a nice day tomorrow.
P Diggs

Durham, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Jul 14, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>I'm sorry sweetheart but you're just not as familiar with the Bivle as you think you are. When you've studied the scriptures as long and in-depth as I have then come back to me and we'll rumble,KAY! Till then, I won't "cast my pearls before swine!" Tell you what though, I'll make it easy for you to win this so you'll be happy. I will "SIMPLY SAY' that you're right and I'm wrong. There now, You won the debate.
You can say what you want, but you still have failed to answer the question. What part of the bible proves that God did not want races to mix?? I have seen where it said he didnt want jew to mix with others so there eyes would not be turned from him to other Gods, but no where does it say because i dont want two races mixed, it was spiritual not racial. I am not on here to swap witt, but anyone as deeply rooted it the word shoud be able to show me this concpt in the word. I dont need you to tell me i won, your approval means nothing to me. I just want an answer. Can you give it?? As faor as you casting your perals before swine... God separates the wheat from the chaff, i dont have to talk about the meaning you already know scholar!!

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Jul 14, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

1

P Diggs wrote:
<quoted text>
You can say what you want, but you still have failed to answer the question. What part of the bible proves that God did not want races to mix?? I have seen where it said he didnt want jew to mix with others so there eyes would not be turned from him to other Gods, but no where does it say because i dont want two races mixed, it was spiritual not racial. I am not on here to swap witt, but anyone as deeply rooted it the word shoud be able to show me this concpt in the word. I dont need you to tell me i won, your approval means nothing to me. I just want an answer. Can you give it?? As faor as you casting your perals before swine... God separates the wheat from the chaff, i dont have to talk about the meaning you already know scholar!!
Actually I have posted the answer here ( well at least one scripture) but you were too dense to recognize it. Your problem, not mine.

“Born Again Heathen”

Since: Jun 07

washington dc

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Jul 15, 2007
 
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>I'll be whatever makes you happiest,LOL but it still won't change the facts that I presented. And you've never heard the word MAMZER and you're laughing at me. Are you laughing in an effort to try to not appear so stupid and unlearned after you put your foot in your mouth. You are the one that challenged me on the word MAMZER remember, so when I try to take you to a deeper level, you're too addlepated to handle it. Sweetheart, trust me when I say that you're not in my class when it comes to the DEEPER studies of the Bible, BELIEVE ME on this. I know that sounds rather arrogant and I'm not trying to be but it's a fact. When I see these little novices with the scriptuires, such as yourself trying to challenge me on things they have had little or NO TRAINING at all in it makes me say things like that. A little bit of Bible knowledge to an imbecile can be a dangerous thing.
I'm laughing cuz you are a nut. you crack me up!

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Jul 15, 2007
 
shiki wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm laughing cuz you are a nut. you crack me up!
Well that's similar to what the Pharisees told Christ after He told them things they were not ready nor capable of receiving. So I think I'm in good company.

“Lets get drunk and then screw”

Since: Jul 07

Fort Liquordale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Jul 15, 2007
 

Judged:

3

<Megalomania by Incubus plays in the background>

Tony17 I rarely tell anyone to shut up, but dammit shut the hell up.

Now re-read all the BS you've written. Does any of that sound like the tone of a person who has a clue what "God" wants, let alone how a Christian should carry themselves.

PRIDE is not only ugly but a SIN in the eyes of some people's "God". So PLEASE take your megalomaniac bantering to a more appropriate thread.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Jul 15, 2007
 

Judged:

2

Spunkalunk wrote:
<Megalomania by Incubus plays in the background>
Tony17 I rarely tell anyone to shut up, but dammit shut the hell up.
Now re-read all the BS you've written. Does any of that sound like the tone of a person who has a clue what "God" wants, let alone how a Christian should carry themselves.
PRIDE is not only ugly but a SIN in the eyes of some people's "God". So PLEASE take your megalomaniac bantering to a more appropriate thread.
MAKE ME!!! And just who said I was a Christian? Now you re-read what I wrote you spirit.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41
Jul 15, 2007
 

Judged:

2

Spunkalunk wrote:
<Megalomania by Incubus plays in the background>
Tony17 I rarely tell anyone to shut up, but dammit shut the hell up.
You've got to be a CRACKHEAD. Look at your photo. LOOKS LIKE YOU'VE JUST PUT DOWN A CRACKPIPE.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42
Jul 15, 2007
 

Judged:

2

Rose wood wrote:
<quoted text> You can say what you will, but I've stated several times I do not wish to get into a debate. It's not, because I've afraid to be wrong, but it's pointless. Anyway I know a main factor about you that makes me feel you're disillusioned anyway.
Well just what is this "MAIN FACTOR" that you know about me that makes you think I'm 'dis-illusioned?" I hope you're not referring to the fact that I'm a gay man. Sorry sweetheart but that does not make me dis-illusioned at all. You're afraid of me aren't you. You're afraid to go too in-depth in debating the Bible aren't you cause you know and I know and this forum knows that..YOU ARE NOT EVEN REMOTELY QUALIFIED TO GO TO THE DEPTH that is required to discover the hidden messages in the Scriptures. Don't be 'SKEERED' LOL. You know one is supposed to build up the 'BRETHREN', not tear them down. It is not my intent to embarrass you or 'TEAR YOU DOWN' in discussing the scriptures. But if someone comes here pretending that they are a seasoned Bible scholar and it is crystal clear to me that they are still on milk i.e., still babes or novices when it comes to handling the deeper meanings of Gods word, then yes I will tear them apart. Most people that THINK they have a firm grasp on the scriptures are so mistaken. Most of them still think that Adam and Eve's sin in the garden was that they ate some sort of produce that God told them not to eat. These same 'christians' have been pretending to be christians for many years and they have yet to figure out that that story was a METAPHOR for something MUCH MORE SINISTER than the eating of some sort of forbidden produce. But if you try to explain the deeper meaning to them they will stomp their little feet and wring their hands screaming that NO, NO, NO, They fell becasue they ate the wrong kind of produce that God told them not to eat. How immature. It's time for Christians to grow uo and mature in Gods word and stop believing the lies that are coming from the church pulpit. If a person can't accurately figure out what happened in the Garden of Eden,and the first 6 chapters of Genesis, there is NO WAY they will accurately be able to handle and understand the rest of the Bible for the rest of the entire Bible hinges on the first 6 chapters of Genesis. And I guarantee you that there is NOT ONE PERSON on this forum that can accurately handle the first 6 chapters of Genesis so forget about the rest of the Bible. Of course this statement will make many that think they are Bible scholars very angry and they will try to lash out at me but be that as it may cause I said what I meant and I meant what I said.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

31 Users are viewing the Top Stories in the Blogosphere Forum right now

Search the Top Stories in the Blogosphere Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
hair cut stories of sikh boys and girls (Sep '09) 7 hr Swarndeep Singh 4,210
did god create black people for slaves? (Nov '09) 11 hr Becky1975 137
Gang Stalking Debate Forum! (Jan '10) 12 hr Alastair Durston Ross 8,369
Why white men hate seeing black men dating asia... (Mar '12) 13 hr Who Dat 3,202
2 kids escape from darrington academy (Aug '08) 18 hr paul barnett 204
Are whites the most destructive race on earth?? (Oct '12) 18 hr gottondas 32
what do white american men think of muslim wome... (Aug '11) 18 hr gottondas 119
www.copart.com is not a good place to buy a car... (Nov '10) Jul 15 Nick 343
•••
•••