Comments
21 - 40 of 8,380 Comments Last updated Wednesday Aug 27
Joe

Daly City, CA

#23 Jan 24, 2010
Anti organized nuisance crime; "sticks and stones", "sit and lie", stalking, smearing, vandalism ... etc..

DOES NOT USE THE WORD "GANG STALKING" AS IT WILL BE MISINTERPIT BY VAST MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION...

The website below has a better description of these crimes.

http://www.sherlockinvestigations.com/index.p...

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#24 Jan 25, 2010
Joe wrote:
Anti organized nuisance crime; "sticks and stones", "sit and lie", stalking, smearing, vandalism ... etc..
DOES NOT USE THE WORD "GANG STALKING" AS IT WILL BE MISINTERPIT BY VAST MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION...
The website below has a better description of these crimes.
http://www.sherlockinvestigations.com/index.p...
Can this be about the same thing but called differently where you are: say, as in a vernacular of the West Coast?
to Reggie

Providence, RI

#25 Jan 29, 2010
The groups change as one crosses the country.
The wealthy groups who trailed my son and me (via gps hidden in the rear wheel well by perps) were driving very nice SUV's and costly vehicles. They would honk at each other, bright you with their headlights, box you in while driving, try to run you off the road, wave handguns at you and sneer. They were excellent at using their gps intructions, but were not particularly violent at this time. When they got tired, they took motel rooms for a nice break.

For where they had "left the lines" there were others- refreshed- waiting to join in.

I have mentioned that one Wilton car with a soccerball decoration on the rear followed all the way out and back. I've been laughed at for mentioning this but- seriously it is not normal behavior. He would- if ahead- sleep at a rest stop until we arrived. If behind, he'd get there very soon.
to Reggie

Providence, RI

#26 Jan 29, 2010
There are different levels of gangstalkers. The man who ordered ours essentially wanted to "punish" (i.e. kill) us to regain the money contained in my late parents' accound in Darien. The "initiator" collabolrated with the Bank, and even had a test run using "will desantis" who withdrew then deposited $700. The attorney used this an "urgent" reason to be appointed- when he and his cronies set up the whole plan.

The lower level gangstalkers are just "following orders" and often do not know "more than they need to know." Many do not even know who they are following or why. All they know is they are gaining status in the group as well as money. Many retiree's obtain extra income this way.
to Reggie

Providence, RI

#27 Jan 29, 2010
Anyway, the lower levels were the "slugs" (my nickname). They performed such group actions as terrorizing you with threats of death,rape and mutilation.
At another place, they threatened to rape my daughter in front of me.

They threw garbage at your car.Going under an overpass, they dumped some gluey chemical at the car.

In the North east and Central areas of the US- there were many stupid threats of Satanism.
In the South, our cat was stolen even as we stood by and begged for him. No one would help.
In the south they harrassed my 88 year old Aunt.

Other actions- such my son being rufed then stabbed with viral material leading to his struggle to save his arm from amputation.


In one setting, they -police- stole our new vehicle without just cause. There was no criminal nor civil complaint

In SC, these were the slugs who, with handguns, special night lighing measures, and shotguns crawled along the beach in front of our motel room. I called cops- they "saw nothing but a man walking" Yet, the presence of one cop car lead to the group of men hiding in the cabana all night, with me spotlighting them if they started to get closer.

These were some of the "types" of gangstalkers we encountered. Thank God my son survived. He is very personable and I believe this is part of the reason he was spared...then.
xoxomariaxoxo

Des Arc, AR

#28 Feb 1, 2010
I have all the evidence in the world to prove everything necessary. Why go to the feds, they helped aide trying to get people to rob me, rape me, and use violent force against me, force me into unwanted sexual acts so they can watch. It's still happening and being trapped in my home to silence it. Either way, take a good look at them. Look carefully and you will see that they are in fact nowhere near decent people. Every single one of them are in fear of anyone finding out what they do. You only hear about governement force dprostitution from other countries, not this one. Besides, remember that it isn't you running from the cops and hiding like tyrants. You almost hae to feel sad for watching people brainwash their own kids and use them to help aide their own cheap thrills while silently voting on whether or not a force dmiscarriage of another is OK. People don't support it, they just lie to get support. As you can see they use trashy, uneducated people of your neighborhood and those claiming to be "god's soldier". They are just delusional freak of natures who unfortunately need the cheap thrill in their life for whatever reason that may be. The quicker you understand and comprehend that the only person in the game ashamed of themselves is them.
xoxomariaxoxo

Des Arc, AR

#29 Feb 1, 2010
I can tell it has alot to do with money and revolves purely around that. They tried using violence to rob me. They stole my CC and purchased a thousand dollars worth of stuff. Luckily, the bank gave me the money back so essentially they robbed the bank. They tried robbing me in dark areas of my neighborhood. They even stole various items from me then returned them back damaged. Strange stuff but still no point. So far the only point has been cheap thrills. It's amazing how man people deep down are that sick. I always knew it just never had the proof.
xoxomariaxoxo

Des Arc, AR

#30 Feb 1, 2010
It's not normal behavior. These people are programmed into violence and accepting and aiding sick things. Most of them not educated enough to wake up and realize what they have done. Those who do get scared, violent from shame, run, or help aide in silencing you to cover for themselves. Only more proof that they know exactly who they are and what they do. People only get violent when there is money or politics involved and cops mysteriously can't catch them if they know they are facing some serious charges.
Eleanor White

Gore Bay, Canada

#31 Feb 2, 2010
"Can these elite organizations be hired to stalk people?"

According to P.I. David Lawson, whose two books are quoted in this summary:

http://www.multistalkervictims.org/lawson.htm

... the answer is yes. Lawson reported that the organized stalking groups can also serve as corporate thugs to "take care of" people interfering with the corporation's goals.

I offer this e-booklet to provide a simple, concise collection of what is known about the crime:

http://www.multistalkervictims.org/osatv.pdf

That booklet offers some thoughts on the "who are they" question. However, targets cannot finger a specific organization at this point.

We do know, from thousands of encounters, that all levels of government are claiming ignorance when in fact they have had a large number of complaints. Functionally, that helps the perpetrators.

The U.S. National Center for Victims of Crime receives, by their own acknowledgement, "thousands of calls per month" regarding OS. The report of the attorney who made the inquiries is Appendix 1 of the e-booklet above.

Eleanor White
Ontario, Canada
RayJay

United States

#32 Feb 8, 2010
Why is everybody soo negative towards the thought of gang stalking...Nothing positive ever gets out there...leads me to believe that the stalkers themselves are posting "fear"
There is a secret government agency beginning to go after the perpatrators. Charges can be conspirecy to commit murder and murder charges.they are taking everybody down to the flunkies,
placing there children in foster homes....Look UP Victims
CT lady

Providence, RI

#33 Feb 8, 2010
Check the multistalking laws....federal.
CT lady

Providence, RI

#34 Feb 8, 2010
Federal Interstate Stalking Law
18 U.S.C 2261A (1)
Whoever (1) travels in interstate or foreign commerce or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel
places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to, that person, a member of the immediate family (as defined in section 115) of that person, or the spouse or intimate partner of that person; or (2) with the intent
(A) to kill or injure a person in another State or tribal jurisdiction or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States; or (B) to place a person in another State or tribal jurisdiction or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to
(i) that person; (ii) a member of the immediate family (as defined in section 115) of that person; or (iii) a spouse or intimate partner of that person, uses the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce to engage in a course of conduct that places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to, any of the persons described in clauses
(i) through (iii), shall be punished as provided in 2261(b).
INTERPRETATION
2261A(1) makes it a federal crime to travel across state, tribal or international lines to stalk someone. The stalker must have the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate the victim, who must be placed in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury. The victim's family members, spouse or intimate partners are also protected.
2261A(2) makes it a federal crime to stalk someone across state, tribal or international lines, using regular mail, e-mail, or the Internet (i.e., cyberstalking). The stalker must have the intent to kill or injure the victim, or to place the victim, a family member, or a spouse or intimate partner of the victim in fear of death or serious bodily injury.
2261A(1) and (2) make it a federal crime to stalk someone within the special or maritime jurisdiction of the U.S. This includes federal lands such as national parks and military bases.
If you have any questions about the interpretation of these provisions, contact the U.S. Attorney's Office in your district.
KEY DEFINITIONS
"Spouse or Intimate Partner" (See 18 U.S.C.2266(7)(A)(ii))
* A spouse or former spouse of the target of the stalking;
* A person who shares a child in common with the target of the stalking;
* A person who cohabits or has cohabited as a spouse with the target of the stalking; or
* Any other person similarly situated to a spouse who is protected by the domestic and family violence laws of the state or tribal jurisdiction where the injury occurred or the victim resides.
"Course of Conduct" (See 18 U.S.C.2266(2))
A pattern of conduct composed of two or more acts, evidencing a continuity of purpose.
"Serious Bodily Injury" (See 18 U.S.C. 2119(2) and 18 U.S.C.1365(g)(3) and (4))
Bodily injury (see below) which involves (A) a substantial risk of death; (B) extreme physical pain; (C) protracted and obvious disfigurement; or (D) protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty. This includes any conduct that, if the conduct occurred in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States would violate section 2241 (aggravated sexual abuse) or 2242 (sexual abuse) of this title.
"Bodily Injury" (See U.S.C.1365(g)(4))
(A) a cut, abrasion, bruise, or disfigurement; (B) physical pain; (C) illness; (D) impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; or (E) any other injury to the body, no matter how temporary.
.
CT lady continued

Providence, RI

#35 Feb 8, 2010
"Immediate Family" (See 18 U.S.C.115(c)(2))
Immediate family includes the individual's spouse, parents, siblings, children, or any other person living in the individual's household related by blood or marriage.
To report a violation of this federal law, contact the FBI or U.S. Attorney's Office in your district.
Endnotes
1. 18 U.S.C. 2261A was originally enacted on September 23, 1996. In November 2000, the federal statute was amended as part of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) of 2000.
Technical Problems? Please e-mail our webmaster.
Address
For Victim Assistance, please call the National Center for Victims of Crime Helpline at
1-800-FYI-CALL, M-F 8:30 AM - 8:30 PM EST, or e-mail gethelp@ncvc.org
CT lady part 1

Providence, RI

#36 Feb 8, 2010
Sorry these were reversed. Federal Stalking Law:

18 U.S.C 2261A (1)

Whoever (1) travels in interstate or foreign commerce or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to, that person, a member of the immediate family (as defined in section 115) of that person, or the spouse or intimate partner of that person; or (2) with the intent (A) to kill or injure a person in another State or tribal jurisdiction or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States; or (B) to place a person in another State or tribal jurisdiction or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to (i) that person; (ii) a member of the immediate family (as defined in section 115) of that person; or (iii) a spouse or intimate partner of that person, uses the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce to engage in a course of conduct that places that person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to, any of the persons described in clauses (i) through (iii), shall be punished as provided in 2261(b).
INTERPRETATION

2261A(1) makes it a federal crime to travel across state, tribal or international lines to stalk someone. The stalker must have the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate the victim, who must be placed in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury. The victim's family members, spouse or intimate partners are also protected.

2261A(2) makes it a federal crime to stalk someone across state, tribal or international lines, using regular mail, e-mail, or the Internet (i.e., cyberstalking). The stalker must have the intent to kill or injure the victim, or to place the victim, a family member, or a spouse or intimate partner of the victim in fear of death or serious bodily injury.

2261A(1) and (2) make it a federal crime to stalk someone within the special or maritime jurisdiction of the U.S. This includes federal lands such as national parks and military bases.

If you have any questions about the interpretation of these provisions, contact the U.S. Attorney's Office in your district.
KEY DEFINITIONS

"Spouse or Intimate Partner" (See 18 U.S.C.2266(7)(A)(ii))

* A spouse or former spouse of the target of the stalking;
* A person who shares a child in common with the target of the stalking;
* A person who cohabits or has cohabited as a spouse with the target of the stalking; or
* Any other person similarly situated to a spouse who is protected by the domestic and family violence laws of the state or tribal jurisdiction where the injury occurred or the victim resides.

"Course of Conduct" (See 18 U.S.C.2266(2))

A pattern of conduct composed of two or more acts, evidencing a continuity of purpose.

"Serious Bodily Injury" (See 18 U.S.C. 2119(2) and 18 U.S.C.1365(g)(3) and (4))

Bodily injury (see below) which involves (A) a substantial risk of death; (B) extreme physical pain; (C) protracted and obvious disfigurement; or (D) protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty. This includes any conduct that, if the conduct occurred in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States would violate section 2241 (aggravated sexual abuse) or 2242 (sexual abuse) of this title.
Billy

Anaheim, CA

#37 Feb 8, 2010
Dumb thread
Targeted Individual

Washington, DC

#38 Feb 13, 2010
I don't want to give false hope but I witnessed something today that indicates possibly an authority figure who was addressing one of my gangstalkers. The gangstalker tailed me and parked her car by mine. About ten minutes later some guy with a military cut parked behind her. She got scared and took off. Then he checked me out for about ten seconds and took off. A possible sign of hope? I don't know.
CA_target

Anaheim, CA

#39 Feb 13, 2010
Please Vote to Enforce Existing Stalking Laws.
http://ideascale.com/t/UB3VZFzo

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#40 Feb 14, 2010
Targeted Individual wrote:
I don't want to give false hope but I witnessed something today that indicates possibly an authority figure who was addressing one of my gangstalkers. The gangstalker tailed me and parked her car by mine. About ten minutes later some guy with a military cut parked behind her. She got scared and took off. Then he checked me out for about ten seconds and took off. A possible sign of hope? I don't know.
So, you have noticed that where ever you go-- there they are, too!
CA_target

Anaheim, CA

#41 Feb 14, 2010
Reginald,
That does sound encouraging. I blew the whistle on a cybercriminal in July '06, had no help from anyone in law enforcement, the DA, etc., and became a TI. After 6wks it escalated to dangerous gang members. Anyway, in May '07, I finally got the help of a police commissioner in Sacramento, he came down to check it out. He had the authority to call the FBI. The National Guard showed up! I have been writing 'Letters to America' for awhile to ask them to help the TI's out there. Maybe, they listened. My last 'Letter to America' is at http://www.nowpublic.com/world/official-docum...
CA_target

Anaheim, CA

#42 Feb 14, 2010
I'm Donalds on the NowPublic forum.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories in the Blogosphere Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Optifast 800 calorie diet (Dec '06) 15 hr Debivan 5,525
hair cut stories of sikh boys and girls (Sep '09) Mon Aakash Singh 4,255
Why are white men so attracted to asian women? (Jul '08) Mon PurpleVelvet 21,614
New way to Make Money Receive Text Messages (Nov '11) Sun david Washington 3
Home Office Charles Farr MOD Sir Fank Cooper Si... Sun Stuart Furness 1
Why Do White Women Love Black Men? (Sep '08) Aug 29 james 2,285
US Vetoes UN Resolution Condemning Israel's Gaz... (Jul '06) Aug 28 James 314
www.copart.com is not a good place to buy a car... (Nov '10) Aug 26 david 354
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Top Stories in the Blogosphere People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••