Knicks won't bother trying to play St...

Knicks won't bother trying to play Steph again

There are 4 comments on the Newsday story from Nov 23, 2008, titled Knicks won't bother trying to play Steph again. In it, Newsday reports that:

Mike D'Antoni declared the Stephon Marbury situation "over with" and said "we're not going to come back" to re-visiting the thought of playing the exiled guard again.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

barton geo

North Port, FL

#1 Nov 23, 2008
I can't get comfortable taking any adult male seriously who calls himself "Donnie". This entire mess shares a common thread with earlier debacles involving Chris Webber as a rookie being publicly humiliated by coach Don Nelson, PJ Carlissimo getting throttled by Latrell Spreewell . For what reason? Because those coaches felt it was quite OK to humiliate and degrade a player in front of others. Regardless of whatever he may have done in the past, Marbury deserves to be treated with dignity, not humiliated daily. The Knicks will not get James and Walsh will not achieve his goals because the players know that White men who treat Black men with such disdain are not worth associating with.
Ricky123

Solvang, CA

#2 Nov 23, 2008
Barton geo: Puh-leeze. You might have noticed that not all the black men in the NBA are treated that way - only the ones who destroy team chemistry, act like prima donnas, and who generally act like the rules don't apply to them. Ask the other 14 guys on the Knicks' roster if they think Donnie Walsh is a racist - or if they think Marbury is a jerk. I bet more the latter total would be much higher.
Mister Skull

Brooklyn, NY

#3 Nov 23, 2008
The other Knicks players made their feelings about Marbury quite clear last year when they voted for him not to start after his temper-tantrum and disappearance. Getting rid of Marbury is long overdue, but there is no need to rush. Walsh should do what is right for the team.
VOR

Bronx, NY

#4 Nov 23, 2008
I heard D'Antoni's interview after MArbury refused to play. He calmly explained that when they inactivated him, they didn't want to embarrass him by keeping him on the active roster and not playing him more than a few minutes per game. With Crawford gone, they offered him the chance to play 30-35 minutes a game. Marbury refused.

I think for any kid who ever bounced a ball with dreams of playing in the NBA, who played in the rain, shoveled snow off courts just to play in the freezinf cold with a wet ball, getting the chance to play in the NBA under any circumstance would be something they would do without hesitation. Marbury is a knucklehead who will never get it. His next stop might not even be in the NBA, although someone will likely try to resurrect him.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jerome James Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Knicks on the 'pay no mind' list (Feb '08) Mar '12 terrome porter 21
News Isaiah Rider (Apr '10) Apr '10 BD Gopherfan 1
News Is Morris the real deal? - AM New York (Mar '07) Jan '10 glen wildeforde 3
News Phoenix Suns: Amare, Nash, Shaq And The Draft (Jun '09) Jun '09 col 3
News Knicks' new guys could face Raptors (Feb '09) Feb '09 Tiffany 12
News Chicago Bulls trade Larry Hughes to Knicks for ... (Feb '09) Feb '09 Jeebs 223
News Knicks turn down Nate Robinson trade, pick up L... (Feb '09) Feb '09 Tiffany 28
More from around the web