Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1403949 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#950775 Jul 22, 2013
Eman wrote:
"(ABC NEWS)-- George Zimmerman, who has been in hiding since he was acquitted of murder in the death of Trayvon Martin, emerged to help rescue someone who was trapped in an overturned truck, police said today.Sanford Police Department Capt. Jim McAuliffe told ABC News that Zimmerman "pulled an individual from a truck that had rolled over" at the intersection of a Florida highway last week. Florida Highway Patrol is now handling the case, McAuliffe said"
It's going to take a lot more than that to make up for killing someone. Was it a busload of orphans?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#950776 Jul 22, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
It would be hard to find enough people to fill a big room who didn't feel for this family.
But the same room was empty when a white woman's baby was shot in the face by a black teen. Hardly anyone knew about it.
See the problem a lot of us are having with the hypocrisy - and our dilemma? Of course, we feel sorry for the family. But why just this case?
And why the lies by the liberal media, i.e. this administration, to perpetrate a racial divide that didn't even exist?
Because there's a much bigger problem afoot. Manipulation and control.
If they dont' talk about the Zimmerman case, they have to talk about Fast and Furious, the 11 million illegal alien lie, the IRS, the NSA, Benghazi, etc., etc., etc.,... and worst in their nightmares is having to talk about who Obama is. Every time anyone looks anywhere, it becomes obvious Obama isn't who he says he is.

This is nothing more than an attempt to divert the attention of the American people away from what our government is doing, no different than the Snowden drama epison invented by the government to divert everyone's attention away from the unconstitutional acts of the government.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#950777 Jul 22, 2013
tell_it_like_it_IS wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats a huge pile of stanky grey areA you just stepped in...
hate r moneys millions while defending a banks billions,!!!!!!!
but i didn't get it wrong.

Fresh off the false and politicized attack on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, today we’re hearing the know-nothings blame the subprime crisis on the Community Reinvestment Act — a 30-year-old law that was actually weakened by the Bush administration just as the worst lending wave began. This is even more ridiculous than blaming Freddie and Fannie.

The Community Reinvestment Act, passed in 1977, requires banks to lend in the low-income neighborhoods where they take deposits. Just the idea that a lending crisis created from 2004 to 2007 was caused by a 1977 law is silly. But it’s even more ridiculous when you consider that most subprime loans were made by firms that aren’t subject to the CRA. University of Michigan law professor Michael Barr testified back in February before the House Committee on Financial Services that 50% of subprime loans were made by mortgage service companies not subject comprehensive federal supervision and another 30% were made by affiliates of banks or thrifts which are not subject to routine supervision or examinations. As former Fed Governor Ned Gramlich said in an August, 2007, speech shortly before he passed away:“In the subprime market where we badly need supervision, a majority of loans are made with very little supervision. It is like a city with a murder law, but no cops on the beat.”

Not surprisingly given the higher degree of supervision, loans made under the CRA program were made in a more responsible way than other subprime loans. CRA loans carried lower rates than other subprime loans and were less likely to end up securitized into the mortgage-backed securities that have caused so many losses, according to a recent study by the law firm Traiger & Hinckley (PDF file here).

Finally, keep in mind that the Bush administration has been weakening CRA enforcement and the law’s reach since the day it took office. The CRA was at its strongest in the 1990s, under the Clinton administration, a period when subprime loans performed quite well. It was only after the Bush administration cut back on CRA enforcement that problems arose, a timing issue which should stop those blaming the law dead in their tracks. The Federal Reserve, too, did nothing but encourage the wild west of lending in recent years. It wasn’t until the middle of 2007 that the Fed decided it was time to crack down on abusive pratices in the subprime lending market. Oops.

http://www.businessweek.com/investing/insight...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#950778 Jul 22, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Republicans are more comfortable with it than democrats because you can no longer use the tax code to shape behavior. Democrats would lose control of their victims without the tax code.
Exactly.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#950779 Jul 22, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text>You're having another of your delusions again DB! What did my post have to do with the constitution? Does the constitution state anywhere that," a group of people, no matter the race, can't where their pants having off their ass or, anything of a dress code anywhere? No! You're dumb enough to mistake everyday wear for job employment clothing. Ignorant enough to believe that, black folks are ignorant enough to not know how to dress when applying for a job or, going to a job interview! Your bigotry is appalling!
Your post had to do with just making up the rules as you go, and applying them subjectively.
We have a Constitution specifically to avoid that medieval concept of government, dufus.

The Constitution is the rule. Do we have to fight ANOTHER war over that?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#950780 Jul 22, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean the voices of easily manipulated Americans? Yes, unfortunately, they are.
Which is what concerns the rest of us.
3 million FOXbots hardly qualifies as 'the rest of us'.

someday you'll have to explain why the most of us won't start watching FOX.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#950782 Jul 22, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Cons have been discrediting teachers for years now as union hacks.
What makes you 'special' in their eyes?
I think teachers were being blamed for the unquestionable failure of our education system that was changed from the best in the world to the most expensive in the world that generates the most ignorant workforce in the industrialized world, and has a record of a 40+ year decline without a single year of improvement.

... next?
tell_it_like_it_ IS

United States

#950783 Jul 22, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>When you lock yourself there of your own free will, it's understandable.
Next you'll be singing 'Mammy' to us in black face paint...
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#950784 Jul 22, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
That's ridiculous. The "fight or flight" instinct happens in just seconds. Trayvon had 4 minutes to think about confronting Zimmmerman. He could have "flit" to where his father was staying in just 20 seconds long after he first made eye contact with Zimmmerman on the phone and after he first ran off.
So why didn't he just keep running?
Because the liberal media told you not to think about that. That's why.
The state claims that two minutes were unaccounted for, where did you hear four minutes? According to Zimmerman's statements Trayvon could not have seen George outside the truck until seconds prior to the confrontation.

But wait, the resident witnesses were drawn in by loud arguing voices prior to the gunshot. I guess George forgot about the arguing eh?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#950785 Jul 22, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! You are such a historical contortionist, son!
You forgot to answer the post. I'll help you. Here it is again:

Let's go over US history again:
In 2003 the Democrats supported the war in Iraq in exchange for the Republicans giving them no effective oversight of their Marxist CRA program. All necessary legislation was put in place then.
Compounding this idiocy, the Democrats took over all oversight of the financial institutions that caused the economic collapse in January, 2007, coincident with the year the effect of the Democrats' Marxist subprime housing mortgage underwriting program began to have negative effects on the economy.
After two years of oversight by Democrats, the Democrats' Marxist subprime housing loan program collapsed our economy.
Prior to the Democrats' Marxist subprime loan program, the world invested in US real estate mortgage industry because it was a foregone conclusion that... you may need to write this down... history proved that Americans always paid their mortgages.
The Democrats changed that perception of America.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#950786 Jul 22, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Republicans do have a problem with it. They don't think women can be trusted to make up their own mind on abortion or not. The GOP thinks men have to make that decision for women.
A gallup poll from last year shows the majority are pro-life.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/154838/Pro-Choice-...

That was before the Gosnell case and a liberal movement now demanding abortions at any stage of development.

Abortion involves more than one life. And informed decisions are a common sense approach in any medical procedure.

Most liberals are just too easily manipulated. Sorry to say.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#950787 Jul 22, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Your post had to do with just making up the rules as you go, and applying them subjectively.
We have a Constitution specifically to avoid that medieval concept of government, dufus.
The Constitution is the rule. Do we have to fight ANOTHER war over that?
And we have amendments to it because it is an imperfect document.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#950788 Jul 22, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
If they dont' talk about the Zimmerman case, they have to talk about Fast and Furious, the 11 million illegal alien lie, the IRS, the NSA, Benghazi, etc., etc., etc.,... and worst in their nightmares is having to talk about who Obama is. Every time anyone looks anywhere, it becomes obvious Obama isn't who he says he is.
This is nothing more than an attempt to divert the attention of the American people away from what our government is doing, no different than the Snowden drama epison invented by the government to divert everyone's attention away from the unconstitutional acts of the government.
Only right wing crazies talk about it son. They keep trying to beat a dead horse... probably because they have nothing else to beat!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#950789 Jul 22, 2013
tell_it_like_it_IS wrote:
<quoted text>
Next you'll be singing 'Mammy' to us in black face paint...
Why son?
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#950790 Jul 22, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>It's going to take a lot more than that to make up for killing someone. Was it a busload of orphans?
Pffffttt, Zimmerman probably cut him off and forced him to crash;
that fatty can bearly hoist himself off the toilet, let alone lift another person.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#950791 Jul 22, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
3 million FOXbots hardly qualifies as 'the rest of us'.
someday you'll have to explain why the most of us won't start watching FOX.
When Fox starts reporting the news, Homer will watch.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#950792 Jul 22, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
However, I think your article made a very good point about our criminal justice system..."Once you are labeled a felon, the old forms of discrimination – employment discrimination, housing discrimination, denial of the right to vote, denial of educational opportunity, denial of food stamps and other public benefits, and exclusion from jury service are suddenly legal." THAT is what is wrong with our system of "justice" and THAT is what needs to change. IMO, once a person has served their time and is off probation or parole, their record should be expunged, automatically. How can we expect people to get a new lease on life and have and have a promising future if we continue to punish them for something they did in the past? It's just wrong.
No.
If you choose to commit a crime, and you are convicted of that crime, the public has every right to assume you are, and will always be a criminal.
It's up to that criminal to convince the public that they have reformed.
And, convincing them of that may take a very, very long time.
They had their "due process of law". Just because they were released from prison doesn't mean everything should be like they never did it. There is a social penalty to pay, as well as a government penalty.
mr owl

Norman, OK

#950793 Jul 22, 2013
GZ, labelled a murderer by Liberals, and character...

"George Zimmerman Emerged From Hiding for Truck Crash Rescue"

http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-eme...

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#950794 Jul 22, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
If they dont' talk about the Zimmerman case, they have to talk about Fast and Furious, the 11 million illegal alien lie, the IRS, the NSA, Benghazi, etc., etc., etc.,... and worst in their nightmares is having to talk about who Obama is.
Well, that's just about the truest thing anyone has posted on here since the liberal media frenzy of lies about race first began.

Thank you.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#950795 Jul 22, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>The state claims that two minutes were unaccounted for, where did you hear four minutes? According to Zimmerman's statements Trayvon could not have seen George outside the truck until seconds prior to the confrontation.
But wait, the resident witnesses were drawn in by loud arguing voices prior to the gunshot. I guess George forgot about the arguing eh?
52 minutes unaccounted for between the 7-11 and Trayvon's assault on Zimmerman

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 2 hr zef 311,488
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 7 hr NotInPotatoQuality 20,387
News Two men shot in one-hour span overnight in Balt... 9 hr bozo 1
boycott the usps Sun JOHNNY LENNON 1
News Is Illinois couple's murder tied to bankruptcy ... (Oct '08) Sun TheGambler 12
News Two men shot, one fatally, inside suspected dru... Sun bozo 1
News Stateville gets new lease on life as Pontiac pr... (May '08) Jul 23 sad mommy 50

Baltimore Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Baltimore Mortgages