Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#857995 Feb 12, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"teal dumb"
Do you practice being dumb?
Solar energy is not free. The panels do not cost anything? The labor to install the panels is free? Think before you post, just once.
Peace
KMA
Solar energy is what the sun rains down on us every day.

You are thinking about electricity derived from solar energy.

Quit being do GD dumb.
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#857996 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are also against killing terrorists by helicopter?
What if we send in a seal team?
No?
Drones and helicopters. Where the fuhell were they during Benghazi. Plenty of advanced "Get a CLUE' big, black fwags waving prior.

Benghazi-Foreign Policy FAILURE.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#857997 Feb 12, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Post it again, dufus. Go to your "information" and copy and paste it here for us to read. Don't forget to put the part about the spontaneous demonstration that never happened in all caps.
Here's my post again for comparison:
Put that timeline here for us to see. Make sure you put in all caps where Obama's spontaneous demonstration against a video that didn't even exist when Al Qaeda planned the attack and had a grand total of 17 hits worldwide before Obama invented his lie and blamed it for the attack happened.
We want to make sure we get all of those details.
Here's what it should look like:
Perhaps you are ignorant of what happened. It is obvious that the Al Qaeda attack in Benghazi was the result of a sophisticated plan.
The Al Qaeda assault on the location where the American ambassador was seemed to be intended to kidnap the American ambassador, not kill him. Stevens died of smoke inhalation when Al Qaeda attempted to smoke him out of a room instead of blowing the doors off and lighting him up with their AKs.
There was another Al Qaeda team prepositioned for an ambush to repulse the Americans that would respond to the initial assault on the location where they were attempting to kidnap Stevens. When it was obvious there would not be an assault on the Al Qaeda team attempting to kidnap the American ambassador, the Al Qaeda team responsible for ambushing the American relief force repositioned and attacked the subject team they initially intended to ambush at the location the American security team never left because they received orders to not assist the American ambassador.
And the White House watched this on real-time video.
Which leads to many other questions.... like:
Why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up an Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Somewhere in there is Americans seeking permission to attack Al Qaeda and being told to stand down, and Americans asking "where the f**k is the Specter" knowing it was on station and should have been blowing away the Al Qaeda mortors they were lighting up, before Al Qaeda finally zeroed in on them and killed them.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House hung the Americans out to dry and watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Look it up. Maybe you can be informed. Pentagon timeline Benghazi. Really even a dumbasss like you can look it up.

You have proof it was Al Qaeda? Of course not. To a dumbass like you all terrorists are Al Qaeda.

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#857998 Feb 12, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
One of the questions still not answered:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the live video feed?
And, why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
It is obvious that the Al Qaeda attack in Benghazi was the result of a sophisticated plan.
The Al Qaeda assault on the location where the American ambassador was seemed to be intended to kidnap the American ambassador, not kill him. Stevens died of smoke inhalation when Al Qaeda attempted to smoke him out of a room instead of blowing the doors off and lighting him up with their AKs.
There was another Al Qaeda team prepositioned for an ambush to repulse the Americans that would respond to the initial assault on the location where they were attempting to kidnap Stevens. When it was obvious there would not be an assault on the Al Qaeda team attempting to kidnap the American ambassador, the Al Qaeda team responsible for ambushing the American relief force repositioned and attacked the subject team they initially intended to ambush at the location the American security team never left because they received orders to not assist the American ambassador.
And the White House watched this on real-time video.
Which leads to many other questions.... like:
Why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up an Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Somewhere in there is Americans seeking permission to attack Al Qaeda and being told to stand down, and Americans asking "where the f**k is the Specter" knowing it was on station and should have been blowing away the Al Qaeda mortors they were lighting up, before Al Qaeda finally zeroed in on them and killed them.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House hung the Americans out to dry and watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Perseveration in schizophrenia.
Crider A. Source Dept. of Psychology, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
Abstract:
Perseveration in schizophrenia may take a variety of forms, which can be conceptualized as varying manifestations of an underlying neurocognitive deficit. Comparative studies have demonstrated higher than normal levels of perseverative responding among schizophrenia patients on capacity-demanding tasks, including prompted discourse, reversal learning, and the generation of guessing sequences. There is little evidence that perseveration is associated with deficit signs of schizophrenia. However, perseveration appears to covary with both positive thought disorder and voluntary motor disturbance. Perseveration in schizophrenia thus appears to be a productive sign elicited by a failure to mobilize cognitive resources in situations requiring controlled information processing and the concomitant inhibition of activated but task-inappropriate responses. An information-proces sing model proposed by Shallice (1988) attributes perseveration to a failure of a higher level executive control system to modulate a lower level response selection system under a requirement for novel response generation. This model suggests that perseveration is the consequence of a failure of frontal specification of striatal outputs during controlled processing, resulting in the continued reselection of previously activated outputs
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#857999 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This is why you remain so uninformed.
You quote an organization that advocates for fossil fuels & was founded & managed by a former Enron exec.
I quoted an article out of an establishment managed by such perhaps.

That however, does NOT change the FACTS.

This is why you remain so DUH A Vey DUHummmfounded and confused. You cannot differentiate between truth and reality, for tunnel vision 6th grade level partisian hatred, due to fourth grade level reading comprehension.

Pit YOUR EBT cawrd up and YOU pay for you some sowar Duhmbo--let us know how that werks out fer ya.(just don't holler when it goes all to hell, one of dem dar backer up battries busts, or dey aint nuff sunshine to heat yer one spigot of running cold water!!)

They took them OUT of the Whitehouse for a reason moron--

Have you checked out Katmandoo yet Duhmbo? Seriously....
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#858000 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Look it up. Maybe you can be informed. Pentagon timeline Benghazi. Really even a dumbasss like you can look it up.
You have proof it was Al Qaeda? Of course not. To a dumbass like you all terrorists are Al Qaeda.
It's in Nepal.

Don;t bother with the web poopogranduh page on solar though-even it-- does NOT work lol.
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#858001 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Look it up. Maybe you can be informed. Pentagon timeline Benghazi. Really even a dumbasss like you can look it up.
You have proof it was Al Qaeda? Of course not. To a dumbass like you all terrorists are Al Qaeda.
More time out required in the willfull ignert corner for you huh?
Imabotanicalcell

Manchester, KY

#858002 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Solar energy is what the sun rains down on us every day.
You are thinking about electricity derived from solar energy.
Quit being do GD dumb.
What r u?

lol

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#858003 Feb 12, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
I quoted an article out of an establishment managed by such perhaps.
That however, does NOT change the FACTS.
This is why you remain so DUH A Vey DUHummmfounded and confused. You cannot differentiate between truth and reality, for tunnel vision 6th grade level partisian hatred, due to fourth grade level reading comprehension.
Pit YOUR EBT cawrd up and YOU pay for you some sowar Duhmbo--let us know how that werks out fer ya.(just don't holler when it goes all to hell, one of dem dar backer up battries busts, or dey aint nuff sunshine to heat yer one spigot of running cold water!!)
They took them OUT of the Whitehouse for a reason moron--
Have you checked out Katmandoo yet Duhmbo? Seriously....
There were no facts. Only bullshit from a fossil fuel advocate.

Bullshit you sucked in like a dry sponge in a cesspool.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#858004 Feb 12, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
More time out required in the willfull ignert corner for you huh?
I'm afraid no one can stand in that corner until you vacate it.
Imabotanicalcell

Manchester, KY

#858005 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Oil belongs to the property owner & it is sold.
You people are sofa king stupid. You think people with a rig can run around drilling holes & sucking up that free oil.
Now THAT type of crappola IS some pretty Ignorant (beyond belief even sometimes) Ignorance.

The shining epitomy of libuhrulTICS-ya commie bootlicker.
Nj raider 1

United States

#858006 Feb 12, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok. Let's go over how the government of the United States really works again.
CONGRESS controlls all revenue, borrowing and spending.
When Bush took office, the total public debt was 5 trillion dollars.
dot-com bust...
Arab jihad declares war on the United States...
When the Democrats took full control of all the purse strings of government in January, 2007, the total public debt was 8.5 trillion dollars, and the annual deficit was 0.16 (that's zero point one six) trillion dollars.
Please tell us what the Democrats did to that total debt and annual deficit since.
Did you say the Democrats increased the deficit ONE THOUSAND PERCENT?
Did you say the Democrats DOUBLED THE DEBT?
It's public knowledge that Clinton left a 5/6 trillion dollar surplus. Are you denying that? My post had nothing to do with the democrats & everything to do with the contrast between President Obama & bush. Are you denying the 7 attacks under bush & dozens killed? Are you denying bush's motives behind the iraqi invasion? Are yiu denying that bush lied about wmds & I dont want to her nothing about Valerie Plame, Dick Cheney, or anyone else. Bush was president! Why do you describe it as Obama's government, then turn around & put the blame on the democrats under bush's gov't? Don't pick through the post & try & find grounds to stand on. You've asked your question 100 times now it's your turn to answer some questions!

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#858007 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave its impossible to reason with mentally ill people that don't have the ability or even desire to reason. These people try to draw others into their fantasy world merely to have someone to bounce their crazy hypotheses off. They aren't the least bit interested in testing their arguments against logic, it doesn't matter in a fantasy world. These pedantics have knowledge but no wisdom.
DBWriter (civil war & perseveration), waxturd (multiple personalities & narcissistic judge-its), Shinningshitforbrains (paranoia driven rants) are obviously mentally ill. Maybe we need to do more to direct them to get help rather than enable them.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#858008 Feb 12, 2013
Former Vice President Dick Cheney voiced support for President Obama's drone program, in an interview that aired Tuesday.

"I think it's a good program," Cheney told CBS' Charlie Rose. "I don't disagree with the basic policy that the Obama administration has pursued in that regard."

Cheney said he supported the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen and Al Qaeda cleric, in Yemen. "He was clearly a part of Al Qaeda," Cheney said.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/c...
TrueFootPrintRed uction

Manchester, KY

#858009 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This is why you remain so uninformed.
You quote an organization that advocates for fossil fuels & was founded & managed by a former Enron exec.
How to reiduce duh 'lektrik bill in duh warmer munfs.

Especially Ignert slacker libuhrulTics, sponging off of OTHER peoples tax dolluhs- pay attention-it's sooo simple even yewz kuld do it!

Open duh windows and STFU (and spare the environment yet MORE nothing but hot air and whineDUH)

Buncha whiney azz DUHMmies.
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#858011 Feb 12, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
RealDave its impossible to reason with mentally ill people that don't have the ability or even desire to reason. These people try to draw others into their fantasy world merely to have someone to bounce their crazy hypotheses off. They aren't the least bit interested in testing their arguments against logic, it doesn't matter in a fantasy world. These pedantics have knowledge but no wisdom.
DBWriter (civil war & perseveration), waxturd (multiple personalities & narcissistic judge-its), Shinningshitforbrains (paranoia driven rants) are obviously mentally ill. Maybe we need to do more to direct them to get help rather than enable them.
Streets lined with weapon brandishing terrorists is not paranoia driven ranting.
The inability to see what is right on front of the faces for all the world to see, and the DENIAL of such thereafter, is another whole arena.

Dup-ed is as dup-ed does. Don't be dup-ed, dupe.

Benghazi-foreign policy failure.
Solyndra-energy policy failure.

Failure is as failure does.

Both instances were failures. Just admit it, the REAL world is full of it.
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#858013 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm afraid no one can stand in that corner until you vacate it.
Well hold your breathe then-cuz it's MY corner of STUPID is as STUPID does.

SO there.
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#858014 Feb 12, 2013
entrenched wrote:
go figure
anduh ...FLUSH and swish.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#858015 Feb 12, 2013
Well here's a bit of good news.

For those who find Valentines Day too risque__Orlando's Liberty Council is rolling out it's 10th annual Day of Purity on Thursday for teens who wish to commit or recommit to purity.

Sounds like fun eh?

Judged:

17

17

17

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Jane Says

New York, NY

#858017 Feb 12, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>95% of Obama followers are ignorant, the other 5% keep you that way. When you blame other people for the things that go wrong in your miserable life, remember this..... Things will continue to go wrong in your miserable life.
miracles do happen and as often the case young starry eyed liberals go out in the real world and find out that holding hands and singing kumbya doesn't really solve problems. they also may come to realize that equal opportunity can be squandered due to the need for instant gratification, which leads to persistently poor decisions and generational dependency on the governmdent. here is one former lib who like a moth to a butterfly, has evolved into being not-PC, because it makes sense.

'Work: The only answer to poverty
Programs that rely on handouts have failed time and again

Today, America spends over $600 billion a year on welfare and poverty-related programs. They do not work. They create, rather than lessen, dependency.

For just $155 billion, we could establish a proven, subsidized employment program in the private sector and Works Progress Administration-type effort that would employ 11 million dependent individuals. These jobs could pay a salary of $20,000, lifting millions of families out of poverty.

Besides the fact that this would save a lot of money, work is the best solution for poverty. I know this because it has been my life’s work.

In 1965, I enlisted in the War on Poverty. A battalion of young, optimistic soldiers began to lay siege to the forces that created what we considered victims of America’s capitalistic system. We were true believers, crusaders for the eradication of need.

At the time, the U.S. poverty rate was 15.2%, with more than 20 million people living below the poverty line.

Fast forward to last year, when the poverty rate was 15.1% and more than 40 million people (including 15 million children) were living in poverty.

From the time I started out, we had spent $19 trillion to end poverty — and had failed even to reduce it.

What went wrong?

For answers, we must look at the two pet strategies for solving the problem: income redistribution and government-run poverty programs. It seems Draconian to oppose giving a financial handout to a person in need. But history has proven handouts simply do not work.

Welfare, which started out as a tiny program to help the widows of miners, became a geyser of cash that created an underclass, mostly of single mothers dependent on the government to survive.

Work was discouraged; having children out of wedlock was no longer frightening, because it meant a check in the mail every month. Dependency and illegitimacy prevailed. Not until 1996, when the welfare laws were overhauled and a time limit was placed on cash assistance, did work become a priority. The welfare rolls dropped by more than 60%.

continued
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/work-answe...

Judged:

17

17

17

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 1 hr WARRIOR 19,391
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 5 hr cpeter1313 306,292
Mrs. Bush: History will vindicate her husband (Jun '08) 11 hr Swedenforever 54,525
STEVE DeBAUGH (May '12) Oct 22 Steve 2
Baltimore on Orkin Rattiest City List Oct 21 numberonepestcont... 1
Need help to get down! Oct 20 sweetenvy 1
Review: Atas Marc J Oct 20 Briansaul 5
Baltimore Dating
Find my Match

Baltimore Jobs

Baltimore People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Baltimore News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Baltimore

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]