An ugly attack on Mormons

Did you catch the political ad in which two Jews ring the doorbell of a nice working-class family? They barge in and rifle through the wife's purse and then the man's wallet for cash. Full Story

“I am happy”

Since: Jul 08

St. Petersburg, FL

#936 Dec 14, 2008
MattJ wrote:
<quoted text>
No, that is YOUR biased interpretation of what you did to them. THEY will call it "great suffering".
That is why you have blown it, you have given them just what they need to paint themselves as the martyrs.
And again, they have not suffered one iota on anything. Get a clue or I can sell you one. In order for this "great suffering" to occur, someone must feel pain. No pain has been dealt, just a little bit of giving them a taste of their own damn medicine.

“I am happy”

Since: Jul 08

St. Petersburg, FL

#937 Dec 14, 2008
Motorhead Fan wrote:
<quoted text>Like you, Mormons have a first amendment right to express themselves. Mormons can speak up anything they want, just like you. What does California have to do with Utah? How about legal precedent being introduced into their courts from California - it appears the person you attacked might know a great deal more than you do about the repercussions of what happens in California affecting other states.
SEE EVERYONE, THIS IS A PERFECT ILLUSTRATION OF THE HOMOSEXUAL FASCIST AT WORK.
What, specifically, does that gentleman have to know about California that would make homosexual marriage more acceptable to him? Maybe homosexual marriage is repugnant to some people regardless of whether they live and where the marriages are taking place.
Telling someone to shut up because they are a Mormon idiot and know nothing about California is as devoid of meaning and substance as Moe Green telling Michael Corleone that "Nobody comes into my town and insults me, I'm Moe Green". WTF, he's not from California? So what, he's entitled to share his opinion on this thread like everyone else.
Damn, you're an infant - and a fascist infant at that. Don't worry, I won't tell you to shut up, I want you to keep running your yap to show everyone what a joke you and your beliefs are.
And you are a Virginia redneck and the only thing better than you are your laws that prohibit consentual oral sex between adults. As for your ASSumption of the Mormon church being entitled to free speech, you are wrong. They are free to assemble and have a right to their little cult that believes in aliens, but what the entity does not have the rights to is to spend government earned monies and play politics. We will have them stripped of their tax exempt status.

“I am happy”

Since: Jul 08

St. Petersburg, FL

#938 Dec 14, 2008
Motorhead Fan wrote:
<quoted text>Actually the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was voted on and, thanks to a majority of votes by Congress - it passed.
Homosexual marriage and black civil rights are not in the same ball park. There's no moral equivalence. We vote on things dealing with behavior all the time. Homosexual marriage ws put to a vote and lost - it isn't a civil right.
Then fine, with a democrat controlled congress and a democrat president coming in a month, you will have absolutely no problem with the Civil Rights Act of 64 to be extended to gays and federal civil unions or marriage being legally endorsed by the same congress? If that happens, I really expect you to shut the hell up and move on because your post here says it all. You want to play like a vote determined all of this, then fine, we will play your game and I give it 18 months that federal civil unions for gay will be on the books and every state in the country will have to legally allow it. In 4 - 6 years it will be federal, gay marriage.

You may want to move to India because I can see the courthouses in Richmond and Midlothian now. All the gays getting married to each other and you are sitting there with your chewing tobacco and threatening to shoot up a bunch of gays. Redneck.

“I am happy”

Since: Jul 08

St. Petersburg, FL

#939 Dec 14, 2008
exiled wrote:
I am not an LDS member, nor likely to ever become one. I don't like the position of their women, and I don't agree with their theology at all. But as neighbors, coworkers, friends, they are great. Overall they are hardworking, honest, helpful, polite, and nice to look at. Their stance on homosexual marriage is consistent with MOST Christians interpretation of the Bible. Again, I think the problem would be over if homosexuals would just push for some other relationship status with similar rights attached. It is the word "marriage" that makes it hard for many to swallow.
In other words, you support "separate, but equal" theologies from the 40s, 50s, and 60s. How successful were those theologies again? Were they successful before or after crosses were burned in people's front yards?
George Bush

Grayslake, IL

#940 Dec 14, 2008
Did they repeal the Constitution while I was asleep? Or did they just repeal the Guaranteed Rights section?
American

Homer Glen, IL

#941 Dec 14, 2008
This another example of My Democratic Party becoming an organization of hate!
Republicans and Conservatives can get nasty but in the last few years, my Democratic Party and the liberals have out done them 4-1!

The formula is simple...
1. ID what group(s) hurt you and then attack!
2. When they come back at you spread vicious lies and distort their beliefs.
YukYukYuk

Staten Island, NY

#942 Dec 14, 2008
exiled wrote:
I am not an LDS member, nor likely to ever become one. I don't like the position of their women, and I don't agree with their theology at all. But as neighbors, coworkers, friends, they are great. Overall they are hardworking, honest, helpful, polite, and nice to look at. Their stance on homosexual marriage is consistent with MOST Christians interpretation of the Bible.
I seem to recall something about Howard Hughes hiring them exclusively because they were honest.
Too bad they're brainwashed robots.

All "churches" should pay taxes, especially
Scientology and "religious schools, like Yeshivas and the Ayn Rand School. What a joke.
YukYukYuk

Staten Island, NY

#943 Dec 14, 2008
American wrote:
This another example of My Democratic Party becoming an organization of hate!
Republicans and Conservatives can get nasty but in the last few years, my Democratic Party and the liberals have out done them 4-1!
The formula is simple...
1. ID what group(s) hurt you and then attack!
2. When they come back at you spread vicious lies and distort their beliefs.
You are so Clueless! Everybody does that. Its called self-defense. Turning the other cheek sucks. You can't keep your Halo on when someone's stepping on your face!
Disgusted

Peotone, IL

#944 Dec 14, 2008
Motorhead Fan wrote:
<quoted text>Come on! I always apologize to people who zero in on certain things and insist others speak with absolute, granular precision. There was nothing phony about it. There's several people I work with that make everyone walk on egg shells because nobody knows when they will erupt in outrage over something that tweaked them the wrong way. Rather than knock them out and go to jail, we always accomodate them with an earnest apology and they wander away thinking they showed everybody who's boss, when in fact, they've simply left the room to the joy of everyone else.
If you don't know that white, male, heterosexual Christians and their families can be stereotyped in the media and by homosexual activist groups without fear of substantive repercussions, you're asleep at the switch. I did not indicate that you specifically stereotyped white, male heterosexuals and their families, but your response indicated a creepy kind of malignant narcissism reflecting the notion that everything that happens in your vicinity is centered on you.
When a pattern of behavior emerges across a large group of people who act in a common manner towards a common objective, one can conclude that certain sweeping indictments and generalizations are more true than false. It is what it is.
Your reply is pure idiocy, but not surprising. You made a sweeping indictment of a group of people. Then, when questioned, it becomes a personal attack on the questioner. You obviously know narcissism.
YukYukYuk

Staten Island, NY

#946 Dec 14, 2008
rumor1 wrote:
<quoted text>Marriage is not a civil right.
Would you say it's a civil "liberty?"
American

Homer Glen, IL

#948 Dec 14, 2008
So what you are saying is if you are losing the argument then lie, cheat and slander...

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)
YukYukYuk wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so Clueless! Everybody does that. Its called self-defense. Turning the other cheek sucks. You can't keep your Halo on when someone's stepping on your face!

Since: Sep 07

Midlothian, Virginia

#949 Dec 14, 2008
YukYukYuk wrote:
<quoted text>
Civil Right Act of 1964 was voted on by Congress, not the general population. My encyclopedia shows the National Guard escorting black kids to school.
Do you think it would have been passed in the voting booths of America?
I believe the Supreme Court, with the Constitution as a guide, should decide on gay marriage. They've been pretty fair so far.
I believe the Civil Rights act of 1964 would have passed had the general electorate been allowed to decide.

I know you want the Supreme Court to decide it - it's easier to get what you want that way - to hell with the electorate, right?

Does your encyclopedia show the National Guard escorting black children to school in every state or just where George Wallace was governor? I don't remember the Guard escorting black children to school in about 40 + other states and I was alive at the time.

Since: Sep 07

Midlothian, Virginia

#950 Dec 14, 2008
Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Your reply is pure idiocy, but not surprising. You made a sweeping indictment of a group of people. Then, when questioned, it becomes a personal attack on the questioner. You obviously know narcissism.
You're toxic and assume way too much. People like you need to be kept at an arm's length before they bring everyone else down with them.

I can make sweeping indictments of whole groups of people - everyone does it all the time with Nazis, Communists, Fascists and Militant Homosexual activists. That is unless you have kind things to say about nazis, communists, fascists and militant homosexual activists. Hell, you'd probably attack someone for making a sweeping generalization about al-quaeda. Grow up.

Since: Sep 07

Midlothian, Virginia

#951 Dec 14, 2008
YukYukYuk wrote:
<quoted text>
What is a social conservative?
The black marriage rate is low.
The Baptist divorce rate is the highest of all religions.
Incidently, atheists and agnostics have the lowest divorce rates.
Black conservative leaders have been begging black men to take responsibility for their children.
Black single mothers are extremely common.
In what way are they conservative, besides being anti-gay?
Look up black church attendance. Surprisingly low.
Blacks don't buy off on homosexuality as readily as other groups of people. Keep in mind, they are being blamed by the homosexual community for swinging the vote in a way that got your collective panties in a knot.
Disgusted

Peotone, IL

#953 Dec 14, 2008
Motorhead Fan wrote:
<quoted text>You're toxic and assume way too much. People like you need to be kept at an arm's length before they bring everyone else down with them.
I can make sweeping indictments of whole groups of people - everyone does it all the time with Nazis, Communists, Fascists and Militant Homosexual activists. That is unless you have kind things to say about nazis, communists, fascists and militant homosexual activists. Hell, you'd probably attack someone for making a sweeping generalization about al-quaeda. Grow up.
I only criticized those making sweeping indictments, no one else. The only one needing to grow up here is you if you cannot take anyone questioning your statement. What do you think this forum is, a place for everyone to bow down and worship your words?

Since: Sep 07

Midlothian, Virginia

#954 Dec 14, 2008
StevenFL, I can't get over your hate and bigotry. You only want the first amendment to apply to your side, you want to make sweeping generalizations about people but can't handle them about your type.

You're just pathetic, but that's O.K., you're the one who has to live with it.

Now that you guys have been laying your souls bare and dispensing your anger, hate and prejudice, I am more convinced than ever that you guys are just as sick and loopy as pedophiles, necrophiles and people who have sex with animals. Really, after reading your sewage, you don't deserve to marry.
Disgusted

Peotone, IL

#956 Dec 14, 2008
StevenFL, I can't get over your hate and bigotry. You only want the first amendment to apply to your side, you want to make sweeping generalizations about people but can't handle them about your type.

Mr. Motorhead- what was that about sweeping generalizations, again?
Rose

Pacific Palisades, CA

#957 Dec 14, 2008
Motorhead Fan wrote:
<quoted text>I believe the Civil Rights act of 1964 would have passed had the general electorate been allowed to decide.

I know you want the Supreme Court to decide it - it's easier to get what you want that way - to hell with the electorate, right?
We should all have equal rights, even when that's not popular.
Motorhead Fan wrote:
Does your encyclopedia show the National Guard escorting black children to school in every state or just where George Wallace was governor? I don't remember the Guard escorting black children to school in about 40 + other states and I was alive at the time.
The fact it happened in even one place says a lot.
Timbo

Severn, MD

#958 Dec 14, 2008
People should have the right to go straight to hell if they so desire.
YukYukYuk

Staten Island, NY

#959 Dec 14, 2008
Motorhead Fan wrote:
Now that you guys have been laying your souls bare and dispensing your anger, hate and prejudice, I am more convinced than ever that you guys are just as sick and loopy as pedophiles, necrophiles and people who have sex with animals. Really, after reading your sewage, you don't deserve to marry.
Well, Well, Mr Motormouth, at last we see your soul too. Thanks for your honesty.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min fetch almighty 1,191,147
Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 3 min Pearl Jam 308,925
Veteran Democratic Sen. Mikulski won't seek re-... 4 min Sick of Politics 6
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Mon Namu Myoho Renge Kyo 19,633
Four shot in Hillen neighborhood of Northeast B... Sun Sad 1
In Maryland, economic angst breaks through the ... Sun Brad 1
Do you think global warming is here? Sun Brad 1
Baltimore Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Baltimore People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:36 am PST

Bleacher Report 8:36AM
Report: Jones Meeting with Bengals, Titans
Bleacher Report10:33 AM
Hampton Cut by Ravens Following DWI Arrest
NFL10:47 AM
Victor Hampton released by Ravens following arrest
Bleacher Report12:45 PM
Playmaking FS Headling Skins' Free Agency Big Board
Bleacher Report10:15 PM
Best Draft-Day Contingency Plans for Redskins