Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 315370 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315176 Nov 9, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
So it was murder before RvW. It was illegal killing back then. I guess God hasn't caught up with RvW. Where is the reason in killing the unborn baby at 20 weeks illegal and thekilling of the unborn baby at 19 weeks and six days legal?
No, it's never been considered murder, just an illegal medical procedure.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#315177 Nov 9, 2013
DAVID27 wrote:
<quoted text>
That's great. Did you know many believe that brown cows give chocolate milk?
What is a Catholic/pagan?
Ask a born-again Christian, hon. I'm not one of them.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#315178 Nov 9, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it's never been considered murder, just an illegal medical procedure.
That seems like an insufficient discription. What else would be an illegal medical procedure?

Killing a child at any age while still in the womb is "just" a medical procedure. And you don't think of yourself as pro abort.
katie

Spanaway, WA

#315179 Nov 9, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Why can you stand to have another point of view presented. Of course only your opinion counts when it comes to your life.
Is it a threat to you to read a differing view? It certainly isn't to me. You have visions and fears of people tearing down your rights and and forcing you into servitude. Defensive and on guard all the time. Don't women have everything they ever wanted now. What's the problem and the reason for the irrrationality?
Huh? Of course I welcome differing views. It's why I ask you questions. It's what I've been recommending to you, to accept differing views -- but you keep shooting these down and choosing to believe others or I am miserable or a victim or whatever you claim from one day to the next.

What's the problem? How about 100 laws focused on women's reproductive rights, but nothing for jobs jobs jobs? What's the reason for the irrationality? I'd say the Conservative GOP, specifically the Tea Party, and their push to have all American citizens believe and worship the Republican Jesus.
katie

Spanaway, WA

#315180 Nov 9, 2013
StopTheMadness wrote:
<quoted text>
You farkkin hypocrite!! YOU are the one who pees your depends whenever someone disagrees with your fawkin opinion! You think you're always right you arrogant cow!
It was another example of Ink's hypocrisy. She don't see it, though.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#315181 Nov 9, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? Of course I welcome differing views. It's why I ask you questions. It's what I've been recommending to you, to accept differing views -- but you keep shooting these down and choosing to believe others or I am miserable or a victim or whatever you claim from one day to the next.
What's the problem? How about 100 laws focused on women's reproductive rights, but nothing for jobs jobs jobs? What's the reason for the irrationality? I'd say the Conservative GOP, specifically the Tea Party, and their push to have all American citizens believe and worship the Republican Jesus.
You don't welcome other opinions. I can agree with every decision you have made for your life. You do complain a lot though so it seems you are not content with the state of things.

Can't you see that what you call 'women's reproductive rights' is what others call killing unborn babies and some people think they need to try and stop the killing at least after a certain point.

And yes, it is irrational to think that republicans are trying to make you worship Jesus.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315182 Nov 9, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
That seems like an insufficient discription. What else would be an illegal medical procedure?
Killing a child at any age while still in the womb is "just" a medical procedure. And you don't think of yourself as pro abort.
I don't consider myself one, because I'm not one, and you misstating my position doesn't mean otherwise.
katie

Spanaway, WA

#315183 Nov 9, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't welcome other opinions. I can agree with every decision you have made for your life. You do complain a lot though so it seems you are not content with the state of things.
If I didn't welcome others' opinions, I would not try to engage others in conversation. I would not try to understand others' perspectives or experiences even though I lack the same experience or circumstances. If I didn't welcome others' opinions, I would be just like you. Do you think I'm just like you?
Can't you see that what you call 'women's reproductive rights' is what others call killing unborn babies and some people think they need to try and stop the killing at least after a certain point.
And yes, it is irrational to think that republicans are trying to make you worship Jesus.
Can't you see "women's reproductive rights" includes more than induced abortion? When I say "reproductive rights" I am talking about the whole shebang, not just induced abortion or what you insist on wrongly calling, "killing unborn babies".

Induced abortion ends unwanted/unhealthy pregnancy by the removal of an embryo/fetus. Most of these take place at 8wks gestation. Your insistence this is equivalent to infanticide shows me you would rather believe in a false premise than reality.

But then I remember you're the one who recently claimed that your blind faith and opinions were facts and our scientific, medical, legal facts merely opinions.

How you got "Republicans trying to make you worship Jesus" from what I posted is clearly beyond me. So there's no response.

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#315184 Nov 9, 2013
"sassyjm" brayed
There are many reasons that people come to the conclusion that there is no God.

I guess being smart enough to know that you don't need an imaginary fried would be the top reason
Ink

Havertown, PA

#315185 Nov 9, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
If I didn't welcome others' opinions, I would not try to engage others in conversation. I would not try to understand others' perspectives or experiences even though I lack the same experience or circumstances. If I didn't welcome others' opinions, I would be just like you. Do you think I'm just like you?
<quoted text>
Can't you see "women's reproductive rights" includes more than induced abortion? When I say "reproductive rights" I am talking about the whole shebang, not just induced abortion or what you insist on wrongly calling, "killing unborn babies".
Induced abortion ends unwanted/unhealthy pregnancy by the removal of an embryo/fetus. Most of these take place at 8wks gestation. Your insistence this is equivalent to infanticide shows me you would rather believe in a false premise than reality.
But then I remember you're the one who recently claimed that your blind faith and opinions were facts and our scientific, medical, legal facts merely opinions.
How you got "Republicans trying to make you worship Jesus" from what I posted is clearly beyond me. So there's no response.
No you wouldn't be like me anymore than I could be like you.

To be honest the only woman's right in question is abortion which does mean the intentional killing of an unwanted fetus, which looks like a baby. After five weeks we know if it is a son or a daughter. I think the reality of the act is clear.

I don't think I ever claimed to have 'blind faith but I do believe in God and that doesn't contradict science.

I will go back and read your comment about Jesus.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#315186 Nov 9, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>How you got "Republicans trying to make you worship Jesus" from what I posted is clearly beyond me. So there's no response.
You said:

I'd say the Conservative GOP, specifically the Tea Party, and their push to have all American citizens believe and worship the Republican Jesus.

Care to explain what you meant?
katie

Spanaway, WA

#315187 Nov 9, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You said:
I'd say the Conservative GOP, specifically the Tea Party, and their push to have all American citizens believe and worship the Republican Jesus.
Care to explain what you meant?
The push behind the hundred or so laws aimed at reducing/removing women's reproductive rights comes from a few different sources/resources. You would need to reference Republican Jesus and know this is the antithesis of Jesus to get what I said. Then you'd have to research the Tea Party and the Koch brothers since they're the money behind the Tea Party to get what I said. Oh, and of course have a good understanding of what the PLM is and why it was created.

Since NAP has already posted a link on the Republican Jesus and others have posted links on the Tea Party and the Koch brothers, I figured you'd had the opportunity to read about it and understand it. I also figured you had a good understanding of the PLM and its push behind all these new laws which also include trying to deny birth control by shutting down Planned Parenthood. Since you're so open to others' opinions and all.

Guess not, eh?
Ink

Havertown, PA

#315188 Nov 9, 2013
katie wrote:
<quoted text>
The push behind the hundred or so laws aimed at reducing/removing women's reproductive rights comes from a few different sources/resources. You would need to reference Republican Jesus and know this is the antithesis of Jesus to get what I said. Then you'd have to research the Tea Party and the Koch brothers since they're the money behind the Tea Party to get what I said. Oh, and of course have a good understanding of what the PLM is and why it was created.
Since NAP has already posted a link on the Republican Jesus and others have posted links on the Tea Party and the Koch brothers, I figured you'd had the opportunity to read about it and understand it. I also figured you had a good understanding of the PLM and its push behind all these new laws which also include trying to deny birth control by shutting down Planned Parenthood. Since you're so open to others' opinions and all.
Guess not, eh?
Sorry don't know anything about a republican Jesus. Sounds silly to me.

I thought Obamacare was going to take care of all women's health problems.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315189 Nov 9, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you funny! You misquoted Morgana on the prior page by attributing Ink's quoted words to Morgana (about Ink claiming men came from God, women from men). I know, I know... it's "different" when you do it. Right?
Riiight! LOLOL
*sigh* What are you talking about? I didn't do anything of the such. Go back and reread what I said.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#315190 Nov 9, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry don't know anything about a republican Jesus. Sounds silly to me.
I thought Obamacare was going to take care of all women's health problems.
Well, that was rather stupid of you, wasn't it, since no one has ever made such a claim. Since when does healthcare coverage "take care of" one's health problems? It's not medicine, you know.

You are so stupid, it sits on you like a second skin.

Why are you here?
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315191 Nov 9, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
How is an embryo or fetus an "existing,developing child"? These are not United States citizens. These are not even part of the species of homo sapiens yet. Not until birth. Birth is the magic wand, JM. Why are you trying to change it? What's in it for you?
What's an abortion Katie? It is a procedure that ends the life of a womans developing,existing offspring in the womb. A pregnancy means that she conceived her offspring.It's a new unique life in there.

Birth is part of the process of a humans life journey.

You dehumanize to suit your selfish agenda. You give me the chills. You're very evil to the core Katie. Your daughter had your granddaughter in her belly not long ago. I bet a million dollars that all found out that "it" was a girl and got super excited when you got the chance to feel "her" move and kick,and see her grow bigger and bigger.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315192 Nov 9, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Morgana posted words from the Bible. She didn't finish the verse to make it look different than the real meaning.
Exactly,and that is why I was trying to clarify what she "thought" that it meant(that only man came from God and not women). Of course we all know the story about how God took mans rib to create a woman.
feces for jesus

Thiells, NY

#315193 Nov 9, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>*sigh* What are you talking about? I didn't do anything of the such. Go back and reread what I said.
To think, it was only a year ago that you were on here whining that gas was scarce in NY as you "drove through towns under water".

We've yet to see any proof of your James Bond-like car that car drive you through towns under water.
sassyjm

Cresskill, NJ

#315194 Nov 9, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
No doubt the only god paul was working for, was the god of this world satan. All the while he "thought" he was doing the work of the only true God.
Many many today fill the pulpits, and church pew that are doing the same thing. They may not be as extreme as paul was, but they are still working for satan, while thinking they are working for God.
If God came back and pulled all of His children out on a Sun morning around 11 am, there would be many many "churches "full of people left behind, and never missing a word of singing amazing grace :(
See,I've been saying that I don't think that he "thought" he was doing the work of the only true God. What he was doing was self-centered and violent and that can't be passed off as "doing the work of the the only true God". He was deceived and deceived himself. God came along and gave him truth.

As far as the rest of your post,I can agree on most definately, but that also goes for those who believe they are praising God but not obeying his Holy word and commandments while avoiding his church(which Jesus established and set up while on earth.)
Ink

Havertown, PA

#315195 Nov 9, 2013
sassyjm wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly,and that is why I was trying to clarify what she "thought" that it meant(that only man came from God and not women). Of course we all know the story about how God took mans rib to create a woman.
They aren't having a good day if they don't call me a liar several times, especially Bitner.

Do you know anything about a republican Jesus?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 11 min RoxLo 1,567,797
Mace Electric's Dick Colon raped an 11-year-old... (Jun '13) 13 hr TBD 67
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 14 hr Dave spano 21,017
News 15 homeless single moms in Osceola get housing ... (Dec '08) Wed sweetpea 25
Capital sex offender free in Baltimore. (May '15) Jul 22 COCO4U 40
News Bristol Man Injured In Scooter, Car Collision (Jun '08) Jul 20 Tonysidotijr 12
News More than 30 BoatHouse Canton employees leave a... Jul 20 Mister Jeremy 2

Baltimore Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Baltimore Mortgages