Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 313231 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Ink

Havertown, PA

#312730 Oct 6, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said the flood itself was a myth. I said the Noah story was a myth...and you know that so try to keep on track.
I never mentioned Noah.
Many days ago Feces asked me, "where is the evidence of your world wide flood?" I answered;

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/evidence-sug...

Meaning that there is evidence of a major flood which may have seemed world wide to the ancient peoples. That's all.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312731 Oct 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you did.
What "reasoning"? About what? All I said is that no one is trying to change "the" meaning of the word marriage, because there isn't, nor has there ever been, just one meaning. That has been proven.
Who made such an argument? I haven't seen it.
Fine show me an older dictionary that describes two men or to women in a sexual relationship as a marriage. My Webster's Dictionary from 1968 doesn't have that definition.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312732 Oct 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Fine show me an older dictionary that describes two men or to women in a sexual relationship as a marriage. My Webster's Dictionary from 1968 doesn't have that definition.
That was never the argument. Why must you be so dishonest? Your OWN source showed proof of my ACTUAL argument, in fact. It listed more than one definition. You dishonestly didn't provide a link to that source, or copy and paste the other definitions, but they were there.
Katie

Pacific, WA

#312733 Oct 6, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink is slipping into her Deliberately Obtuse mode and is now bastardizing everything I wrote. And that is why civil discussions don't seem to progress with her.
Yes, agree, LNM.
It gets tiring.
Katie

Pacific, WA

#312734 Oct 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
No I didn't. Why would I compare them? They are very different. The only connection was that posters said homosexuality goes back to ancient times therefore gay marriage is acceptable and I said so do incestuous relationships and pedophilia for that matter. So why does that prove that any of these acts are acceptable.
Personally I could care less about gay marriage but your reasoning has holes in it. Just do it because you want to.
Wait a minute here! You said modern day LGBT *changed* the definition of marriage from one man marrying one woman. And you were shown the many different philosophies of marriage, the different definitions of marriage going all the way back to ancient times. You forget why? You asked for proof of it going back 25yrs or more. So you got the proof.

See, your post above is an attempt to change the parameters of your own argument. That is deceitful. That's why you get called on being "less than honest".
Katie

Pacific, WA

#312736 Oct 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I never mentioned Noah.
Many days ago Feces asked me, "where is the evidence of your world wide flood?" I answered;
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/evidence-sug...
Meaning that there is evidence of a major flood which may have seemed world wide to the ancient peoples. That's all.
Nobody said a flood didn't happen around the Black Sea around 5, 6, 7 thousand years ago. Nobody was arguing about floods. The argument was specifically about Noah's flood. Based on your responses. Like the one where you claimed you believed God meant it when he said there would be no more floods of that proportion. Only trouble with that is, scientists are studying old evidence of ancient tsunamis. And we've all heard and seen the destruction of the recent tsunamis in this very decade. That tells me nature determined the force of flooding, not the will of God. That's why the story of Noah's Flood, and the similar stories told by other peoples in other cultures during different times, were told as ways to explain what must have been beyond their knowledge at the time.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312737 Oct 6, 2013
Husker Du wrote:
<quoted text>You are a complete jackwagon.
Whatever THAT bit of redneck phraseology means.

You ARE a liar. You admitted as much.

“GO BLACKHAWKS!!”

Since: Dec 07

Home of Lord Stanley!

#312738 Oct 6, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
Good morning everyone,
Going to my grand,daughter BD party ..little miracle BABY..
MY son's,daughter after many miscarried.
Anyhow got me thinking
Want to SHARE,something really neat for Cristmas,with my friends here for
YOUNG KIDS
LET ME HIGHLY RECOMMEND
ELF ON A SHELF
http://www.bedbathandbeyond.com/store/search/...
He it she comes before,Christmas,from the north pole (they have a tv half hour movie )
Goes back each night to report to Santa,if kids,are good.
Shows up wen kids,wake up ...different shelf .
Kids,HAVE fun looking for it ...
Goes,back home Christmas,eve ...till next year .
Oh the kids,name it too !!!!
Found it last year#!!!
I sent from Amazon ..so it came from North pole,..video and book ..
They have,boy and girl ...different races ..
Wish I had thought of it
Here,are,some videos.
http://www.bing.com/search...
GOD,BLESS you all ..
Hey Rose! Good to see you. My niece got Elf on the Shelf for Christmas and she loves it. She loves to put it in different places. She thinks it's hilarious when she puts it in the bathroom and one of us discovers it, lol. I hope all is well with you.:o)
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312739 Oct 6, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Wait a minute here! You said modern day LGBT *changed* the definition of marriage from one man marrying one woman. And you were shown the many different philosophies of marriage, the different definitions of marriage going all the way back to ancient times. You forget why? You asked for proof of it going back 25yrs or more. So you got the proof.
See, your post above is an attempt to change the parameters of your own argument. That is deceitful. That's why you get called on being "less than honest".
The dictionary definition.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312740 Oct 6, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody said a flood didn't happen around the Black Sea around 5, 6, 7 thousand years ago. Nobody was arguing about floods. The argument was specifically about Noah's flood. Based on your responses. Like the one where you claimed you believed God meant it when he said there would be no more floods of that proportion. Only trouble with that is, scientists are studying old evidence of ancient tsunamis. And we've all heard and seen the destruction of the recent tsunamis in this very decade. That tells me nature determined the force of flooding, not the will of God. That's why the story of Noah's Flood, and the similar stories told by other peoples in other cultures during different times, were told as ways to explain what must have been beyond their knowledge at the time.
Isn't amazing, that she's so stupid, she thinks she can pretend she wasn't talking about Noah? Just like she wanted to pretend that she wasn't talking about women having abortions when she said "death at someone else's whim".

She's lying like a rug.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312741 Oct 6, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody said a flood didn't happen around the Black Sea around 5, 6, 7 thousand years ago. Nobody was arguing about floods. The argument was specifically about Noah's flood. Based on your responses. Like the one where you claimed you believed God meant it when he said there would be no more floods of that proportion. Only trouble with that is, scientists are studying old evidence of ancient tsunamis. And we've all heard and seen the destruction of the recent tsunamis in this very decade. That tells me nature determined the force of flooding, not the will of God. That's why the story of Noah's Flood, and the similar stories told by other peoples in other cultures during different times, were told as ways to explain what must have been beyond their knowledge at the time.
They may be studing old sunamis but that is quite different than the flood that stayed and changed the landscape.

I think that it is just fine that you don't see the hand of God in anything. I am not trying to convince you. It isn't neccessary.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312742 Oct 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
That was never the argument. Why must you be so dishonest? Your OWN source showed proof of my ACTUAL argument, in fact. It listed more than one definition. You dishonestly didn't provide a link to that source, or copy and paste the other definitions, but they were there.
You can think that the definition of marriage in the dictionary included same sex unions back to the first printed dictionary if you want. If you believe it, then it must be true.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312743 Oct 6, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, agree, LNM.
It gets tiring.
No it is just a pain in the butt when you insist on making your meaning, my meaning. If you are still talking about the flood, all I said was that scientists say that there was one 5,000 years ago and it was one of a kind.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312744 Oct 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You can think that the definition of marriage in the dictionary included same sex unions back to the first printed dictionary if you want. If you believe it, then it must be true.
My argument never specified dictionary entries. Given that the concept predates dictionaries, why would I do so?
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312745 Oct 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't amazing, that she's so stupid, she thinks she can pretend she wasn't talking about Noah? Just like she wanted to pretend that she wasn't talking about women having abortions when she said "death at someone else's whim".
She's lying like a rug.
I will answer you again. I believe there is somethingf in the story of Noah's Ark. That doesn't mean I take it literally. But something catastrophic happened and not everyone survived. Do I believe that God was involved? Yes, but I believe that He is involved in everything. My first response on this subject was to point out 'only' that there was evidence for a real flood and it might not be mythology.

Someone said gays face death daily due to someone else's whim. I said everybody faces death daily according to someone else's whim. We see it everyday with random shootings and killings. We also see see it everyday when a woman chooses to abort her child. For any child conceived, her life depends on the whim of her mother.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312746 Oct 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
My argument never specified dictionary entries. Given that the concept predates dictionaries, why would I do so?
My argument was all about the dictionary definition. If you are honest you will see that it has recently changed to include same sex couples.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312747 Oct 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
The dictionary definition.
You said nothing about the dictionary at first, either.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312748 Oct 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
My argument was all about the dictionary definition. If you are honest you will see that it has recently changed to include same sex couples.
No, your original whine didn't specify the dictionary, either.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#312749 Oct 6, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I will answer you again. I believe there is somethingf in the story of Noah's Ark. That doesn't mean I take it literally. But something catastrophic happened and not everyone survived. Do I believe that God was involved? Yes, but I believe that He is involved in everything. My first response on this subject was to point out 'only' that there was evidence for a real flood and it might not be mythology.
Someone said gays face death daily due to someone else's whim. I said everybody faces death daily according to someone else's whim. We see it everyday with random shootings and killings. We also see see it everyday when a woman chooses to abort her child. For any child conceived, her life depends on the whim of her mother.
You just proved me right, thank you.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#312751 Oct 6, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, your original whine didn't specify the dictionary, either.
It was a comment not a whine and at least one other poster gave me several modern dictionary definitions. One poster even said that is how dictionaries evolve. So everyone but you knew I was talking about the dictionary. Not unusual.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Badjudgment 1,483,435
News Faces Drug Charges (Aug '08) Sun Mt Vernon Rd resi... 15
News Baltimore shootings up 30 percent compared to t... Sat red dawn 2
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Sat Well Well 20,775
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) Jan 19 truth 7,994
Mosby Jan 18 Johnathan T 4
News DUI Defendant Drinks 12-Pack at Court - (Oct '07) Jan 17 Dudley 47

Baltimore Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Baltimore Mortgages