Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 309875 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#291621 Apr 2, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
True. As far as I'M concerned, it's THEIR hell. Let them burn in it.
They have to live their lives in fear of a punitive God...sounds like they're in their hell already.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#291625 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
She made it easy for you but all she said was nothing in scripture has come to pass. I showed you where it has.
You can buy what she says hook line and sinker but it is a stupid conversation to have with you because you don't believe anything in Judaism either. Dead man walking.
You showed me nothing but a link to a list that I was supposed to "cross-reference" to numerous scriptures that was supposed to keep me busy "for a week" blah blah...
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#291626 Apr 2, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
What???
My post was quite clear. You said abortion should be illegal because it ends a human life. I said that spontaneous abortion would also be included in that, were it to actually happen. Such a blanket statement/desire should be carefully phrased.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#291627 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
What you don't grasp is that I have no interest whatsoever in what Jews or atheists think of my religion. Christianity isn't going away and I have plenty of people to discuss it with.
Oooo...Ink is gonna snatch up her toys and storm off the playground in a huff.

Newsflash Ink...I don't care if you fundies think I'm going to burn in your mythical hell while your mythical God looks on.

Life is a 2 way street.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#291628 Apr 2, 2013
How cute. prove it.
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
<quoted text>
Regressive liberalism, the sexual revolution, abortion, the dog of zion, is why so many people have std's you fool!
feces for jesus

Westbury, NY

#291629 Apr 2, 2013
Correction:

if that were to actually happen
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291630 Apr 2, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oooo...Ink is gonna snatch up her toys and storm off the playground in a huff.
Newsflash Ink...I don't care if you fundies think I'm going to burn in your mythical hell while your mythical God looks on.
Life is a 2 way street.
I wasn't criticizing atheism or Judaism. I wouldn't do that.

I also don't give any thought to your life here or after you die.
You don't seem to be able to understand that you aren't important to me nor is what you think about God or religion. Hope this isn't a letdown to you.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#291631 Apr 2, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not like suspected child abuse, where the reporting is mandatory. They did an inspection for their own purposes, the clinic didn't meet the criteria, so they didn't grant them membership. They are not a state reporting agency, they merely have a membership of clinics that meet their own standards to recommend to women who call looking. It's really simple. Did the inspector tell her immediate superiors in the NAF? Because I don't remember if any article ever said. Did she, or anyone at the NAF KNOW that the clinic was NOT being inspected by the state? She wants to pretend they are just as culpable as the state when they are not, and can't let go of this particular bone. And when she began, she was trying to use it to "prove" that PCers don't really care about women, implying that our "leadership" (the NAF) doesn't really care, and we weren't taking them to task for it here on Topix, that's all.
The Gosnell clinic isn't a model if the typical abortion provider. Period. I don't care what these fanatics think.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291632 Apr 2, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
You showed me nothing but a link to a list that I was supposed to "cross-reference" to numerous scriptures that was supposed to keep me busy "for a week" blah blah...
No problem.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#291633 Apr 2, 2013
I would argue that life is a 4-way stop where everyone believes they have right of way.
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oooo...Ink is gonna snatch up her toys and storm off the playground in a huff.
Newsflash Ink...I don't care if you fundies think I'm going to burn in your mythical hell while your mythical God looks on.
Life is a 2 way street.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#291634 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you have to support the rights of the one being killed.
I was interested in Susanm's opinion, specifically. Thanks for your input, though.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#291636 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
The laws change.
And, people's personal religious beliefs will still not be relevant in the making of those laws. You should agree with that, since you don't care about anyone else's religions. Correct?

Do you even bother to read posts, or do you just pop off, half-cocked, every time?
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291638 Apr 2, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>I was interested in Susanm's opinion, specifically. Thanks for your input, though.
I am too.

You're welcome.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#291639 Apr 2, 2013
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting. If this is true, then you can't blame the RCC for the rapes that were committed by their priests, because what is told to them in confidence, for example the confessional, they would not be legally bound to report.
You can blame the NAF for anything you want. I also think the NAF had an ethical obligation to report that clinic to the state. You stated that the NAF is "criminally responsible." I'm wondering if you can prove that a law was broken by the organization. There's a difference between an ethical responsibility and a legal responsibility.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291640 Apr 2, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
I would argue that life is a 4-way stop where everyone believes they have right of way.
<quoted text>
A four way stop has an order.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#291641 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I can take anything you can dish out.
You've already demonstrated that you can't. Too late to flex your muscles, big mama:-)

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#291642 Apr 2, 2013
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
<quoted text>
Like any queer is qualified to speak of any parenting since either so called relationship lacks the proper 'balance and structure' that only a male and female can provide. More importantly, all children, when the state is involved, should be provided and afforded the basic human rights to a FEMALE mother for compassion, nurtuting, and bonding that ONLY a female mother can provide in the child's most indelible years of their lives. It has already been proven detrimental in a 'single' parent home, which is a same sex home, since there is no opposite sex.
Judas is the devil.
No one is talking about parenting or sexual orientation, you nutjob.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#291643 Apr 2, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
My post was quite clear. You said abortion should be illegal because it ends a human life. I said that spontaneous abortion would also be included in that, were it to actually happen. Such a blanket statement/desire should be carefully phrased.
Do we really have to go back to the difference between being killed and dying arguement again?
Katie

Spanaway, WA

#291644 Apr 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I wasn't criticizing atheism or Judaism. I wouldn't do that.
I also don't give any thought to your life here or after you die.
You don't seem to be able to understand that you aren't important to me nor is what you think about God or religion. Hope this isn't a letdown to you.
You don't give any thought to other people's freedom, either.

Probably explains how you can justify (to yourself at least) stealing all American women's civil rights out from under them like a thief in the night.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#291645 Apr 2, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>You've already demonstrated that you can't. Too late to flex your muscles, big mama:-)
Whatever

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min Grey Ghost 1,232,878
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 22 min Chuck 19,925
News Hampden's Alchemy opening restaurant in Bel Air 4 hr Rachael 2
News Let Freedom Ring 10 hr Local 4
News Tom Brady suspended four games, Patriots lose d... Sun tom wingo 45
News Thousands storm Baltimore streets in protest ca... Sun Lisa 598
News Homicides in Baltimore up 40% Sun TheTruthHurts 3
More from around the web

Baltimore People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]