Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 309974 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“qui tacet consentire ”

Since: Oct 12

Detroit

#284386 Feb 17, 2013
feces for jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
You're insane. You think your baseless opinions about the world are facts. Too bad you don't research anything before opening your big, fat mouth.
Many other people from other cultures can speak of their personal experience with God, just like you. And if their God is not the same as yours, do you think that makes their experience invalid? Remeber, you're the dimwit who talks about Hindus worshipping cows when that is total BS. Seems like you're the as$hat making Gods up in an effort to devalue other religions and their beliefs.
Wait a minute moron, your name, "Feces for Jesus" is disrespectful and intolerant of other's beliefs. You rant about bible thumpers yet you're no different in your attack on their beliefs. What makes you think your beliefs, or understanding, is so superior to others that you offer "feces" to theirs? You're just an intolerant, hypocritical POS, no different than those you hate.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284387 Feb 17, 2013
Guppy is a raging homophobe and seems genuinely unaware that the rest of the world no longr lives in the 1950's. She'll say incredibly idiotic things and whine when her errors are pointed out.

My parents prized education more than probably any other factor. They encouraged us to learn things even if they weren't career-oriented, and to question anything that seemed incongruous.

I'm not sure they allow "take a child to work" day in medical facilities these days, but I can imagine it: "Now, honey, this is called a speculum--can you pronounce that? Now, you aren't going to BELIEVE what Mommy is going to do with this..."
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, <quoted text>
Wow, Cptr (and back atcha), is Guppy pouting because your post wasn't linked? I saw it, read it, and thought how similar it was to my own childhood. We had a big family. Most the women were educated and worked as nurses. Sometimes I even went to work with my mom or gramma. Probably wouldn't be legal these days, though.
Do you think Guppy's ever had anyone's real respect?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284388 Feb 17, 2013
Neither has microsoft...
Katie wrote:
oops! ignore SB's post up there with Cptr's. not sure how it got there. haven't quite figured out all the bugs in Windows 8 yet.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284389 Feb 17, 2013
So "guppy" is your real name?
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you so afraid to use your real name? Is it a boys name?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284390 Feb 17, 2013
If government would get out of the way of cloning research, we probably could grow hearts and other body parts.
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you want them to? Things are being done in labs that the public never hears about...so who knows?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284391 Feb 17, 2013
Katie and I are the same person? That's news to me.
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Peter seems to be having a melt down. It's OK. Things will get better, they always do. Even for someone as mean as you.
Don't take your unhappiness out on other people. Learn to deal with it on your own.
Katie and Peter are the same people. It doesn't matter to me. They don't fool anyone.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#284392 Feb 17, 2013
I've had an internet stalker, back when I was young and naive and using my real name. Never again. My posting name is a permutation of elements in my real name, and I had someone actually look up a "c peter" in Indianapolis, which of course wasn't me.
Eddie M wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not prudent for people to be giving out full names on such a forum. Maybe you wouldn't stalk people, as you say, but there may be others who might so last names should not be given or solicited.
Ocean56

AOL

#284393 Feb 17, 2013
SapphireBlue wrote:
Are you, too, getting tired of this president continually talking about women as if any of us ever thought we were second-class citizens before he came on the scene? What's up with that? Even feminists are starting to say knock it off, Mr. President.
Nope, I'm not tired of the President speaking up for women at all. The regressive Republicans are the ones who think women are second-class citizens. They make that obvious whenever they come up with new ways to restrict abortion rights for women who WANT them.

So which feminists are saying "knock it off, Mr. President?" Specifics would be helpful.
Ocean56

AOL

#284394 Feb 17, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
What exactly is your problem? You are on here using a made up name while complaining that we are too. You're starting to act creepish and too interested in our personal information.
Exactly. People who solicit PERSONAL information really creep me out. It's NONE of their bleeping business.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#284395 Feb 17, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are saying I'm dumb and you're smart, and that if anyone does an internet search about hindus worship cows, then absolutely no websights will say that SOME hindus DO worship cows, correct?
If you googled "Hindu's worship cows" and ignored the first dozen pages where effectively EVERY site acknowledges that they do NOT worship cows - then yes, you're dumb. Worse - you're being DELIBERATELY dumb.

If you recall, this is what many have tried to tell you - you ignore what you're being told and being shown, in your strange quest to alienate posters.

THe very first link that comes up, says:

http://www.religionfacts.com/hinduism/things/...

"Hindus do not worship the cow"

The second site listed - a Hindu site - says:

http://www.nhsf.org.uk/index.php...

"Hindus don't worship cows. We respect, honour and adore the cow. By honouring this gentle animal, who gives more than she takes, we honour all creatures.

Hindus regard all living creatures as sacred - mammals, fishes, birds and more. We acknowledge this reverence for life in our special affection for the cow. At festivals we decorate and honour her, but we do not worship her in the sense that we worship the Deity."

This is not unlike your attempts to demean and dimminish other's views of their faiths. Perhaps you should become familiar with the Nostra Aetate in which the Vatican affirms the validity of other faiths.

In your own stubbornness, you not only alienate posters, you alienate your own faith.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#284396 Feb 17, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course now the basta@rd has to actually see the post.
When I brought up one of Doc's past eff-ups he told me to forget the past. Funny coming from him, doncha think?
Now ? Didn't the "bastard" see the post originally and have it removed ? The bastard's just seeing it NOW ? Make up your mind. Which is it ?

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#284397 Feb 17, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously my posts existed so your claims that I didn't answer you, or that it's my "MO" to leave your questions unanswered, was quite wrong. Again you forget how I tracked down one of my past posts answering one of your questions that you claimed I didn't answer, and proved you wrong back then.
What we really have is your "MO" of claiming your questions are going unanswered...and being wrong.
You were wrong that first time you claimed I didn't answer your question, and I proved it by digging up my unanswered post.
You were clearly wrong this time when you claimed I didn't answer your current question, as you well know.
You were wrong when you claimed I didn't provide the post number when you asked for it.
And you were wrong with the whole "took the bait/it wasn't bait per se" debacle.
What we have is a clear pattern of you being wrong quite often.
I can only go by what I see. If the alleged answer to my post is not visible to me, how am I to know you actually did answer ?
Only in hindsight, in consideration of evidence of post removal, will I admit I was wrong. But I'll never apologize for having said I never saw the posts....because I never did.
Obviously you were wrong about me removing the posts. So it appears there is enough wrong to go around for everyone.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#284398 Feb 17, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, their paranoid ideas about all that displayed just how irrational the PC nutcases are. Not once did they consider any rational explanation. It went stupid to completely irrational in 1 sec flat.
Logic would have told them, certain people here are not afraid to respond to posts. Why would they think others would report them and have their posts removed, and for the reasons they suggested? Because that's what they would do, and those would be the reasons why.
True. Haven't some of them actually admitted to reporting posts and trying to get some PL's bounced ?
I've demonstrated nothing but a willingness to answer and answer directly any question directed at me. Certainly cannot say the same for others ( Bitter, Tinker Bell, etc ). Now all of a sudden I'm going to be the one having posts removed ?
feces for jesus

Bellmore, NY

#284399 Feb 17, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are saying I'm dumb and you're smart, and that if anyone does an internet search about hindus worship cows, then absolutely no websights will say that SOME hindus DO worship cows, correct?
No, I said you're insane. You blab on and on about things you don't know about, like starving children and hindus worshipping cows. Then again, the American use of the word worship has swayed from it's original meaning, but you wouldn't care to know about any of that either.

Maybe you can find a blog by a religous nut, like yourself, that says that Hindus worship cows, but that still won't be true. Do you ever check your sources or are do you just believe whatever you read...... as long as it fits into your world view and your beliefs?

Perhaps a very small percentage of Hindus might worship a cow. It's not as if I am in the Hindu nation taking a census of each person. I will not rule out the possibility. This is called keeping an open mind; something you know very little about.
feces for jesus

Bellmore, NY

#284400 Feb 17, 2013
The Prince wrote:
<quoted text>
eYt here you are promoting your pagan hate for all Chrisitians. They love you and pray for you. You are undeserving but that is waht Chrsitians do. You are a pagan and will never understand that. Satan has you now.
awwww, poor baby Tom Tom doesn't like people questioning the BS in his religion. Go cry to your zombie god, nancyboy.
Anonymous

United States

#284401 Feb 17, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
If you googled "Hindu's worship cows" and ignored the first dozen pages where effectively EVERY site acknowledges that they do NOT worship cows - then yes, you're dumb. Worse - you're being DELIBERATELY dumb.
If you recall, this is what many have tried to tell you - you ignore what you're being told and being shown, in your strange quest to alienate posters.
THe very first link that comes up, says:
http://www.religionfacts.com/hinduism/things/...
"Hindus do not worship the cow"
The second site listed - a Hindu site - says:
http://www.nhsf.org.uk/index.php...
"Hindus don't worship cows. We respect, honour and adore the cow. By honouring this gentle animal, who gives more than she takes, we honour all creatures.
Hindus regard all living creatures as sacred - mammals, fishes, birds and more. We acknowledge this reverence for life in our special affection for the cow. At festivals we decorate and honour her, but we do not worship her in the sense that we worship the Deity."
This is not unlike your attempts to demean and dimminish other's views of their faiths. Perhaps you should become familiar with the Nostra Aetate in which the Vatican affirms the validity of other faiths.
In your own stubbornness, you not only alienate posters, you alienate your own faith.
Yes, but feces keeps bringing up the hindus, when I always said "SOME " worship cows. If you go past many post you get to some.

I don't view religion, like hair styles, and that what ever works for you is fine.
I've always viewed religion as either a way to save mankind from what he deserves or it was fake. I just went for years thinking anyone who worshipped anything was an idiot, and was taught to believe the garbage.
(IT IS NOW MY OPINION) based on what I experienced personaly, that their is a God, and one God. I also believe in the word of God as the bible, not the quran or book of mormans, etc.

If someone would like to tell me about their faith in their god, then that would be great, but so far all I've been getting from (MOST), is people who claim to not to believe in any god, but wants to tell me all about my God.
feces for jesus

Bellmore, NY

#284402 Feb 17, 2013
_Bad Axe wrote:
<quoted text>Wait a minute moron, your name, "Feces for Jesus" is disrespectful and intolerant of other's beliefs. You rant about bible thumpers yet you're no different in your attack on their beliefs. What makes you think your beliefs, or understanding, is so superior to others that you offer "feces" to theirs? You're just an intolerant, hypocritical POS, no different than those you hate.
Thing is, I don't come on here ranting about what I believe as if it is absolute truth. If I choose to call out religious wackos on their BS, and you don't like it.... then too bad.

Feces for jesus is here: Please enjoy


oh, and go eff yourself.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#284403 Feb 17, 2013
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Appreciated.
Would it be fair to say your use of the "legal strict definition of viability" could become practically limitless, as medical technology advances.
Theoretically I guess so. I believe even the SC in Casey vs PP acknowledged that the limits of viability were moving earlier in pregnancies as medical technology advanced.
But something like an artificial womb would change everything...and not just the concept of viability. Abortion would likely not even be an issue anymore.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#284404 Feb 17, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, but feces keeps bringing up the hindus, when I always said "SOME " worship cows. If you go past many post you get to some.
No, you NEVER get to any that say "some" worship cows, since by their faith's belief, THEY DO NOT WORSHIP COWS.

Period.

You may have found sites by morons that are making that claim, but since its NOT a factual claim, its simply more bullshit on the internet.

If you bothered to actally try to LEARN something about that faith, you'd know that to be true, and stop tying to DEMEAN THEIR FAITH by ignoring the facts.

You're so busy trying to invalidate OTHERS faiths, you're ignoring the facts.

AGAIN, this is what you claimed you would "try" not to do anymore, yet you're not even trying, you're just repeating the same bullshit and trying to justify it.
If someone would like to tell me about their faith in their god, then that would be great, but so far all I've been getting from (MOST), is people who claim to not to believe in any god, but wants to tell me all about my God.
You're lying. Again. I personally have tried to tell you about MY faith, the Jewish faith, and you've ignored it. Numerous times. In fact, you've tried to deman the Jewish faith in the process. You're ignoring everything you're being shown about the Hindu religions, you've ignored everything STO and others have tried to speak to you about regarding THEIR Christian faith, because YOU dont like it and dont believe in it.

Because YOU dont believe in it doesn't invalidate the facts about their beliefs. But AGAIN, you're so busy ignoring what you dont like, you miss the big picture.

Why am I NOT shocked that you're not only incapable of learning something new, but that you dont practice what you preach?

When it comes to faith, its not about YOU, its about the INDIVIDUAL.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#284405 Feb 17, 2013
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
Theoretically I guess so. I believe even the SC in Casey vs PP acknowledged that the limits of viability were moving earlier in pregnancies as medical technology advanced.
But something like an artificial womb would change everything...and not just the concept of viability. Abortion would likely not even be an issue anymore.
I have to respectfully disagree. Abortion would certainly be an issue, because there are women that wouldn't want to have their ZEF transplanted. It would open another option, but it wouldn't eliminate many of the issues themselves.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Grey Ghostmoron 1,236,029
News Homicides in Baltimore up 40% 36 min Right Wing 16
News Thousands storm Baltimore streets in protest ca... 2 hr Bam 653
News Baltimore police ID latest homicide victims 3 hr reality is a crutch 1
Al Sharpton claims to be a roachologists 9 hr Right Wing 2
News Repeal of 'rain tax' requirement yet to trickle... 18 hr okimar 3
News Two teens charged as adults in gang rape at Ska... (Aug '10) 22 hr suetiggers 31
More from around the web

Baltimore People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]