Your idiocy flies over my head a lot.Yes, all the time. It's not my problem it flies right over your head.
Read brainiac.....READ ! Elective abortion ! Without restriction.Btw, seventeen is more than four.
"In the 1960s, states began reforming their strict antiabortion laws, so that when the Supreme Court made abortion legal nationwide, legal abortions were already available in 17 states under a range of circumstances beyond those necessary to save a woman's life (see box)."
(the box is at the bottom of the page and CA is one of those states, just like i mentioned)
Only 4 states had legal unrestricted abortion before 1973......FOUR. Not 17 !
And no.....4 is NOT more than 17.
The point is not moot genius. If it were then you'd be OK with going back to pre RvW days and have the States individually set their own abortion laws. I'm sure there would be at least a few that would keep it legal so any woman who lived in a State where it was illegal would be free to jet right over there and kill that little nuisance legally.The point's been made more often than I count, that within those laws, pregnant women were free to leave their home states, go to those states with legal abortion, and obtain the same. So your question to LNM is moot.
In any case you've had your say on this....as stupid and idiotic as it is. Why don't we let the person to whom the question was asked.....answer. Whaddya say huh ? Ya nosy parker ya.
Oh button it you old crank. All you PC do here is make clever little take-off names on PL posters.....knutter, Dic, skank, etc. Now all of sudden you demand respect ? Get lost you hypocritical phony.Why don't you start showing some respect and using people's actual SNs? You want me to begin referring to you as bawkbawkdoc?
Yeah right....that's all my posts are....just a litany of ad homs.'Cause you seem chicken to actually use your brain for anything aside from ad homs.
You're a complete joke.