Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311613 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Katie

Auburn, WA

#283140 Feb 9, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Well I think you're wrong. Humans have a soul, animals don't."
How do you know?
There was a Twilight Zone episode where an old man, played by Arthur Hunnicut, died in a hunting accident along with his dog. The old man and his dog were walking along a path in the woods not knowing they were dead. They came across a gate manned by a very charming fellow who told them it was the gate to Heaven, but the dog was not allowed in. The gatekeeper explained that he would take the dog to a very nice place where he'd be happy but it was in a separate place. The old man was indignant that it would not be Heaven if he couldn't have his beloved hound with him and so the old man moved on. He then came upon another nice man who invited him into the real Heaven and told him the dog would also be welcome to enter. This guy told the old man that the gatekeeper had really been the devil in disguise and that dogs were most certainly allowed in Heaven.
I agree with the old man...a Heaven that wouldn't allow my beloved dogs in would be no Heaven at all.
Agree, LNM, and one of my favorite episodes :)
Obskeptic

Oak Park, MI

#283141 Feb 9, 2013
Why I only got two holier than though liberals to disagree, call me nuts and clueless? How awful is that?. Why it's almost as awful as say, killing a baby. I'm just horrified at their judgements of me. What am I to do? I'm wringing my hands over it, and may even lose sleep tonight. I suppose I shouldn't complain though, at least I was treated more humanely then a fetus in "lilbunnypoopoo" womb would be, so I guess I can deal with it. But I'm just shattered over it.
Obskeptic

Oak Park, MI

#283142 Feb 9, 2013
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
You are oh so christ-like. Spare us your hypocrisy.
I'm so sorry "Kenose". My statements were meant to offend you.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#283143 Feb 9, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are - without ANY doubt - one of the STUPIDEST people on this thread. And that's saying A LOT.
The TRUE teaching's of the Islam has NOHTING to do with the terrorism of Bin Laden.
You're an ignorant shmuck, and not worth the saliva it would take to spit on your sorry ass.
<quoted text>Sounds a LOT like you're making yourself sound right now.
You want to know why more and more people turn from your version of jesus?
Read your own stupidity and the day you understand how sickening you are, is the day you'll know why.
He's an ignorant, Southern redneck.
Obskeptic

Oak Park, MI

#283144 Feb 9, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you attack straight people with YOUR words. Same thing.
I realize that no one wants to be gay, but you really need to come to terms with it. You can't carry this anger around with you for the rest of your life. It will make you sick.
Gee, you give gays a very bad name.
Yes, I can have my opinion and you can have yours, no matter how pathetically ignorant its basis is.
You said your mother was stronger than me. I asked you, how so, and you never answered. Couldn't come up with a good answer?
Hey Guppy, what do you think cpeter1313 would have to say about abortion if humans were able to determine if a fetus was going to be homosexual or lesbian, and then they started aborting them in large numbers? Do you think he might discover that he is nothing more then a hypocritical ass when it hits that close to home?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#283146 Feb 9, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you spell lesbien?
Lilrabbitfoofoo.

Did you forget that quickly troll?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#283147 Feb 9, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Guppy, what do you think cpeter1313 would have to say about abortion if humans were able to determine if a fetus was going to be homosexual or lesbian, and then they started aborting them in large numbers? Do you think he might discover that he is nothing more then a hypocritical ass when it hits that close to home?
I believe he, like the rest of us, dont care about the reasons women may or may not choose to make that medical decision for themselves. Its not about the reasons WHY, and THAT is what your kind simply are too stupid to understand.

Fortunately, not one person has to justify their decision to abort. Nobody needs to know the reasons, and its none of anyone's business.

Women have the right to CHOOSE. We do not need to support the reason for choice - nor do we need to support the choice they MAKE to support their RIGHT TO MAKE THEIR OWN MEDICAL CHOICE.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#283148 Feb 9, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, you nailed that one "Lilrabbitfoofoo".
You're right. I did.
Thats why when the christians eventually leave the muslim countries they are being murdered and persecuted in, those peace loving muslims start killing each other.
ROFLMAO You're simplistic views belie your ignorace.
Your ridiculous name calling and arrogant ridiculing comes off as an angry, petulant child.
LOL No, not really. But you keep telling yourself that dearheart.
<<wink>>
Your immaturity is only outdone by that stupid, childish name you call yourself.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!! And what exactly does YOUR name represent there sparky, hmmmm?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#283149 Feb 9, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it that you stupid lib's live in a perpetual state of outrage? Where there's a problem, create a bigger one. Where there is unity, divide and make enemies. Where people are productive, regulate them and tax them till they stop. Where a tiny little baby is growing, kill it and tear it out in pieces. Where someone has the gaul to disagree, attack them and their supporters relentlessly until none are willing to challenge. Where freedom exists, place the shackles of big government on it till it is sufficiently stifled. If you are the shining example of what all jews are like (and your not even close), no wonder the Arabs, Persians, and Germans have continued efforts to exterminate you. I must say, I would miss your type about as much as you would miss your aborted daughter or son.
Anyone have any idea what this idiot is babbling about now?@@

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#283150 Feb 9, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
More name calling, anger, and immature childish rants will be the response, but you know that already, she's an angry lib .
Goo Goo, Foo Foo, Poo Poo, or whatever she wants to call herself is as predictable as the sun coming up tomorrow.
And this coming from the freak who's bitching about "childish rants".

LOLOLOLOL!!!

Carry on dolt.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#283151 Feb 9, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Guppy, what do you think cpeter1313 would have to say about abortion if humans were able to determine if a fetus was going to be homosexual or lesbian, and then they started aborting them in large numbers? Do you think he might discover that he is nothing more then a hypocritical ass when it hits that close to home?
Well, that was just dumb. I'd be willing to be a year's salary that the only people who would be interested in aborting a fetus to avoid having a gay child would be the anti-choicers. I don't know any PCer who would want to do so. Nor would any PCer think a woman's reasons were theirs to dictate.

You clearly didn't think this through before posting.
The Prince

Allentown, PA

#283152 Feb 9, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
Very true, Sharia Law is NOT good for women in the least. But conservative religions don't treat women well either, a fact that conservative Christians like to ignore. For the "christian" extremists who think that girls and women were well treated in past American history, I think it's time for a little reminder of some facts you probably don't want to see mentioned on a public forum. Too bad. The fact is, we had an American version of Sharia Law in the 19th century. At the beginning of the 19th century in America --
-- Girls got much less education than boys did.
-- Girls' activities, especially for middle- and upper-class girls, were limited to "ladylike" pursuits.
-- Girls and women were considered naturally weaker and inferior to boys and men.
-- It was thought shocking, outrageous, and even scandalous for a woman to give a speech in public, especially to audiences of both men and women.
-- Middle- and upper-class women were expected to confine their activities to a "separate sphere" or their homes. Women were also expected to show the "virtues" of religious piety, wifely submission, and motherly domesticity. And they always had to be escorted outside their homes by a man.
-- Married women had NO legal rights, including to own property, keep their inherited money, enter into contracts, sign legal documents, or control what happened to their wages or their children.
-- Women who were single or had to earn money had very few job opportunities and were always paid less than men who did the same job.
-- Middle- and upper-class women were expected to wear layers of restrictive and heavy clothing, and corsets that were so tight that many women suffered serious health problems as a result.
-- Almost a million African women were chattel slaves.
-- Women were not allowed to vote.
-- Married women had no choices over their reproductive process. Any woman who got married was expected to produce children, whether she WANTED to be a mother or not.
In addition to the above, as if that weren't oppressive enough, conservative men of the 19th and early 20th century opposed every measure that improved women's lives, especially a woman's right to vote. THAT'S what the 19th century feminists fought so hard to change, and eventually succeeded in doing so, even though it took 72 years, from 1848 to 1920, to achieve that goal. The shame was that it took that long for women to GET that right to vote in the first place.
Comparing Sharia Law and Chritiostianity in the U.S.? Congratulations lezbo, you just won the dumbest post of the week award. As a prize you get a 30 page transcript of all of foomuffchew's vulgar posts.
The Prince

Allentown, PA

#283153 Feb 9, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
All women are attracted to straight men.
All normal women.
The Prince

Allentown, PA

#283154 Feb 9, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Well I think you're wrong. Humans have a soul, animals don't."
How do you know?
There was a Twilight Zone episode where an old man, played by Arthur Hunnicut, died in a hunting accident along with his dog. The old man and his dog were walking along a path in the woods not knowing they were dead. They came across a gate manned by a very charming fellow who told them it was the gate to Heaven, but the dog was not allowed in. The gatekeeper explained that he would take the dog to a very nice place where he'd be happy but it was in a separate place. The old man was indignant that it would not be Heaven if he couldn't have his beloved hound with him and so the old man moved on. He then came upon another nice man who invited him into the real Heaven and told him the dog would also be welcome to enter. This guy told the old man that the gatekeeper had really been the devil in disguise and that dogs were most certainly allowed in Heaven.
I agree with the old man...a Heaven that wouldn't allow my beloved dogs in would be no Heaven at all.
And that is why you are a pagan. You can make up your own rules for not only life but the afterlife. Hello, I am a pagan and my religion is a twilight episode. Did you get married at a Ren fair like biter? You pagans are funny. I understand why Christianity and reality truns you off. You are still 10 years olds in large adult bodies
The Prince

Allentown, PA

#283155 Feb 9, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Lilrabbitfoofoo.
Did you forget that quickly troll?
Pagan fallback
Anonymous

United States

#283156 Feb 9, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, I just know that the idiot is going to jump all over my previous post where I said no one thinks cleaning the house is "less important", managing to imply that your post renders everything I say wrong.
But anyone can see that you are talking about the woman having to do it all without pay, by herself, and without the freedom to choose, and are not talking about the act itself being unimportant.
Oh, well, let him be an ass about it.
Well you're right, and you're wrong.
I have been and still can be, an idiot, but I won't "jump all over you ",for saying housework is any less important.:)
Anonymous

United States

#283157 Feb 9, 2013
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, you prove how stupid you are with posts like this. "Viking" men did not rule their family in the same way you and your crazy religion do. Women played a vital role and were highly respected. It's unfortunate that you lie about other cultures constantly in an effort to exalt your opinion.
It's been a while since Bright Sun was here. We missed your stupidity.
Not sure who bright sun is, but again I didn't lie, just becouse I used a bearded man with an irin fist.
As far as your earlier post, well that's the answer you always get about evolution, "you just don't understand how it works ",so perhaps you could tell me, where we came from, are origions?
How did life begin?
Where are all the missing links?

It is all the same story "long ago, and far away this and that happened "we think ". Or "that is our hypothesis" or "that is our theory ".

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#283158 Feb 9, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well you're right, and you're wrong.
I have been and still can be, an idiot, but I won't "jump all over you ",for saying housework is any less important.:)
How could you "jump all over" me for something I didn't say?
Anonymous

United States

#283159 Feb 9, 2013
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, garbage claims from you. You do know humans are animals, right? There goes that idiotic theory.
Oh hey, did you know the word soul isn't in the bible either? You really don't know much about anything.
Well tell God all about what He should have and should not have put in His word then.
Anonymous

United States

#283160 Feb 9, 2013
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>I was quoting your Bible and your God.
To answer your question" Ishmael was 12 years old when Isaac was born. So Abraham had to be very old when he indulged in sex with Hagar.
He was, and so was His wife, when she bare a son.
With God all things are possible.

Before the flood, and before we lost the canopy between us and the sun, men lived hundreds of years. Animals were much larger then as well as men.
If you care to explore any of that Dr. KENT Hovind has many vids about evolution /creation.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min John Galt 1,418,491
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 49 min no love lost 20,503
Review: Around The States Moving & Storage (Apr '15) 12 hr mableS769 67
legit Research Chemicals Vendor (Sep '13) 23 hr Badguyforever 39
News Stateville gets new lease on life as Pontiac pr... (May '08) Wed lockemup 54
News Veterans get ALS disability (Jul '08) Wed Sjpowers 30
News 2 Dead, 4 Injured After Shootings In Baltimore ... Aug 23 grounded in reality 1

Baltimore Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Baltimore Mortgages