Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 309876 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#281904 Feb 3, 2013
Guppy wrote:
OK, Lynne is a current poster. Glad you got that straightened out.
BTW - Is anyone having an abortion this week? It's not to late to make an appointment.
I COULD be ........ let me check my schedule... Wait, nope. Not my turn this week.... You sure it wasn't yours?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281905 Feb 3, 2013
I was going to, but I'm booked solid.
Guppy wrote:
OK, Lynne is a current poster. Glad you got that straightened out.
BTW - Is anyone having an abortion this week? It's not to late to make an appointment.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281906 Feb 3, 2013
You might as well ask fire to be wet.
John-K wrote:
<quoted text>
Be nice "Knit"...
:)
Guppy

Englewood, FL

#281907 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
I COULD be ........ let me check my schedule... Wait, nope. Not my turn this week.... You sure it wasn't yours?
Once a year is good for me and I had one last month, so I'm good.
Gtown71

United States

#281908 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>You're lying yet AGAIN. Every bit of the bullshit you've been spouting is part of ORGANIZED religon. Extremist specifically. YOu'd do pretty well as a member of the Westboro Baptist Church, follower of Fred Phelps.
I have attended and been part of organized religion, since my soul was saved by the touch of God,but organized religion did not and could've not saved me.
Some people experience the new birth, inside of an organized religion, but it is still a personal one on one "personal " experience with God and "?"

Most people do not want to experience this life changing event, becouse of their lifestyle "no, not only gays ",but most are afraid God will either ask them to stop doing certain things, or perhaps have their entire "core values "changed, if they do come to the Lord.

What would it profit to gain the whole world, but lose your soul.

Just imagine what all you would have to change, in order to be considered a good christian?

Many would have to change their entire way of life,but God gives all those who are born again, not only the desire to do so, but the power as well.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#281909 Feb 3, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>Actually, it would be on you to prove that I DID alter it since YOU are the one making THAT claim...
<quoted text>
lol, coming from the poster who claims to be a lawyer.
Wrong, CD. Not "Bravo". Ignorant. She claims e-mail would be legit, her burden of proof that it is. No way for her to prove it, not even if others of her friends posted they saw the e-mail. They couldn't prove that either.
A lawyer would know; anything claimed from e-mails is "inadmissable" in a forum like this. lol. It's very obvious you "don't know" anything, and more obvious that you didn't get an education at Harvard Law.
This isn't a courtroom geeze and no they are not inadmissable in a public forum lol.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281910 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Good try Lynniekins. LOL!
Just because link didn't work doesn't mean peoploe couldn't google for themselves, nitwit.

The picture you had up WAS on google and yahoo search engines under Stephen King's gate. I notice you removed it from your avatar. You must have known you were caught in a lie, fool.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281911 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Psssssssst.......Lynniekins, I posted it publically on Photobucket dear......
Carry on.
lol You got a photo from Google, you liar, and got caught, because I checked, as anyone else could have done.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281912 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually that IS it. I posted it publically on Photobucket for just this purpose.
Ya moron.
Anyone that posts pictures on Photobucket and marks them for public use, can find them via a google search.
You're a moron Lynne, but an entertaining one!
This is FUN!!
You're SO easy! You take the bait EVERY time! <<grin>>
You're full of shit. lol.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281913 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
So much for "not caring" huh Lynne?
YOu're preforming EXACTLY as expected ... just a little more now....
Toots, I'm OWNING you and you should expect it. It's always going to be that way.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281914 Feb 3, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>This isn't a courtroom geeze and no they are not inadmissable in a public forum lol.
No, it it's not a courtroom, you nitwit. lol Yes, they are inadmissable, insomuch as looking at it intelligently and sensibily. Something you PC aren't capable of doing.

The point you missed, because you're so stuck on kissing up to Foo and defending her no matter how much she LIES, is that e-mails don't matter HERE, they're NOT credible [because] they can easily be altered.

CD likes to pretend to be a lawyer, so I enjoy using court references to prove what a bumbling lying buffoon he is, whenever he posts agreement to what would and wouldn't constitute proof here.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281915 Feb 3, 2013
Foo claimed proof of her "mutual abuse" claim was IN THE THREADS here. She can pull them up and post those. The e-mail claim is stupid and just desperate bullshit because she knows she has NOTHING to prove her claim. She can post something and clasim it's an e-mail and she would still have NOTHING that proved her claim, because there's no doubt she'd create an e-mail out of thin air and claim Lynne wrote it. Just like she pulled that photo off the internet and claimed Lynne took it. Because if Foo's posting, she's lying.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#281916 Feb 3, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, what a bonehead. Your interest in what Lynne said and Foo's claims is much more than you claim mine is.
My interest when PCers make claims,(no matter the topic), is that they provide valid proof of their claims. E-mails aren't valid proof, and the whole thing is ridiculous.
Valid proof? I don't care about what the emails prove or disprove about mutual abuse or anything else. I just want to know what Lynne had to say lol. This forum isn't a court of law but it's hilarious to see you act like Judge Judy.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#281917 Feb 3, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it it's not a courtroom, you nitwit. lol Yes, they are inadmissable, insomuch as looking at it intelligently and sensibily. Something you PC aren't capable of doing.
The point you missed, because you're so stuck on kissing up to Foo and defending her no matter how much she LIES, is that e-mails don't matter HERE, they're NOT credible [because] they can easily be altered.
CD likes to pretend to be a lawyer, so I enjoy using court references to prove what a bumbling lying buffoon he is, whenever he posts agreement to what would and wouldn't constitute proof here.
Inadmissable has nothing to do with looking at something intelligently and sensibly which is a very good example as to why you probably shouldn't use legal terms to make someone else look like a buffoon. The same goes for proof. Your idea of proof is not the same thing the legal world would consider proof.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#281918 Feb 3, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
Foo claimed proof of her "mutual abuse" claim was IN THE THREADS here. She can pull them up and post those. The e-mail claim is stupid and just desperate bullshit because she knows she has NOTHING to prove her claim. She can post something and clasim it's an e-mail and she would still have NOTHING that proved her claim, because there's no doubt she'd create an e-mail out of thin air and claim Lynne wrote it. Just like she pulled that photo off the internet and claimed Lynne took it. Because if Foo's posting, she's lying.
Well alot ppl feel the same about you, so it's an even playing field.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#281919 Feb 3, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Send me the e-mails. I will read them. I bet they are entertaining.
At least, who cares about proof.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281920 Feb 3, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually that IS it. I posted it publically on Photobucket for just this purpose.
Ya moron.
Anyone that posts pictures on Photobucket and marks them for public use, can find them via a google search.
You're a moron Lynne, but an entertaining one!
This is FUN!!

You're SO easy! You take the bait EVERY time! <<grin>>
One more thing; no one needs to post any photo publicly on photobucket, that they're using for their avatar photo. They just have to copy it to their own picture files. Your lies are so ridiculously childlike and obvious.

Foo: "You're a moron..., but an entertaining one!
This is FUN!!
You're SO easy! You take the bait EVERY time!"

Psychological projection, Toots. You're the one taking the bait, and getting caught every time.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281921 Feb 3, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text> Valid proof? I don't care about what the emails prove or disprove about mutual abuse or anything else. I just want to know what Lynne had to say lol. This forum isn't a court of law but it's hilarious to see you act like Judge Judy.
I'm mocking CD, who acts like he's in court here.

Ayakaneo: "Valid proof? I don't care about what the emails prove or disprove about mutual abuse or anything else. I just want to know what Lynne had to say lol."

Exactly. You're an ignorant little twit who's only here for the gossip factor.

Some of us are here to prove that those who are here claiming to be PC, are people who are liars and not credible in the least to be trusted in anything said on the topic of abortion or any other topic. That way those who google abortion discussions and end up here, can see that those representing "abortion rights" are a bunch of ignorant bufffons, who lie and not here because they care about anything but themselves and their own selfish gratifications, like lying, gossiping and taking topics off of abortion.
No Relativism

West Lafayette, IN

#281922 Feb 3, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
What do I need to say I haven't already said? Adoption, like anything else, works best case by case, not cookie-cutter. All choices afforded pregnant women need to be left intact with proper, case by case protocols followed. Nobody needs any more restrictions or prohibitions because we are supposed to self-governing. I am not my brother's keeper no matter what seems to be the current trend. I believe people, including your inane erroneous self, are capable of making their own decisions. Too bad you're such a control freak, eh, BB?
Katiekins: "Adoption, like anything else, works best case by case, not cookie-cutter. All choices afforded pregnant women need to be left intact with proper, case by case protocols followed."

Problem is, you made it clear that "unwanted/unhealthy fetuses are doomed. There's no way getting around that reality. I didn't make it up, I am stating it."

You see, by "doomed" you meant killed intentionally in the womb (i.e. abortion). You didn't mean adoption.

Your statement was definitive. YOU didn't include adoption as an option.

Now you talk about "all choices afforded pregnant women need to be left intact."

YOU sure didn't leave the adoption intact in your post. YOU shut it out and left ABORTION as the ONLY option. Look for yourself:

"Unwanted/unhealthy fetuses are doomed. There's no way getting around that reality. I didn't make it up, I am stating it."

Yep...you made it quite clear...."There's no way getting around that reality."

You also made it a statment of fact - rather than opinion: "I didn't make it up, I am stating it."

You're a mess.......

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#281923 Feb 3, 2013
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Well alot ppl feel the same about you, so it's an even playing field.
The ones who feel that way about me are the very ones to have been proven to be the pathological lying buffoons here. People like you kiss up to them and you couldn't care less whether they're telling the truth or not. You're part of a big group here, and that makes you happy because you think that just because there's a lot on your side, that you're right somehow. Thing is, it's just a big group of mind bogglingly senseless fools. You're in THAT group. More power to you, Toots.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 28 min Bluestater 1,232,953
Baltimore: The most racist city in America! 4 hr joey 2
27 wounded 9 dead 4 hr joey 1
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 4 hr UnderstandPeople 19,927
Why is racism getting worse in Baltimore????? 8 hr tghyy ojays 1
Rev. Dr. Franklyn V. Beckles, Jr. Inventor of C... (Aug '14) 8 hr huhgio lol II I 3
News Hampden's Alchemy opening restaurant in Bel Air 14 hr Rachael 2
More from around the web

Baltimore People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]