Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 309888 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Guppy

Englewood, FL

#281666 Feb 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Stay with the therapy. God willing things will get better and you will be able to make sense again.
Too funny.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281667 Feb 2, 2013
Oh, piss off. Andrea yates was a BIG ol' christian, and got rid of her kids, remember? And no, that's not what the NY statute says, but you're too fu**ing lazy to read it for yourself.
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Your right, there is a big difference. Progressives have not "found" the right to kill your kids yet outside the womb if they are an inconvenience to you. Their working on it though. Like in New York, the Governor wants a women to be able to "remove" her unborn child, for any reason, up to and including the the last month of the third trimester. Wouldn't that just make you jubilant? My guess is you would be more horrified at someone killing a puppy then a baby, but thats just a guess.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281668 Feb 2, 2013
And straight boys could keep it in their pants. Were you a virgin on your wedding night? How about your wife?

But it's really about punishing women who enjoy sex, isn't it? As for "valuing" fetuses, that's a philosophical decision. You'remfree to worshipo them if you wish, but no one else has to follow your beliefs.
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
A women has lots of choices, including leaving the guys dick alone. You can call yourself Mother Theresa if you want, it does not change reality. Reality is that when your confronted with the decision of whether you value the life of an unborn, human child, you don't value it at all. I'm sure there were many Nazi's that had to square themselves with the reality that they were superior to all humans, especially Jews, and they did, just like you. Thats how it happens "Ocean 56", with people like you. How does that make you feel? Being pro-death or anti-life or whatever people decide to label it?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281669 Feb 2, 2013
1) It's the woman's body; she chooses if she remains pregnant or not. Go ahead and stamp your little feet over it.

2) The constitution delineates rights, which take effect at birth or naturalization. Not you.
Obskeptic wrote:
Since its all about "choice", why is it that the womens choice matters more then what some group of men choose, or maybe what a group of Muslims might choose? For instance, what if I believed I am entitled to choose to remove from our society those who choose sloth over responsible productivity? Or maybe those amongst us who are "damaged" or "abnormal"? Maybe those of us who have grown old and fragile and no longer contribute to the good of society? I know, how about those among us who's opinion differs from mine or my mob, and by the judgement of Gods like yourself have declared us useless morons undeserving to breath the same air as your enlightened class? History is full of the carnage of such "thinkers" like yourself. I refer to you as the class of citizens that don't know they don't know, and don't care.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281670 Feb 2, 2013
Can hetero sex happen if the man says "no"?

Marital assets can be discussed during the marriage. In terms od debt, divorce, etc, they are held as community property.

Most of us can tell the difference between a fetus and a born human; you can't. Not our problem.
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Your funny. So its all about a womens choice, but its the man that pursues the sex and makes the choice for it to happen. So if you make half the money in the house and combine it with your husbands, you have the "choice" of whether he has any say over how its used in your lives? I'm not jewish, I just find their hypocrisy over the value of life as a sick joke. They whine about having 6 million of their ancestors murdered in the holocaust, yet they vote for and support the murder of millions of innocent babies. Go figure. Its the same kind of circular thinking you pride yourself on. You know everything about everything except for the stuff you don't know you don't know, yet your still an expert on that too. Your arrogance and judgmental attitude about everything and everyone that doesn't fit into your box goes right over your head. Men are stupid. Conservatives are stupid. Everyone that disagrees with you is stupid. But you? Your an intellectual legend in your own mind. Typical pro death liberal.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#281671 Feb 2, 2013
I believe guppy ws referring to the fact that hitler never actually killed anyone himself.
hmmm wrote:
<quoted text> Hitler ordered at least three million Jews, Catholics , etc killed. There have been fifty five million and counting abortions in this Country alone, five times that in the world.
Ocean56

AOL

#281672 Feb 2, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
Thats cool, because as far as i am concerned, you are pro-death. You can ask my daughter if she values your pity, or her life, because my girlfriend at the time, who is now my wife of 26 years, was pregnant with her, and we "chose" to have her. Its something that would be very foreign to you and your mindset because you place a high value on things like death, selfishness, and greed. Your not about personal sacrifice, because your progressive ideology is into excuses to justify something like killing a baby for your own convenience. Yeah, calling it "choice" makes it OK in your mind, because when you think your God, and are arrogant enough to believe your God, passing judgement on the life of another human, especially the child from your own seed, is like getting the oil changed. How do you feel about animals? Is it cool to choose to kill them as well?
As I said previously, you can call me whatever you like, it makes no difference to me. The fact remains that EACH woman can and will make her OWN decision what to do about a pregnancy, and she doesn't need YOUR approval or permission to do so.

Personally, I think progress is far better than regression, and thankfully I can reject your regressive mentality with no penalties whatsoever. No matter how much you whine about it, motherhood is still OPTIONAL, not required, and a woman can reject it for any reason, including the most basic one; she DOESN'T want to be a mother. You're just pissed that women CAN reject motherhood with no penalties. Too bad, pal.
Ocean56

AOL

#281673 Feb 2, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
A women has lots of choices, including leaving the guys dick alone. You can call yourself Mother Theresa if you want, it does not change reality. Reality is that when your confronted with the decision of whether you value the life of an unborn, human child, you don't value it at all. I'm sure there were many Nazi's that had to square themselves with the reality that they were superior to all humans, especially Jews, and they did, just like you. Thats how it happens "Ocean 56", with people like you. How does that make you feel? Being pro-death or anti-life or whatever people decide to label it?
"Leaving the guy's dick alone," now THAT's funny. I can't wait to see how this nonsense will be received by any married prochoice woman who either doesn't want any kids or a mother who is DONE with the whole procreation thing and doesn't want any more. When some of them start telling you off, I'll go get the popcorn. I'll also enjoy having a good laugh, at YOUR expense.
Ocean56

AOL

#281674 Feb 2, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
Your funny. So its all about a womens choice, but its the man that pursues the sex and makes the choice for it to happen.
So what. Since it is the WOMAN who takes on all the health risks and complications of carrying a pregnancy to term, it is only logical that it is the WOMAN who makes the choice whether or not to continue a pregnancy.

Like other conservative anti-choice guys, you're just pissed that you can't force a woman to gestate a pregnancy she may never have wanted to begin with and quite possibly used contraception to PREVENT. Too bad. Motherhood is OPTIONAL, not required, and no woman has to be a mother unless she WANTS to. The 1800's are over, and we women get to make our OWN sexual and reproductive choices. Get used to it.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#281676 Feb 2, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Basically you are saying, the people who go to church are better people.
You're allowed to think that way.
Where would you go if you were looking to place your child in a family, the local pub?
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#281677 Feb 2, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
Freedom to do what?
I would rather be clothed and fed then be able to dance around my village in a piece of dirty old cloth, actually, maybe nothing.
Sorry you were sick for so long.
I can't believe that you are serious. I think you are just trying to make a bad joke.

Doing much better now, thanks.
Make my day

Danielson, CT

#281678 Feb 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Where would you go if you were looking to place your child in a family, the local pub?
These pro-death advocates are really screwed up. The top Fukked up offenders are foofoo ,Katie, Bitner, Ladilulu, junket ,CD,Ocean,chicky and CPeter.

They are lying,menaces to society. They have no common sense and no sense of humor. Just pure unadulterated evil. No respect for anyone. One has to wonder just what went wrong in their lives.
Obskeptic

Wixom, MI

#281679 Feb 2, 2013
Guppy wrote:
<quoted text>
How does one round up and kill 11 million people? Doesn't sound possible.
Hitler seemed to like blonde, blued eyed little boys and girls. Hmmm. I find that interesting.
The same way the progressives co-opt the useful idiots that can rationalize that just because it's in the womb, that its not a human. Its not only possible, but the holocaust goes on still everyday. You couch the argument with ambiguities like "choice", "rights", "fairness" as if its just about you. The biggest challenge for the selfish to comprehend is that it always has to be about themselves, and be damned with anybody else. Rounding up and killing millions has happened in mans history to many times, and the ignorant and complacent will see to it that it happens again. It takes real courage to stand in opposition of the mobs thinking, and cowardice to stand with them even when your soul tells you their wrong.
Guppy

Englewood, FL

#281680 Feb 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Where would you go if you were looking to place your child in a family, the local pub?
The people who go to church on Sunday, were drinking at the local pub on Saturday night. Ha!
Obskeptic

Wixom, MI

#281681 Feb 2, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
I believe guppy ws referring to the fact that hitler never actually killed anyone himself.
<quoted text>
The old degrees of culpability argument. You have to be kidding me. The other pathetic joke is you using the constitution to defend your argument when you could care less about the document. You have contempt for it unless you can conveniently use it to make a point. I dismiss your arguments in the same arrogant manner you wave your hand away at mine.
Obskeptic

Wixom, MI

#281682 Feb 2, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
So what. Since it is the WOMAN who takes on all the health risks and complications of carrying a pregnancy to term, it is only logical that it is the WOMAN who makes the choice whether or not to continue a pregnancy.
Like other conservative anti-choice guys, you're just pissed that you can't force a woman to gestate a pregnancy she may never have wanted to begin with and quite possibly used contraception to PREVENT. Too bad. Motherhood is OPTIONAL, not required, and no woman has to be a mother unless she WANTS to. The 1800's are over, and we women get to make our OWN sexual and reproductive choices. Get used to it.
So as long as its about "choices", it would only seem logical that if the man has no choice in the decision as to whether his unborn son or daughter is killed at the hands of the mother, he should be able to choose to not be financially obligated for that child if he never intended to create it, and the mother chooses to have it and raise it anyway, right? That would be fair, right?

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#281683 Feb 2, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Been sick for over ten days. On the computer very little in those ten days. Plus I scroll over much of what isn't part of my conversation. That would include many of your posts.
BTW, I don't see any reason to lie to you. For what purpose?
Yet the post you did reply to had within it Tom Tom's insults which you claim to not have seen, and then used the lame excuse that you were sick and so hadn't been here for a few days, yet I found that you indeed had been posting.

Your purpose was clear. While complaining that my remarks were "supercilious" you didn't want to have to acknowledge that they were in response to your fellow fundie who was insulting Bitner's beliefs. You wanted to cling to your double-standard. I saw through it so your lying was in vain.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#281684 Feb 2, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>She has a crush on Siggy Freud.
She NEEDS Siggy Freud.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#281685 Feb 2, 2013
Make my day wrote:
<quoted text>These pro-death advocates are really screwed up. The top Fukked up offenders are foofoo ,Katie, Bitner, Ladilulu, junket ,CD,Ocean,chicky and CPeter.
Hey, I think I'm all that's left.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#281686 Feb 2, 2013
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, you're confused. I said there's nothing wrong with that to a post from Bitner, not to a post from Chicky.
Try again.

Wrong. While you did say that in response to Bitter, you also said there was nothing wrong with a statement from Tinker Bell defining viability exclusively WITHOUT medical assistance.(Post #274777)

Speaking of Bitter, why DID you say there was nothing wrong with her statement about a preemie being able to REACH viability with medical assistance ? When in fact you agreed that a preemie receiving medical assistance was ALREADY viable. Hmmmm ?

[QUOTE]You've finally seen the light. That's good, because my Duracell batteries were nearing the end of their useful life.
Thanks!
It's what I've been saying all along F. Lee.
I'd post a link to your post of slightly over a year ago, but I've not got the patience to swift through 10,000 pages to find it.
You haven't got the patience my ass. You know it doesn't exist. If you thought it did, you'd find the patience alright.
So you'll just have to live with the fact that everyone else who's read your posts knows you're just now reverting your position to agree with me.
No, I don't think I'll live with it just because YOU don't have the balls to go back and look for posts that don't exist.
Reverting my position ? You don't have to lift a finger ball-less. I'll find the posts that show what my position has been all along.
I will, however, say thanks. Again, you've finally seen the light.
<quoted text>
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Sure, sure sure.
You're really saying that my position has been the same as chicky's, Tinker Bell's, moncie, bitter, katie, et al ? Is THAT what you're saying ? That viability is defined as the ability to survive WITHOUT medical assistance ? That if a preemie requires medical assistance it cannot be viable ?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 12 min RealDave 1,233,394
News Baltimore Bloodshed Continues; 28 Shot, 9 Dead ... 5 hr to the strongest 3
Violent Memorial Day in Baltimore Without a Spe... 7 hr perple nerple 4
Mace Electric's Dick Colon raped an 11-year-old... (Jun '13) 11 hr Petrolith 37
News Homicides in Baltimore up 40% 12 hr NIMBY 6
27 wounded 9 dead 16 hr Shep 4
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 21 hr Bam 19,928
More from around the web

Baltimore People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]