Yet the post you did reply to had within it Tom Tom's insults which you claim to not have seen, and then used the lame excuse that you were sick and so hadn't been here for a few days, yet I found that you indeed had been posting.<quoted text>
Been sick for over ten days. On the computer very little in those ten days. Plus I scroll over much of what isn't part of my conversation. That would include many of your posts.
BTW, I don't see any reason to lie to you. For what purpose?
Your purpose was clear. While complaining that my remarks were "supercilious" you didn't want to have to acknowledge that they were in response to your fellow fundie who was insulting Bitner's beliefs. You wanted to cling to your double-standard. I saw through it so your lying was in vain.