I use the same as you, and yes I mess up on scripture sometimes, but not on this on.<quoted text>
I use the KJV. I use a Strong's.
Given your summary of The Law of Jealousies, I urge you to get a Strong's Concordance. You can even find one on-line.
"It has nothing to do with her being pregnant."
Yeah, it does.
See, you and I have different interpretations of the same text. I've studied it. You haven't. If you study it and come back with the same conclusion, where does that leave us, as Christians?
Who is right? Is there a grand interpreter in the world we can go to to straighten it out? No, there isn't.
So. where does that leave you? I'll tell ya -- it leaves you with a lot of work to do. If you're a Christian, it is your responsibility to study the Bible and pray to the Father in the name of the Son that when you pass on information, you do not mislead anyone. I've read enough of your posts to know you are completely careless in this regard.
I'm sorry bro., but the verses never indicate whether or not the womans with child.
I agree, this is the reason tbere are so many denominations, most I feel start there own church using the book of acts.
Anytime people take verses out of context they can make the bible say what they want it to.