Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 313199 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Katie

Seattle, WA

#275605 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Only to ignorant buffoons would ability to suffer or not suffer while being PUT TO DEATH, make some difference in the killing.
Normal people would be just as disturbed by the killing of children who were sentient, as those who lie helplessly in a bed unaware that someone is killing them.
So executions have moved from all kinds of torturous devices to hanging/shootings to lethal injections because "ability to suffer or not suffer while being PUT TO DEATH, make some difference in the killing[?]"

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275606 Jan 10, 2013
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I am not impressed.
Now...
Question....did you ever sing or talk to your babies while in the womb?
How trivial; you're trying to validate your opinion of what's in a pregnant woman's womb, by appealing to what a mother would have called her unborn! That would almost be the same as if I told you about many women who called their unborn "this f*cking bastart," or ever expressed themselves by saying "get this sack of sh*t out of me now!"

Question; did you tell your "daughter in the womb" you'd wish her dead if she had an abortion when she grew up?

“Clever words”

Since: Sep 09

constellate

#275607 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course I understand what sentient is. I'm not like you people. I actually understand the terms and understand what I read.
I posted about a non-sentient child on life support TEMPORARILY, because the non-sentience of the human life in utero is only temporary, and do you thiunk it would be okay to just kill that person because they're temporarily unconcious and can't feel anything?
You can take that and your stupidity to the bank, pea brain.
I know you are not a brain-dead buffoon, but you come across as one. What exactly is a "non-sentient" child that temporarily requires life support. A z/e/f?

Your ability to post without insulting others casts you in a poor light, LynneD.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275608 Jan 10, 2013
sassyliciouus wrote:
God says no to sex before marriage. I think he knows what he's talking about. I think it's sad when we dont listen. Going against our loving God brings self inflict hardships. Unfortunately, young kids are exposed to sex shoved down their throats.....movies tv shows (that most of the time the Parents allow) and divorced parents living with or spending sleepovers with their S.O. These kids think having casual sex is normal..My suggestion would be to address that and we won't have to worry about pregnant teens.
Your approach is useless to kids . Sex is beautiful within the boundaries thst God set up for us. I don't believe scaring the crap out of a teenager is affective
.<quoted text>
Maybe when marriage gets a little tough sometimes but not unsolveable, they should think about the example they are setting for their children. Don't you think people give up on their marriages much too easily.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275609 Jan 10, 2013
Tom Tom wrote:
<quoted text>
More of your anti-Chrisitan hate. I am sure your Rabbi is proud of his little faux member.
Very.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275610 Jan 10, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>You answered your own question. It's none of your business nor anyone else's why the woman wants an abortion. Therefore it isn't an issue. If one has a problem with one reason or another, one doesn't have to abort a pregnancy for that reason. Why do you keep asking?
You would be one that would say whatever reason is okay.

See Katie?

“Clever words”

Since: Sep 09

constellate

#275611 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Foo: "Sentinence has NOTHING to do with being able to SAY something ."
You idiot. It's Junket who used the "saying something" as her argument.
I know what sentient is and proof of that is in my post following the one you took that sentence from. The post where I said,
~"A child on life support who is in a coma can't feel pain either. But is it okay to rip that child apart limb from limb? The obvious answer; NO.
It has nothing to do with whether or not the pain is known and felt. It's the ACT itself that's wrong, whether or not the victim is concious and can feel pain. "~
You have zero impulse control, like a child. You JUMP to post something just to argue with pro-lifers, and you don't ever know what you're talking about.
This time it's you jumping on your belief that I don't know what "sentient" means, when I do.
You made a raging fool of yourself again.
Please do not mischaracterize my post. I said nothing of the sort. I stated "sentient", nothing more, nothing less. Rusty, btw is the man that married Andrea, and for whatever reason believed that her post partum depression (if that's what it was) would be cured with a good dose of "Eve was evil" and of course another baby (Mary) in her arms. Guess he was wrong.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275612 Jan 10, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink claimed we "all agree" with it so let her dig herself out of her own shitpile and prove it.
Let's see ink pull up posts from "all" of us clearly stating that we "agree" with it.
And BTW, you've asked me this a couple of times before and then ignored my answers.
Elise already said any reason is fine. So has Bitner. If you dfeel different, say so.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275613 Jan 10, 2013
Forum carlsbad nm wrote:
Ask the babies if they would like to live.
"Baby, do you want to live?"

Wahh Wahh Wahh!!!!

Sorry, speak English; do you want to live?

Wahh Wahh Wahh!!!
Katie

Seattle, WA

#275614 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"I cry when I read about how hard he fought."
You HYPOCRITE!
You people have spent countless pages arguing that {manner of death} doesn't matter, because the END RESULT is the same; death. There you are proving [manner of death] DOES matter, and are proving why it matters.
It matters just as much when a fetus dies by natural causes or is killed by abortion. The result is the same, the MANNER OF DEATH is the difference. You just proved it with your own words.
Boneheads.
Your anger is misplaced.
As is your "argument".

Do you know how to properly debate?
Or just fling ad homs like monkeys fling sh*t?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275615 Jan 10, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
I find it a bit ironic that for the women 'who never wanted to GET pregnant in the first place' made the decision to have sex with a man. If they truly never want to get pregnant, the most logical solution is not to have sex with a man.
What planet are you from?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275616 Jan 10, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
I would say that every time a woman has sex she should expect to get pregnant. Being shocked that you've become pregnant, even though you're taking contraceptives or the man always uses condoms, still shouldn't shock any woman because having sex with a man always carries with it the possibility of pregnancy.
So the reality is no pregnany is truly 'unplanned' or 'unwanted'.
Any sexually active woman who is shocked by pregnancy is really either pretty naive about sex or just pretty stupid.
Who says a woman is shocked when she gets pregnant? The fact is that she doesn't have to stay pregnant if she doesn't want to. Why do you think you have a right to make law forcing her to stay pregnant against her will?
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275617 Jan 10, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
You made the claim that we "all agree" with it. You do the work to prove it. Show a post for each of us stating that we each "agree" with it. We don't have to shit for you.
If you don't think that gender selection is acceptable, say so.

Otherwise supporting abortion on demand includes aborting one sex for the other.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275618 Jan 10, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
Remember that woman in Texas, Andrea Yates, who made the decision to drown her five kids in the bathtub?
She made the decision to terminate her five kids. It was her choice to do so.
I don't find any difference between her and any woman who has had five abortions in her lifetime.
Well, then, you really are an idiot.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275619 Jan 10, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>What planet are you from?
LB426.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275620 Jan 10, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do realize that there are those who are just as Godless as you, and still find the killing on evolutions tinest things, to be a horrific thing, don't you?
Plus, if a country is not going to recognize a baby in the womb as a human, then that country should never charge anyone for the death of the baby in the womb, if the baby dies for any reason, as a result of their actions.
Anyway you slice it, it is a double standard. The very same ones who accuse pro lifers as being control freaks, are in FACT the control freaks themself.
They want it to be a baby if they say it is, or they want it to be equal to a tumor, that needs removing, so that the woman can get on with 'her ' life.
The reason the pro death people would fight so hard against a law, that said anything before birth is not human, is becouse the first pregnant lady that is just days away from delivery, that gets shot through the stomach by a stray bullet, and all the guy would get was recklous indangerment of "1" human life, then it becomes all to real that the bundle she carried was in fact a child.
I pray that one day people will look back and see how america was, and that the holucost was nothing compared to what we allowed to happen to soo many of our own people.
What?
Katie

Seattle, WA

#275621 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
All of what I said applies and it's your own argument that doesn't apply. In order for you to have an argument about sentience, you'd have to be making it about temporary non-sentience, because it's a fact that the human life in utero is non-sentient only temporarily. If left alone and if all goes well, it'll become as sentient as we all are.
Uh no, your post does not apply to what I asked zef regarding his claim that sentience had no impact on life or living life. I'm interested in reading his reasons for this claim. So I asked some follow up questions. Your butting in and demanding what the topic should be about is no exception for your display of willful ignorance.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#275622 Jan 10, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You would be one that would say whatever reason is okay.
See Katie?
What am I supposed to see that you think I don't?

You're the one who, after years of posting with me, can't remember I don't necessarily like abortion. However, the possibility of women losing their civil rights to personal privacy and bodily autonomy disturbs me more than an individual woman safely and legally aborting an unwanted or unhealthy pregnancy. For you, it's the opposite. You focus on drivel and call it good.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#275623 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't understand why you pea brains keep trying to deflect with nonsense. Foo was OWNED again while she tried to argue what a pedophile is, and her response was nothing more than a desperate attempt at deflection. So is yours.
Lynne, you have a seriously PATHETIC need to "OWN" people, yet you are the one being OWNED pretty regularly.

LOL

I wasn't arguing what a pedophile is. I simply gave a singluar FACTUAL dictionary definition that states its when an older man is sexually aroused by a child.

YOU have chosen to argue about it by coming up with every explaination you can cut and paste - yet NONE of which proves Merriam-Webster wrong.

You aint arguing with me Lynniekins, you're trying to argue with a dictionary definition that doesnt say what you WANT IT TO.

ROFLMAO!

Like it or not, you were A CHILD. You were an immature brat back then - and the adult man that you claimed you were SO mature and could handle it .... you couldn't.

ANd you made THAT claim as an adult. Clearly you never grew out of the immature brat stage LOL!

By MANY, that man could and would be considered a pedophile, a predator, a statutory rapist.

Its a good thing in a way that you lost all those "children" - beacuse they'd have had a pedophile, a predator, a rapist for a papa, not to mention a lunatic for a mutha. LOL

Carry on Lynniekins. Its fun to wind your stupid ass up and see how long you go!
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275624 Jan 10, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
What am I supposed to see that you think I don't?
You're the one who, after years of posting with me, can't remember I don't necessarily like abortion. However, the possibility of women losing their civil rights to personal privacy and bodily autonomy disturbs me more than an individual woman safely and legally aborting an unwanted or unhealthy pregnancy. For you, it's the opposite. You focus on drivel and call it good.
Only a good pro choicer would call aborting a baby drivel.

Only a good pro choicer would turn a blind eye to girl babies being aborted in favor of boys.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Aquarius-wy 1,480,959
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 10 hr truth 7,994
News Baltimore shootings up 30 percent compared to t... 12 hr former democrat 1
Mosby Wed Johnathan T 4
News DUI Defendant Drinks 12-Pack at Court - (Oct '07) Tue Dudley 47
News Stop Maryland's season of cruelty: fall bow hun... (Sep '07) Jan 15 IAMGKNEE 113,993
News Baltimore man fires shots because someone took ... Jan 15 Dudley 2

Baltimore Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Baltimore Mortgages