Agreed. 100%.<quoted text>
I didn't say it was nor do I think it should or ever could be.
To say that because the end result is the same there is no difference between induced and spontaneous abortion is absurd....whether you consider abortion murder or not.
There would be no need for RvW if that were the case. Even the SC acknowledged the difference when they rendered their decision. If there were no difference between spontaneous abortion and induced abortion then there would be no need for RvW and affirming a woman's right to abort. After all, there are no laws against spontaneous abortion nor will there ever need to be. So if induced is athe same as spontaneous....why the need for RvW /
However, the inital question was about the end result being the same, and that's what I was responding to.
Nope. But I dont compare either one to 9/11 either, that was you in your post, hence my comment.I don't know. Did YOU compare your mother and father's natural deaths and your friends murder to a woman making her own medical definition ?