Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311358 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#269190 Dec 10, 2012
Junket wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course not. My Mother is 100% Catholic - albeit both of my parents seem to feel exception should be made for maternal survival and raped victims. Don't quote me, though. I wouldn't want them to be "ex-commed".
Was it a sad day for you when you eard about Twinkies' demise?
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#269191 Dec 10, 2012
*heard*

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#269192 Dec 10, 2012
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
quite emotional indeed.
1782 Do emotions scare you, honey?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#269193 Dec 10, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Cpeter: If you cloned humans, the DNA test would read the same as that of a non-clonal human.
Even your liberal ilk believe cloning humans is beyond the pail. It's illegal, and makes your point moot. Again.
"... beyond the pail."

You're such a dweeb, lol.

Since: Sep 09

Location hidden

#269194 Dec 10, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Was it a sad day for you when you eard about Twinkies' demise?
Puddles, you can not seem to resist attacking a poster when you've run out of ways to counter a post.

It's childish on your part. Granted, my naming you "Puddles" is also immature, but I figured you liked it better than "Basement Boy" or "No Relevance".

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#269195 Dec 10, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Synonyms For Dummies
You're deflecting.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#269196 Dec 10, 2012
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
irrelevant to the discussion??? you make the claim that a woman carrying a dead fetus is still "pregnant", but the medical definition of "pregnant" is irrelevant???
damn you're stupid.
Yes, because the discussion was about a missed miscarriage.
HuskerDu

United States

#269197 Dec 10, 2012
cpeter1313 wrote:
We aren't slaves to biology. Women can terminate a pregnancy.
BTW--mom would tell you to mind your own business. She was a good catholic but she didn't want to tell anyone else how to live teir lives.
<quoted text>
So, you didn't listen to the priest at your mom's funeral mass?

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#269198 Dec 10, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, the stats were updated in August of 2012 (4 months ago). He's a statitician as well as physicist. And, he includes the stats from Planned Parenthood's research arm: Guttmacher Institute.
The website was updated not the stats.
"At the other extreme, AGI's surveys of 1987 and 2004 (as well as the detailed statistics from Minnesota) suggest that a significant fraction of abortions are obtained by mothers who have the means to care for a child but do not want their lives inconvenienced. Even sex selective abortions may be more common than those for some of the hard cases. This illustrates the consequences of the current extreme policy in the United States regarding abortion".
You see that word "suggest"?
suggests 3rd person singular present of sugĀ·gest (Verb)
Verb
Put forward for consideration: "I suggest that we wait a day or two".
Cause one to think that (something) exists or is the case.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269199 Dec 10, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Even your liberal ilk believe cloning humans is beyond the pail.
"pail"? Try "PALE" you moron.
It's illegal, and makes your point moot. Again.
So are most LTA's except those for a woman's health - yet your kind keep babbling about them as if they're still happening.

Nice double standard there No Relevance.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269200 Dec 10, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie: You think we're better than the lowly animals?
________
sasssylicious: "Do you have your animals on the very same level as your children?"
Foo: "Than our children? Not really. On the same level as the likes of you? Nope, not at all. They're worth MUCH MORE than your kind are."
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
__________
sasssylicious wrote: So, if you had a choice to save either your daughter or your cat, you'd perhaps choose to save your cat? WOW, just WOW.
Foo: Now if I had to save my cat or you? Hands down, the cat ANY day. Wouldnt even have to give it a second thought.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
Nice try at editing my post. Fortunatley EVERYONE here knows how dishonest you are, and you failed. Again.

sasssylicious wrote: So, if you had a choice to save either your daughter or your cat, you'd perhaps choose to save your cat? WOW, just WOW.

My FULL response was:

Foo: Which letters of which word in the TWO WORD sentence "NOT REALLY" confused you Skanky?

Now if I had to save my cat or you? Hands down, the cat ANY day. Wouldnt even have to give it a second thought.

I maintain that answer. I would save my pet BEFORE even considering saving the likes of you or the Skank.

Dont like that? Oh well, just another in your pathetic life's long list of "tough shit" moments No Relevance.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#269201 Dec 10, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Your daughter wasn't a stranger. She was your daughter. And. You killed her.
Except she doesn't have a daughter, she's never killed ANYONE. You're a lying sack of shit No Relevance. And a laughable one at that. LOL!
Katie

Seattle, WA

#269202 Dec 10, 2012
worships reality wrote:
<quoted text>
you did not answer it and he did not veer off. you introduced self defense. once you did that then you were agreeing that the killing was for something beyond just an "inconvenience", which is what his specific question asked.
you're hopelessly ignorant.
Oh, is Triple L interpreting again, only under a different name? He veered off with his last sentence. You probably skipped past it, nosy parker.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#269203 Dec 10, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, is Triple L interpreting again, only under a different name? He veered off with his last sentence. You probably skipped past it, nosy parker.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
Omg,Foo, you're right! That comment has Lily smell all over it... She's such a dickwad, lol.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#269204 Dec 10, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You continue to fail in redefining the normal process by which mankind was created to procreate. You only make a moron out of yourself when clumsily trying to morph a normal part of mankind into a disease.
The preborn baby has not "intruded" (this presupposes he/she come from outside in). Baby s/he was created RIGHT where s/he was supposed to be created...doing EXACTLY what s/he is supposed to be doing.
You even wrongly attempt to classify mankind's normal process of pregnancy a 'civil rights violation'.
You're a mess.
Why are you wasting time introducing a false premise to this "discussion"? WTH is "redefining the normal process by which mankind was created to procreate"?

Since when was a healthy gestation to full term guaranteed as part of the procreation process?

Pssst Homosexuality is as normal and natural as pregnancy.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#269205 Dec 10, 2012
cpeter1313 wrote:
I think it's lodged in a significantly-lower portion of her anatomy.
And she likes it.
<quoted text>
I hope it didn't impale her brain.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#269206 Dec 10, 2012
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>Omg,Foo, you're right! That comment has Lily smell all over it... She's such a dickwad, lol.
Ha! LOL

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#269207 Dec 10, 2012
TomTom wrote:
<quoted text>
Please tell us again how you hated being pregnant and have only one child because you hated that part of you rwomanhood. Once more for old time sake,please. Don't leave out the part about the toxic religion you turned your back on, that wanted you to be a baby factory.
Oh, Please. For Christmas.
What business is it of yours if someone doesn't like being pregnant or doesn't want kids? Really, what business is it of yours? Are women required to like pregnancy and having kids on your say so? And what business is it of your if people choose to leave a religion?

You're just another self-righteous, sanctimonious, pompous, ignorant fundie.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#269208 Dec 10, 2012
TomTom wrote:
<quoted text>
You find cruelty funny? Another mean spirited pagan.
No, I find fundie idiocy funny. That's why you're so hilarious.
HuskerDu

United States

#269209 Dec 10, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Except she doesn't have a daughter, she's never killed ANYONE. You're a lying sack of shit No Relevance. And a laughable one at that. LOL!
Mmmm yeah ,she did.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min FYVM 1,396,034
Review: Around The States Moving & Storage (Apr '15) 2 hr RobertLHill 46
Freddy Gray's neck was a pre existing condition. Mon KKK_KKK 2
DA needs to resign Mon Baltimorean 1
legit Research Chemicals Vendor (Sep '13) Jun 26 Blue eyes boggy bebe 33
Another one found not Guilty Jun 25 bozo 3
News Police Make Attempted Murder Arrest in Northwes... Jun 25 bozo 2

Baltimore Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Baltimore Mortgages