Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 336760 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#262607 Oct 8, 2012
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>As long as this woman followed her own conscience, the outcome was of her own choosing - no matter how unpalatable the outcome and/or unfathomable her reasoning may be to others.
My deepest condolences to your brother in law, and to his and your families, Foo.
Exactly.

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#262608 Oct 8, 2012
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>We agree on very little, but we do agree here.
As do I.

I'm not sure why she feels compelled to lambast me, however.

I guess she's just on auto-rant.

{{shrug}}

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#262609 Oct 8, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
I certainly don't see anything good about it at all. And if there is no God then her beliefs drove her to make such a choice for absolutely no reason. She died for nothing.
It is no different than suicide. She died feeling she was doing what was best.

As long as she wasn't coerced, it is really as it should be.

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#262610 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> FooL...cpeter...johnny/carbon ...all called it an abortion. Lala will attest to it.
FooL also called it "an abortion procedure" to have a D&C in general
Thanks for proving it with THEIR posts. They will continue to give you grief to distract ;)
Kinda funny though to watch them bs their way out lol
Could you please stop dragging me into something I'm not even following?

No, I will NOT attest to anything of the sort.

Leave me out of this, please.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#262611 Oct 8, 2012
realkatie wrote:
<quoted text>
Wait, what about your hypothetical where you'd choose death for your daughter rather than a life-saving abortion? It is very similar to what Foo's posted. Yet you call her a monster. You probably called Michael Schiavo a monster, too. But the three of you all made decisions based on what was right for you and your family members. Do you still believe Michael Schiavo to be a monster?
I think the term "monster" is reserved for people who actually commit heinous acts, not for people who write posts thats we don't agree with or make end-of-life decisions that go against our particular sensibilities. Or... have abortions :-O

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#262612 Oct 8, 2012
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
Doubletalk. She said if it was in her body " she owned it" period.
You own your kidney. You decide whether it comes out or stays in.

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#262613 Oct 8, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
lol, you're welcome, and I agree.
They did say thast, and no Ladilulu won't attest to that. She refused to attest to it back in Jan., she sure won't do it now. Again, you're expecting integrity in discussion from a pathological liar?
I have no clue what you two are yammering about, you stupid cow.

I have no desire to discuss whatEVER it is, have you picked up on that yet, feeb?

Or does someone have to beat you to get you to understand them??

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#262614 Oct 8, 2012
OLD LADY wrote:
<quoted text>
Not mine..I've read many different quotes from many famous people.. The quote is longer,but the kindness one stuck in my mind. I guess, I should have wrote who quoted it.. One may disagree at the end of her quote,depending on what one believes,but all of us should try and" be kind anyway."
“People are often unreasonable and self-centered. Forgive them anyway.
If you are kind, people may accuse you of ulterior motives. Be kind anyway.
If you are honest, people may cheat you. Be honest anyway.
If you find happiness, people may be jealous. Be happy anyway.
The good you do today may be forgotten tomorrow. Do good anyway.
Give the world the best you have and it may never be enough. Give your best anyway.
For you see, in the end, it is between you and God. It was never between you and them anyway.”
Mother Teresa
That is a beautiful quote. I didn't know Mother Teresa was a Buddhist... Lol, just kidding :-)

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#262615 Oct 8, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me, but it is YOU people who claim to be pro-CHOICE, not pro-lifers, and you ARE villifying her by suggesting she made the wrong choice.
She made HER CHOICE. Respect HER choice and be quiet about it already.
I did nothing of the sort, you stupid old sow.

I am in complete agreement with you.

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#262616 Oct 8, 2012
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>She made her autonomous decision according to her personal ethics. Isn't that what we believe to be her right? She died, being true to herself. Dying isn't the worst thing to happen to a person, imo.
Exactly.

That is precisely what we advocate for.
sassylicious

Jackson, NJ

#262617 Oct 8, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text
Could you please stop dragging me into something I'm not even following?
No, I will NOT attest to anything of the sort.
Leave me out of this, please.
Lala, Lily even showed the link with YOUR words telling me that it is NOT an abortion. You thought that I was saying that it was when in fact it was peter and johnny.

This conversation continues and since finding out that "I" didnt say it, youve remained silent because you were afraid to confront fooL with her bs(or peter or johnny).

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#262619 Oct 8, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
Two sentences were mistyped.
Supposed to be in this order.
~After which, what's coded and charted is what the dilation and curettage was for.
It will state which kind of abortion, whether spontaneous, missed, incomplete or induce etc.~
I told you this several times. Specifically, "with the distinction of the type of abortion" and you disagreed.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262620 Oct 8, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
It is a terrible thing that we are talking about, but to place her belief in the possible "afterlife" above the very real life she had seemed to be counter-productive, wouldn't you say?
What I would say is it was HER CHOICE about HER OWN life. Who are any of you to judge her choice about HER OWN life?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#262621 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> Ever hear of a botched abortion?
Ever hear of women going in for an abortion and then days or more later being in agony or still bleeding? She goes to the ER. Dr left a body part of the baby still in mom. They do emergency D&C.
Tell me, in your opinion, is she still pregnant? According to you since the baby is still inside then she is pregnant.
What part of the body is it? Foot=not pregnant. Head= pregnant. You're being silly, so silly is what you get. Thank goodness abortion is legal in the U.S, or your scenario would be a common occurrence. We're never going back to those days, no matter how badly some people would like us to.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262622 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I don't agree. God rest the girls soul ((if true) and healing for the family (if true) but this was brought up by foo and it backfired on her and her proabortion agenda
.
She claims to be for choice but she proved to be anti- her choice. How DARE she ridicules and disrespects this womans choice and religious beliefs. All she cared about was killing that 'baby(she conveniently referred to a fetus as).
I agree about that. But that's about Foo. I don't agree with her using this woman at all.
sassylicious

Jackson, NJ

#262623 Oct 8, 2012
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>I think the term "monster" is reserved for people who actually commit heinous acts, not for people who write posts thats we don't agree with or make end-of-life decisions that go against our particular sensibilities. Or... have abortions :-O
FooL exploits women. This woman DIED and without even full knowledge of the particulars, she jumps on her unfortunate death along with her baby.

Who CARES if she disagrees with the girls choice. Not HER business remember?

She even posted a womans pictures as her avatar(exploiting her) to gain attention while lying about her story. We're awaiting THAT proof that fooL supposedly had saved @@

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262624 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> HER CHOICE was to not kill her baby.
End of story.
Exactly. Her choice was also about her own life, and she chose death for herself before killing her child in utero.
The very epitome of what she believed, as a mother and as a religious woman. She LIVED what she believed.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#262625 Oct 8, 2012
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> And they wonder WHY they are referred to as proabortion.
@@
Exactly.
Ink

Feasterville Trevose, PA

#262626 Oct 8, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
What part of SHE made the decision did you not understand?
"She was pregnant, and they dont know exactly what happened yet, but what IS known so far is that somehow he placeta was ripped (?) and being a religious Catholic, she refused an LTA to save her life. Now both she and the baby are dead."
Stop already, because ALL of you using her story this way are dishonoring HER CHOICE and HER BELIEFS.
I have just come back on this thread after days away and I may have to be brought up to speed because I don't understand why she refused an abortion. The Church does not expect any woman to give up her life for a fetus.

From the Catholic Encyclopedia

However, if medical treatment or surgical operation, necessary to save a mother's life, is applied to her organism (though the child's death would, or at least might, follow as a regretted but unavoidable consequence), it should not be maintained that the fetal life is thereby directly attacked. Moralists agree that we are not always prohibited from doing what is lawful in itself, though evil consequences may follow which we do not desire. The good effects of our acts are then directly intended, and the regretted evil consequences are reluctantly permitted to follow because we cannot avoid them. The evil thus permitted is said to be indirectly intended. It is not imputed to us provided four conditions are verified, namely:

That we do not wish the evil effects, but make all reasonable efforts to avoid them;
That the immediate effect be good in itself;
That the evil is not made a means to obtain the good effect; for this would be to do evil that good might come of it — a procedure never allowed;
That the good effect be as important at least as the evil effect.
sassylicious

Jackson, NJ

#262627 Oct 8, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
I am so sorry for your family's loss, foo :(
xoxooxoxox
According to some on here, life-saving abortions are never necessary. I guess they were wrong, eh?
Prove an abortion was necessary to save mom.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Baltimore Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Trumpbot 1,745,371
12 hr Queens78 3
person Apr 18 ljean 1
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Apr 18 Radio Flyer 3016 21,530
Baltimore is dead to me Apr 17 Truth 1
Mace Electric's Dick Colon raped an 11-year-old... (Jun '13) Apr 14 Mohammed 90
Obama Must Have a Midget Ding Dong Apr 10 Zoo Keeper 1

Baltimore Jobs

Personal Finance

Baltimore Mortgages