Scientists say they have proved climate change is real, now mus...

[SpaceBlues]

PHD wrote:

<quoted text>Well you started the New Year running. The good thing is that you haven't lost the ability to give the space out blues another spanking. Right or wrong by your statements you sure do spank the spaced out blues pretty good.

LOL.

[PHD]

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>LOL.

Come on now you said I drove tina out of here. Admit it she spanked you this time. And A Happy New Year to You.

[SpaceBlues]

The oil shale boom can be seen from space.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/12/us-sh...

[PHD]

The hot air you spew can be seen from space.

[SpaceBlues]

PHD wrote:

The hot air you spew can be seen from space.

Show us the picture.

This is not, however:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/...

[litesong]

phudd feces face wrote:

The hot air you spew can be seen from space.

'phudd feces face' can be seen from space, showing the increasing uglification of Earth.

[PHD]

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>Show us the picture.
This is not, however:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/...

That would be your forte. Not sure if it’s the hot air picture or space picture. You tell all remember you’re the one that calls everyone STUPID that disagrees with your statement so you show the entire picture.

[SpaceBlues]

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
'phudd feces face' can be seen from space, showing the increasing uglification of Earth.

Sad.

[pff is my abbreviation.]

[SpaceBlues]

PHD wrote:

<quoted text>That would be your forte. Not sure if it’s the hot air picture or space picture. You tell all remember you’re the one that calls everyone STUPID that disagrees with your statement so you show the entire picture.

Show where I called "everyone STUPID."

[ChromiuMan]

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>Chrom. misunderstood, I've never written "global warming is a hoax". There's no citation for that quote because that's now what I wrote.
I've written climate change mitigation is a hoax because there's never been an experimental test of climate change mitigation. Climate always changes, it warms, cools or stays the same.
.
<quoted text>Stawaman; of course global warming is real and so is global cooling. Climate change mitigation is the hoax, not climate change.
Reading comprehension - it's a wonderful thing.

Do tell, how do strategies like reforestation and emission reductions automatically translate to those being a hoaxes? Did you decipher that from a crop circle?

[ChromiuMan]

Brian_G wrote:

Another year has past without any experimental test of climate change mitigation. The science hasn't caught up to the politician's promises for saving our planet from man made catastrophic global warming alarmism.

So you need a scientific study to tell you that every time you mow your yard or rake leaves, the plant material contains carbon that has been sequestered from carbon dioxide? You need a scientific study to reveal that a Ford Fusion emits less carbon dioxide than a Cadillac Brougham? Have you sprayed your lawn with diquat and removed a spark plug from your car to better display your contempt of "the politician"?

[tina anne]

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

Nothing of interest here.

Then try to add something of interest.

[Patriot AKA Bozo]

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
Then try to add something of interest.

Why? You couldn't understand anyhow!

[tina anne]

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>Show where I called "everyone STUPID."

Actually you have used the phrase "dumb liars". A example can be found on the link below in post 7478 post on December 30, 2012. Of course that isn't the only time you use that phrase. You tend to use it every time a skeptic has you backed into a corner you cannot seem to get yourself out of. Something akin to the reaction by a cornered rat.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...

[SpaceBlues]

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
Why? You[tina] couldn't understand anyhow!

You are right.

tina called the sun "a nuclear reaction." She claims to hold a science degree. LOL.

[tina anne]

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>You are right.
tina called the sun "a nuclear reaction." She claims to hold a science degree. LOL.

And posted a link to Cornell University to prove it. What does Space Blues have beside an empty claim. Can you say nuclear fusion. It seems like the astromer at Cornell did. Notice how SpaceBlues dosn't say what the sun is? No claims of what actually is happening or any offers of facts to back them up from a reputable source. Only the claim that I have to be wrong. Because if I was right then he would have to admit that he is wrong. No wonder SpaceBlues is blue. It seems he knows little about space.

So much for the claim that I do not know anything about science.

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php...

[SpaceBlues]

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
And posted a link to Cornell University to prove it. What does Space Blues have beside an empty claim. Can you say nuclear fusion. It seems like the astromer at Cornell did. Notice how SpaceBlues dosn't say what the sun is? No claims of what actually is happening or any offers of facts to back them up from a reputable source. Only the claim that I have to be wrong. Because if I was right then he would have to admit that he is wrong. No wonder SpaceBlues is blue. It seems he knows little about space.
So much for the claim that I do not know anything about science.
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php...

LIAR. Dumb liar.

You published, a "a nuclear reaction." Where does it say that?

It DOES NOT. You merely continue with your lies.

You know no science nor mathematics because you have NONE.

[tina anne]

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>LIAR. Dumb liar.
You published, a "a nuclear reaction." Where does it say that?
It DOES NOT. You merely continue with your lies.
You know no science nor mathematics because you have NONE.

.
Start with the title and then read down. I also notice a lack of comment about what type of reaction is happening in the sun. If you want to claim it is not a nuclear reaction the please tell us what is happening with the sun. Is it a huge lightbulb? The shinning face of god?

Actually, why not just read it. He mentions not only nuclear reaction but even states the type of nuclear reaction and the products of that nuclear reaction.

[SpaceBlues]

The sun is not a nuclear reaction. [Contrary to what tina claims.]

[SpaceBlues]

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
.
Start with the title and then read down. I also notice a lack of comment about what type of reaction is happening in the sun. If you want to claim it is not a nuclear reaction the please tell us what is happening with the sun. Is it a huge lightbulb? The shinning face of god?
Actually, why not just read it. He mentions not only nuclear reaction but even states the type of nuclear reaction and the products of that nuclear reaction.

Dumb liar.

Where does it say like you published the "sun is a nuclear reaction?"

It DOES NOT. You lie always about science and mathematics because you know none.