Chevy Volt leapfrogs Toyota's Prius

Chevy Volt leapfrogs Toyota's Prius

There are 11794 comments on the taintedgreen.com story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Chevy Volt leapfrogs Toyota's Prius. In it, taintedgreen.com reports that:

Toyota has fallen to GM on the MPG front. The Japanese company continues to lose market.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at taintedgreen.com.

Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7524 Nov 24, 2013
iluvmyVolt wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey just me, or just us, or dolt, or voice of reality, or whatever it is you are calling yourself now.
I found another Volt that can be opened with my key fob. I found it at one of the targets in San Jose, CA.
Guess what? When I started the car, it had the same miles and the same amount of gas used as the guy down the street (the one I break into so I can video his screen .... remember?). It is also the same miles and same gas used as mine.
So, either all these Volts are mine (is mine), or everybody in the SF Bay Area that owns a Volt have the exact miles and have used the same amount of gas as mine, his, theirs, whatever.
In case you don't get what I mean ... this is verifying my claim that I have only used 7 gallons of gas for over 5,000 miles.
You can deny all you want. It doesn't make you right. Video proof is verifiable. That's why it is allowed in court.
Duh.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =ciaM-VKAjRUXX&feature=you tu.be
YouTube videos are inadmissible in court.
Quit the theatrics and get over it.
Root

Shreveport, LA

#7525 Nov 24, 2013
Leagle Beagle wrote:
<quoted text>
Continue to believe what you want us to believe Root.
I have no control over that.
You have very often said one thing and done the opposite--on record many times.
So your phoney baloney denials are nothing new.
But I do know that you've been the number one Fake Beagle here, and you have faked at least one other name as well.
No doubt it's happened more than that.
Gotcha on three counts at least.
No us, only you. You've told so many lies you can't even keep them straight. Remember when you were a young boy, somebody must have taught you that one lie leads to another, and another, so on? I would suggest you relive that life lesson.
Root

Shreveport, LA

#7526 Nov 24, 2013
Leagle Beagle wrote:
<quoted text>
YouTube videos are inadmissible in court.
Quit the theatrics and get over it.
Another lie I've watched unfold and told over and over again. Youtube videos are admissible in court.
Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7527 Nov 24, 2013
Root wrote:
<quoted text>Another lie I've watched unfold and told over and over again. Youtube videos are admissible in court.
Sorry pal.
Not YouTube videos showing only a shot of a car's instrument panel.
There's no way to verify who's car it is, where, what how, why, etc.
That point has already been made--repeatedly.
Get used to it.
Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7528 Nov 24, 2013
Root wrote:
<quoted text>No us, only you. You've told so many lies you can't even keep them straight. Remember when you were a young boy, somebody must have taught you that one lie leads to another, and another, so on? I would suggest you relive that life lesson.
Spoofers, by definition, are always lying.
So the shoe fits you Root.
You'll just have to wear it.
Spoofers are really nasty people.
Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7529 Nov 24, 2013
Root wrote:
<quoted text>No us, only you. You've told so many lies you can't even keep them straight. Remember when you were a young boy, somebody must have taught you that one lie leads to another, and another, so on? I would suggest you relive that life lesson.
After many many pages of posting filth (under his own name!!), Root gets called on his disgusting conduct.

His excuse?

Quote: "Golly, that can't be me, I was out of the country for a year, and my computer was hacked!"

Now let's talk about telling lies Rootsy old sod.

PS--who would buy a car from this guy?

Anybody?
Root

Toronto, Canada

#7530 Nov 24, 2013
My sincere apologies. I admit to posting fake identities. I promise to stop. From now on I will only post about cars. Please forgive my sins.
And a special apology to Legal Beagle for all the bad things I said about him. I am really sorry sir. Can you please forgive me too.
Root

Shreveport, LA

#7531 Nov 24, 2013
Leagle Beagle wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry pal.
Not YouTube videos showing only a shot of a car's instrument panel.
There's no way to verify who's car it is, where, what how, why, etc.
That point has already been made--repeatedly.
Get used to it.
Not true, in a court of law the video would be admissible. Along with the video would be the owner and the car to verify. Youtube videos are admissible in court and there are cases you can reference. You lied when you
said YouTube videos are not admissible.

You also lie when making false accusations and you have a long storied past of doing that here. Of course when you lie there is no evidence. You have lied.
Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7532 Nov 24, 2013
Root wrote:
My sincere apologies. I admit to posting fake identities. I promise to stop. From now on I will only post about cars. Please forgive my sins.
And a special apology to Legal Beagle for all the bad things I said about him. I am really sorry sir. Can you please forgive me too.
It's about time!!
If this in fact an honest apology.
Then your apology is accepted.
I don't hold grudges.
Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7533 Nov 24, 2013
Whoa--hold on a minute!
I just noticed that Root's post was done from Toronto!
How can that be?
Has Root mistakenly used one of his fake IP tricks?
Or is it another silly IP Spoofer turning the table on Root?
How about it Root--did you apologize or not?
Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7534 Nov 24, 2013
Root wrote:
<quoted text>Not true, in a court of law the video would be admissible. Along with the video would be the owner and the car to verify. Youtube videos are admissible in court and there are cases you can reference. You lied when you
said YouTube videos are not admissible.
You also lie when making false accusations and you have a long storied past of doing that here. Of course when you lie there is no evidence. You have lied.
About the only place a YouTube video like that would be admitted in court would be in some tin pot dictatorship in a backwater country somewhere.
In our courts, and yours---no way!
Get real.
Even if an owner was present, the video would be tossed out as hearsay.
There's absolutely no way to distinguish that video from any other.
Root

Shreveport, LA

#7535 Nov 24, 2013
Leagle Beagle wrote:
<quoted text>
About the only place a YouTube video like that would be admitted in court would be in some tin pot dictatorship in a backwater country somewhere.
In our courts, and yours---no way!
Get real.
Even if an owner was present, the video would be tossed out as hearsay.
There's absolutely no way to distinguish that video from any other.
Actually hearsay is what you practice daily when you make false allegations. Now that "would" be thrown out.

You said youtube videos were not admissible in court and now you want to update it to say "that" video would not be admissible in court. Laugh..

His video would be admissible because he and his car would be there as evidence. Just because someone smartly won't give you his identity on a video presented to you on this website holds zero water. Youtube videos are admissible in court and there are cases available for you to reference. You said otherwise numerous times and you were wrong just as you uusually are.

There is some good news though, Volt will probably be the number one yet again this year.
Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7536 Nov 24, 2013
Root, you have no idea of what you're talking about.
Furthermore what kind of stunt are you trying to pull with first an apology, then you start right up again with garbage?
Unbelievble.
Root

Shreveport, LA

#7537 Nov 24, 2013
There should be no question as to why your legal career didn't work out. Volt is doing well though.
Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7538 Nov 24, 2013
Quicklaw.com

"Video images from social media sites such as YouTube and Facebook are considered as outside of court evidence or hearsay. Given that such randomly accessible second hand video images are impossible to authenticate as to origin, or that such images can be easily altered, they do not qualify as valid evidence"
Root

Shreveport, LA

#7539 Nov 24, 2013
They do qualify and are admissible. This is where you go wrong so often. You believe everything you read on the internet.

Judge - Where did you get that information Pooh
Beagle dog - I got it from the internet!

Laugh
Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7540 Nov 24, 2013
Quicklaw is a law library. Used by law firms and businesses everywhere.
It's a huge database, containing decisions, precedents, definitions, etc from the US, Canada, and the UK on literally every subject.
The quoted definition is from that database.
There are no precedents anywhere in those three countries where social media videos have been allowed in law, and there are hundreds of precedents where they have been disallowed in law.

Sometimes Root, you really make yourself look very foolish.
Root

Shreveport, LA

#7541 Nov 24, 2013
They are admissible. Here, I have another one..

Beagle dog - Root is picking on me and I read on the internet and I think it's called spoofing!

Judge - Pooh, bring forth evidence.
Beagle dog - I can't because it will give away my trick. Umm and you have to believe me like because I said so.

Judge - You say you put out links with benign cookies. Bring those links forward.

Beagle dog - Well see judge that's the funny thing, I can't. But it's true like really really true umm!

Judge - you shall now bring forth an IP.

Dog - well the strangest thing is I can't but I know it was him and umm you have to believe me.

Judge - Root claims you have a long track record of blaming people for being someone they aren't. He says you moan and whine about it but you're always wrong. Is this true?

Dog - umm well ah kinda. But I know. And umm like I hate this Volt car and like umn it's cold outside and ah you have to believe me umm they make fun of me and Canada.

Judge - where did you study law pooh?

Dog - Pt Barnum and Carson's late night on line academy.

Judge - Son, you have dirty hands and no proof. Case dismissed.

Dog walks out with his tail between his legs.. a whimper can be heard as he stops to clean the pooh from his bottom. The court room feels sorry but pooh lied .
Leagle Beagle

Windsor, Canada

#7542 Nov 24, 2013
Root wrote:
They are admissible. Here, I have another one..
Beagle dog - Root is picking on me and I read on the internet and I think it's called spoofing!
Judge - Pooh, bring forth evidence.
Beagle dog - I can't because it will give away my trick. Umm and you have to believe me like because I said so.
Judge - You say you put out links with benign cookies. Bring those links forward.
Beagle dog - Well see judge that's the funny thing, I can't. But it's true like really really true umm!
Judge - you shall now bring forth an IP.
Dog - well the strangest thing is I can't but I know it was him and umm you have to believe me.
Judge - Root claims you have a long track record of blaming people for being someone they aren't. He says you moan and whine about it but you're always wrong. Is this true?
Dog - umm well ah kinda. But I know. And umm like I hate this Volt car and like umn it's cold outside and ah you have to believe me umm they make fun of me and Canada.
Judge - where did you study law pooh?
Dog - Pt Barnum and Carson's late night on line academy.
Judge - Son, you have dirty hands and no proof. Case dismissed.
Dog walks out with his tail between his legs.. a whimper can be heard as he stops to clean the pooh from his bottom. The court room feels sorry but pooh lied .
Reads like something out of a grade three "show and tell" theatrical.
Guess when one considers the source, it doesn't surprise.
Good entertainment though.
Well, maybe not.

More user friendly than his vulgar spoofing, perhaps.
Pete

Grandville, MI

#7545 Nov 24, 2013
Root wrote:
They do qualify and are admissible. This is where you go wrong so often. You believe everything you read on the internet.
Judge - Where did you get that information Pooh
Beagle dog - I got it from the internet!
Laugh
Wifey says:
BM will never fix their products to achieve Toyota and Honda level reliability and durability...

because they are only in existence being on the taxpayers dime.

Too Funny.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Autos Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Yanhua Mini ACDP Programming Master Tue EmilyWhtie 1
5 cylinder chevy colorado (May '07) May 14 Mike 323
News Junkyard Gem: 1998 Plymouth Breeze Expresso May 12 Dick Tracy 4
News Majority owners explore sale of NASCAR, sources... May 9 Oh phartse 2
News What Pope Francis and Obama may talk about (Sep '15) May 8 Serial deserters 54
New arrived obd tools recently (info post) May 8 jimmyLIN 1
News WEIRD and WONDERFUL? Video Footage Of Kim Jong ... May 1 Birds of a feather 3