As Toyota Sputters, VW steers for the top

[Stop It]

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>Get your head straight. The man clearly said Toyota didn’t take any funds. It’s amazing how we must explain everything to you. In a way, we feel sorry for you.

I could care less what the man said or didn't say.

Here's what you said---and I quote:...

"Toyota most certainly took bailout funds from the Japanese government and tax breaks from the US government and US states."

Now who's head ain't on straight?

JJFADS once again raggin' on Toyota for something the Detroit Three wrote the book on?

[Stop It]

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>Again, your posts are on this very thread for all to review as proof that you failed miserably. Stop spreading rubbish, dry your mouth and move on. Nobody respects a canuck that whines on an internet forum.

One more time:.. 0+0=0

PSST: Insofar as judging respect is concerned, you're not qualified.

[JJFADS]

Stop It wrote:

<quoted text>
I could care less what the man said or didn't say.
Here's what you said---and I quote:...
"Toyota most certainly took bailout funds from the Japanese government and tax breaks from the US government and US states."
Now who's head ain't on straight?
JJFADS once again raggin' on Toyota for something the Detroit Three wrote the book on?

Again, go back and read the posts. The man said Toyota didn’t accept funds and I simply said they did. It’s really very simple. This has nothing to do with any other maker and unfortunately you don’t comprehend such simple interaction between posters. You really need to pay attention and start reading all the posts before you start typing. Get your head on straight.

[Stop It]

JJFADS---the problem you have is that you're always seeking to win battles of wits---but the fact is you're unarmed!

Cheers!

[JJFADS]

Stop It wrote:

<quoted text>
One more time:.. 0+0=0
PSST: Insofar as judging respect is concerned, you're not qualified.

Keep on digging it a little deeper. For the umpteenth time you lost the debate. You opened your mouth and spewed irrelevant and off topic rubbish. Until you concede that fact you will continue to look stupid.

[JJFADS]

Stop It wrote:

JJFADS---the problem you have is that you're always seeking to win battles of wits---but the fact is you're unarmed!
Cheers!

The problem has your name on it as the posts are very clear and concise for all to review. Unfortunately like a poor marksman you missed the target. Keep on digging canuck.

[Stop It]

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>The problem has your name on it as the posts are very clear and concise for all to review. Unfortunately like a poor marksman you missed the target. Keep on digging canuck.

Is that your best effort?
Pretty weak, my man.
Especially for someone who professes to be an intellectual giant.
You really are beyond your means, my friend.

PSST---Don't give up your day job.

[Stop It]

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>Keep on digging it a little deeper. For the umpteenth time you lost the debate. You opened your mouth and spewed irrelevant and off topic rubbish. Until you concede that fact you will continue to look stupid.

Maybe I'm looking stupid today, but I can change that tomorrow morning.
On the other hand, you're way past your prime, my friend.

[Stephany McDowell]

Farfigneuuuuuuuugen.

[JJFADS]

If that's typical of your posts to come, please do not post on these threads.
Your proven lack of reading comprehension, your tendency to insult others, and your willingness to distort what is plainly written in the posts are clearly inappropriate.

[JJFADS]

Stop It wrote:

<quoted text>
Is that your best effort?
Pretty weak, my man.
Especially for someone who professes to be an intellectual giant.
You really are beyond your means, my friend.
PSST---Don't give up your day job.

If that's typical of your posts to come, please do not post on these threads.
Your proven lack of reading comprehension, your tendency to insult others, and your willingness to distort what is plainly written in the posts are clearly inappropriate.

[The Authority]

Stephany McDowell wrote:

Farfigneuuuuuuuugen.

Not quite the right spelling but "the joy of driving" is what you meant to say.

[2003emm3]

To Germans Fahrvergnügen means enjoying the Autobahn. To many Americans, unfortunately, it means driving their lard a$$es to the donut shop.

[2003emm3]

As far as VW, I read today in "Auto, Motor und Sport" that VW is preparing a new sedan for the U.S. market, one notch above the Passat maybe like the Phaeton, to compete with the Camry. As GM and Chrysler are folding and smaller, VW is moving in.

[whatever]

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>Toyota most certainly took bailout funds from the Japanese government and tax breaks from the US government and US states.

But why would state and local governments want to give Toyota tax breaks and why would Toyota refuse tax breaks? You wouldn't refuse a tax break would you?

[Stop It]

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>If that's typical of your posts to come, please do not post on these threads.
Your proven lack of reading comprehension, your tendency to insult others, and your willingness to distort what is plainly written in the posts are clearly inappropriate.

More blatant hypocracy from a third rate forum hack?
From the git go you've freely countenanced what are clearly "inappropriate" posts from countless others--outright racial slurs, crude profanity, incessant personal insults, meaningless spam, etc.(some of which is contributed by you)!
Then you take issue with one poster who challenges you on much of what you post--which you openly admit is your objective just to keep the pot boiling here.
Face it pal--with my challenges, you've met your match and then some, and now you're trying a little intimidation to make it go away.
Ain't gonna work,my friend.
As long as you continue your silly little games to justify your existence here, you can plan on me being squarely in your face.

PS.
On the other hand, perhaps it's a more practical idea for you to find some other place to stroke your ego.

[Stop It]

whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
But why would state and local governments want to give Toyota tax breaks and why would Toyota refuse tax breaks? You wouldn't refuse a tax break would you?

US manufacturers , including automakers get tax breaks, cash incentives, and Govt. support in foreign countries too.
It's been a common practice for years.
Singling out offshores like Toyota as being somehow "wrong" for doing so is just hypocracy.

[JJFADS]

Character flawed people like yourself do tend to do desperate things in desperate situations....

[JJFADS]

whatever wrote:

<quoted text>
But why would state and local governments want to give Toyota tax breaks and why would Toyota refuse tax breaks? You wouldn't refuse a tax break would you?

The post was in response to another post that said Toyota did not take bailout funds when in fact they did. Automakers have taken tax breaks from governments for years. That’s one of the ways a state brings in an automaker.

[Stop It]

JJFADS wrote:

Character flawed people like yourself do tend to do desperate things in desperate situations....

Pot calling the kettle black?
Or just a feeble attempt at a cheap shot from someone who doesn't even know the meaning of the word "character"?
Maybe all of the above?