Court favors disclosing anti-gay marr...

Court favors disclosing anti-gay marriage donors

There are 1781 comments on the KCRA-TV Sacramento story from May 20, 2014, titled Court favors disclosing anti-gay marriage donors. In it, KCRA-TV Sacramento reports that:

Same-sex marriage opponents can't keep the identities of their campaign donors secret, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday in upholding a lower court decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KCRA-TV Sacramento.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#935 Jun 17, 2014
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
And that is yet another similarity between different human rights struggles: We can mandate racial and ethnic equality. We can have black Presidents, female senators and Supreme Court Justices, Hispanic congressmen and justices, and laws protecting individuals. But we may never achieve equality in small minds like your own. At least, as a society, we can insist that everyone be served cordially and respectfully.
I know how much bigots hate that. But they're in the minority.
great response to 'wondering'. Big Red Heart

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#936 Jun 17, 2014
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you live in the 17'th century? I thought so.
And why does Kimare always talk about the dangers of anal intercourse. Does he think lesbians are into anal?

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#937 Jun 17, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
If you don't favor anal sex, try oral sex.
I guess Greg thinks since he has a useless vagina then all lesbians have must have anal sex.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#938 Jun 17, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
Everyone, no exception, is a bigot to some degree. Everyone, even you. That puts bigots in the majority.
Is there a point you are making or are you just showing off a new hat?

So because everyone's a 'bigot to some degree' then NOM deserved to have special rights?

Is that what you are claiming?

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#939 Jun 17, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Blondie, Your assertion about anal sex is a lie.
Smile.
<quoted text>
And we can trust you to give us the facts?
Smirk.
OK. Just the facts. Why do you think anal sex is the preferred form for lesbians?

That's what you are claiming basically.

And you've never explained how your own wife was able to marry a lesbian and have it legal.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#940 Jun 17, 2014
Christsharians on the DL wrote:
<quoted text>
We were saying it's not about anal sex because you don't rail about heterosexuals who engage in it.
It's just about your conflicted sexual disorder of homophobia.
Does he think anal sex is how lesbians make love since his vajayjay is all dry and crusty?

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#943 Jun 17, 2014
cpeter1313 wrote:
Yeah...a gay matchmaker. There's an authority... You know NLP is nothing more than a vague 70's self-help "theory" with NO practical or peer-reviewed data to support it, right? Of course you don't. Idiot.
We've already done the webmd entry; all forms of interpersonal contact carry risks, including vaginal/penile intercourse. The fact is that millions of people enjoy anal sex with no problems at all.
<quoted text>
Good ole Kimmie. We talk about issues, facts, and law and he talks about taking it up the butt.

sigh
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#944 Jun 18, 2014
DNF wrote:
So because everyone's a 'bigot to some degree' then NOM deserved to have special rights?
Is that what you are claiming?
No. The donors have a right to privacy. Gays are into special rights, not NOM.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#945 Jun 18, 2014
DNF wrote:
Is there a point you are making or are you just showing off a new hat?
It's an a$$hat. Wondering never leaves home without it.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#946 Jun 18, 2014
KiMare wrote:
Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
It exposes homosexuality as a sexual birth defect.
Smile.
What relevance, do you suppose, this has to the topic at hand?

It appears that you are being an inflammatory troll simply because you are too dumb to offer a rational valid and on topic argument.

What relevance could your statement possibly have to whether or not anti-gay donors financial donations are disclosed or not?

When you make such irrelevant posts, you merely expose yourself as the bigoted and inflammatory troll that you are.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#947 Jun 18, 2014
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
What relevance, do you suppose, this has to the topic at hand?
It appears that you are being an inflammatory troll simply because you are too dumb to offer a rational valid and on topic argument.
What relevance could your statement possibly have to whether or not anti-gay donors financial donations are disclosed or not?
When you make such irrelevant posts, you merely expose yourself as the bigoted and inflammatory troll that you are.
Oh quit the sissy whining and gay troll ad homoan attacks.

You know anal sex exposes homosexuality as a sexual birth defect.

Why are you afraid to face the truth?

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#948 Jun 18, 2014
KiMare wrote:
Oh quit the sissy whining and gay troll ad homoan attacks.
You know anal sex exposes homosexuality as a sexual birth defect.
Why are you afraid to face the truth?
I'm not. You, on the other hand, seem terrified to face the truth, which is why you constantly attempt to obfuscate with irrelevant and inflammatory drivel like this.

First, whether or not one participates in anal sex is irrelevant. You merely bring it up to enflame the thread because you have no valid on topic argument.

Second, when last I checked, a very small number of lesbians, who are also homosexual, participate in anal sex.

Third, studies have found that anal sex if far more prevalent among heterosexuals than homosexuals (this may have to do in part by the percentage of the population composed of heterosexual vs homosexuals).
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/06/anal...
http://io9.com/5873230/the-cdc-wants-you-to-k...

Lastly, the courts have, rightly, decided that the government has no interest in the private sexual conduct of consenting adult citizens. So, your idiotic notion has no bearing whatsoever upon the thread.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-102....

Would you care to put on some big boy pants and try to offer a valid, rational, and factually supported argument? I, personally, don't think you are up to the task.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#949 Jun 18, 2014
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
It's an a$$hat. Wondering never leaves home without it.
"What relevance, do you suppose, this has to the topic at hand?"

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#950 Jun 18, 2014
Wondering wrote:
<quoted text>
No. The donors have a right to privacy. Gays are into special rights, not NOM.
According to SCOTUS, money is speech. And we have a right to know who's speaking.

By what doctrine do you claim "donors have a right to privacy?" Did you read it on a sheet of paper after wiping yourself?
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#951 Jun 18, 2014
lides wrote:
anti-gay donors financial donations are disclosed or not?
ka-boom!
Did you mean:
anti-gay donors are disclosed or not

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

#952 Jun 18, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh quit the sissy whining and gay troll ad homoan attacks.
You know anal sex exposes homosexuality as a sexual birth defect.
Why are you afraid to face the truth?
You and your anal sex obsession. Why don't you just go out and get laid. Pay some sex worker to shove a huge one up your butt. Maybe THEN you can calm down and quite obsessing over it. You clearly want it.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#953 Jun 18, 2014
Wondering wrote:
"What relevance, do you suppose, this has to the topic at hand?"
I'm glad you asked.

It is an expression of the fact that you are routinely off topic, and never bring anything of substance to the discussion. Personally, I have long since lost any hope that you might suddenly attain any meaningful degree of intelligence or reading comprehension and contribute something of note.

Tell me, Wondering, can you think of any reason why such contributors should not stand behind their donation or even admit they had contributed?
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#954 Jun 18, 2014
lides wrote:
Tell me, Wondering, can you think of any reason why such contributors should not stand behind their donation or even admit they had contributed?
Did you have someone read the story to you? Eastman gave readers a reason.
"The concerns about harassment are very much alive, and we're going to continue to protect our donors wherever these concerns arise."

I can give you reasons all day long, start here:
http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2013/09/04...

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#955 Jun 18, 2014
Wondering wrote:
Did you have someone read the story to you? Eastman gave readers a reason.
"The concerns about harassment are very much alive, and we're going to continue to protect our donors wherever these concerns arise."
As per usual, the dim-wit sides with the attorney for the hate group.

Face it, Wonderbread, if they don't want the potential of harassment, they need not donate to the cause. Why do you hate personal accountability?

It seems that NOM are the only people having difficulty complying with disclosure laws. I wonder why that is? Perhaps, they have something to hide?
http://bangordailynews.com/2014/05/28/politic...
Pat Robertson s Fatwass

Philadelphia, PA

#956 Jun 18, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You know anal sex exposes homosexuality
Yet you don't seem to care much about heterosexuals who engage in anal sex and how that reveals heterosexuality "to be a birth defect."

Of course that selectivity on your part is because you're sexually driven by all things (male) homosexual.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Autos Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
EU cars key programmer advice, Lonsdor K518 is ... Oct 12 lanny717 2
XTOOL X-100 PAD Tablet Key Programmer (Nov '15) Oct 10 jimmyLIN 16
XTOOL X300 Plus X300+ Auto Key Programmer with ... Oct 10 jimmyLIN 1
Full-System Diagnosis for Gasoline Oct 7 jimmyLIN 1
News GM to Introduce at Least 20 New EVs by 2023 Oct 3 Solarman 3
News The World's Cleanest 2003 Honda Odyssey Has An ... Oct 1 pbug56 1
News Buy a new NSX and you can put the badges on as ... (Mar '17) Sep 26 a hole 3
BMW ISTA-D Rheingold 4.05.23 free dwonload her... Sep 26 willburr555 5
More from around the web