However court rules, gay marriage debate won't end

Mar 28, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: NewsCenter 25

However the Supreme Court rules after its landmark hearings on same-sex marriage, the issue seems certain to divide Americans and states for many years to come.

Comments (Page 67)

Showing posts 1,321 - 1,340 of2,351
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1394
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
If there's no harm being done...why are we having this discussion???
Because bigots like you keep making up lies about gay people.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1395
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
The argument isn't even relevant, anyway. When one claims the kids are worse off, you have to ask worse off than what? What alternative did the kids have?
We don't say that poor families can't raise kids, simply because they'd be better off in a rich family. We don't say that poor couples can't foster or adopt children because they'd be better off in some non-existent wealthier household.
The whole argument is a red herring from the beginning. Why are we arguing over how red it is?
It's the only argument they have left.

Common sense aside (that doesn't work on them), since there are no actual studies yet of MARRIED same-sex couples raising kids, they can make their nonsense claims that allowing us to marry will somehow have a NEGATIVE effect on our kids that isn't present if we're not married.

It's ridiculous, but as we heard at the oral arguments, it's something the anti-gays on the court seem to be willing to buy into to delay any sweeping ruling.

That whole "it's too new" thing.

The justices know it's b.s. too, but they have their own agenda right now to delay the inevitable as long as possible.

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1396
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Gay And Proud wrote:
<quoted text>
If we were to follow that logic then we should be insisting that every home where children are raised should have a heterosexual male parent, a heterosexual female parent.
Actually, that the children have their mother and father in the home with them, regardless of their sexuality....

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1397
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Because bigots like you keep making up lies about gay people.
What lies??? That a man can't be a 'mother' regardless of his sexuality??? That's a lie??????

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1398
Apr 11, 2013
 
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
It's funny how you pick and choose "experts" that draw only the conclusion you want. And even then, you ignore what they actually said and twist it into what you want.
'I' didn't pick and choose anyone....they made their own determinations and went public with them....
What about the hundreds of experts who came to different conclusions than Regnerus? Why haven't the experts whom you so admire on recognized psychology and child welfare boards accepted the conclusions that you have made up from Regnerus' study?
You 'do' realize hundreds of experts disagree with 'your' studies as well right????

Of course there is disagreement...that's why 'research' is on-going...
Personally, I think you're pretty clever at twisting facts. But that is not the same as being intelligent.
What facts did I twist??? That the study was peer reviewed? That it was published in a scientific journal?? That there are at least 18 individual sociologists that back up Regnerus' methods and results???? What facts did I twist???

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1399
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, that the children have their mother and father in the home with them, regardless of their sexuality....
what happens when one of them dies? do you parent police come take the kids away?

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1400
Apr 11, 2013
 
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you. I think we all agree that children are better off in stable households, and marriage tends to stabilize households. So we are in 100% agreement that same-sex couples will continue to raise children and that those children will be better off when their parents marry.
Best the 'optimum' situation is in the home with their biological parents, married and in a low conflict relationship.....FACT! Shouldn't we move towards the 'best' situation for our children???

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1401
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, that the children have their mother and father in the home with them, regardless of their sexuality....
Nope, gender of the parents doesn't matter.

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1402
Apr 11, 2013
 
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, no evidence whatsoever that a girl "needs a mother in the home with her" to become a well adjusted woman; nor a boy needing a father in the home either.
Wow! Denial of your daughters needs doesn't mean she doesn't need them.....
In fact millions of boys & girls grow up to be well adjusted successful adults without a same gender parent in the home, including our current President!
...and millions more don't, because of selfish, non-caring people like you...

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1403
Apr 11, 2013
 
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, gender of the parents doesn't matter.
Well, considering a man can't be a mother, and a woman can't be a father...I'd say you were wrong on that...

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1404
Apr 11, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>what happens when one of them dies? do you parent police come take the kids away?
Really?? This is your idea of a 'relevant' question???

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1405
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?? This is your idea of a 'relevant' question???
it was pretty relevant in my life...

“You Get My Truth Here!”

Since: May 09

Nonya!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1406
Apr 11, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>it was pretty relevant in my life...
Which makes it pretty irrelevant to the 7 billion people in this world...thanks for acknowledging how perfectly 'useless' your posts are....
Francisco dAnconia

Bellows Falls, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1407
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
You and your fellow anti-gays keep claiming gays raising kids is harmful, so the onus is on you to prove that.
Otherwise we get the benefit of the doubt just like every other parent.
no, its not, until you can PROVE beyond reason it is not, it is RATIONAL to believe so...
Francisco dAnconia

Bellows Falls, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1408
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, the Renergus study didn't look at kids raised by same-sex couples. They looked at kids raised by OPPOSITE-SEX couples where one of the parents had an affair at some point during the marriage with someone of the same sex.
Even you aren't dishonest enought to claim that is anywhere near the same as being raised by a committed same-sex couple.
So the only relevance the study has is to the effects of infidelity on kids.
AGAIN and AGAIN, yes, i acknowledge flaws in ALL the studies, renergus, and the same exact flaws and WAY more in all the studies you want to say prove conclusive on the issue!

In short, if renergus is flawed, so are the smaller hand picked self reporting non married samples....

see how CONSISTENCY works?
Francisco dAnconia

Bellows Falls, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1409
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>

Gender has NOTHING to do with parenting skills.
Which man breast-feeds?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1410
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Which makes it pretty irrelevant to the 7 billion people in this world...thanks for acknowledging how perfectly 'useless' your posts are....
it is relevant in that many single parents raise perfectly well adjusted kids.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1411
Apr 11, 2013
 
Francisco dAnconia wrote:
<quoted text>
no, its not, until you can PROVE beyond reason it is not, it is RATIONAL to believe so...
No, that is not rational at all, that is your prejudice clouding your reasoning skills.
Francisco dAnconia

Bellows Falls, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1412
Apr 11, 2013
 
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
No. I mean science that uses acceptable methodology.
you mean like using HAND PICKED highly educated gays self reporting samples and excluding bad gay parents and supporting itself with no objective evidence like the studies that support your agenda?

you merely agree or disagree with the study, and that aint science...
psychological degree my arse, you are A PSYCHO...
what did you do for GE then with a PSYCH degree you lying loser...

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1413
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Get That Fool wrote:
<quoted text>
Best the 'optimum' situation is in the home with their biological parents, married and in a low conflict relationship.....FACT! Shouldn't we move towards the 'best' situation for our children???
How does banning same-sex couples from marrying further your goal?

Does banning same-sex couples from marrying prevent them from having kids?

Does banning same-sex couples from marrying force opposite-sex couples to marry & raise their biological kids together in a low conflict relationship?

Nope, the only thing banning same-sex couples from marrying accomplishes is denying their kids the same legal protections kids of married hetero couples have.

You only hurt the kids.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1,321 - 1,340 of2,351
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

16 Users are viewing the Autos Forum right now

Search the Autos Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Oriental Toyota Gets Put On Probation 7 hr Mexican Sex Slave 21
Off the Hook: NHTSA closes probe on Toyota Taco... (Sep '08) Thu CharleneBlake 62
Obama sends condolences to South Korea Thu Rix 1
Westboro Baptist Church to picket Indianapolis 500 Thu Harry Balzonja 10
pathfinder problems (Jan '06) Wed scott 392
Chevy Volt leapfrogs Toyota's Prius (Nov '10) Apr 16 iluvmyVolt 8,516
Super Silca SBB Key Programmer from aliexpress (Sep '13) Apr 16 khalil 3
•••

Buy a New Car


Zipcode:
•••
•••
•••