War Indonesia vs Australia, Who will ...

War Indonesia vs Australia, Who will win? - Topix

There are 4601 comments on the www.topix.com story from Jan 27, 2011, titled War Indonesia vs Australia, Who will win? - Topix. In it, www.topix.com reports that:

POLL: Indo totally destroy Aussies * Indo wins after a struggle * Aussie mgd to defend itself * Aussie surrender without fight....

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.topix.com.

straa

London, UK

#4276 Sep 16, 2013
European Aussie wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I was watching it. It was interesting. Seems the Russians want to get involved and sort things out now. We'll see how this goes.
I made reference to my Political party to your earlier mention of Australia leading economic markets with Indinesia, Phillipines and Thailand. Good idea.
BTW Did you see that clown abuse me from UK -'Anglo whatever' his name was? Some of you Anglo's hate us European (Germans and Slavs) but dont realise that we should all stick together. We are white and Christians. The world is becomming a very hostile place ;)
No I havent heard of him, it seems a bit strange considering Britain is a Anglo Saxon germanic country

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#4277 Sep 16, 2013
straa wrote:
<quoted text>
The official world record was held by a Canadian soldier, his record had stood for over twenty years, then was broken twice in one minute by a british sniper in Afghanistan, he broke the record by shooting a taliban sniper in the head, then broke his own world record again, one minute later, by bagging a taliban commander
Remember what I said in my comment? Neither the Australian government nor military commented on the rumor, so it couldn't be confirmed. So yes, officially the British sniper still has the record, but only because the UK government confirmed it. Unofficially the record belongs to the Australian sniper, whose name was not revealed.
European Aussie

Flinders, Australia

#4278 Sep 16, 2013
straa wrote:
<quoted text>
No I havent heard of him, it seems a bit strange considering Britain is a Anglo Saxon germanic country
Yeah probably some blackman spamming me ;) Cant please everyone I suppose. I don't really hate ALL these sorts, just wish they would stay in their own countries!
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#4280 Sep 17, 2013
Russia holds firm against use-of-force clause in UN Syria resolution

By Associated Press, Updated: Tuesday, September 17, 4:54 AM
MOSCOW — Moscow is insisting that a new United Nations resolution on Syria not allow the use of force, but Russia’s foreign minister appeared to suggest Tuesday that the issue could be reconsidered if Syria violates an agreement on abandoning its chemical weapons.
Sergey Lavrov made the statement in a news conference with his French counterpart Laurent Fabius. France and the United States say that a military option remains on the table and are pushing for the U.N. resolution to reflect that.
Jason Rezaian SEP 16
In Syria, inspectors find ‘clear’ evidence of chemical attack
Lavrov said that Russia “spoke clearly” about rejecting the use-of-force clause when the chemical weapons agreement was worked out in Geneva.
++++++++=

----------

From the above report, what does that mean that Russia’s foreign minister appears to suggest the issue could be reconsidered if Syria violates an agreement on abandoning its chemical weapons?
Because As Syria already signed the chemical weapons treaty, it is not possible for US or Russia to say about Syria, since they would not use sarin gas, and how does it come about to say if Syria violates an agreement on abandoning its chemical weapons?
If Syria won't let US and France in, would they use ground troops to find chemical weapons again like Iraq case by the minister saying as so crazy ?
Is it not the Russia’s foreign minister stupid to contradict by saying that a new United Nations resolution on Syria not allow the use of force, and actually will not do that and change by using strike and invasion instead--which will be troublesome disaster like Iraq. If US and France want to strike and use ground troops to find out, Syria might not have any, or already destroyed them, or had already shipped away, US will end up finding nothing. So, the question if Syria really has any chemical weapons will never be known, like Iraq.
What a dumb foolish joke that is, as only silly fools would keep on taking that radical Obama'S SAYING of CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND to chase and destroy like another Iraq drama cycle, and would SEEM NOT being ABLE TO STOP on chemical weapons pursuit? This pursuit is also a violation of sovereignty of Syria, that cannot be done. The proposal in attempt to check into Syria to dismantle chemical weapons is impossible, and is a violation of sovereignty of Syria, of which it imposes serous threats to the stability of Syria and the ME region, from what is said by--Russia’s foreign minister appears to suggest the issue could be reconsidered if Syria violates an agreement on abandoning its chemical weapons.
As All that is with little clear mind, that is so simple to reject the trouble making calling chemical weapons issue by the irresponsible fool Obama by passing the buck in the boiling hole he digs for himself, because IT IS A DEAD-end STREET OF GOING nowhere, to repeat like Iraq WMD dismantling.
Nobody should listen to US by passing the buck as one has to do it, including North Korea, Iran, but there are just dumb idiots on the planet who are of foolish stupidity.
AS it is a free world, people around the world have free thinking, that anything of US can be refused, that people can do any ways or the other way around as they want.
Right now, if strike and invasion won't happen this time, in the future US might want to do strike again to Syria and Iran .
It is the only direction for Syria, Iran, to prepare in large scale of warfare and battle systems against US as critical importance now.
As North Korea has nuke weapons and does constant battle training systems against US and Japan,US is afraid to touch NK,and feels scared of NK all the time. So, for Iran, Syria, that is the way like NK that these nations have to build up tackle and attack systems against US for sake of security.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#4281 Sep 17, 2013
Truth wrote:
<quoted text>My dear Australian reader I would like to know where did you get your idea that Indonesia is a peace loving country unfortunately that myth of peace loving countries does not exist anywhere in the world the majority of Indonesians are still primitive barbarians they murdered peace loving Ahmadi Muslims in front of the police and world media the barbarian government did not even condemn that beastly Islamic behavior and innocent Christians have there Churches burnt down and no reaction by that barbarian Muslim government like you find in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia .These so called Muslim governments are not interested in God because they don't truly believe in God . What they are interested in is money and the opinions and publicity of their barbaric and primitive citizens not justice and truth .
compared to the terrorist state of Malaysia yes they are very peaceful, especially after the collaspe of the long ruling leader Suharto. Churches are burned down but Christians didn't get slaughtered as they suffered in Iraq... there are vilolence of religious in past but both parties have suffered as Christians living in Muslim dominated land are untouched for most of the time. If you think Indonesia isn't peace loving country, you should see how USA have done worst.... what CIA has done, sabotaging Iran's policy and leader in past and even the twin tower bombing conspiracy... while in Indonesia all religion could for most of the time coexist, and there are no law againts religious conversion or drinking alcohol in the country, some liberal Muslims can even eat pork without fear of police raiding the families, or people eating in eating in public spaces during the fasting before Ramadan... Indonesia isn't brutal and evil as the Arabs, the real violent Muslims there are the cultist group called FPI which is fanatic front line of islamic gang mob that occasionally demonstrate and cause terror among the populace, the general population see them as terrorist and evil. Indonesia for this even became the target of the evil islamic bombing terrorist.... which is organized by Malaysians due to their contrast belief about the religion, they see Indonesians as being too liberal and free about the religion and therefore they are looked down and sabotaged many times.... you think Bali is target of bombing? Jakarta also become the victim.... and the both terror link is connected to the terror group (forgot the name but they are responsible for Southern Minandao terror), which is well-known to have received Malaysian government secret support for their rampage in Southern Thai and Philippines....

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#4282 Sep 17, 2013
dammit my keyboard sucks! some of the phrases are missing....

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#4283 Sep 17, 2013
Truth wrote:
<quoted text>My dear Australian reader I would like to know where did you get your idea that Indonesia is a peace loving country unfortunately that myth of peace loving countries does not exist anywhere in the world the majority of Indonesians are still primitive barbarians they murdered peace loving Ahmadi Muslims in front of the police and world media the barbarian government did not even condemn that beastly Islamic behavior and innocent Christians have there Churches burnt down and no reaction by that barbarian Muslim government like you find in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia .These so called Muslim governments are not interested in God because they don't truly believe in God . What they are interested in is money and the opinions and publicity of their barbaric and primitive citizens not justice and truth .
well i have to add, yes there are no peace loving country anywhere on earth, even Australia... Indonesians are still developing country, though most of them are liberal and open-minded it is still a developing country, most of the uneducated and unemployed population are easy to be manipulated, however not to an extend as what has happened in afganistan

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#4284 Sep 17, 2013
straa wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny, in the west we support many independence movements that split countries up, but whenever a Scottish man talks about independence from Britain, we shut him down LOL, I understand you not wanting to lose part of your country, as an Englishman I wouldn't ever want to see Scotland leave Britain, luckily they don't want to leave Britain, so its ok, if you wanted to keep east timor, you should have tried to convince them that leaving Indonesia would be a mistake, make them want to stay, if they still say they want to leave, you have to respect that and let them go, give them independence, its the right thing to do, lots of Anglo countries were given independence from Britain, you shouldn't try to hold on to something against their wishes, it might be painfull to lose them, but its the only way and has to be done, if the Scots ever said they wanted to leave Britain, we would let them go, no matter how painfull it would be
lmao good one matey, i have to agree with you on this one...

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#4286 Sep 18, 2013
Bogensexpat wrote:
<quoted text>now what makes you think that west Papua wanted to be out from Indonesia? look at how poor timor is now, few hundreds militia who gained international view didn't mean that the entire province wanted to be parted from the country itself lol, so lets say the aborigins of alice's spring wanted to be free, so the australians government would just let them go?
Okay, Australia helped East Timor get Independence because the Indonesian military was attempting to commit genocide by killing all the men and raping the women to create an Indonesian 'master race'. Australia found out and stepped in, with the Indonesian military cowering back to Indonesian territory. The Indo government won't tell you this, but they are terrified of the Australian military. The Indonesians are now trying to do the same thing in West Papua and thats why we will likely see the oz military in New Guinea as the Indo's wave there fists from across the border.
Bogensexpat

Asia/Pacific Region

#4287 Sep 18, 2013
Shadowraptor360 wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, Australia helped East Timor get Independence because the Indonesian military was attempting to commit genocide by killing all the men and raping the women to create an Indonesian 'master race'. Australia found out and stepped in, with the Indonesian military cowering back to Indonesian territory. The Indo government won't tell you this, but they are terrified of the Australian military. The Indonesians are now trying to do the same thing in West Papua and thats why we will likely see the oz military in New Guinea as the Indo's wave there fists from across the border.
well are the Indonesian military commits a mass slaughter in Papua currently? Doubt so, are Indonesian afraid of Australia? Not necesarily i would say.. The genocide in East Timor was conducted by our military dictator who wanted to show off Indonesias superiority over her territory but ended up losing it permanently, but on the case of Timor the vote goes independence but Papua its still a no, why should Australia intefere? Basically to weaken Indonesia not human right issue crap whatever no, why? Because Australia is the one who is afraid, i dont see any reason to be so anyway, its really the same issue as falk island in Argentina
Bogensexpat

Asia/Pacific Region

#4288 Sep 18, 2013
On second thought its papua new guinea that are afraid, and its in Australias interest if they get stronger or cover more territory, so then Australian company could start digging more gold on the territory...

Not really falkland, but on this case there would be military conflict to make either side to give up

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#4289 Sep 18, 2013
Bogensexpat wrote:
On second thought its papua new guinea that are afraid, and its in Australias interest if they get stronger or cover more territory, so then Australian company could start digging more gold on the territory...
Not really falkland, but on this case there would be military conflict to make either side to give up
Yeah Falklands is a different scenario entirely and I doubt there would be military action. Australia is a member of the UN security council and is currently the most powerful nation in the region. Indonesia declaring war on Australia would be a death sentence for Indonesia, no offence to Indonesian forum goers, but I don't see any major nations supporting Indonesia in the UN security council if a war was to occur between Indo and Aus.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#4290 Sep 18, 2013
Shadowraptor360 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah Falklands is a different scenario entirely and I doubt there would be military action. Australia is a member of the UN security council and is currently the most powerful nation in the region. Indonesia declaring war on Australia would be a death sentence for Indonesia, no offence to Indonesian forum goers, but I don't see any major nations supporting Indonesia in the UN security council if a war was to occur between Indo and Aus.
that is true, however there are also very little chance that Australia would even gain a hold over any land in Indonesia, but there are chances Indonesia who have more capable men to die to gain one. Australia is the most advanced along with Singapore but not the most powerful, there are only 25 million people there.. should there be no UN support diplomatically i doubt Australia could win.. but the case here i do not like is some who mention Indonesia as true islamic state, because its not
Malon Monroe

Bandung, Indonesia

#4291 Sep 18, 2013
MALON ADALAH PENYEMBAH IBLIS BETINA KAFIR PEOT ELIZABETH.
MASA UMAT ISLAM MENYEMBAH RATU KAFIR ?
MASA UMAT ISLAM TA'AT PADA PENGUASA DEDENGKOT KAFIR ?
JANGAN-JANGAN MALON SENDIRI KERAJAAN KAFIR ?

Since: Aug 12

Jakarta, Indonesia

#4293 Sep 18, 2013
Gimana sih,aus kan dah anteng,ditongkrongin astute tuh
European Aussie

Flinders, Australia

#4294 Sep 18, 2013
The Great Boganexpat wrote:
<quoted text>that is true, however there are also very little chance that Australia would even gain a hold over any land in Indonesia, but there are chances Indonesia who have more capable men to die to gain one. Australia is the most advanced along with Singapore but not the most powerful, there are only 25 million people there.. should there be no UN support diplomatically i doubt Australia could win.. but the case here i do not like is some who mention Indonesia as true islamic state, because its not
"Rafa La La" whatever SOB...,lol, is quoting what I say to you in other threads. Suggests I swap wifes with him WTF?? Muzzies man...

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#4295 Sep 18, 2013
European Aussie wrote:
<quoted text>
"Rafa La La" whatever SOB...,lol, is quoting what I say to you in other threads. Suggests I swap wifes with him WTF?? Muzzies man...
rauf lala is an idiot bigot muslim turdskins who claim to be pakistani, but well he hides his ip address, if he is trully in Pakistan he shouldn't be ashamed to show it to the world
European Aussie

Flinders, Australia

#4296 Sep 18, 2013
The Great Boganexpat wrote:
<quoted text>rauf lala is an idiot bigot muslim turdskins who claim to be pakistani, but well he hides his ip address, if he is trully in Pakistan he shouldn't be ashamed to show it to the world
Tell me about it.
I once knew and despised an Aussie that use to sleep around on his wife. When I meet all these Muzzies who do this and worse, yet claim to belong to some higher strict religious order the guy was a f vcking saint by comparison, lol...
KGB

Surabaya, Indonesia

#4297 Sep 21, 2013
Russia will help Indonesia in any war, any battle field. Any war you name it, Russia or former Soviet Union always on the opposite to the United States, why ? because this is a long unfinished cold war dated back to 50 years ago.
As Russia did in Syria and other countries such as Libya, Algeria, Iran, and Iraq. Rather than small populated country like Australia it will be China an overpopulated 1.3 billion people. China is a major thread to Indonesia. They have technology, military forces, and giant economic growth. They also have Jackie Chan, Xiaomi cheap Smartphone, and Kung Fu Panda.
Ahem

Qinhuangdao, China

#4298 Sep 21, 2013
KGB wrote:
Russia will help Indonesia in any war, any battle field. Any war you name it, Russia or former Soviet Union always on the opposite to the United States, why ? because this is a long unfinished cold war dated back to 50 years ago.
As Russia did in Syria and other countries such as Libya, Algeria, Iran, and Iraq. Rather than small populated country like Australia it will be China an overpopulated 1.3 billion people. China is a major thread to Indonesia. They have technology, military forces, and giant economic growth. They also have Jackie Chan, Xiaomi cheap Smartphone, and Kung Fu Panda.
Why does ever idiot think Russia is going to help them ? What has Indonesia done for Russia ? NOTHING! Russia will only help its slavic neighbors and nobody else.

Russia will not risk a war to help Indonesia. Did Indonesia help Russia in the Afghan war or WW2 or WW1 ?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Melbourne, Australia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
I need them! 9 min Gfc 15
ClubX bayswater cinema room (Jun '14) 31 min quietlysensual 1,608
Winter 57 min Sniffy is a nonce 3
Adam Goodes needs to grow up! 1 hr Observer 4
Sniffy Jokes!!! 2 hr Its me 19
What U bin do? 3 hr Ehh 3
Flora and fauna park 3 hr beachtimes 111
Club x Thomastown (Aug '14) 20 hr anon 1,687
More from around the web