SLO council rejects allegations that CAPSLO stole from homeless

The San Luis Obispo City Council has affirmed its support for Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo County and publicly dismissed a local news website’s allegations that the nonprofit was pilfering money from homeless clients.

[Reject Cal Fraud]

Good move by our City Council to reject these deceitful, non-factual, lies by CalCoast blog site, they think they are reporting News ? What a laugh they are two terminated from New Times and others old hags who can not find a job so they rely on the public to support them with with these ridiculous non existence alleged stories.

Both are the laughing stock of the community and the professional press. Just today i listened to three local professionals talk about the funny unbelievable fabricated stories they blog on. Ever wonder why Prize winning journalist or real investigative reporter or AP wire, or major media never publish there trash ? because as A.I.M. put it and AP they are not reporters and have no facts or evidence in any of their funny stories. They are two clowns without a circus to perform at !

[Cal Coast Exposed]

CalCoast failed to pay taxes and is under criminal investigation for tax fraud.

[Robert Stienburg]

The claims above and elsewhere on this site have been investigated by us and determined to be false and/or unsupportable. Numerous similar postings (all from unreliable anonymous pseudonyms) have been made on various other web sites:

http://tinyurl.com/20120703A
http://tinyurl.com/20120703B

There are several others.

No substantiating information or evidence has been supplied. Claims that investigations exist have also been determined to be false.

Unless credible information is supplied it can only be concluded that the claims originate from an angry or aggrieved individual attempting to damage reputations without merit. As CalCoastNews appears to us to be an investigative news agency it is likely that all of the the posts originate from a single individual posing as multiple parties who is unhappy with a past news article. This is a fairly common scenario.

In our opinion, all of the above is false.