California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legalization Initiative

[RiccardoFire]

When the CDC launched new swine flu vaccine in 2009, it recommended children as young as 6 months be vaccinated. All FDA-approved intramuscular flu vaccines comprise an inactivated virus. So is there any evidence that inactivated viral influenza vaccines are effective in very young children?

Answer the question big mouth d. Show us the journals. Back your mouth or just do as most of us predict, just lie and insult.

[BrassO]

So why do you think they did it that way?

Was there a plan behind all this?

Just where did they cook all this up at in the first place?

[RiccardoFire]

A study in England has strengthened evidence from Scandinavia that a vaccine used to prevent pandemic flu boosted the risk of sleep disorder among teens and children, doctors said on Tuesday.

Using the Pandemrix vaccine increased the risk of narcolepsy among people aged four to 18 by a factor of 14 compared to those who did not get the jab, they said.

[RiccardoFire]

Two years to the day after CSL's Fluvax was banned for use in children under the age of 5, news has emerged that Australian doctors are continuing to administer this shot to infants and toddlers despite the fact that there are four other vaccines that are licensed for use in this age group.

Originally, it was discovered that the rate of febrile convulsions following Fluvax was 10 times higher than the 'expected' rate and was causing seizures in 1 child in 100. As a result, the Chief Medical Officer of Australia, Jim Bishop, banned the vaccine for use in children under five and current recommendations state that it should only be used in children between five and 10 years of age if no other vaccination is available.

[RiccardoFire]

A new scientific study published in The Lancet reveals that influenza vaccines only prevent influenza in 1.5 out of every 100 adults who are injected with the flu vaccine. Yet, predictably, this report is being touted by the quack science community, the vaccine-pushing CDC and the scientifically-inept mainstream media as proof that "flu vaccines are 60% effective!"

This absurd claim was repeated across the mainstream media over the past few days, with all sorts of sloppy reporting that didn't even bother to read the study itself (as usual).

It was published! It was published!

[Rain]

The magical tour will begin very soon, or has it already?

[Cowboy Dan]

Get up on your roof, Rain. Maybe you can catch a ride with the meteor passing by this weekend.

[G points]

A all know a "d" is below average, so can't have anymore of this being posted here since it sets a bad example for other readers to follow.

[Jillian Galloway]

It was the will of the American people that legalized marijuana in CO and WA and it was the will of the American people that gave President Obama a second term. He can't now nullify one without severely undermining the legitimacy of the other!

In the seventy years since the launch of the marijuana prohibition we've learned a few important things: 1.) The prohibition absolutely does NOT stop people using marijuana. 2.) The prohibition causes FAR more harm than what it prevents. 3.) The prohibition fuels organized crime and makes children LESS safe.

It is fundamentally WRONG for the government to continue any policy that causes more harm than good! We have to put the safety of our children FIRST and demand that marijuana be legalized like beer and wine.

[RiccardoFire]

Jillian Galloway wrote:

It was the will of the American people that legalized marijuana in CO and WA and it was the will of the American people that gave President Obama a second term. He can't now nullify one without severely undermining the legitimacy of the other!
In the seventy years since the launch of the marijuana prohibition we've learned a few important things: 1.) The prohibition absolutely does NOT stop people using marijuana. 2.) The prohibition causes FAR more harm than what it prevents. 3.) The prohibition fuels organized crime and makes children LESS safe.
It is fundamentally WRONG for the government to continue any policy that causes more harm than good! We have to put the safety of our children FIRST and demand that marijuana be legalized like beer and wine.

while I agree pot should be legal, I didn't realize we elected the Marxist a second time because of the pot issue?

[Trains]

The magical medical tour will begin very soon, or has it already?

[ThomasA]

Jillian Galloway wrote:

In the seventy years since the launch of the marijuana prohibition we've learned a few important things: 1.) The prohibition absolutely does NOT stop people using marijuana. 2.) The prohibition causes FAR more harm than what it prevents. 3.) The prohibition fuels organized crime and makes children LESS safe.
It is fundamentally WRONG for the government to continue any policy that causes more harm than good! We have to put the safety of our children FIRST and demand that marijuana be legalized like beer and wine.

Step forward and come up with a 100% accurate non-invasive field test that will stand up in court to show THC content in someone suspected of using MJ like the BAT used in alcohol tests. Until that time, companies with a zero policy and police suspecting a DUI will have to put up with positive/negative results and act accordingly.

[BeekerBeeker]

The magical medical tour will begin very soon, or has it already?

I was under the impression the bus would be yellow in color?

[RiccardoFire]

ThomasA wrote:

<quoted text>Step forward and come up with a 100% accurate non-invasive field test that will stand up in court to show THC content in someone suspected of using MJ like the BAT used in alcohol tests. Until that time, companies with a zero policy and police suspecting a DUI will have to put up with positive/negative results and act accordingly.

What do you call a blood test for alcohol? Just like booze they can do a blood or a urine test. Why you so worried and scared bro?

[ThomasA]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>What do you call a blood test for alcohol? Just like booze they can do a blood or a urine test. Why you so worried and scared bro?

You're sidestepping! A BAT is a non-invasive test for alcohol content and can be administered in the field where a pee test shows either positive/negative and not whether you smoked last night or this morning. Any kind of blood testing is at the employee's expense. They would be challenging a professional testing lab rather than the employer. Any testing on the employee's part would have to be done at the same time as the first test to prevent dilluting,blocking,or tampering with the results.

[BeanOs]

Glendora, California news:

A steady group of RACISTS writers for the sgvexaminer.com have once again posted their twisted southern racists cramp-ons.

March 7 - 13, 2013 edition, page B2 an B3.

George Ogden, Ken Herman and Ken Eliasberg but another person Steve Herfert couldn't make the newspapers deadline this time but he regulary speaks at the council member for West Covina, California.

All these clowns are GOP, Republican or Tea Party bigots.

[RiccardoFire]

ThomasA wrote:

<quoted text>You're sidestepping! A BAT is a non-invasive test for alcohol content and can be administered in the field where a pee test shows either positive/negative and not whether you smoked last night or this morning. Any kind of blood testing is at the employee's expense. They would be challenging a professional testing lab rather than the employer. Any testing on the employee's part would have to be done at the same time as the first test to prevent dilluting,blocking,or tampering with the results.

How many people that drink or smoke would want to work for a North korean style company like that in the first place? DO you go around collecting the piss? Why you so worried about it? If you worry what an employee puts in their body, and work performance, sick days....etc. Do a blood test, make sure they don't smoke at home, or drink alcohol, sugar drinks, diet soda drinks, popcorn candy, maybe have a curfew so they get enough sleep at night. lol...keep it up....lol

[ThomasA]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>How many people that drink or smoke would want to work for a North korean style company like that in the first place? DO you go around collecting the piss? Why you so worried about it? If you worry what an employee puts in their body, and work performance, sick days....etc. Do a blood test, make sure they don't smoke at home, or drink alcohol, sugar drinks, diet soda drinks, popcorn candy, maybe have a curfew so they get enough sleep at night. lol...keep it up....lol

You're rambling and babbling! Try again when you come down tomorrow.

[RiccardoFire]

ThomasA wrote:

<quoted text>You're rambling and babbling! Try again when you come down tomorrow.

Ok, i will look up easier words and try to talk down to your third grade argument.

[Randy -Rock- Hudson]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>while I agree pot should be legal, I didn't realize we elected the Marxist a second time because of the pot issue?

We didn't elect him at all, the Electoral College did.