CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming

Created by CitizenTopix on Oct 12, 2010

4,595 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Tops

Monrovia, CA

#7118 Feb 13, 2013
Sit on it and spin, you out of towner posters.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#7119 Feb 13, 2013
http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2012/11/20/g...

Dr. Norman Page says that ďThe earth is entering a cooling phase which is likely to last about 30 years and possibly longer.Ē

What does Dr Bigot Dope think?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#7120 Feb 13, 2013
Make my day

tell me that you donít think that oil is a fossil fuel?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#7121 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
Make my day
tell me that you donít think that oil is a fossil fuel?
I don't really care, but it's debatable. A study published in Science Magazine today presents new evidence supporting the abiotic theory for the origin of oil, which asserts oil is a natural product the Earth generates constantly rather than a ďfossil fuelĒ derived from decaying ancient forests and dead dinosaurs.
The lead scientist on the study ? Giora Proskurowski of the School of Oceanography at the University of Washington in Seattle ? says the hydrogen-rich fluids venting at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean in the Lost City Hydrothermal Field were produced by the abiotic synthesis of hydrocarbons in the mantle of the earth.

You need to think outside of the old box. Science is always changing, it's not absolute. The time we sit back and stop thinking like you is when we don't advance. We used to think eating soy was healthy just a few years ago. Keep up with the times....loser!

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#7122 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
Make my day
tell me that you donít think that oil is a fossil fuel?
Make my day
tell me that you think that cold snowy weather is a sign of global warming?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#7123 Feb 13, 2013
Thanks

We are done :D

You should look into scientology :)

right up your tree

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#7124 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
Thanks
We are done :D
You should look into scientology :)
right up your tree
I was done long time ago with you, you are an idiot that thinks science never changes. You should look into scientific journals. Like I said, I don't really care, but am open to a scientist saying different. Russian and Ukrainian scientists have produced an elegant proof that abiotic oil production (from intense pressure and high temperatures at least 100 kilometers below the earth's surface) is entirely consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, but that no such proof has ever been put forth for the fossil fuel theory. In fact, he states that there is no ďfossil fuel theory,Ē merely a hypothesis for which no proof has ever been set forth.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#7125 Feb 13, 2013
No seriously we are done

I am not discussing actual science with a pseudoscience aficionado

you donít have enough information to talk on any science subject

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#7126 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
No seriously we are done
I am not discussing actual science with a pseudoscience aficionado
you donít have enough information to talk on any science subject
No seriously we are done
I am not discussing actual science with a pseudoscience aficionado
you donít have enough information to talk on any science subject...Science changes, you can try to insult me and talk big like you are the one and only expert, but by doing that you are calling people that are actual scientist that I posted from the same thing. People like Henrik Svensmark, and others. You even said all you do is take a telescope to schools and talk to little boys, you are the one that is an insult to science. Go eat some soy. Get some help!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#7127 Feb 13, 2013
The number of sciences you have to ignore to believe what you choose to believe means you know nothing, of any sciences at all.

None of the wild beliefs you have, have passed the standards of peer review

You have no idea how rigorous that is.

The reason they have not passed is because they have never been submitted, and for good reason. You are being suckered by people making money on conspiracy theory enthusiasts

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#7128 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
The number of sciences you have to ignore to believe what you choose to believe means you know nothing, of any sciences at all.
None of the wild beliefs you have, have passed the standards of peer review
You have no idea how rigorous that is.
The reason they have not passed is because they have never been submitted, and for good reason. You are being suckered by people making money on conspiracy theory enthusiasts
Hey old man, this is 2013, not 1970. Stop living in the past, times have changed. You talk big old man, but modern day scientist don't agree with your old fashion. I posted the names of the scientist, why don't you tell them they are nuts...lol...I hope when I get old that I won't be as stubborn and backwards as you.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#7129 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
None of the wild beliefs you have, have passed the standards of peer review
"peer review" like politicians, government grants to prove a certain way, hollywood idiots...YOU!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#7130 Feb 13, 2013
I am not discussing astronomy with an astrology nut

Seriously we are done, belief is not science, it takes actual evidence, things are put up for peer review so cross disciplinary sciences can weigh in on results. Nothing you are talking about has done that, it is shaman fooling the gullible, they are going after people that desperately want to believe something for religious or political reasons.

They have hit their mark, you are stupid enough to buy this crap

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#7131 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
I am not discussing astronomy with an astrology nut
Seriously we are done, belief is not science, it takes actual evidence, things are put up for peer review so cross disciplinary sciences can weigh in on results. Nothing you are talking about has done that, it is shaman fooling the gullible, they are going after people that desperately want to believe something for religious or political reasons.
They have hit their mark, you are stupid enough to buy this crap
This is global warming, not astronomy which as I'm sure you might know is finding new discoveries all the time. Like I said, why don't you tell people like Henrik Svensmark, who is a physicist and professor in the Division of Solar System Physics at the Danish National Space Institute in Copenhagen, that he is an idiot??? He has no religious or political reasons, but you nailed it. The studies are coming from Government studies that are predetermined. I have never heard my Church say anything about it. But I know you had to add that with your Bigotry.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#7132 Feb 13, 2013
I am not going to discuss anything that has not been published specifically for peer review across the multiple disciplines of science

anything that has not done that, isnít science, but is propaganda

You are being played the fool
Big D

Modesto, CA

#7133 Feb 13, 2013
There are some other conspiracy theories you should check out

There is one saying George Bush personally masterminded 911 and ordered the demolition of the world trade center.

If you are not already on the moon landings were faked train, that is a good one for you.

And of course the old standby of birthers

How about the one about the Jewish control of the banking industry

And of course Atlantis

Ancient aliens

and my personal favorite, that JFK is alive and well and living in Cuba sharing an apartment with Elvis that they rent from Jimmy Hoffa

None of these "theories" have been submitted to the scientific journals for peer review either, you should be championing them too.
cyberjill

San Jose, CA

#7134 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
I am not going to discuss anything that has not been published specifically for peer review across the multiple disciplines of science
anything that has not done that, isnít science, but is propaganda
You are being played the fool
my gosh u are rude and full of itself, science is debatable, I had a teacher like that dumb as hell
cyberjill

San Jose, CA

#7135 Feb 13, 2013
Big D wrote:
I am not going to discuss anything that has not been published specifically for peer review across the multiple disciplines of science
anything that has not done that, isnít science, but is propaganda
You are being played the fool
but you are the fool......fool!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#7136 Feb 13, 2013
cyberjill wrote:
<quoted text>my gosh u are rude and full of itself, science is debatable, I had a teacher like that dumb as hell
You think I am rude, try publishing one of his theories for peer review, you would be laughed out of the academies.

They expect real science, not politically motivated garbage
Pattie4s

Monrovia, CA

#7137 Feb 13, 2013
These out of towners post "rick perry" frapp anyway.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atascadero Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News District attorney protests Fresno murderer's re... Sat No one cares 2
Police Judicial Corruption Wrongful Convictions (Oct '14) Fri SETUP 3
SMITH VOLVO, Inc. SUED Apr 22 Allen Dawson 4
News Boxer: Regulators' 'heads should roll' over Dia... Apr 15 Hidden govt info 1
lenny jones & dave congalton Apr 15 anonymous 2
DON'T BUY: Crystal Geyser water and Volvic water (Nov '08) Apr 14 mema1221 4
Dogs in SLO Grocery Stores Illegal Apr 11 No Dogs in MY FOOD 3
More from around the web

Atascadero People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]