Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#182464 Mar 3, 2013
I just have to interrupt here for a minute and ask, what kind of loser would sit around obsessively rigging the judge-its over and over again?

Can anyone imagine what kind of loser would do that?

Jizzy? Dan? Bill? Xavier?

YUK!YUK!YUK!

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#182465 Mar 3, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
the formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife
That definition violates the 14th Amendment, so it should be changed.
LiesSGV

Covina, CA

#182466 Mar 3, 2013
George Ogden the great pain in the backside liars club president.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#182467 Mar 3, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
That definition violates the 14th Amendment, so it should be changed.
What should be changed, the definition or the 14th amendment?

YUK!YUK!YUK!
LiesSGV

Covina, CA

#182468 Mar 3, 2013
George Ogden the great pain in the backside liars club president.

Along with is side kicks, Steve Herfert.

Steve Herfert just couldn't resist spouting more of his racist West Covina, California carp.

Could Shelley Sanderson, Rob Sotelo (a plumber) and Andrew Mcintyre really be racists after all?

Don't ya just love it when racists come out of the closet? Doing it in public was such a stupid move on their part, but you know that's how racists operate these days and of old days too.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182469 Mar 3, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. Look idiot, you don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry!
Sheesh.
Nobody said you did, again you are failing miserably in your comprehension of the law.

But why don't you tell us again how your know more about the law than the judge?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182470 Mar 3, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Riiight.
So freedoms on how to live as long as they don't harm others were never at the crux of the forming of our government.
Better get a grip skippy.
The freedom to marry an adult of one's choice can easily be seen as a right.
Oh look, Dan wants to chime in and protect the equally irrelevant Rose.

I'm sorry that both Rose and you have such trouble accepting what the courts have said. I guess you don't like the DOMA ruling anymore huh?
SackOwheat

Covina, CA

#182471 Mar 3, 2013
Did ya hear about the Stupid Republican in Sacramento, California this past weekend?

More than 1,000 delegates to the state party's spring convention elected former california state lawmaker Jim Brulte.

He will be the new Republican party chairman and charged him with recruiting a more diverse pool of candidates, since the republican can only muster 30% of the registered voters in California.

After what the idiots in Washington D.C. with the sequester did this percentage number will drop even farther to about 20%..

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182472 Mar 3, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Most people into anal sex are straight, stupid.
Another useless statistic from Rose.

BTW Rose, straight people do more of EVERYTHING, heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by about 80:1.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#182473 Mar 3, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Waitaminit! I didn't write all that Rosie, you're fibbing. I just asked if that was a leg lamp or your leg.
Well, dummy, the leg lamp is an idealized image of the female form upon which (straight) men hang their fantasies.

Like that idiot who claims he thinks I'm a man, then tries to insult me by telling me I'm really well hung, you need to work on your insults.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182475 Mar 3, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
That definition violates the 14th Amendment, so it should be changed.
It doesn't Rose, and the court explained it to you, I am sorry that you are too ignorant to understand that equal right's do not equate to equal outcomes.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182476 Mar 3, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
That definition violates the 14th Amendment, so it should be changed.
BTW Rose, you never explained to us how a Constitutional Amendment with was drafted and ratified in violation of Article V of the US Constitution can be used to negate a law as unconstitutional?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182477 Mar 3, 2013
SackOwheat wrote:
Did ya hear about the Stupid Republican in Sacramento, California this past weekend?
More than 1,000 delegates to the state party's spring convention elected former california state lawmaker Jim Brulte.
He will be the new Republican party chairman and charged him with recruiting a more diverse pool of candidates, since the republican can only muster 30% of the registered voters in California.
After what the idiots in Washington D.C. with the sequester did this percentage number will drop even farther to about 20%..
The Sequester was Obama's Idea, and the GOP received 37% of the CA vote, but who needs facts?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#182478 Mar 3, 2013
akaidiot wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody said you did, again you are failing miserably in your comprehension of the law.
But why don't you tell us again how your know more about the law than the judge?
You are just an idiot.
LOLSER!
Judges disagree with each other. Why else would there be more than one on the Supreme Court?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#182479 Mar 3, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW Rose, you never explained to us how a Constitutional Amendment with was drafted and ratified in violation of Article V of the US Constitution can be used to negate a law as unconstitutional?
You just make up crap.
Thanks for the laugh at your expense.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182480 Mar 3, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are just an idiot.

LOLSER![/Quote]

I'll worry about what you think of me and your made up term's- "LOLSER" - when I finish this $200 bottle of wine and don't have another to open.

[QUOTE who="Rose_NoHo"]< quoted text>
Judges disagree with each other. Why else would there be more than one on the Supreme Court?
Interesting statement. And how do you feel about our lives being regulated by how one can stack the court as opposed to what the Constitution says?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#182481 Mar 3, 2013
akaidiot wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't Rose, and the court explained it to you, I am sorry that you are too ignorant to understand that equal right's do not equate to equal outcomes.
Dummy, I didn't say anything about equal outcomes. I'm talking about equal rights. A man has the right to marry a woman, a woman should have that same right. I doubt there will be an equal outcome, as many women married to women as there are men married to women, but a woman should have that equal right. And vice versa.
Why are you against equal right's?(LOL)

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182483 Mar 3, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You just make up crap.
Thanks for the laugh at your expense.
Really? I would worry about you opinion if you actually knew what Article V said.

Not to mention you are completely ignorant of history.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#182484 Mar 3, 2013
akaidiot wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting statement. And how do you feel about our lives being regulated by how one can stack the court as opposed to what the Constitution says?
Whatever, b!tch.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#182485 Mar 3, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dummy, I didn't say anything about equal outcomes. I'm talking about equal rights. A man has the right to marry a woman, a woman should have that same right. I doubt there will be an equal outcome, as many women married to women as there are men married to women, but a woman should have that equal right. And vice versa.
Why are you against equal right's?(LOL)
Again you have shown you are incapable of critical thinking. Don't worry Rose, you will get that GED, I have faith in you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atascadero Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
California rural law center workshop/training Wed 1234_slo 1
News Plight of Farmworkers Focus of Santa Barbara Co... Tue Reggie Williams 1
News California police chief admits to issuing fake ... Dec 5 Reggie Williams 1
Narcotics Task Force NARC AJ Santana GONE (Feb '15) Dec 1 Jeromie dillon 5
San Luis Obispo Has a New Judge/Commissioner C... Nov 22 Ole boys 2
News Deputy's DUI arrests leads to allegations of fa... Nov 19 IAF 1
Dave Congalton Loses it after Trump Election Nov 14 KVEC-listener-I-hope 1

Atascadero Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Atascadero Mortgages