Advertisment
 

Join the Topix community today: 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Photography

Cyrus photograph: art - or something else?

Comments (Page 7)

Showing posts 121 - 122 of 122
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
Myself
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#144
May 16, 2008
 
erotic leer.
Ow come on. Here is the thing that i think lies at the truth of the mattter
they were bad photos.
she wasnt topless. Topless means nipples. there was not even cleavage. no part of her chest was exposed.
lets get real.
miley has been described as just out of bed look. like she was trying to be sexy. she did not look sexy. she looked sick to be honest. And i think that is what really people are ticked off about. That the poor girl thought she was going to look glamorous... and doesnt.
whose fault is that. Lebowitz took the pics. But Billy Rae Cyrus and his wife were there. Billy Rae posed in same pic as daughter when she was dressed exactly same... in sheet. So he was not duped. Comeon you think you would not say hey, my daughter looks like she is naked under there....this is not appropriate for her. and it darn well looks freaky that i am in photo with her...
nope.
so billy ray did not see it that way. And now because of Media Pressure they are claiming to be duped.
I did not loose respect for them for photos.
i lost respect for them when they acted duped. They saw the pics and had to sign approval for themmm. They were not duped. And they are transparent as all get out trying to say they were
Myself
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#145
May 16, 2008
 
Mmk. miley is old enough to know that when you come out clothed in only bedsheet and they have you lying down taking pics and then one where your lying next to dad...

its going to be construed as sexual

billy rae is definatly old enough.

And even if they had never seen them, they were the oens being photographed.

but they did see the photos
And they had to approve the usage of them

They saw the photos
They liked the photos
Miley called them art.

And then media and fans had a fit.

suddenly she was duped. suddenly she was embarrassed.

Myself i dont think the photos were sexual looking. Frankly no cleavage no private parts at all shown.

she looks more like a cracked out person than sleazy.

they are bad photos.

which miley and her parents approved of

so they liked them until others didnt.

They werent taking advantage of.
they are making a scapegoat out of lebowitz
Showing posts 121 - 122 of 122
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Photography Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
a hard, good life 2 hr doris tyrie 1
Suzanne Koan captures Big Isle scenes 23 hr karl 8
Brides get dirty in 'Trash the Dress' movement Fri Jaxon217 1
Cazimero halau to highlight hula festival Fri JOYCE-CALIFO... 1
Women On the Frontlines Fri D Sheraz 1
Miley Cyrus, Disney critical of Vanity Fair pho... Jul 17 Michael Estrada 52
Events calendar Jul 16 Monterey Sur... 1
Related Topix Forums: Entertainment, Miley Cyrus, Arts, Baltimore County, MD