|
Abhijit
|
MEE12 wrote: <quoted text>
Red Rose & Aaj Ka MLA - both Rajesh Khanna films, which were banned..what does that tell you????
Amitabh's Inquilaab did better than Rajesh Khanna's Aaj Ka MLA head to head. At the same time Jeetendra did Yeh Desh, which came 2nd out of the 3 movies made. Dont compare Ram Balram to Aa Aab Laut Chalein...there's no comparison, and im sure everyone will agree with me!!!
Dharmendra has his own style of acting and Amitabh has his own. Rajesh Khanna didnt have his own style he copied Dev Anand's acting.
Dharmendra & Amitabh were always one above the rest e.g. Jeetendra, Rajesh Khanna, Vinod Khanna, Shashi Kapoor and Shatrughan Sinha!!! Your analysis is meant for sub-standard audiences for whom Amitabh was born. So it is better not to discuss when you have not depth knowledge about acting skill and other aspect of film media. By copying anybody can not establish the historic title FIRST SUPERSTAR OF INDIAN CINEMA. And can not be the holder of PRIDE OF THE FILM INDUSTRY, LIVING LEGEND, YUGANTAR GAURAV ACTOR AND ULTIMATELY DADA SAHEB PHALKE GOLDEN ACTOR AWARDEE. Dev Anand or any other star/actor can never be able to perform in Anand, Amar Prem, Red Rose and Aaj Ka MLA, Janta Hawaldar, Akhir Kyon, Prem Nagar, Mehabooba, Agar Tum Na Hote, etc. simultaneously with depth and with justifiable characterization. In term of versatility Rajesh Khanna have shown tremendous range that is impossible for any Amitabh, Dharmendra etc. to even touch the lowest level of it.
|
|
Abhijit
|
radzi wrote: <quoted text>
The lanky "lembu" was unsellable during his early days, but connections helped him hang-on.
Even Mumtaz said straight-on that Amit was "unsellable".
His strategy was to get help from other stars in masala multi-starers movie and he tagged along popularity of other stars in the climbing process.
He rode on the popularity of Indian cinema into its slump in the late 80s and early '90s.
....Beyond all norms???? Very sensible and justifiable presentation of histroic facts. Thanks a lot.
|
|
sanjay
|
Mee,
U are comparing ram balram with aa ab laut chelin which iself is odd. TRhe former was a potbolier while the latter was not.
Dharmendra had a style of hiw own while rajesh copied dev anand? This shows U have not watched hindi films.
Dharmendra did only action roles save for the odd satyakam/chupke chupke.
Even in the late 80s when rajesh was well past is primne, amit was so jittery of rajesh that he worked day & night to finish inquilaab & release it ahead of aaj ka MLA.
Dharmendra continued to be in the No.2 position always & continued doing B grade films well into the 80s & even early 90s. He then switched over to bojpuri films charging 1 lakh per day. He hismelf admiited sheepishly in interviews that he did bojpuri films just for money & apoligised to his fans (if any).
|
|
Abhijit
|
FOR GENERAL KNOWLEDGE TO MR. MEE??????????
The television programme K For Kishore recently had a two-day celebration of Khanna. What Today's stars including yesterday's Amitabh and others can't take away from Khanna is that in spite of his less presence in lime light, Khanna has created a long long lasting body of work—films and songs that are heralded as classics in the annals of Hindi cinema. In this term others of today's as well as contemporaries of Khanna have produced nothing that matches an Amar Prem or an Avishkaar or Amrit.
|
|
MEE12
Romford, UK
|
Ive noticed that this website has removed the true facts I wrote about Rajesh Khanna...which were no comparison to Dharm and Amitabh!!! I know that I can not be put down, and know one here can defend themselves with me. So why bother!!!
|
|
MEE12
Romford, UK
|
Dharm and Amitabh's partnership will always rule the industry..they are both extremley talented. Rajesh Khanna will always be below them!!
|
|
MEE12
Romford, UK
|
EX-Kabeer wrote: Sanjay,
You should know Dharmendra was Hero in sholay and Amitabh was his sidekick. Same is true for Ram Balram and Chupke Chupke.
You seem to be a fanatic Amitabh fan. Amitabh Bachchan is solely responsible for lost era of film making i.e. 1980-90. He downgraded bollywood films with his cheap masala flicks. I watched Mard with my kids to show what Amitabh was in his heydays. They couldn't stop laughing looking at absurd plot and shallow acting by Amitabh. All of Amitabh's film are B grade and he has always been a sidekick but managed to hog the highlight using better media management (rather making controversial remarks).
He is what an actor should never be. When you say Amitabh's films are B grade....you need to remember he has worked with BIG producers and directors in the industry. Rajesh Khanna aka Dev Anand has also done B grade movies such as Khudai???
|
|
Abhijit
|
MEE 12:
Sorry to say friend that you are absolutely poor chap in term of discussing in this forum. Every time you used to post nonsenses. Seems that you do not know the meaning of Actor and Star and talent. Unnecessary why to waste our time and tarnish the gravity of this Forum. If in your opinion Khudai is a B grade film, then only GOD can save you. I have nothing to say against a stupid statement. Thanks,
|
|
|
|
Abhijit
|
MEE12 wrote: Ive noticed that this website has removed the true facts I wrote about Rajesh Khanna...which were no comparison to Dharm and Amitabh!!! I know that I can not be put down, and know one here can defend themselves with me. So why bother!!! Mr. Stupid, please stop talking nonsenses and first learn english and then try to write in sense. Learn the difference between know and no.
|
|
Abhijit
|
EX-Kabeer wrote: Sanjay,
You should know Dharmendra was Hero in sholay and Amitabh was his sidekick. Same is true for Ram Balram and Chupke Chupke.
You seem to be a fanatic Amitabh fan. Amitabh Bachchan is solely responsible for lost era of film making i.e. 1980-90. He downgraded bollywood films with his cheap masala flicks. I watched Mard with my kids to show what Amitabh was in his heydays. They couldn't stop laughing looking at absurd plot and shallow acting by Amitabh. All of Amitabh's film are B grade and he has always been a sidekick but managed to hog the highlight using better media management (rather making controversial remarks).
He is what an actor should never be. You are absolutely correct Kabeer ji. My kids also state that how this poor chap is called as Big B and such other nonsense titles. He is a sub standard entertainer and nothing else.
|
|
sanjay
|
Kabeer,
Amit was not a sidekick to dharam in sholay or chupke chupke.
I am a kaka fan & not amit's. But one has to accept facts.
I have not discuued the quality of dharm's/amit's films here..
But if U have to talk of quality, Amit performed in many cheap films. Agreed.
But what about Dharam? He romanced with heroines with anita raaj & even sonu walia in crap films like naukar biwi ka, mahashaktishali etc.,
Shall I list the crap flms, he did in the late 80s & early 90s? They are numerous.
|
|
Abhijit
|
sanjay wrote: Kabeer,
Amit was not a sidekick to dharam in sholay or chupke chupke.
I am a kaka fan & not amit's. But one has to accept facts.
I have not discuued the quality of dharm's/amit's films here..
But if U have to talk of quality, Amit performed in many cheap films. Agreed.
But what about Dharam? He romanced with heroines with anita raaj & even sonu walia in crap films like naukar biwi ka, mahashaktishali etc.,
Shall I list the crap flms, he did in the late 80s & early 90s? They are numerous. All of a sudden how do you friends forget that this is Superstar Rajesh Khanna Forum?
|
|
Abhijit
|
sanjay wrote: Kabeer,
Amit was not a sidekick to dharam in sholay or chupke chupke.
I am a kaka fan & not amit's. But one has to accept facts.
I have not discuued the quality of dharm's/amit's films here..
But if U have to talk of quality, Amit performed in many cheap films. Agreed.
But what about Dharam? He romanced with heroines with anita raaj & even sonu walia in crap films like naukar biwi ka, mahashaktishali etc.,
Shall I list the crap flms, he did in the late 80s & early 90s? They are numerous. Amit was not a sidekick to dharam in sholay or chupke chupke-- Dear Sanjay, to a certain extent I do agree with Kabeer that in both these films Dharamendra was main Hero and Amit was side hero. This is fact.
|
|
MEE12
|
Abhijit wrote: <quoted text>
Mr. Stupid, please stop talking nonsenses and first learn english and then try to write in sense. Learn the difference between know and no. You mean learn English with a capital E, and your telling me to learn English my friend???? I can list many B movies of Rajesh Khanna too!!
|
|
Abhijit
|
MEE12 wrote: <quoted text>
You mean learn English with a capital E, and your telling me to learn English my friend????
I can list many B movies of Rajesh Khanna too!! There is some B movies of Rajesh Khanna too, but they are merely 5% of his total films and they are not vulgar or cheap, whereas in others cases, especially Dharam or Amitabh's this per centage is 85-90% with full of cheapness.
|
|
radzi
|
EX-Kabeer wrote: Sanjay,
Please watch Sholay and Chupke Chupke again and then come back and say that Amitabh was not a sidekick in both the films.
Actually the best thing will be to make a person who doesn't know both Dharam and Amit, watch Sholay and Chupke Chupke. Ask him/her to name hero and the sidekick.
My kids can point out this fact and you can't. It is amazing.
Tomorrow you will say that Amitabh was hero in Anand. The old cinema poster of "Sholay" had a big Dharam picture on top of the board and a small Amit picture at the bottom left corner. The new poster on the DVD box has a bigger Amit face on it and left out Dharam all together? Same goes with Anand. The New DVD poster had Amit as the star of the movie! ....defies all norms by defying truth.
|
|
Abhijit
|
radzi wrote: <quoted text>
The old cinema poster of "Sholay" had a big Dharam picture on top of the board and a small Amit picture at the bottom left corner. The new poster on the DVD box has a bigger Amit face on it and left out Dharam all together?
Same goes with Anand. The New DVD poster had Amit as the star of the movie!
....defies all norms by defying truth. This is called intrusion on others Territory by fraud, just like capturing farmers' land.
|
|
MEE12
|
Abhijit wrote: <quoted text>
There is some B movies of Rajesh Khanna too, but they are merely 5% of his total films and they are not vulgar or cheap, whereas in others cases, especially Dharam or Amitabh's this per centage is 85-90% with full of cheapness. Dharm & Amitabh have worked in bigger banner movies and your saying 85-90% full of cheapness...get your calculations right!!! Rajesh Khanna (lady hips) is full of cheap!!
|
|
EX-Kabeer
|
MEE12,
You are now devoid of logic and using cheap language. The only meaningful film both Dharam and Amit ever did were Satyakam and Mili but don't forget it was Sanjeev Kumar and Jaya Bhaduri who made these movies work.
At the time of marriage, Amitabh was struggling and Jaya was established just like Abhishek and Aish. I guess son is following father's shortcut to stardom.
Now buzz off.
|
|
Faeque
|
anaad22 wrote: what about Aamir Khan ? he is very good. Amir khan is super star, he has all the quality extra ability and creativity, still Rajesh khanna is not bad.
|
Judge it!
Most Popular
