Albuquerque teenager 'shoots dead two adults and three children'

[Norskejente]

JohnInLa wrote:

<quoted text>Attention norshtjente!!! What if some big deranged kid shoves a couple of little kids into a pool and they drown? Who is guilty? The pool or the big kid? Answer you deranged azz-hole.

How many deranged kids have pushed kids in a pool to drown them????? Chances are better a kid with a gun shoots the kids while they are in the pool. BTW pools are there for enjoyment and yes many die in pools but they are accidents not deliberate. OH yea guns are made to do only one thing and that is kill, what don't you get about that azzhole!

[Armed Veteran]

So you wrote:

<quoted text>
got way with it.
A 17 year-old is a child.

When that 17yo is 5'-11" tall and on top of you pounding your head into the concrete sidewalk, age is irrelevant.

Many 17yo criminals have been tried as adults in the courts.

[Toss up]

Willothewisp wrote:

Some of you spend too much time on the internet and not enough time watching the SuperBowl.

about which is a bigger waste of time.

noisy, boring - nothing but hype and commercials.

[Well]

Armed Veteran wrote:

<quoted text>
When that 17yo is 5'-11" tall and on top of you pounding your head into the concrete sidewalk, age is irrelevant.
Many 17yo criminals have been tried as adults in the courts.

if you shoot an unarmed kid when you are out cruising for trouble with a gun and playing cop, you can make up any story and hope it sticks.

[Armed Veteran]

Well wrote:

<quoted text>
if you shoot an unarmed kid when you are out cruising for trouble with a gun and playing cop, you can make up any story and hope it sticks.

Well yeah....except for those little things called "eye-witnesses" and "physical evidence" that supports his "story". But other than that, you are spot on.

You might be a tool, but I would wager NOT the sharpest one in the shed.

[Nope]

Armed Veteran wrote:

<quoted text>

.

he had no business playing cop and he killed the only real witness. He might get away with manslaughter as a result.

You live in a shed? So sorry.

[Yeah]

Armed Veteran wrote:

<quoted text>
Well yeah....except for those little things called "eye-witnesses" and "physical evidence" that supports his "story". But other than that, you are spot on.
You might be a tool, but I would wager NOT the sharpest one in the shed.

There are rape victims who misidentify their attackers and send the wrong person to prison.

And the only real physical evidence is a dead body done by Zimmerman.

[Here Is One]

Only wrote:

<quoted text>
a moron would call a 13 year old an adult.
There is one now.

Please post a link where I called a 13 year old an adult..........OOOPS ya cant can ya..........LOL

[Here Is One]

Armed Veteran wrote:

<quoted text>
When that 17yo is 5'-11" tall and on top of you pounding your head into the concrete sidewalk, age is irrelevant.
Many 17yo criminals have been tried as adults in the courts.

5.11 was the autopsy report and they normally show a shorter height do to rigor mortise.......

His football records show him at 6.1

[Here Is One]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>There are rape victims who misidentify their attackers and send the wrong person to prison.
And the only real physical evidence is a dead body done by Zimmerman.

Wrong again..........LOL

Grass stains on Zims back
Lack of grass stains on dead 215 suspect code purple.
Injury to Zims face
Injury to the back of Zims head
911 tape
code purple 215 suspects call to GF
Eye witness
Blood stains
Autopsy report

But what do you expect from a moron that claims the burden of proof is on the defense???

Post # 46912 http://www.topix.com/forum/us/politics/TKPEED...

[well]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>

At age 13 you are no longer a child

duuh - you got caught lying again.

[Willothewisp]

Seems that the gray now has to resort to being a gray.
It's the copycat thing.

[Here Is One]

well wrote:

<quoted text>
duuh - you got caught lying again.

At age 13 you become a teenager not a child and not an adult..........LOL

[barefoot2626]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Apparent is not beyond a shadow of doubt..........LOL

LOL

Conviction is.

LOL

Evidence... posted.

[barefoot2626]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
At age 13 you become a teenager not a child and not an adult..........LOL

LOL

In the USA, it's 18.... adult...

LOL

[barefoot2626]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
At age 13 you become a teenager not a child and not an adult..........LOL

LOL.

You become a teenager because of the English language.

LOL

"teenager' affords you no special status.

LOL

[barefoot2626]

Willothewisp wrote:

I guess those who are interested can see that you can responsibly and legally hunt Moose with a 30-30.

I see...

So Homo One is wrong...

Of course, I pointed that out after the first post.

[barefoot2626]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
I asked the troll to prove her allegations that everyone who owns a assault weapon is crazy and she refused

Of course I reminded troll that she can't find that quote because it doesn't exist.

And she has me mixed up with another.

Of course, Homo One being wrong has nothing to do with anything else anyone said.

30/30 = legal to use on moose in Canada.

[barefoot2626]

Here Is One wrote:

So I baited her in

Troll Homo One sure 'baited' me good... by posting something that was wrong and pretending for the last week that she was right...

Funny how it keeps coming out that she was wrong and just won't admit she is wrong.

[barefoot2626]

Here Is One wrote:

There are places where it is not legal

Of course, troll Homo One insisted it was not legal in Canada and I've already posted proof it is.

Funny how every time Homo One is proved wrong... she says it's bait or a trap of some kind...