Some gay-rights foes claim they now a...

Some gay-rights foes claim they now are bullied

There are 12354 comments on the Contra Costa Times story from Jun 11, 2011, titled Some gay-rights foes claim they now are bullied. In it, Contra Costa Times reports that:

In this Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009 file picture, New York state Sen. Ruben Diaz, D-Bronx, right, speaks during a debate over same-sex marriage in the New York state Senate at the Capitol in Albany, N.Y. Diaz complained in May 2011 that he's received death threats because he opposes legislation to legalize same-sex marriage.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Contra Costa Times.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#13075 Feb 12, 2013
Anne Ominous wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh really, Babs?
Let's conduct a little experiment.
We need three uninhabited islands, and three groups of people.
On one island we put all men. On the second all women. On the third, a mix.
No one can come or go to any of the islands.
When we check in five or ten years, whats your prediction for the likelihood of children on any of the islands?
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL You've created a whole new category! It's called BIGOT BABBLE!
And we have another blonde ad homoan troll attack!

Looking for a gay with a brain and a reason...

Smirk.
Anne Ominous

Greeley, PA

#13076 Feb 12, 2013
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
What are 'we' pretending to be grading a term paper? Well, you can grade this F. For F(_)ck You! Sick Bigoted POS
morons with no argument scream "bigot"

Profanity is the effort of a feeble mind trying to express itself forcefully

:)
Anne Ominous

Greeley, PA

#13077 Feb 12, 2013
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
BIGOT
morons with no argument scream "bigot"

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#13078 Feb 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Did you notice that Bruce Willis and I have the same smirk.
Smile.
When he pulls his pants down and bends over, his smirk looks identical to your face.

Other
Mother of Anne

Pompano Beach, FL

#13079 Feb 12, 2013
Anne Ominous wrote:
<quoted text>
morons with no argument scream "bigot"
Now Anne, you know what your psychiatrist said about your screaming.
Mother of Anne

Pompano Beach, FL

#13080 Feb 12, 2013
Anne Ominous wrote:
<quoted text>
morons with no argument scream "bigot"
Profanity is the effort of a feeble mind trying to express itself forcefully
:)
Now Anne, must I wash your vile mouth out with Clorox again?

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#13081 Feb 12, 2013
Anne Ominous wrote:
<quoted text>
morons with no argument scream "bigot"
Profanity is the effort of a feeble mind trying to express itself forcefully
:)
Nice try, Nope no feeble mind here and in this case the response is appropriate for a BIGOT like you...so I'll reiterate F(_)ck You!

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#13082 Feb 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
All you said was, "I'm one bitchy ass crack".
You are not a lesbian, the fact is, no man wants to marry you!
Did you notice that Bruce Willis and I have the same smirk.
Smile.
LOL, Oh but I am a Lesbian, just as much as you are...you are so consumerist and ignorant, I regret even communicating with you...
Anne Ominous

Greeley, PA

#13083 Feb 12, 2013
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
for a BIGOT
morons with no argument scream "bigot"
Anne Ominous

Greeley, PA

#13084 Feb 12, 2013
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
F(_)ck You!
Your feeble minded butthurt is showing again :)
Mother of Anne

Pompano Beach, FL

#13085 Feb 12, 2013
Anne Ominous wrote:
<quoted text>
morons with no argument scream "bigot"
Now Anne, what were you told about your screaming again?
Mother of Anne

Pompano Beach, FL

#13086 Feb 12, 2013
Anne Ominous wrote:
<quoted text>
Your feeble minded butthurt is showing again :)
Now Anne, what did we say about your filthy mouth already?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#13087 Feb 12, 2013
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, Oh but I am a Lesbian, just as much as you are...you are so consumerist and ignorant, I regret even communicating with you...
You can't stop talking now, I'm in the middle of writing a book,'The Taming of the Lesbian Shrew'.

Smirk smile.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#13088 Feb 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't stop talking now, I'm in the middle of writing a book,'The Taming of the Lesbian Shrew'.
Smirk smile.
great 600 pages of fruits and nuts, trees twigs and berries
BigNutsMcGee

Albany, NY

#13089 Feb 12, 2013
Anne Ominous wrote:
<quoted text>
morons with no argument scream "bigot"
Profanity is the effort of a feeble mind trying to express itself forcefully
:)
Bigotry is the effort of a feeble mind trying to allay irrational fears.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#13090 Feb 12, 2013
Anne Ominous wrote:
<quoted text>
Your feeble minded butthurt is showing again :)
And you called my responses lame..LOL How do you know it hurts?

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#13092 Feb 17, 2013
Each individual is free to conceptualize marriage for themselves, any way they choose.

But legally, marriage it is a fundamental right of the individual.

The only eligibility requirement for fundamental rights is being human.

Reasonable restrictions may be made only when a compelling and legitimate governmental interest can withstand judicial scrutiny. Most can agree with the courts that reasonable restrictions include age, ability to demonstrate informed consent, and not being closely related or currently married. Within those limits, gay people qualify.

While churches may place any restrictions they choose on their own ceremonies, the government can only restrict fundamental rights when a compelling and legitimate justification can be demonstrated.

Procreation ability has never been a requirement for marriage, and therefore fails as a legitimate qualification. Yet even that irrational excuse for discrimination ignores the fact that gay people can and do reproduce, and are raising children either biologically related or adopted. Denial of equal treatment under the law provides nothing to opposite sex couple families. It only harms same sex couple families needlessly.

Gay couples are seeking to be treated equally under the laws currently in effect, in the remaining states that do not yet recognize their marriages, and by the federal government.

Neither tradition nor gender provides a legitimate governmental interest sufficient for denial of this fundamental right.

As Justice Kennedy wrote about the founding fathers: "They knew times can blind us to certain truths and later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress."

Laws that treat gay people less than equal to straight people are laws that only serve to oppress. It is time to overcome the prejudices we were taught as children and stop harming our neighbors and family members by passing laws that dehumanize and harm gay citizens through denial of the legal equality promised in the founding documents and required by the 5th and 14th amendments to the constitution.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#13095 Feb 18, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
Each individual is free to conceptualize marriage for themselves, any way they choose.
But legally, marriage it is a fundamental right of the individual.
The only eligibility requirement for fundamental rights is being human.
I don't think your really thought about that assertion...

Most importantly, it makes the word marriage meaningless.

Second, it is not even legally true.

Third, you set your own prejudicial parameters without legitimate cause.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#13096 Feb 18, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
Each individual is free to conceptualize marriage for themselves, any way they choose.
But legally, marriage it is a fundamental right of the individual.
The only eligibility requirement for fundamental rights is being human.
Reasonable restrictions may be made only when a compelling and legitimate governmental interest can withstand judicial scrutiny. Most can agree with the courts that reasonable restrictions include age, ability to demonstrate informed consent, and not being closely related or currently married. Within those limits, gay people qualify.
While churches may place any restrictions they choose on their own ceremonies, the government can only restrict fundamental rights when a compelling and legitimate justification can be demonstrated.
Procreation ability has never been a requirement for marriage, and therefore fails as a legitimate qualification. Yet even that irrational excuse for discrimination ignores the fact that gay people can and do reproduce, and are raising children either biologically related or adopted. Denial of equal treatment under the law provides nothing to opposite sex couple families. It only harms same sex couple families needlessly.
Gay couples are seeking to be treated equally under the laws currently in effect, in the remaining states that do not yet recognize their marriages, and by the federal government.
Neither tradition nor gender provides a legitimate governmental interest sufficient for denial of this fundamental right.
As Justice Kennedy wrote about the founding fathers: "They knew times can blind us to certain truths and later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress."
Laws that treat gay people less than equal to straight people are laws that only serve to oppress. It is time to overcome the prejudices we were taught as children and stop harming our neighbors and family members by passing laws that dehumanize and harm gay citizens through denial of the legal equality promised in the founding documents and required by the 5th and 14th amendments to the constitution.
As to the rest of your post;

SCOTUS has disagreed numerous times, not on a moral basis ever.

The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too is simply silly.

Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples do not just fail in the primary essence of marriage, out of all relationships, they are the oxymoron of marriage.

Moreover, if you remove the element of procreation, you dumb down marriage to just a friendship. Hardly a cause for government interest, let alone selective discrimination.

Smile.
I Concur

Pompano Beach, FL

#13097 Feb 18, 2013
vincent andrew wrote:
Men belong with women and women belong with men..
End of story...
Are you the newly revamped unregistered zeldo whose entertaining but controversial comments disappeared from the forum for months?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Albany Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Upstate job growth slow despite taxpayer subsidies (Mar '17) 9 min Trumps Army 597
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 4 hr No doubt 21,727
Andrew Cuhomo 19 hr Maurice the Elitist 3
Similitudes (Dec '15) May 21 anonymous 79
warning: rude employee at christmas tree shops (Aug '12) May 17 Chris J 45
Ts any in albany May 15 Ts lover 1
Eric Schneiderman - The hypocrisy of New York’s... May 9 The Silent Majority 1

Albany Jobs

Personal Finance

Albany Mortgages