Michael Jackson Fans Ruin A Book On A...

Michael Jackson Fans Ruin A Book On Amazon's Website

There are 483 comments on the KSOC-FM Dallas story from Feb 6, 2013, titled Michael Jackson Fans Ruin A Book On Amazon's Website. In it, KSOC-FM Dallas reports that:

A new book about the King of Pop Michael Jackson 's questionable private life is proving to be an opponent Michael Jackson's fans are willing to take on.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KSOC-FM Dallas.

J-J-Jina Wild

“VITILIGO”

Since: Jun 10

IS A BIOTCH

#357 Mar 25, 2013
Oyster Muncher wrote:
<quoted text>
'Timmy' might but 'Tim' doesn't, you stupid hag.
BTW, who is Tim????
This is Tim

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080024/

Methinks Kracker has confused you with Jerome.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#358 Mar 25, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
So, if you think Evan Chandler set up Michael, via his son, I'd like to hear your explanation about how Jordan so accurately descriped his wee-wee, the D.A. wanted to introduce the child's drawing and description, along with the photos of the real McCoy, in court.
Jut make it interesting.
Jordan never made an accurate description.

Sneddon is on record for having falsified evidence.



“Justice was done. The man’s innocent. He always was.”
Attorney Tom Mesereau

ononothimagin

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#359 Mar 25, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Jordan never made an accurate description.
Sneddon is on record for having falsified evidence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =-eSC997_HH0XX
“Justice was done. The man’s innocent. He always was.”
Attorney Tom Mesereau
Maybe, but Mesereau's statement is merely his opinion, not a fact.

MJ was never proven innocent. He bought his way out of his civil case and the jury in his criminal trial acquitted him because they felt there wasn't enough evidence to convict him.

You fans call that "proven innocent."

The rest of the world call it, "He was given the benefit of the doubt." (Again!)
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#360 Mar 25, 2013
ononothimagin wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe, but Mesereau's statement is merely his opinion, not a fact.
MJ was never proven innocent. He bought his way out of his civil case and the jury in his criminal trial acquitted him because they felt there wasn't enough evidence to convict him.
You fans call that "proven innocent."
The rest of the world call it, "He was given the benefit of the doubt." (Again!)
And your opinion about MJ is just that--your opinion, highly colored by bias and prejudice.

Evan Chandler sought a civil settlement from the beginning. MJ ultimately agreed to such a settlement,(one in which he never admitted to molesting anyone), and haters proceed to say that MJ 'bought his way out of it'.

How so? It was the Chandlers (and the hope of the Arvizos) who purused such monetary gain. He capitulated, but nowhere in the settlement does he admit to molesting anyone.
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#361 Mar 25, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Jordan never made an accurate description.
Sneddon is on record for having falsified evidence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =-eSC997_HH0XX
“Justice was done. The man’s innocent. He always was.”
Attorney Tom Mesereau
You're wasting your time; it's like talking to a brick wall. That one refuses to accept that Sneddon's opinions, hopes and desires for it to be a match didn't make it so.
persephone

Sunnyvale, CA

#362 Mar 25, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
So, if you think Evan Chandler set up Michael, via his son, I'd like to hear your explanation about how Jordan so accurately descriped his wee-wee, the D.A. wanted to introduce the child's drawing and description, along with the photos of the real McCoy, in court.
Jut make it interesting.
If it was so accurate, then why didn't two grand juries think it was enough to vote for an indictment?

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#363 Mar 25, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> If it was so accurate, then why didn't two grand juries think it was enough to vote for an indictment?
True dat...

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#364 Mar 25, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> You're wasting your time; it's like talking to a brick wall. That one refuses to accept that Sneddon's opinions, hopes and desires for it to be a match didn't make it so.
yeah...Len is in a total fantasy world....

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#365 Mar 25, 2013
J-J-Jina Wild wrote:
<quoted text>
This is Tim
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080024/
Methinks Kracker has confused you with Jerome.
Tim Sneddon is Tom's brotha.....who is Inda....
Wacko Jacko

London, UK

#366 Mar 25, 2013
Jermaine 7 wrote:
<quoted text>yeah...Len is in a total fantasy world....
You've got the same initials as Jordan Chandler.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#367 Mar 25, 2013
Wacko Jacko wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got the same initials as Jordan Chandler.
Don't think so....
Wacko Jacko

London, UK

#368 Mar 25, 2013
Jermaine 7 wrote:
<quoted text>Don't think so....
Yeah you do - JC - Jordan Chandler, Jerome Cockandbull.
Ric Tuss

Sydney, Australia

#369 Mar 25, 2013
J-J-Jina Wild wrote:
<quoted text>
This is Tim
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080024/
Methinks Kracker has confused you with Jerome.
Haha! Perfect!
Ric Tuss

Sydney, Australia

#370 Mar 25, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text>
Evan Chandler sought a civil settlement from the beginning.
No he didn't. That's the story from Anthony Pellicano. Are you saying that Anthony Pellicano is a reliable source?

*laughter*
Ric Tuss

Sydney, Australia

#371 Mar 25, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> If it was so accurate, then why didn't two grand juries think it was enough to vote for an indictment?
Where is your proof the grand juries were shown the photos and description? Oh, that's right, you haven't any, you just wish it to be so. Sorry, we only deal in facts.

*laughter*

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#372 Mar 25, 2013
ononothimagin wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe, but Mesereau's statement is merely his opinion, not a fact.
MJ was never proven innocent. He bought his way out of his civil case and the jury in his criminal trial acquitted him because they felt there wasn't enough evidence to convict him.
You fans call that "proven innocent."
The rest of the world call it, "He was given the benefit of the doubt." (Again!)
He got aquitted because of falsified evidence that tried to make him look guilty.

That is proven innoncene.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#373 Mar 26, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> If it was so accurate, then why didn't two grand juries think it was enough to vote for an indictment?
Please provide a link to a legal document, proving your claim. I have asked you to provide one, many times before.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#374 Mar 26, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Jordan never made an accurate description.
Sneddon is on record for having falsified evidence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =-eSC997_HH0XX
“Justice was done. The man’s innocent. He always was.”
Attorney Tom Mesereau
Just when I think you can't get any stupider, you open your mouth and spew something even more ridiculous. F'loon, if you ever develop good reading-comprehension skills and look at the legal documents, you will notice Mesereau never denied the drawing, description, and photos of Michael's splotchy weiner matched. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#375 Mar 26, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Just when I think you can't get any stupider, you open your mouth and spew something even more ridiculous. F'loon, if you ever develop good reading-comprehension skills and look at the legal documents, you will notice Mesereau never denied the drawing, description, and photos of Michael's splotchy weiner matched. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Tom Mesereau knows they didn't match....you are the one embarrassing yourself..your real motive here is transparent..

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#377 Mar 26, 2013
Jermaine 7 wrote:
<quoted text>Tom Mesereau knows they didn't match....you are the one embarrassing yourself..your real motive here is transparent..
Instead of laughing about the legal documents, perhaps you should read Mesereau's response to the D.A.'s desire to introduce the drawing, description, and photos in court. There is no statement from him, claiming they didn't match. He was, however, determined to keep them OUT of court. Had they not matched, it would have been Michael's free pass.

You know very well Mesereau knew they matched.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Black Entertainment Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Celebrities Who Snagged Billionaires: Miranda K... 6 hr Kelly - DJ 2
News Mariah leaves bra at home 7 hr Kelly - DJ 2
100 FACTS black people don't want White people... (Apr '08) Jul 22 RIP 82
News Heron takes on Running Man Challenge Jul 20 kelly 2
News Monday By the Numbers: J.Lo's dates, a legendar... Jul 19 Rb RECORDS 1
News Beyonce's Colorist Rita Hazan Reveals Her Rules... Jul 19 kelly 1
News Nick Cannon on the Most ''F--ked Up'' Part Abou... Jul 19 kelly 2
More from around the web