Michael Jackson spent A 23MILLION buy...

Michael Jackson spent A 23MILLION buying silence of at least TWO...

There are 146 comments on the Mirror.co.uk story from Jun 29, 2013, titled Michael Jackson spent A 23MILLION buying silence of at least TWO.... In it, Mirror.co.uk reports that:

Secret FBI files exclusively seen by the Sunday People reveal Michael Jackson spent A 23million buying the silence of at least two dozen young boys he abused over 15 years.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Mirror.co.uk.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#41 Jul 1, 2013
sheepleloveroyalty wrote:
<quoted text>
Read in detail:
...investigate and prosecute crimes that CROSS legal, geographical and jurisdictional boundries...
10-20 years ago it was tougher to call in the FBI. It's not like TV where they roam the country doing what they want. It usually takes a local invitation if not clear cut federal jurisdiction. Pedophile laws have been enhanced alot since the 90s when Jackson apparently did most of his deeds. To start the file they have took a request from someone, more than likely outside the FBI.
Because of the growth of child porn-internet crosses state lines and kidnappings by physcos that went very public it's now easier for the feds to investigate. 10-20 years ago the FBIs primary jobs racketeering, catching spies and money scams. There was a time when the FBI only took lawyers and accountants and some scientists. Now it's a four degree.
I was just about to mention that to the idiot. Still, the redacted files that got revealed did not clear Michael. Twice, the witnesses refused to testify. The train incident with the social worker also put a question mark on Michael's behavior with children. The fuzzy videotape of the Neverland boys was also a red flag. And the phone sex with Terry, which f'loons laugh about, also a red flag.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#42 Jul 1, 2013
FollowTheMoney wrote:
<quoted text>
Freedom of Information Act request with the federal government. I think some are online in bits and pieces.
I might believe the just "sleeping" if it was 2 people but two DOZEN people and millions of dollars later? I can't believe people still think this was a shake down from 2 dozen people that really didn't know each other that well.
There was and is too much crap associated with MJ. Get his stuff off of top 40 radio which is already bad and repititious enough.
I've seen some of them, and they don't clear Michael of anything. Are the rest held for a certain number of years, before being made public?

Michael's known pay offs to families accusing him of molesting their children already showed something was rotten in Denmark. The legal documents removed any doubt. The new revelation is astonishing. A new child, every year-and-a-half? His access to children must be every pedophile's dream.

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#43 Jul 1, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
I've seen some of them, and they don't clear Michael of anything. Are the rest held for a certain number of years, before being made public?
Michael's known pay offs to families accusing him of molesting their children already showed something was rotten in Denmark. The legal documents removed any doubt. The new revelation is astonishing. A new child, every year-and-a-half? His access to children must be every pedophile's dream.
Also more disturbing is the more famous MJ got the more he was able to attract boys not only in the states but in the UK (Terry George was one), Norway (Omer Bhatti), Australia (Wade Robson, Brett Barnes) and parts of Asia. But only these countries. It seems if he went overseas, if he saw a "good looking" young male, he'd immediately get in with the family to get their trust so the boys in those families could spend time with him in hotels and at all of his houses at Hayvenhurst, the "Hideout" apartment, his L.A. condo and, of course, Neverland, which explains why all those homes were searched during the first allegations (I think Neverland was only searched for the second public allegations in 2003).

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#44 Jul 1, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
<quoted text>
Also more disturbing is the more famous MJ got the more he was able to attract boys not only in the states but in the UK (Terry George was one), Norway (Omer Bhatti), Australia (Wade Robson, Brett Barnes) and parts of Asia. But only these countries. It seems if he went overseas, if he saw a "good looking" young male, he'd immediately get in with the family to get their trust so the boys in those families could spend time with him in hotels and at all of his houses at Hayvenhurst, the "Hideout" apartment, his L.A. condo and, of course, Neverland, which explains why all those homes were searched during the first allegations (I think Neverland was only searched for the second public allegations in 2003).
That he found children from all over the world shows how predatory he was.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#45 Jul 1, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Sandusky was guilty but Michael Jackson was innocent.
Wade is committing this same stunt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =HkL_VSHIJU8XX
No, Michael Jackson is not innocent. He paid off his accusers.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#46 Jul 1, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Sandusky was guilty but Michael Jackson was innocent.
Wade is committing this same stunt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =HkL_VSHIJU8XX
You're stupid Wade Robson isn't committing anything similar to that child in Toronto, Canada.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#47 Jul 2, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
That he found children from all over the world shows how predatory he was.
His fame facilitated all of that. He was able to shop for a boy in every country if he so pleased. What kid would't want to meet the great Michael Jackson???

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48 Jul 2, 2013
sheepleloveroyalty wrote:
<quoted text>Read in detail:

...investigate and prosecute crimes that CROSS legal, geographical and jurisdictional boundries...

10-20 years ago it was tougher to call in the FBI. It's not like TV where they roam the country doing what they want. It usually takes a local invitation if not clear cut federal jurisdiction. Pedophile laws have been enhanced alot since the 90s when Jackson apparently did most of his deeds. To start the file they have took a request from someone, more than likely outside the FBI.

Because of the growth of child porn-internet crosses state lines and kidnappings by physcos that went very public it's now easier for the feds to investigate. 10-20 years ago the FBIs primary jobs racketeering, catching spies and money scams. There was a time when the FBI only took lawyers and accountants and some scientists. Now it's a four degree.
The fact is they were involved in his case and found nothing. Pedophiles never just stop. They go on till they drop. MJ was never a pedophile.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#49 Jul 2, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact is they were involved in his case and found nothing. Pedophiles never just stop. They go on till they drop. MJ was never a pedophile.
The FBI did find evidence. But in both investigations, witnesses refused to talk. However, if you think the FBI found nothing, then do tell us what was on the videotape "Neverland Ranch Boys, Vol. I?" And do tell us what kind of noises alarmed the canadian social worker, from the train compartment Michael shared with a young boy?
rosalinda de la quatch

Sweden

#50 Jul 2, 2013
persephone wrote:
<quoted text> Just because someone's mother went on shopping trips doesn't mean that she 'pimped' out her son to MJ.
You really need to be reminded that MJ was known to be generous to many people--not just boys and parents of boys.
But you do not know for sure correct? The line has to be drawn somewhere correct? MJ did reward parents for allowing him to spend time with the little tiny children correct? Sure your celebrity worshiping head wants it to be a case of MJ being generous correct? But we have no idea exactly what the parents were receiving correct? I've heard all kinds of things that some received expense cars and even homes correct? Jordi's mother for example receive some very very expensive and glamorous jewelry correct? And this happened after MJ practically begged her to let him sleep with her son correct? Even for a celebrity worshiper like yourself you have to agree that is kind of creepy correct?

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#51 Jul 2, 2013
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact is they were involved in his case and found nothing. Pedophiles never just stop. They go on till they drop. MJ was never a pedophile.
Michael Jackson never stopped professing the virtues of man/boy bed sharing had NAMBLA-approved art books, faced sexual allegations from young boys, and had numerous special-friends over the years. That qualifies him as a pedophile.
patricia

Dublin, CA

#52 Jul 5, 2013
Li Lie Lies, and more Lies.................. God will end this soon.
patricia

Dublin, CA

#53 Jul 5, 2013
Lies, Lies Lies, and more Lies.................. God will end this soon.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#54 Jul 5, 2013
patricia wrote:
Li Lie Lies, and more Lies.......... God will end this soon.
God already did end it. Pedo Pan is dead.

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#55 Jul 6, 2013
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
The FBI did find evidence. But in both investigations, witnesses refused to talk. However, if you think the FBI found nothing, then do tell us what was on the videotape "Neverland Ranch Boys, Vol. I?" And do tell us what kind of noises alarmed the canadian social worker, from the train compartment Michael shared with a young boy?
F'loons love to claim the FBI found "nothing". The FBI may not have had cause to arrest Pedo Pan but they uncovered questionable things between Jackson and young boys. Why the f'loons fail to acknowledge this is akin to being an ostrich and sticking their f'loon heads in a hole.

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#56 Jul 6, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
F'loons love to claim the FBI found "nothing". The FBI may not have had cause to arrest Pedo Pan but they uncovered questionable things between Jackson and young boys. Why the f'loons fail to acknowledge this is akin to being an ostrich and sticking their f'loon heads in a hole.
Yep. "Questionable noises from MJ and his "cousin" in the train" definitely causes for alarm, wouldn't ya think? lol but I guess people didn't read that part. Only thing they read is "not enough to charge him" which isn't the same as exonerating him or "proving" he was "innocent".

“Why can't you share your bed?”

Since: May 13

Canada

#57 Jul 6, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep. "Questionable noises from MJ and his "cousin" in the train" definitely causes for alarm, wouldn't ya think? lol but I guess people didn't read that part. Only thing they read is "not enough to charge him" which isn't the same as exonerating him or "proving" he was "innocent".
Also the transporting of minors across state lines. Checking himself and the child into hotels and claiming the child is a cousin or son.

Since: Jun 13

Fuquay Varina, NC

#58 Jul 6, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
Also the transporting of minors across state lines. Checking himself and the child into hotels and claiming the child is a cousin or son.
Yeah there were suspicions MJ had violated the Mann Act. Like I said earlier, him checking himself and one of the children as "cousin" or "son" was a pattern MJ had with his young "friends" since 1983 at the least.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#59 Jul 6, 2013
TripleH1976 wrote:
<quoted text>
F'loons love to claim the FBI found "nothing". The FBI may not have had cause to arrest Pedo Pan but they uncovered questionable things between Jackson and young boys. Why the f'loons fail to acknowledge this is akin to being an ostrich and sticking their f'loon heads in a hole.
When anyone points out all the red flags the FBI uncovered, it's almost entertaining to see f'loons go into denial.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#60 Jul 6, 2013
BadMan84 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah there were suspicions MJ had violated the Mann Act. Like I said earlier, him checking himself and one of the children as "cousin" or "son" was a pattern MJ had with his young "friends" since 1983 at the least.
I believe this is why the SBPD brought in the FBI, in the first place, which is something f'loons pretend to ignore everytime the information is brought up.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Black Entertainment Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News CNN's Bell: Snoop Dogg Shooting Trump Not as Ba... Jul 18 Red Crosse 38
100 FACTS black people don't want White people... (Apr '08) Jul 15 Blueblood 98
News Former WHAM Personality Harry Abraham Has Died (May '09) Jul 15 monty diamond 4
News New 'Family Feud' host Steve Harvey focuses on ... (Sep '10) Jul 12 AmPieJam UncleSam 4
News Opinion: Jay-Z's '4:44' may be his step into fe... Jul 6 doesthissuck 3
News Rock Hall Anniversary: Marriage of Michael Jack... (May '14) Jul 6 The Power Of Mast... 18
White humiliation and slavery (Jan '16) Jul 5 WhiteSupremacy 16
More from around the web