The fact is MJ did NOTt own that photograph.<quoted text>
I am not sure why you and most MJ fans defy logic and treat this debate like a court room - nudity is not illegal depending on the context its used. Ignore the courts for one second, and use your HUMAN INITIATIVE
Now answer me this question, if MJ did own those photographs would you find that questionable to any degree? If your answer is no, then why try to excuse the photograph as being a prank?
Speaking of logic if you claim him to have been the pedophile than why didn't MJ have nude photographs of all his friends?
For the simple logic reason because MJ was never a pedophile.