Jake

New York, NY

#20928 Apr 29, 2013
motts wrote:
BLACK MOORS IN EUROPEAN ROYALTY
Queen Charlotte, wife of the English King George III (1738-1820), was directly descended from Margarita de Castro y Sousa, a black MOORISH branch of the Portuguese Royal House.
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/tyne/roots/2004/02/black...
Scroll down and see here in England they can admit that Black Moors were part of royalty.
“The suggestion that Queen Charlotte was black implies that her granddaughter (Queen Victoria) and her great-great-great-great-
granddaughter (Queen Elizabeth II) had African forebears. Perhaps, instead of just being a boring bunch of semi-inbred white stiffs, our royal family becomes much more interesting.”(The Guardian, March 12, 2009)
The Guardian newspaper and the BBC are definitely not afrocentric.
Now here's the question I pose to the EURONUTS. If Black Moors were the worthless slaves they claim they were, why are they married to European royalty?
Take a look at the first Duke of Florence..
Alessandro de' Medici (1511-37) of Black Moorish descent or should we say 'Moorish descent' as the 'Moors' were BLACK.
The Medici, an Italian family of merchants, bankers, rulers, patrons and
collectors, dominated the political and cultural life of Florence from the 15th century to the mid 18th century.
So even after the Moors were defeated they were still held in high regard all over Europe in many royal families.
http://www.google.co.uk/search...
Says the worthless knee grow slave descendant while living in a White people's country cause your knee grow homelands in undeveloped Aperica are as sh8tlands as they were when our white ancestors found your black ancestors swinging from jungle trees. 

Our European Royals did not intermix with you inferior Blacks, g roid, even 
though you want to claim our Superior White European Royalty had no use for you blacks other then to sell your black ancestors as slaves, they did not produce heirs to our European royal houses with you g roids cause they viewed you as inferior Sub Humans who looked closer to primates then humans. 

Our Royal European families were enslaving your g roid ancestors cause they viewed you as subhuman, they were not intermixing their royal European HUMAN blood lines with you subhumans less evolved types. They got rich off of selling your black ancestors as slave because you slave animals. The Medici Family were not knee grows, they were white and humans. 
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cosimo_di ...(Bronzino).jpg

Queen Charlotte, wife of the English King George III (1738-1820), was NOT the directly descendedair any black moorish branch of the Portuguese Royal House, cause NO European family intermixed with you blacks. This lie is promoted by g roids like you who live in OUR WHITE Nations because you are too ashamed to claim your black Aperican ancestors since you have accomplished nothing to offer developed societies so you claim OUR European SUPERIOR ancestors instead of your inferior Neolithic black ancestors. Queen Charlotte was WHITE, she had NO black bloodlines, she had pure human GERMANIC bloodlines, as did all our royals, her features were human fair lovely skin, fair hair and beautiful blue eyes, she did not look like any Sheboonie, she was a human a white Queen who was selling your black ancestors as slaves cause she viewed you all as subhumans.

Now tell us how many of you blacks drowned at sea like rats trying to reach our White Modern Deceloped Nations today, g roid living in White people country instead of your undeveloped 3rd world Blacksh8tlands. lol
Jake

New York, NY

#20929 Apr 29, 2013
motts wrote:
BLACK MOORISH ROYALTY
Moulay al-Rashid (1631-1672)(Arabic:م ول&#15 75;ي ال&#15 85;شي& #1583;) was Sultan of Morocco from 1666 to 1672.
Mawlaay or Moulay al-Rashid is called the founder of the Alaouite Dynasty.
this is how Mulay al-Rashid was described at the time: "He is of middle size; his face is long and thin; his beard, forked and white, his color, almost black with a white mark near the nose" - Abbé Busnot, Histoire de Regne de Mouley Ismael, Roven, 1714
http://moorishpac.com/moulay-al-rashid-sultan...
http://www.aucklandartgallery.com/the-collect...
Hahahaha!!! Look at that TOWELHEAD Ape!! OMG! Too funny!! Hahaha aha!! Look at that g roid in that pic wearing dresses and looking like they are ancient primitives desert rats living in the Aperican desert in sandhuts!! lol! No wonder your knee grows drown like rats trying to reach our White Modern Developed Nations! lol That pic proves what I have been always saying, the modern ages has passed you g roids right by. lol 

Hey freeloading g roid, why don't you go live with those dress wearing primitive g roids in your undeveloped 3rd world sh8thomelands in Aperica 
with their low primitive standards of living among the jungles and desert sands instead of living in Our White modern developed countries where the white men can provide you gorilllaz with white men's higher living modern standards. lol! Don't tell us, we already know, because White people and our White Developed Nations have always been Superior to your Inferior Black Undeveloped Homelands, ape. lol!

Hahahaha!!! g roid continue to live like undeveloped primitives in your black homelands walking around in rags and carrying sticks like Neolithics. lol
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/04/15/art...

Now tell us how many of you g roids drowned today trying to reach our White Modern Developed Nations. hahaha! The sea full of dead g roids! Priceless! lol

"Black Africans died at Mediterranean Sea during voyage to Europe
Africans were riding a boat and died of dehydration during their 15-day trip.
Within a few days the inflatable boat was punctured and air started to leak out. There was no water onboard and people started to die from dehydration within days, he added. Over half of the deceased were said to have come from Eritrea."
Jake

New York, NY

#20930 Apr 29, 2013
motts wrote:
You must drop in next time you are in Philadelphia. Lovely piece of work.
http://www.philamuseum.org/collections/perman...
This is one of my favourites. I wish I could pull some of those 'Morris moves.' The Black Moors taught the Spanish very well.
http://www.muenchner-stadtmuseum.de/en/muench...
Says the g roid while living in a WHITE modern developed country instead of your undeveloped sh8tlands in Aperica. That is no "expert", that is an inferior freeloading knee grow like you living in a White peoples Modern Developed Country instead of your 3rd World Undeveloped Sh8tlands in Aperica. Meanwhile your g roid "bros" continue to live like undeveloped primitives in your black homelands walking around in rags and carrying sticks like Neolithics. lol
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/04/15/art...

Now tell us how many of you g roids drowned today trying to reach our White Modern Developed Nations. hahaha! The sea full of dead g roids! Priceless! lol

"Black Africans died at Mediterranean Sea during voyage to Europe
Africans were riding a boat and died of dehydration during their 15-day trip.
Within a few days the inflatable boat was punctured and air started to leak out. There was no water onboard and people started to die from dehydration within days, he added. Over half of the deceased were said to have come from Eritrea."

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#20931 Apr 29, 2013
moot wrote:
Let's pretend a BLACK MOORISH ROYALTY
Moulay al-Rashid (1631-1672) was Sultan of Morocco from 1666 to 1672.
Mawlaay or Moulay al-Rashid is called the founder of the Alaouite Dynasty.
this is how Mulay al-Rashid was described at the time: "He is of middle size; his face is long and thin; his beard, forked and white, his color, almost black with a white mark near the nose" - Abbé Busnot, Histoire de Regne de Mouley Ismael, Roven, 1714
http://moorishpac.com/moulay-al-rashid-sultan...
http://www.aucklandartgallery.com/the-collect...
BÚLLSHÍT!!

...as always.

The false portrait, that you and all other Afro-Tools have pretended was the face of "Moulay al-Rashid", was nothing more than a completely unauthorized and absurdly incorrect pseudo-image of the actual Sultan.

Those images were the ignorant scrawlings of an unscrupulous English periodical, and nothing more.

Notice how you conniving and asinine, lower than cøçkroaches/denizens of absurdia,

have so painstakingly striven to avoid presenting any of the OFFICIAL portraits of both that Sultan and his brother.

http://www.dar-sirr.com/Sultan_Moulay_Ismail....

scroll down to see them both, FÓÓL.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#20932 Apr 29, 2013
moot wrote:
MOORS = BLACK AFRICANS
"Snowden (1970) and Desanges (1981) reference various writers’ physical descriptions...blah blah.
All of the BÚLLSHÍT that you've just cranked out is nothing more than unsubstantiated rhetoric.

::IT MEANS NOTHING::

and

::IT PROVES NOTHING::

•••

What I have that will easily counter your foolish jibberish,

is the cold hard unbiased rationale of the latest up to date scientific DNA analysis:

http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Ado...

"We present dense, genome-wide SNP genotyping array data (730,000 sites) from seven North African populations, spanning from Egypt to Morocco, and one Spanish population. We identify a gradient of likely autochthonous Maghrebi ancestry that increases from east to west across northern Africa; this ancestry is likely derived from “back-to-Africa” gene flow more than 12,000 years ago (ya), prior to the Holocene. The indigenous North African ancestry is more frequent in populations with historical Berber ethnicity.

In most North African populations we also see substantial shared ancestry with the Near East, and to a lesser extent sub-Saharan Africa and Europe.

To estimate the time of migration from sub-Saharan populations into North Africa, we implement a maximum likelihood dating method based on the distribution of migrant tracts. In order to first identify migrant tracts, we assign local ancestry to haplotypes using a novel, principal component-based analysis of three ancestral populations.

We estimate that a migration of western African origin into Morocco began about 40 generations ago (approximately 1,200 ya); a migration of individuals with Nilotic ancestry into Egypt occurred about 25 generations ago (approximately 750 ya)."

•••

Any misgivings, about the bias of universally accepted Western science, is merely just more dried mud-stones being cast from the wafer-thin glass houses of Afro-Foolish mumbo-jumbo spewing pseudo-science YouTube witchdoctors.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#20933 Apr 30, 2013
motts wrote:
You must drop in next time you are in Philadelphia. Lovely piece of work.
http://www.philamuseum.org/collections/perman...
This is one of my favourites. I wish I could pull some of those 'Morris moves.' The Black Moors taught the Spanish very well.
http://www.muenchner-stadtmuseum.de/en/muench...
BÚLLSHÍT!!!

The following is what REAL Moroccan Berbers have to say about the Harratin Negros...

BLACK MOROCCAN SOLDIERS WERE CONSCRIPTED SLAVES:

http://www.dar-sirr.com/Sultan_Moulay_Ismail....

"When Mawlay al-Rashid's half-brother Mawlay Ismail b. al-Sharif al-Hassani (1672-1727) assumed power, he soon resolved the Makhzan’s depen­dence on unreliable tribal forces by substituting for them a professional black army ('Abid); the 'Abid were made to swear allegiance to their Sultan using al-Bukhari's book, hence their name 'Abid al-Bukhari. This method of recruitment was by no means revo­lutionary, since it had already been adopted by Ahmad al-Mansur al-Sa’adi.But a dynasty's complete reliance on African troops to govern was certainly new. None­theless, the creation of the black slave army, was cer­tainly a 'coup de génie' in the Makhzan's efforts to assuage refractory tribes. With his new army, which by some exaggerated accounts reached 150,000 men, Mawlay Isma'il was able to reduce drastically the subversive influence of the Brotherhoods.

In spite of this he ran into serious opposition from the 'Ulama, particularly Fasis 'Ulama', concerning the legality of forced 'military slavery.' The point of dispute was the compulsory incorporation into the 'Abid army of Moroccan subjects who happened to be of negroïd ancestry (Harratin).

The 'Ulama' argued that any subject whose slave status could not be lawfully demonstrated could not be impressed into the Diwan of 'Abid.

Mawlay Isma'il never fully reconciled the 'Ulama' to his views. As Commander of the Faithful (Amir al-Muminin), legitimized by his 'natural' as well as 'earned' Baraka, Mawlay Ismail exhibited an uncompromising devotion. He made it a point to remind his subjects of his moral superiority by an ostentatious display of religiosity at his court in Meknes ("the exemplary center"), reminiscent of the later 'Abbasid period. It was designed to project a daunting image of a cosmic order personified in the Sultan."

Level 6

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#20935 May 2, 2013
Its copy and paste time wrote:
<quoted text>You are correct - Ibn Khaldun THE ANDALUSIAN - knew exactly what he was talking about “Ham, having become black because of a curse pronounced against him by his father, fled to the Maghrib to hide in shame.... Berber, son of Kesloudjim [Casluhim], one of his descendants, left numerous posterity in the Maghrib”(Smith, 2003, Smith, R.(2003).“What happened to the ancient Libyans? Chasing sources
across the Sahara from Herodotus to Ibn Khaldun,” Journal of World History 14:4, p. 482).
This comment that you said is totaly incorrect Ibn Khaldun THE ANDALUSIAN - knew exactly what he was talking about “Ham, having become black because of a curse pronounced against him by his father, fled to the Maghrib to hide in shame.... Berber,

Wrong! first this dummy called Ibn Khaldun the Turk should have read the BIBLE Ham was NOT CURSED dummy it was his son Canaan here is the scripture your boy should have read and you as well Its copy and paste time you are a uneducated clown for that comment.



Gen 9-25
25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren

Did you read or can you read canaan was cursed NOT HAM and that curse has nothing to do with COLOR or his skin color was cursed

for your info all people on Earth were different shades of BROWN and BLACK skin NO ONE ON EARTH AT THIS TIME WERE WHITE!

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#20936 May 2, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>This comment that you said is totaly incorrect Ibn Khaldun THE ANDALUSIAN - knew exactly what he was talking about “Ham, having become black because of a curse pronounced against him by his father, fled to the Maghrib to hide in shame.... Berber,
Wrong! first this dummy called Ibn Khaldun the Turk should have read the BIBLE Ham was NOT CURSED dummy it was his son Canaan here is the scripture your boy should have read and you as well Its copy and paste time you are a uneducated clown for that comment.
Gen 9-25
25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren
Did you read or can you read canaan was cursed NOT HAM and that curse has nothing to do with COLOR or his skin color was cursed
for your info all people on Earth were different shades of BROWN and BLACK skin NO ONE ON EARTH AT THIS TIME WERE WHITE!
Well, I almost kinda sorta do agree with you on that bit about skin tones, except, of course, that skin tones did lighten up significantly, right about the same time that the last significant gen migration from the Middle East(12,000yrs ago) had made it into all of North Africa, according to the most up to date anthropological analyses.

I can't say that I could logically give that "Noah's story" any more credence than I would any other children's fairy tale.

That fable about Noah's ark doesn't even bother to take into account all other peoples of the World,

because the witch doctor who authored that fable didn't know anything about Chinese, or Norsemen, or Siberians, or Amerindians, nor did it ever make mention of our brother the Neanderthal man, who was already fair skinned many MANY 10's of 1,000,s of years before even the first O.O.A. Exodus.

The Neanderthal man was present as a genetic component of those Eurasians who were the progenitors of the Eurasian Peoples that were the majority population of North Africa before 12,000yrs ago.

Thad Cushman

Phoenix, AZ

#20940 Jun 26, 2013
Curious Me wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I almost kinda sorta do agree with you on that bit about skin tones, except, of course, that skin tones did lighten up significantly, right about the same time that the last significant gen migration from the Middle East(12,000yrs ago) had made it into all of North Africa, according to the most up to date anthropological analyses.
I can't say that I could logically give that "Noah's story" any more credence than I would any other children's fairy tale.
That fable about Noah's ark doesn't even bother to take into account all other peoples of the World,
because the witch doctor who authored that fable didn't know anything about Chinese, or Norsemen, or Siberians, or Amerindians, nor did it ever make mention of our brother the Neanderthal man, who was already fair skinned many MANY 10's of 1,000,s of years before even the first O.O.A. Exodus.
The Neanderthal man was present as a genetic component of those Eurasians who were the progenitors of the Eurasian Peoples that were the majority population of North Africa before 12,000yrs ago.
Noah was before the twelve sons, twelve tribes, twelve nations were born. imagine them as a litter of twekve pit bull puppies. All favoring but none looking exactly the same.

As for the american indians. They are of african and asian descent come across on the beiring straight some had some had been mixed with south american blood.
Thad Cushman

La Habra, CA

#20941 Jun 26, 2013
Look up black moors in america?

You guys downplay religion. During the crusaudes one of the Popes main objectives was to loot king solomans temple. Looking for the knowledge of ancient egypt. Which was held by the moors. Also as to your black art theory. Up until the arabs invaded and caputure the land ofn turkey, all the pictures of the in the vatican of the holy mother and messiah where that of black muslim figures. The pope had them burned and replaced because europeans had problems with killing a group of people who looked like the messiah.
He replaced the picture with the all so famous one of his son Ceasaire Borgia
HughCipher

San Francisco, CA

#20942 Jul 25, 2013
Not all Moors were Black but many were. The term it self means dark. You have far too many Black Africans represented in European Heraldry(city and family crest) for there not to have been Black African Moors. The Europeans of the time period documented what the Moors looked like quite well. Again you have hundreds of these city and family crest http://www.idtg.org/archive/255-controversial... Its only their decedents that seem not to be able to stomach this. To deny that there were Black Moors once you know this history is just silly.
The Moon

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#20944 Aug 16, 2013
Yes, the Moors were Mixed Arabs-Berbers, and both of them they belong to Semitic people, and Caucasoid race.
The Latinos and Blacks were slaves for us!!

Level 5

Since: Sep 12

Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

#20945 Aug 28, 2013
The Moon said

Yes, the Moors were Mixed Arabs-Berbers, and both of them they belong to Semitic people, and Caucasoid race.
The Latinos and Blacks were slaves for us!!

KiloEcho replies

This is a typical case of Arabo-centrism and Arab supremacy propaganda

The word moor predates Islam and the Arab conquest of North Africa by at least a thousand years.

There were Moors LONG before there were any Muslims or Arab conquerors in North Africa.

Saint Maurice, the Patron Saint of the Holy Roman Empire was a black man from Egypt. He was a Moor and yet he was not a Arab nor a Berber. He was not a Muslim. He was a Catholic Saint from Thebes.

Saint Zeno of Veronne, one of the most famous saints in European history was from the ancient Kingdom of Mauretania. He was a moor and depicted as such, that is with dark brown skin. He was not an Arab or a Muslim.

The Ethiopian Empire covered vast areas of the Arabian peninsula.

What was the condition of Arabs when they were ruled by Ethiopians for thousands of years?

The original Moors aka Berbers and their genetic brothers from Egypt are NOT Semites but Hamites also know as Ethiopoids.

Hamitic people share genetic markers, the E3b haplogroup.

Arabs share the J haplogroup with Jews.

Get this in your negrophobic skull, the history of Black Africans did not start with our enslavement and colonization by Arabs who became relevant in world history ONLY in the 7C.

Level 5

Since: Sep 12

Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

#20946 Aug 28, 2013
Curious Me said

BÚLLSHÍT!!!
The following is what REAL Moroccan Berbers have to say about the Harratin Negros...

BLACK MOROCCAN SOLDIERS WERE CONSCRIPTED SLAVES:

he soon resolved the Makhzan’s depen­dence on unreliable tribal forces by substituting for them a professional black army ('Abid); the 'Abid were made to swear allegiance to their Sultan using al-Bukhari's book, hence their name 'Abid al-Bukhari.

This method of recruitment was by no means revo­lutionary, since it had already been adopted by Ahmad al-Mansur al-Sa’adi.

But a dynasty's complete reliance on African troops to govern was certainly new.

None­theless, the creation of the black slave army, was cer­tainly a 'coup de génie' in the Makhzan's efforts to assuage refractory tribes.

KiloEcho replies

How many times do we have to tell you that Arabo-centric version of history of North Africa has no historical value for us?

The history of Black Africans did not start with our enslavement or colonization by Arabs or Europeans.

The Ethiopian Empire covered vast regions of the Arabian Peninsula.

What was the condition of the Arabs when they were ruled by Ethiopians?

REAL MOROCCANS BERBERS were themselves under Arab rule.

Arabs have very little respect for the Berbers they conquered, colonized and occupied.

Arabs enslaved Europeans as well and sold them on public markets like the infamous Salé slave market.

Riff pirates from Morocco used to capture Europeans as late as the early 20C and demanded ransom.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulai_Ahmed_er_R...

Mulai is considered the last of the Barbary Riff Pirates.

Harratin Negroes ?!!!!!! Seriously

It is as if Europeans were never enslaved in North Africa under different names: Barbary slaves, Saqaliba, Janissaries and the Mameluks.

White slavery by Arabs, Moors and Ottomans in North Africa is well documented.

Europeans were slaves under different appellations in Africa and Asia.

1) Janissaries:The Janissaries were infantry Musketeer units that formed the Ottoman sultan's household troops and bodyguards. The force was created by the Sultan Murad I from Christian boys levied through the dev&#351;irme system from conquered countries in the 14th century and was abolished by Sultan Mahmud II in 1826 in the Auspicious Incident. The dev&#351;irme was the practice by which the Ottoman Empire forcibly took boys from Christian families, who were selected by skilled scouts to be trained and enrolled in one of the four imperial institutions: the Palace, the Scribes, the Religious and the Military.

2) Mameluks: A Mamluk was a soldier of SLAVE origin, who were predominantly Cumans or Kipchak and later Circassian and Georgian.Over time, mamluks became a powerful military caste in various Muslim societies. Particularly in Egypt, but also in the Levant, Iraq, and India, mamluks held political and military power.

3) Saqaliba: The term refers to the Slavs, particularly Slavic slaves and mercenaries in the medieval Arab world, in the Middle East, North Africa, Sicily and Al-Andalus. It is generally thought that the Arabic term is a Byzantine loanword: saqlab, siklab, saqlabi etc. is a corruption of Greek Sklavinoi for "Slavs". The word was also often used more generally to refer to all slaves from Central and Eastern Europe.

4) Barbary slaves: Moors and Arabs located in the Barbary Coast (North Africa) captured more than 1 million slaves from Europe. They were pirates who attacked European villages and ships. The most daring even attacked American ships. The Barbary pirates went as far as Iceland to capture slaves. There were slaves markets in North Africa where Europeans were sold.
The Moon

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#20947 Aug 28, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
Arabs who became relevant in world history ONLY in the 7C.
That's enough to show your ignorance.
The ancient Arabs had a great ancient and history before 7C such as:

(Sheba 6000 BC). and the queen of Sheba mentioned in the holy Bible, Torah, and Qu'an.

Nabatean Kingdom 500 BC.(Perta City was the capital city).

Qataban Kingdom 400 BC.

Minaeans Kingdom 3700 BC.

Hadhramaut Kingdom 2000 BC.

And many more.

All of them were small Kingdoms, but on 7C when Islam appeared, the Arabs established an Empires such as "Umayyad Caliphate"

http://islamiccoins.ancients.info/umayyads/Um...

And "Abbasid Caliphate"

http://arabhist.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/a...

You're sick. Probably you were talking to the Spanish people who don't have any civilization, and that's made them inferiors, and obsessed with history.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#20948 Aug 28, 2013
CuloHecho wrote:
How many times do we have to tell you that Arabo-centric version of history of North Africa has no historical value for us?
The history of Black Africans did not start with our enslavement or colonization by Arabs or Europeans.
The Ethiopian Empire covered vast regions of the Arabian Peninsula.
What was the condition of the Arabs when they were ruled by Ethiopians?
REAL MOROCCANS BERBERS were themselves under Arab rule.
Arabs have very little respect for the Berbers they conquered, colonized and occupied.
Arabs enslaved Europeans as well and sold them on public markets like the infamous Salé slave market.
Riff pirates from Morocco used to capture Europeans as late as the early 20C and demanded ransom.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulai_Ahmed_er_R...
Mulai is considered the last of the Barbary Riff Pirates.
Harratin Negroes ?!!!!!! Seriously
It is as if Europeans were never enslaved in North Africa under different names: Barbary slaves, Saqaliba, Janissaries and the Mameluks.
White slavery by Arabs, Moors and Ottomans in North Africa is well documented.
Europeans were slaves under different appellations in Africa and Asia.
1) Janissaries:The Janissaries were infantry Musketeer units that formed the Ottoman sultan's household troops and bodyguards. The force was created by the Sultan Murad I from Christian boys levied through the dev&#351;irme system from conquered countries in the 14th century and was abolished by Sultan Mahmud II in 1826 in the Auspicious Incident. The dev&#351;irme was the practice by which the Ottoman Empire forcibly took boys from Christian families, who were selected by skilled scouts to be trained and enrolled in one of the four imperial institutions: the Palace, the Scribes, the Religious and the Military.
2) Mameluks: A Mamluk was a soldier of SLAVE origin, who were predominantly Cumans or Kipchak and later Circassian and Georgian.Over time, mamluks became a powerful military caste in various Muslim societies. Particularly in Egypt, but also in the Levant, Iraq, and India, mamluks held political and military power.
3) Saqaliba: The term refers to the Slavs, particularly Slavic slaves and mercenaries in the medieval Arab world, in the Middle East, North Africa, Sicily and Al-Andalus. It is generally thought that the Arabic term is a Byzantine loanword: saqlab, siklab, saqlabi etc. is a corruption of Greek Sklavinoi for "Slavs". The word was also often used more generally to refer to all slaves from Central and Eastern Europe.
4) Barbary slaves: Moors and Arabs located in the Barbary Coast (North Africa) captured more than 1 million slaves from Europe. They were pirates who attacked European villages and ships. The most daring even attacked American ships. The Barbary pirates went as far as Iceland to capture slaves. There were slaves markets in North Africa where Europeans were sold.
You're not Ethiopian and Ethiopians were not part of the Maghribíyan Berbers anyway.

You merely have the made up delusional Congoid version of pseudo-history.

The Molecular Biology used in legitimate up to date Anthropology provides the closest view of the overall genetic profile of the North Africa since before its Neolithic period.

http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Ado...

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#20949 Aug 28, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the worthless knee grow slave descendant while living in a White people's country cause your knee grow homelands in undeveloped Aperica are as sh8tlands as they were when our white ancestors found your black ancestors swinging from jungle trees. 
Our European Royals did not intermix with you inferior Blacks, g roid, even 
though you want to claim our Superior White European Royalty had no use for you blacks other then to sell your black ancestors as slaves, they did not produce heirs to our European royal houses with you g roids cause they viewed you as inferior Sub Humans who looked closer to primates then humans. 
Our Royal European families were enslaving your g roid ancestors cause they viewed you as subhuman, they were not intermixing their royal European HUMAN blood lines with you subhumans less evolved types. They got rich off of selling your black ancestors as slave because you slave animals. The Medici Family were not knee grows, they were white and humans. 
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cosimo_di ...(Bronzino).jpg
Queen Charlotte, wife of the English King George III (1738-1820), was NOT the directly descendedair any black moorish branch of the Portuguese Royal House, cause NO European family intermixed with you blacks. This lie is promoted by g roids like you who live in OUR WHITE Nations because you are too ashamed to claim your black Aperican ancestors since you have accomplished nothing to offer developed societies so you claim OUR European SUPERIOR ancestors instead of your inferior Neolithic black ancestors. Queen Charlotte was WHITE, she had NO black bloodlines, she had pure human GERMANIC bloodlines, as did all our royals, her features were human fair lovely skin, fair hair and beautiful blue eyes, she did not look like any Sheboonie, she was a human a white Queen who was selling your black ancestors as slaves cause she viewed you all as subhumans.
Now tell us how many of you blacks drowned at sea like rats trying to reach our White Modern Deceloped Nations today, g roid living in White people country instead of your undeveloped 3rd world Blacksh8tlands. lol
You dumbass racist turd.

Africans were not swinging in trees, idiot boy. Those taken as slaves from W Africa mostly came from kingdoms who were civilized, many part of a larger empire, many of the slaves being scholars, literate people, craftsmen, etc. You know NOTHING about Africa, so shut up.

European royalty were hardly superior. They were parasitic bastards who made the vast majority of europeans suffer for centuries. You admire them? You are an enemy of your own people, scumwad.

Humans are primates, you cretin. Africans were enslaved because it was possible to do so. Historical factors worked against them, not any negative quality of their own. Keep in mind that both Muslims and Europeans were quite willing to enslave white people, and did so extensively.

In 1400, W Africa was richer than Western Europe. What happened, boy? Explain that or shut up forever.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#20950 Aug 28, 2013
The Moon wrote:
<quoted text>
That's enough to show your ignorance.
The ancient Arabs had a great ancient and history before 7C such as:
(Sheba 6000 BC). and the queen of Sheba mentioned in the holy Bible, Torah, and Qu'an.
Nabatean Kingdom 500 BC.(Perta City was the capital city).
Qataban Kingdom 400 BC.
Minaeans Kingdom 3700 BC.
Hadhramaut Kingdom 2000 BC.
And many more.
All of them were small Kingdoms, but on 7C when Islam appeared, the Arabs established an Empires such as "Umayyad Caliphate"
http://islamiccoins.ancients.info/umayyads/Um...
And "Abbasid Caliphate"
http://arabhist.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/a...
You're sick. Probably you were talking to the Spanish people who don't have any civilization, and that's made them inferiors, and obsessed with history.
Spain has always been superior to any “civilization” of Muzscum, boy.

Everything the Arabs got they copied from someone else. At Petra they copied Hebrew writing to create the Arabic alphabet. Mohambone the goathumping hallucinating demon-possessed pervert copied bits of Judaism and Christianity to create his evil cult of Arab supremacy.

Arabs due to their imperialism have had a very NEGATIVE net effect on the world.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#20951 Aug 28, 2013
The Buffoon wrote:
<quoted text>
That's enough to show your ignorance.
The ancient Arabs had a great ancient and history before 7C such as:
(Sheba 6000 BC). and the queen of Sheba mentioned in the holy Bible, Torah, and Qu'an.
Nabatean Kingdom 500 BC.(Perta City was the capital city).
Qataban Kingdom 400 BC.
Minaeans Kingdom 3700 BC.
Hadhramaut Kingdom 2000 BC.
And many more.
All of them were small Kingdoms, but on 7C when Islam appeared, the Arabs established an Empires such as "Umayyad Caliphate"
http://islamiccoins.ancients.info/umayyads/Um...
And "Abbasid Caliphate"
http://arabhist.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/a...
You're sick. Probably you were talking to the Spanish people who don't have any civilization, and that's made them inferiors, and obsessed with history.
The so-called "Queen of Sheba" only goes back as far as Solomon which dates back to only 1000 BC, She was not Arab but...certainly at least not entirely as she was of Ethiopian 'E-M78' parentage and Ethiopians date back to around 2000 BC.

The 'E-M78'Y-Hg itself dates back to ~18,000 kya and coalesced in Egypt.
LION

Charlotte, NC

#20952 Aug 28, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
You dumbass racist turd.
Africans were not swinging in trees, idiot boy. Those taken as slaves from W Africa mostly came from kingdoms who were civilized, many part of a larger empire, many of the slaves being scholars, literate people, craftsmen, etc. You know NOTHING about Africa, so shut up.
European royalty were hardly superior. They were parasitic bastards who made the vast majority of europeans suffer for centuries. You admire them? You are an enemy of your own people, scumwad.
Humans are primates, you cretin. Africans were enslaved because it was possible to do so. Historical factors worked against them, not any negative quality of their own. Keep in mind that both Muslims and Europeans were quite willing to enslave white people, and did so extensively.
In 1400, W Africa was richer than Western Europe. What happened, boy? Explain that or shut up forever.
Great point! Sometimes (not all) you say things that make sense.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min fetch almighty 1,189,348
Suicide Statistics 14 min Rising Lotus 10
How come WHITE WOMEN dont age well? they brea... (Jun '11) 22 min trish_b 319
Why do good looking black women like white men ... (Sep '12) 23 min Heavy Metal Black... 6,464
NIGERIA Actresses are MORE BEAUTIFUL Than Black... 43 min UruEuWauWau 35
uh huh WW wearing AFROS now... 47 min UruEuWauWau 186
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 48 min Glimmer 108,854
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 59 min KiloEcho 31,136
All women prefer white men 1 hr gargantos 2,505
Are black people natural savages? (Nov '11) 3 hr Glimmer 1,293
Somalis and their shameless self promotion 6 hr Loulou 215
More from around the web