Funny

United States

#46 Mar 26, 2013
mhusa wrote:
<quoted text>
so how come y'all can't live like civilized people in any civilization now then? how come you aren't creating things these days? gimme a flippin' break.
civilization as we know it today was largely built by the british.
learn some real history.
you wanna read about some amazing peoples? read about the romans.
i'm sure these are wasted keystrokes. but the white people will know what i'm talking about.


Dude get a life ... what you need is some self confidence ... so you can stop bashing on people you don't even know. Get a college degree, you might feel better about yourself.

Level 6

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#47 Mar 26, 2013
The Discovery Channel is a racist lying bogus t piece of sh!t. period.. where in the world did they get this garbage from? whites have absolutely nothing to do with black history of any kind (except what was in prophecy stealing and enslaving.

Whites always try to steal black history, because they have none' any fool who does not see this should be ''committed'' whites come from Europe where there is nothing that even remotely resembles a Pyramid yet they ''lie'' to the world.

But humanity is awakening to this lie'
ugly monkeys

Omaha, NE

#48 Mar 26, 2013
Proud african american wrote:
The Discovery Channel is a racist lying bogus t piece of sh!t. period.. where in the world did they get this garbage from? whites have absolutely nothing to do with black history of any kind (except what was in prophecy stealing and enslaving.
Whites always try to steal black history, because they have none' any fool who does not see this should be ''committed'' whites come from Europe where there is nothing that even remotely resembles a Pyramid yet they ''lie'' to the world.
But humanity is awakening to this lie'
lol ancient egyptian mummies with blonde and red hair? Explain this.

Level 6

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#49 Apr 4, 2013
Afreekan wrote:
"based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel"
this study has zero credibility..
YEP!

Level 6

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#50 Apr 4, 2013
ugly monkeys wrote:
<quoted text>
lol ancient egyptian mummies with blonde and red hair? Explain
this.
What is there to explain?????? i am not here to play your racist silly white game you cave monkeys ''ARE NOT ABORIGINAL PEOPLE'' you have absolutely ''NOTHING'' to do with ancient culture' you come from fred flinstone and barney rubble, accept it' 4/5 of humanity will never believe you pink skinned ''LYERS''

You Neanderthals were in Egypt (KEMET) meaning land of the blacks, stealing, robbing and lying about our history ever since you have invaded it and witnessed our splender!

Level 1

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#52 Apr 7, 2013
Proud african american wrote:
But humanity is awakening to this lie'
thnk god i always knew the was sumthng wrong wit his story
almon

Voorhees, NJ

#53 Apr 7, 2013
king tut is a loser.. he didn't even have a leg.. he was a freaking cripple..
almon

Voorhees, NJ

#54 Apr 7, 2013
welp least the white man still has george washington..
almon

Voorhees, NJ

#56 Apr 7, 2013
and Alexander the great..
Enlightened

Raleigh, NC

#57 Apr 7, 2013
ugly monkeys wrote:
<quoted text>
lol ancient egyptian mummies with blonde and red hair? Explain this.
Have you ever heard of oxidation of dead hair? Many egyptians used henna in their hair a permanent red natural plant dye. Some people still use it.
Enlightened

Raleigh, NC

#58 Apr 7, 2013
ugly monkeys wrote:
<quoted text>
lol ancient egyptian mummies with blonde and red hair? Explain this.
If you've ever seen a mummy in a museum, you might have thought the ancients went a little overboard with henna and other red dyes. While people have colored their hair practically forever, it's more likely what you're seeing is the change in haircolor that occurs after a person dies. The color of hair comes from the mixture of two melanin pigments: eumelanin (yellow-brown-black) and pheomelanin (red). Pheomelanin is more stable, so over time the eumelanin oxidizes while most of the pheomelanin remains. This is reason most Egypian mummies appear to have reddish hair. The change occurs more slowly under dry oxidizing conditions, such as burials in ice or sand, than under wet reducing conditions, such as burials in wooden coffins or damp caves. Therefore, you would expect to see a more faster or more dramatic haircolor change in a body from the jungle, for example, than a corpse from the desert.

Photo: Pre-Columbian Peruvian mummy.(Emmanuelm, Creative Commons)

http://chemistry.about.com/b/2013/02/27/hairc...
We Wuz Gypshunz

Troy, MI

#59 Apr 11, 2013
The only black culture that has ever existed is tribal jungle culture, uncivilized armed militant AIDS culture (in modern Sub Sahara Africa after they've been weaponized, clothed, fed, etc. by white Socialist Marxists), American Plantation slave culture, and gangster thug culture. Only Plantation culture was admirable. You actually did work and were given a place to live and food to feed your family. You were also unfortunately bred with white European DNA to make better and more intelligent laborers.

Black Africans were incapable of contributing to the ancient Egyptian civilization. Even, ironically, in Nubia. Yes, Nubia (Meroe) was NOT a black (Sub-Sahara) culture. Neither was Ehthiopia. The original darker skinned people from the coast of the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa came from the Arabian Penninsula and were originally darker skinned Indians (Dravidians) from India! This is proven by DNA. Even the Nubians used Sub-Saharan blacks as SLAVES!!!!! Indeed, the Sub-Saharan blacks are depicted in artwork with very archaic features compared to today because the modern variety is a hybrid between more evolved humans.

The Sub-Sahara black Africans were called pygmies in the north due to their smaller stature. The Phoenicians called them gorillas and made a distinction between the hairy savage gorillas that we know of today in zoos and the hairless variety that could be educated as laborers. The black Sub Saharan Africans were reknown for their usefulness as slave labor and it is only because the non-blacks couldn't keep it in the pants that these apes have come in contact with better genes over the generations.

All Sub-Sahara blacks are unique from the rest of humans in an mt DNA perspective: it is all the same haplogroup (L) with the Y DNA contributed by the father coming from non-blacks, proving the fact that non-blacks mated with archaic Sub Sahara primitive females to create the modern hybrid which has given the human race so much trouble because it has just enough intelligence to be slightly above animal but is still a wild animal.

Any of these hybrids who truly thinks they were the Egyptians is deluding themselves. You could not have created such a civilization, not even now. Blacks did not even create Great Zimbabwe. They have created nothing. Tribal blacks cannot even created a stable mud hut to live in and they are so aggressive and sexual that most of them have AIDS. Sub Sahara blacks in Africa will all die off in 10 years or so because of AIDS, especially if gullible whites stop treating them with socialist medical programs keeping them alive. In the US, there are already plans to bomb neighborhoods in places like Detroit which are infested with blacks living in diseased rotting homes without power or water. There are entire neighborhoods of this.

Blacks simply cannot contribute to civilization. They were once useful as slaves but now they are too hybridized to be reliable and too animal to live with. Their intellect is equivilent to a white with Down syndrome. Do you think a population with Downs could build pyramids, even as slave labor? Or create the ancient Egyptian civilization? It is absurd to entertain the idea. Even the darker Nubian dynasties were not Sub Saharan blacks
Enlightened

Raleigh, NC

#60 Apr 11, 2013
We Wuz Gypshunz wrote:
The only black culture that has ever existed is tribal jungle culture, uncivilized armed militant AIDS culture (in modern Sub Sahara Africa after they've been weaponized, clothed, fed, etc. by white Socialist Marxists), American Plantation slave culture, and gangster thug culture. Only Plantation culture was admirable. You actually did work and were given a place to live and food to feed your family. You were also unfortunately bred with white European DNA to make better and more intelligent laborers.
Black Africans were incapable of contributing to the ancient Egyptian civilization. Even, ironically, in Nubia. Yes, Nubia (Meroe) was NOT a black (Sub-Sahara) culture. Neither was Ehthiopia. The original darker skinned people from the coast of the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa came from the Arabian Penninsula and were originally darker skinned Indians (Dravidians) from India! This is proven by DNA. Even the Nubians used Sub-Saharan blacks as SLAVES!!!!! Indeed, the Sub-Saharan blacks are depicted in artwork with very archaic features compared to today because the modern variety is a hybrid between more evolved humans.
The Sub-Sahara black Africans were called pygmies in the north due to their smaller stature. The Phoenicians called them gorillas and made a distinction between the hairy savage gorillas that we know of today in zoos and the hairless variety that could be educated as laborers. The black Sub Saharan Africans were reknown for their usefulness as slave labor and it is only because the non-blacks couldn't keep it in the pants that these apes have come in contact with better genes over the generations.
All Sub-Sahara blacks are unique from the rest of humans in an mt DNA perspective: it is all the same haplogroup (L) with the Y DNA contributed by the father coming from non-blacks, proving the fact that non-blacks mated with archaic Sub Sahara primitive females to create the modern hybrid which has given the human race so much trouble because it has just enough intelligence to be slightly above animal but is still a wild animal.
Any of these hybrids who truly thinks they were the Egyptians is deluding themselves. You could not have created such a civilization, not even now. Blacks did not even create Great Zimbabwe. They have created nothing. Tribal blacks cannot even created a stable mud hut to live in and they are so aggressive and sexual that most of them have AIDS. Sub Sahara blacks in Africa will all die off in 10 years or so because of AIDS, especially if gullible whites stop treating them with socialist medical programs keeping them alive. In the US, there are already plans to bomb neighborhoods in places like Detroit which are infested with blacks living in diseased rotting homes without power or water. There are entire neighborhoods of this.
Blacks simply cannot contribute to civilization. They were once useful as slaves but now they are too hybridized to be reliable and too animal to live with. Their intellect is equivilent to a white with Down syndrome. Do you think a population with Downs could build pyramids, even as slave labor? Or create the ancient Egyptian civilization? It is absurd to entertain the idea. Even the darker Nubian dynasties were not Sub Saharan blacks
And we are supposed to believe the oppressor who tried to erase our history? Sounds like you are talking about white trailer trash to me. Most of your ignorant ancestors didn't ever have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it of out just like the slave but yet you are the biggest racists.
Chuck

United States

#61 Apr 11, 2013
We Wuz Gypshunz wrote:
The only black culture that has ever existed is tribal jungle culture, uncivilized armed militant AIDS culture (in modern Sub Sahara Africa after they've been weaponized, clothed, fed, etc. by white Socialist Marxists), American Plantation slave culture, and gangster thug culture. Only Plantation culture was admirable. You actually did work and were given a place to live and food to feed your family. You were also unfortunately bred with white European DNA to make better and more intelligent laborers.
Black Africans were incapable of contributing to the ancient Egyptian civilization. Even, ironically, in Nubia. Yes, Nubia (Meroe) was NOT a black (Sub-Sahara) culture. Neither was Ehthiopia. The original darker skinned people from the coast of the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa came from the Arabian Penninsula and were originally darker skinned Indians (Dravidians) from India! This is proven by DNA. Even the Nubians used Sub-Saharan blacks as SLAVES!!!!! Indeed, the Sub-Saharan blacks are depicted in artwork with very archaic features compared to today because the modern variety is a hybrid between more evolved humans.
The Sub-Sahara black Africans were called pygmies in the north due to their smaller stature. The Phoenicians called them gorillas and made a distinction between the hairy savage gorillas that we know of today in zoos and the hairless variety that could be educated as laborers. The black Sub Saharan Africans were reknown for their usefulness as slave labor and it is only because the non-blacks couldn't keep it in the pants that these apes have come in contact with better genes over the generations.
All Sub-Sahara blacks are unique from the rest of humans in an mt DNA perspective: it is all the same haplogroup (L) with the Y DNA contributed by the father coming from non-blacks, proving the fact that non-blacks mated with archaic Sub Sahara primitive females to create the modern hybrid which has given the human race so much trouble because it has just enough intelligence to be slightly above animal but is still a wild animal.
Any of these hybrids who truly thinks they were the Egyptians is deluding themselves. You could not have created such a civilization, not even now. Blacks did not even create Great Zimbabwe. They have created nothing. Tribal blacks cannot even created a stable mud hut to live in and they are so aggressive and sexual that most of them have AIDS. Sub Sahara blacks in Africa will all die off in 10 years or so because of AIDS, especially if gullible whites stop treating them with socialist medical programs keeping them alive. In the US, there are already plans to bomb neighborhoods in places like Detroit which are infested with blacks living in diseased rotting homes without power or water. There are entire neighborhoods of this.
Blacks simply cannot contribute to civilization. They were once useful as slaves but now they are too hybridized to be reliable and too animal to live with. Their intellect is equivilent to a white with Down syndrome. Do you think a population with Downs could build pyramids, even as slave labor? Or create the ancient Egyptian civilization? It is absurd to entertain the idea. Even the darker Nubian dynasties were not Sub Saharan blacks
Blah blah blah BS on top of BS.

Pharaoh Ramesses iii e1b1a

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramesses_III

Yes of course they were sun burnt white people with Subsaharan DNA. Lol

And Nubia is still black African Sudan.

You need new material
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#62 Apr 11, 2013
Enlightened wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you ever heard of oxidation of dead hair? Many egyptians used henna in their hair a permanent red natural plant dye. Some people still use it.
Some of the mummies had blonde hair...
Enlightened

Raleigh, NC

#63 Apr 11, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Some of the mummies had blonde hair...
What a joke! YT is trying to claim ancient African history. Egypt is in Africa. YT is from Europe. Imagine a YT working in the hot African sun working for days to build pyramids. You guys are kinda funny.

Level 1

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#67 May 5, 2013
We Wuz Gypshunz wrote:
The only black culture that has ever existed is tribal jungle culture, uncivilized armed militant AIDS culture (in modern Sub Sahara Africa after they've been weaponized, clothed, fed, etc. by white Socialist Marxists), American Plantation slave culture, and gangster thug culture. Only Plantation culture was admirable. You actually did work and were given a place to live and food to feed your family. You were also unfortunately bred with white European DNA to make better and more intelligent laborers.
Black Africans were incapable of contributing to the ancient Egyptian civilization. Even, ironically, in Nubia. Yes, Nubia (Meroe) was NOT a black (Sub-Sahara) culture. Neither was Ehthiopia. The original darker skinned people from the coast of the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa came from the Arabian Penninsula and were originally darker skinned Indians (Dravidians) from India! This is proven by DNA. Even the Nubians used Sub-Saharan blacks as SLAVES!!!!! Indeed, the Sub-Saharan blacks are depicted in artwork with very archaic features compared to today because the modern variety is a hybrid between more evolved humans.
The Sub-Sahara black Africans were called pygmies in the north due to their smaller stature. The Phoenicians called them gorillas and made a distinction between the hairy savage gorillas that we know of today in zoos and the hairless variety that could be educated as laborers. The black Sub Saharan Africans were reknown for their usefulness as slave labor and it is only because the non-blacks couldn't keep it in the pants that these apes have come in contact with better genes over the generations.
All Sub-Sahara blacks are unique from the rest of humans in an mt DNA perspective: it is all the same haplogroup (L) with the Y DNA contributed by the father coming from non-blacks, proving the fact that non-blacks mated with archaic Sub Sahara primitive females to create the modern hybrid which has given the human race so much trouble because it has just enough intelligence to be slightly above animal but is still a wild animal.
Any of these hybrids who truly thinks they were the Egyptians is deluding themselves. You could not have created such a civilization, not even now. Blacks did not even create Great Zimbabwe. They have created nothing. Tribal blacks cannot even created a stable mud hut to live in and they are so aggressive and sexual that most of them have AIDS. Sub Sahara blacks in Africa will all die off in 10 years or so because of AIDS, especially if gullible whites stop treating them with socialist medical programs keeping them alive. In the US, there are already plans to bomb neighborhoods in places like Detroit which are infested with blacks living in diseased rotting homes without power or water. There are entire neighborhoods of this.
Blacks simply cannot contribute to civilization. They were once useful as slaves but now they are too hybridized to be reliable and too animal to live with. Their intellect is equivilent to a white with Down syndrome. Do you think a population with Downs could build pyramids, even as slave labor? Or create the ancient Egyptian civilization? It is absurd to entertain the idea. Even the darker Nubian dynasties were not Sub Saharan blacks
no 1 gives a rat abt ur bubbling, tell me sumtng are u still calling urself aryans, lol
Black Power

Oakland, CA

#68 Jul 8, 2013
We Wuz Gypshunz wrote:
The only black culture that has ever existed is tribal jungle culture, uncivilized armed militant AIDS culture (in modern Sub Sahara Africa after they've been weaponized, clothed, fed, etc. by white Socialist Marxists), American Plantation slave culture, and gangster thug culture. Only Plantation culture was admirable. You actually did work and were given a place to live and food to feed your family. You were also unfortunately bred with white European DNA to make better and more intelligent laborers.
Black Africans were incapable of contributing to the ancient Egyptian civilization. Even, ironically, in Nubia. Yes, Nubia (Meroe) was NOT a black (Sub-Sahara) culture. Neither was Ehthiopia. The original darker skinned people from the coast of the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa came from the Arabian Penninsula and were originally darker skinned Indians (Dravidians) from India! This is proven by DNA. Even the Nubians used Sub-Saharan blacks as SLAVES!!!!! Indeed, the Sub-Saharan blacks are depicted in artwork with very archaic features compared to today because the modern variety is a hybrid between more evolved humans.
The Sub-Sahara black Africans were called pygmies in the north due to their smaller stature. The Phoenicians called them gorillas and made a distinction between the hairy savage gorillas that we know of today in zoos and the hairless variety that could be educated as laborers. The black Sub Saharan Africans were reknown for their usefulness as slave labor and it is only because the non-blacks couldn't keep it in the pants that these apes have come in contact with better genes over the generations.
All Sub-Sahara blacks are unique from the rest of humans in an mt DNA perspective: it is all the same haplogroup (L) with the Y DNA contributed by the father coming from non-blacks, proving the fact that non-blacks mated with archaic Sub Sahara primitive females to create the modern hybrid which has given the human race so much trouble because it has just enough intelligence to be slightly above animal but is still a wild animal.
Any of these hybrids who truly thinks they were the Egyptians is deluding themselves. You could not have created such a civilization, not even now. Blacks did not even create Great Zimbabwe. They have created nothing. Tribal blacks cannot even created a stable mud hut to live in and they are so aggressive and sexual that most of them have AIDS. Sub Sahara blacks in Africa will all die off in 10 years or so because of AIDS, especially if gullible whites stop treating them with socialist medical programs keeping them alive. In the US, there are already plans to bomb neighborhoods in places like Detroit which are infested with blacks living in diseased rotting homes without power or water. There are entire neighborhoods of this.
Blacks simply cannot contribute to civilization. They were once useful as slaves but now they are too hybridized to be reliable and too animal to live with. Their intellect is equivilent to a white with Down syndrome. Do you think a population with Downs could build pyramids, even as slave labor? Or create the ancient Egyptian civilization? It is absurd to entertain the idea. Even the darker Nubian dynasties were not Sub Saharan blacks
http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-201...

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#69 Jul 9, 2013
Oh for the love of god this has already been debunked!

"Swiss genomics company iGENEA has launched a Tutankhamen DNA project based on what they say are genetic markers that appeared on a computer screen during a Discovery Channel special on the famous pharaoh's genetic lineage.

"Maybe they didn't know what they showed, but we got 16 markers from the Y chromosome from these pharaohs," Roman Scholz, the managing director of iGENEA, told LiveScience.

If the claims were true, it would put King Tut in a genetic profile group shared by more than half of Western European men. That would make those men relatives albeit distant ones of the pharaoh.

But Carsten Pusch, a geneticist at Germany's University of Tubingen who was part of the team that unraveled Tut's DNA from samples taken from his mummy and mummies of his family members, said that iGENEA's claims are "simply impossible." Pusch and his colleagues published part of their results, though not the Y-chromosome DNA, in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 2010. The Y chromosome is the sex chromosome found only in males, and looking at the genes in this chromosome would show Tut's male lineage.

Pusch's team used snippets of Y-chromosome DNA to link Tut to his closest relatives, identifying his mom and dad. But they didn't publish the full genetic data that would allow genomics companies like iGENEA to link modern people to the Tutankhamen lineage. According to Scholz, that crucial data is what appeared on the Discovery Channel.

"Dr. Albert Zink from the EURAC [European Academy of Bolzano, an independent research center] in Bolzano and co-author of the 2010 JAMA publication screened the footage and confirmed that the company acts very unscientific," Pusch wrote in an email to LiveScience. "The Swiss company did not try to get into contact with us prior to launching their new Internet page."

The alleged Discovery Channel markers put Tut in a genetic profile group, or haplogroup, that also includes more than half of the men in Western Europe. Scholz said the company is now searching for the closest living relatives of Tutankhamen, men who share all 16 genetic markers on the pharaoh's supposed Y chromosome. Exact matches get a refund for their $179 to $399 test and will also get free additional DNA analysis.

The haplogroup R1b1a2, which iGENEA claims includes King Tut, arose 9,500 years ago in the Black Sea region. How Tut's ancestors would have gotten from that region to Egypt is unknown, but Scholz said iGENEA hopes to learn more by collecting more close and exact matches from modern people of Western European descent.

"The better the match, the more recent the common ancestor," Scholz said.

But people hoping to prove that they've got an ancestor in common with the notoriously sickly boy king should take iGENEA's claims with a grain of salt, Pusch said: "It appears that they try to better sell their DNA testing kit by using the media attention connected to King Tut."
Source:
http://www.livescience.com/15388-discovery-ch...

Even if Tut was R1b it was mostly likely due to AFRICANS! Eurofcks forget that R1b AROSE in Asia!

And migrated to BOTH Africa and Europe.

R1b in Europe = Asia > Europe migration
R1b in Africa = Asia > Africa migration

But it doesn't even matter because R1b DOES NOT tell admixture BUT ANCESTRY!

Tut was African and proven by Autosomal results which ACTUALLY tells admixture.
http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-201...

Get over this King Tit R1b nonsense. It doesn't help ya case...

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#70 Jul 9, 2013
We Wuz Gypshunz wrote:
The only black culture that has ever existed is tribal jungle culture, uncivilized armed militant AIDS culture (in modern Sub Sahara Africa after they've been weaponized, clothed, fed, etc. by white Socialist Marxists), American Plantation slave culture, and gangster thug culture. Only Plantation culture was admirable. You actually did work and were given a place to live and food to feed your family. You were also unfortunately bred with white European DNA to make better and more intelligent laborers.
Black Africans were incapable of contributing to the ancient Egyptian civilization. Even, ironically, in Nubia. Yes, Nubia (Meroe) was NOT a black (Sub-Sahara) culture. Neither was Ehthiopia. The original darker skinned people from the coast of the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa came from the Arabian Penninsula and were originally darker skinned Indians (Dravidians) from India! This is proven by DNA. Even the Nubians used Sub-Saharan blacks as SLAVES!!!!! Indeed, the Sub-Saharan blacks are depicted in artwork with very archaic features compared to today because the modern variety is a hybrid between more evolved humans.
The Sub-Sahara black Africans were called pygmies in the north due to their smaller stature. The Phoenicians called them gorillas and made a distinction between the hairy savage gorillas that we know of today in zoos and the hairless variety that could be educated as laborers. The black Sub Saharan Africans were reknown for their usefulness as slave labor and it is only because the non-blacks couldn't keep it in the pants that these apes have come in contact with better genes over the generations.
All Sub-Sahara blacks are unique from the rest of humans in an mt DNA perspective: it is all the same haplogroup (L) with the Y DNA contributed by the father coming from non-blacks, proving the fact that non-blacks mated with archaic Sub Sahara primitive females to create the modern hybrid which has given the human race so much trouble because it has just enough intelligence to be slightly above animal but is still a wild animal.
Any of these hybrids who truly thinks they were the Egyptians is deluding themselves. You could not have created such a civilization, not even now. Blacks did not even create Great Zimbabwe. They have created nothing. Tribal blacks cannot even created a stable mud hut to live in and they are so aggressive and sexual that most of them have AIDS. Sub Sahara blacks in Africa will all die off in 10 years or so because of AIDS, especially if gullible whites stop treating them with socialist medical programs keeping them alive. In the US, there are already plans to bomb neighborhoods in places like Detroit which are infested with blacks living in diseased rotting homes without power or water. There are entire neighborhoods of this.
Blacks simply cannot contribute to civilization. They were once useful as slaves but now they are too hybridized to be reliable and too animal to live with. Their intellect is equivilent to a white with Down syndrome. Do you think a population with Downs could build pyramids, even as slave labor? Or create the ancient Egyptian civilization? It is absurd to entertain the idea. Even the darker Nubian dynasties were not Sub Saharan blacks
Can anyone really take this post seriously? Explain why Africa was in their golden age while Europe was in their 'dark age'. Explain why inferior African gold JUMPSTARTED the European renaissance.

No one takes your ignorance seriously...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 5 min African AE 28,577
What Does Ending The Cold War With Cuba Mean Fo... 7 min Zombie Corpse Rental 1
Which Topix Black Girl Most Likely To Have Done... 11 min I see triplets 4
326 "justifiable homicides of whites by cops vs... 13 min Nikki 6
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 21 min African AE 97,922
Cops & Black Families 42 min KIP 4
porn site BLACKED gets 53,116 white male visito... 46 min anon 22
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 1 hr Glimmer 27,508
Latino Male Says AA Men Only Wimps in the World... (Mar '14) 1 hr Miguel is the man 2,152
Caucasians Have NO WAY Of Matching Up With The ... 3 hr Guest 46
More from around the web