Maybe the USA Needs a Race War!

Maybe the USA Needs a Race War!

Posted in the African-American Forum

Dr No

Denver, CO

#1 Jul 12, 2013
Arabs are killing Africans, enslaving them and taking their land TODAY. Chinese are slowly taking over Africa. China killed 50 million of their own under Mao and are one of the most racist people on the planet. They will not hesitate to exterminate Africans in their way of land and resources when the West no longer has the power to hold them back.
But in the USA, you have 4th generation fat, welfare blacks who were never slaves and have never worked a day in their lives. They were never slaves, but they whine about slavery 10 generations ago to people who never owned slaves. That's AFTER 50 years of Affirmative Action, general special treatment and $1.5 trillion spent on social spending.
Maybe the USA does need a race war!
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#3 Jul 12, 2013
OK: Let's take a look at your points. I will reserve judgement on your intelligence until after we can clearly see what you have in mind.
1. You start out by saying that Arabs are killing Africans. That's true, but what does it mean. Those Arabs, many of them, are not Arabs at all. They are Muslims and many of them Black. As such,they are fighting a religious war, something comparable to say the persecution of Mormons in the U.S.....and how do you think Arab actions compare (emphasis) to the horror visited on the Rwandan people, a genocide promoted and shielded by Western nations, then there was Mogadishu. In Mogadishu at least one Black child was roasted on an open fires for the pleasure of white troops, and starving Blacks needing food were shot down in cold blood. Or how about Israel bombing helpless citizens in Sudan, or the United States recent collaboration with Libya,(men, women and children publicly brutalized and murdered.) or U.S. collaboration in the Congo (desired poisoning of an elected Prime Minister) and Western collaboration and support of apartheid when it was accepted practice in South Africa. Finally, in your first point, you mention slavery. Did you intentionally overlook Western participation. Between 25 million and 50 million people kidnapped and forced into life long slavery, and up to 50% of the victims did not survive transit.
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#4 Jul 12, 2013
In the context of Arabs you mentioned slavery. Where should we start. Sex slavery might be a good place to begin: Eastern Europe is, today, the prime target for human trafficking. Entire dormitories of girls are enslaved and transported to various parts of the world. It's called "white slavery" and few--if any--Western governments are prioritizing prevention. Indeed, it's rarely mentioned in Western media.
.
And before you mention China and the numbers killed under Mao, you might take a look at Chian Kai Chek and the Kuomintang , or what happened in India when England partitioned that nation, or the Boxer Rebellion, or the introduction of opium to the Chinese population--at large. Then, of course, we should talk about Mao--maybe the Long March and the merciless bombing of civilians from the air (see Flying Tigers) and let's not forget the participation of the U.S. when dropping nukes. Officially 250,00 killed at once, but unofficial figures double those numbers.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#5 Jul 12, 2013
Stag_R_Lee wrote:
In the context of Arabs you mentioned slavery. Where should we start. Sex slavery might be a good place to begin: Eastern Europe is, today, the prime target for human trafficking. Entire dormitories of girls are enslaved and transported to various parts of the world. It's called "white slavery" and few--if any--Western governments are prioritizing prevention. Indeed, it's rarely mentioned in Western media.
.
And before you mention China and the numbers killed under Mao, you might take a look at Chian Kai Chek and the Kuomintang , or what happened in India when England partitioned that nation, or the Boxer Rebellion, or the introduction of opium to the Chinese population--at large. Then, of course, we should talk about Mao--maybe the Long March and the merciless bombing of civilians from the air (see Flying Tigers) and let's not forget the participation of the U.S. when dropping nukes. Officially 250,00 killed at once, but unofficial figures double those numbers.
Typical Islamoapologetics.

MUZ committed history's greatest genocide.
MUZ took more slaves than anyone from Africa, with a higher death rate in transit.
MUZ continue to hold women in 3rd-class status.
MUZ intransigence and antisemitic Nazism continue to create chaos around Israel, a legitimate country acting only in self-defense against maddened Arabonazis.
MUZ committed genocide recently in Sudan.
MUZ are committing genocide right now in Pakistan and Kashmir.

MUZSCUM!!!
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#6 Jul 12, 2013
Dr.No's logic completely breaks down when you switch from totally unrelated global events to African Americans. It's almost mind boggling how any sane person can make such a erroneous transition. But with Dr. No, we get what we see: abnormal even among the stupid.
.
Slaves, no. Wage slaves, yes. We only need to look at the unprecedented differentials existing in incomes between rich and poor to see the utter stupidity of Dr. No's assertion.
With respect to welfare, Dr. No fails again. "Welfare" as we know it is the child of two historical trends. One: Civil servants set up savings programs, logical from an actuarial perspective, to assist the wives of deceased members. They were called "Widows Funds." Keynes, the economist, insisted that government spending was sometimes needed to stimulate a capitalist economy.(Today, capitalism is almost totally dependent on tax payer revenue--but that's another story.) One form of social spending to help business--as it turned out--was Welfare, another was Social Security. So much for Social spending on Blacks.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#7 Jul 12, 2013
It's not a "race" war that we need.

Islam declared war on the world, on humanity, 14 centuries ago. That conflict is not yet resolved.

Islam will lose.
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#8 Jul 12, 2013
We are left then, with Dr. No's final adventure into the absurd. According to Dr. No. it would seem inappropriate for Blacks to complain about slavery because of the elapsed time and generations that were not born at the time. OK:
1.) Let's dismiss the Jewish Holocaust
2.) Forget about Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor,
3.) The destruction of the Twin Towers, by now, is old news.
3.) Can't mention the wholesale bombing of England.
4.) Occupation of France, another unmentionable
5.) Throw out the Bible
etc.

So, on the basis of his totally absurd ravings, Dr.No insinuates that a race war is needed. But Dr. But his absurdities don't argue for a race war; maybe genocide. If true, if our pathetic Dr. No is advocating genocide, he is--indeed-- a very sick person, bordering upon a total psychotic.
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#9 Jul 12, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical Islamoapologetics.
MUZ committed history's greatest genocide.
MUZ took more slaves than anyone from Africa, with a higher death rate in transit.
MUZ continue to hold women in 3rd-class status.
MUZ intransigence and antisemitic Nazism continue to create chaos around Israel, a legitimate country acting only in self-defense against maddened Arabonazis.
MUZ committed genocide recently in Sudan.
MUZ are committing genocide right now in Pakistan and Kashmir.
MUZSCUM!!!
Sorry,
I have no idea, no idea of what you are talking about. This thread is about African Americans and then it has been twisted to the point of torture, and now you bring in "MUZ." Maybe you should try a forum devoted to religious subjects. Give Black Ameicans a rest? We believe in religious freedom.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#10 Jul 12, 2013
Stag_R_Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry,
I have no idea, no idea of what you are talking about. This thread is about African Americans and then it has been twisted to the point of torture, and now you bring in "MUZ." Maybe you should try a forum devoted to religious subjects. Give Black Ameicans a rest? We believe in religious freedom.
I believe in religious freedom. I realize that the greatest threat to that comes from Muz. The 2nd greatest threat is from fundy Christians in the USA.

Dr Nitwit wants a race war of whites against blacks. My assertion is that that is absurd, as far as black Americans, they have not declared war on anyone. Don't these white racists even know black people? I do. I certainly don't want to be at war with them. I like them.

Islam is a different issue, and not irrelevant, because if hostility arises in the USA it is likely to be due to shari'a, or some other Muz nonsense.

Religious freedom means NO SHARI'A!

They can speak for themselves, but I'm sure the majority of AA do not want to live under shari'a law.
Immigrantay

Harrisburg, PA

#12 Jul 12, 2013
Jew fi if Jew wang to.
I jus in USA to werk.

Vaya con Dios!
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#13 Jul 12, 2013
The truly hateful aspect of all of this is that vicious people want to conflate African American with Muslims. With this comes both the baggage of racism and the hate currently being manufactured agains Muslims.
.
The answer for Blacks is to expose this effort for what it is--an anti American effort to divide Americans based on racial and ethnic hatred..
.
Contrary to the apparent efforts of agents posting here at TOPIX, what this nation needs--what the world needs-- is unity on all fronts as we are facing one of the greatest economic calaminities in human history and we liv on a dying planet and abide with nuclear armed nations. Only the insane would stoke race and ethnic hatred in such a world. Blacks, all of us, are for peaceful coexistence and total rejection of hate-mongers in all forms.
39ehonor

Jupiter, FL

#14 Jul 12, 2013
Stag_R_Lee wrote:
OK: Let's take a look at your points. I will reserve judgement on your intelligence until after we can clearly see what you have in mind.
1. You start out by saying that Arabs are killing Africans. That's true, but what does it mean. Those Arabs, many of them, are not Arabs at all. They are Muslims and many of them Black. As such,they are fighting a religious war, something comparable to say the persecution of Mormons in the U.S.....and how do you think Arab actions compare (emphasis) to the horror visited on the Rwandan people, a genocide promoted and shielded by Western nations, then there was Mogadishu. In Mogadishu at least one Black child was roasted on an open fires for the pleasure of white troops, and starving Blacks needing food were shot down in cold blood. Or how about Israel bombing helpless citizens in Sudan, or the United States recent collaboration with Libya,(men, women and children publicly brutalized and murdered.) or U.S. collaboration in the Congo (desired poisoning of an elected Prime Minister) and Western collaboration and support of apartheid when it was accepted practice in South Africa. Finally, in your first point, you mention slavery. Did you intentionally overlook Western participation. Between 25 million and 50 million people kidnapped and forced into life long slavery, and up to 50% of the victims did not survive transit.
hey df, RWANDA GENOCIDE WAS BLACK ON BLACK--600,000 MEN WOMEN CHILDREN BUTCHERED BY BLACKS AGAINST BLACKS--WORST MASSACRE IN WORLD HISTORY IN THAT SHORT TIME FRAME--BLACK BLOODLUST WAS UNBELIEVABLE
Stag_R_Lee

Scottsdale, AZ

#15 Jul 12, 2013
39ehonor wrote:
<quoted text> hey df, RWANDA GENOCIDE WAS BLACK ON BLACK--600,000 MEN WOMEN CHILDREN BUTCHERED BY BLACKS AGAINST BLACKS--WORST MASSACRE IN WORLD HISTORY IN THAT SHORT TIME FRAME--BLACK BLOODLUST WAS UNBELIEVABLE
You are right, but can you honestly say that the United Nations, Belgium, China, France and Egypt were innocent bystanders to the genocide. Why did the U.N. stand silent when it was well known that genocide was being planned and the U.N. continued its silence and inaction (knowing that a genocide was occurring and in violation of its clear mandate) the UN stood silent during the worst of the killing? Why did Egypt and China provide mortars, advanced weapons and machetes? Why did Belgium (it is believed) shoot down the Prime Minister's aircraft? Why did France stand silent until the Tutsi's were able to regroup, organize and turn the tide of battle? Only then, by the way, only when the Hutus were on the run, did the major powers take an active interest. Yes, after the genocidal fury was spent, and the Tutsi's were regaining control, the refugee camps and safe zones were set up, BY THE WEST....the SAFE ZONES were given to Hutus on the run while virtually nothing was being done in areas dominated by Hutus and where the rampage and murders went on unabated. The refugee camps were controlled by Hutu leaders, thus the rape and pillage continued, only under the cover and protection of Western "AID" organizations.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll Which race smells the worst? (May '14) 41 min Will 49
Are Blacks the missing link? (Nov '06) 50 min Monkeybusiness 25
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr Rattlesnake Pete 1,707,201
White people GO AWAY 1 hr IT IS I 320
why is it that louisiana creoles say there not ... (May '11) 1 hr Creole beauty 57
Every Single Black On This Forum... 1 hr The Laughing Axe 17
Smartest posters on Topix afam 1 hr Jake 108
Lone Black Lady Jogging In Park 1 hr Jake 93
Leaving Topix Forever 3 hr The Laughing Axe 31
Nobody is on white people side 5 hr IT IS I 106
Trump's "Listening Session" 5 hr Joey 24
More from around the web