Except, of course, a Negroes shit skin hasn't evolved for them to live in northern climates smdh<quoted text>
Buckwheat, stop saying that nonsense. Brown skin is a beautiful thing! It can also help block out UV rays quite nicely. It's a skin tone well-adapted for tropical environments. Nothing wrong with it at all. We all turn brown (melanin) when we go into the sun for longer periods of time, even many European groups of people. I'm sure you don't think they look like "sht" when you see them with their melanin-tanned skin!
If you dislike certain cultures (thug) then that's one thing, but to hate on someones natural appearance, when that appearance is perfectly fine for the environment in which their ancestors lived in and adapted to over many years? That's just nonsense.
The Negro mutation to shit skin was an adaptation after their hair reduced, for some unknown reason, but pretty much not due to clothing. They are old-world humans, White folks are the new boys on the block and have adaptive skin tone, in colder northern climes we can make lovely vit D, something that US Negroes have trouble with.
Negroes stayed in Africa, in one environment for around 200,000 years, they had no reason to change and adapt, except for minor fluctuations, that primarily led to group extinctions.
The Out Of Africa humans, eventually the Eurasians, were continually moving from region to region and had to have biological adaptations, as well as become ingenious to have some kind of control on their environment. First Eurasians went east and north, then back migrated eventually into Europe, making crackers the new version of humans, adapted to survive in harsh environments by gile and ingenuity.
White folks look down on Africans because in 200,000 years little has changed about them, biologically or in the way they use their environment. I guess, ultimately, it is what they are we do not like, the skin color is just a happy coincidence when labeling them.