White Men And White Women-Part Neande...

White Men And White Women-Part Neanderthals

Posted in the African-American Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

216 Elite

“Mad Izm”

Since: Mar 08

Cleveland, OH

#1 Oct 26, 2010
This is for you genociding IR garbage that are mixing out your melanated/afrikan genes with the caucasoid.
&fe ature=recentf

**********

I knew there was a reason for the European's and other light skinned people's barbaric treatment of darker human beings throughout the world, their violent steal, conquer and destroy attitude.

I always wanted an answer to explain what led change in the protein 6,000-12,000 years ago which changed the skin color from a melanin rich brown to a pink sun abomination.

Seems their so-called attack on "Afrocentrics" was a mask to cover what was the truth being told all along.

"The genetic study team reached their conclusion after comparing the genomes of five living humans—from China, France, Papua New Guinea, southern Africa, and western Africa—against the available "rough draft" of the Neanderthal genome."

Source:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/...

The manipulative white male will say But Wait, they only compared 5 people's DNA out of 6 billion plus in the world???

OK, there was another study done in April 2010 that yielded the same results:

"The researchers arrived at that conclusion by studying genetic data from 1,983 individuals from 99 populations in Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania and the Americas. Sarah Joyce, a doctoral student working with Long, analyzed 614 microsatellite positions, which are sections of the genome that can be used like fingerprints.
She then created an evolutionary tree to explain the observed genetic variation in microsatellites. The best way to explain that variation was if there were two periods of interbreeding between humans and an archaic species, such as Homo neanderthalensis or H. heidelbergensis.

continued......

216 Elite

“Mad Izm”

Since: Mar 08

Cleveland, OH

#2 Oct 26, 2010
"This is not what we expected to find," says Long.
Using projected rates of genetic mutation and data from the fossil record, the researchers suggest that the interbreeding happened about 60,000 years ago in the eastern Mediterranean and, more recently, about 45,000 years ago in eastern Asia. Those two events happened after the first H. sapiens had migrated out of Africa, says Long. His group didn't find evidence of interbreeding in the genomes of the modern African people included in the study."

Source: http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100420/full/n...

Note that last sentence...

Check this out below, they are suggesting that "hair roots" and skin color change may have been contributed from Neanderthal genes:
"The question over whether ancient humans ever "did it" with Neanderthals now appears to be resolved, but the draft genome raises more questions that are just as deep. For example, what traits did humans develop that gave them an evolutionary edge over Neanderthals?

The researchers found some intriguing clues:

* Five genes stood out as different in Neanderthals and modern humans. One of them has to do with how sperm cells whip their tails around. Another relates to wound-healing. Yet another builds a protein for the skin, sweat glands and hair roots. "It's tantalizing to think that the skin changed, but the biological implication of that is not at all clear yet," Pääbo said.*

Several genes showed evidence of positive selection in humans as opposed to Neanderthals - including genes linked to schizophrenia, autism and Down syndrome. "This suggests that some of the genes that were positively selected may have had to do with cognitive development....

It doesn't suggest that Neanderthals had no autism, or that they were more similar to people with autism," Pääbo said.* The researchers also focused on a gene that was linked to development of the frontal part of the skull, the shoulder bone and ribcage.
Those are anatomical features where Neanderthals and humans differ, so the researchers said it was a "reasonable hypothesis" that that particular gene, RUNX2, "was of importance in the origin of modern humans."

Source: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/05/...

Now you see why you IR trash are called sell-outs.....smh

BAPF
This Jive Turkey

United States

#3 Oct 26, 2010
216 Elite wrote:
This is for you genociding IR garbage that are mixing out your melanated/afrikan genes with the caucasoid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =2Ati2wLZ9ygXX&feature=rec entf
**********
I knew there was a reason for the European's and other light skinned people's barbaric treatment of darker human beings throughout the world, their violent steal, conquer and destroy attitude.
I always wanted an answer to explain what led change in the protein 6,000-12,000 years ago which changed the skin color from a melanin rich brown to a pink sun abomination.
Seems their so-called attack on "Afrocentrics" was a mask to cover what was the truth being told all along.
"The genetic study team reached their conclusion after comparing the genomes of five living humans—from China, France, Papua New Guinea, southern Africa, and western Africa—against the available "rough draft" of the Neanderthal genome."
Source:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/...
The manipulative white male will say But Wait, they only compared 5 people's DNA out of 6 billion plus in the world???
OK, there was another study done in April 2010 that yielded the same results:
"The researchers arrived at that conclusion by studying genetic data from 1,983 individuals from 99 populations in Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania and the Americas. Sarah Joyce, a doctoral student working with Long, analyzed 614 microsatellite positions, which are sections of the genome that can be used like fingerprints.
She then created an evolutionary tree to explain the observed genetic variation in microsatellites. The best way to explain that variation was if there were two periods of interbreeding between humans and an archaic species, such as Homo neanderthalensis or H. heidelbergensis.
continued......
They didn't steal shit. Cause come right down to it, what have you got??? Nothin!! All those people live in primitive conditions since forever. The neaderthals had the bigger brain capcities. They neanderthals blood gave us the edge and made us the masters of our environment and of you. And stop trying to understand the white man's science. You ain't cut out for readin writin or arithmatic. You place is in the cotton field boy!
Skilless1333

Louisville, KY

#4 Oct 26, 2010
216 Elite wrote:
This is for you genociding IR garbage that are mixing out your melanated/afrikan genes with the caucasoid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =2Ati2wLZ9ygXX&feature=rec entf
**********
I knew there was a reason for the European's and other light skinned people's barbaric treatment of darker human beings throughout the world, their violent steal, conquer and destroy attitude.
I always wanted an answer to explain what led change in the protein 6,000-12,000 years ago which changed the skin color from a melanin rich brown to a pink sun abomination.
Seems their so-called attack on "Afrocentrics" was a mask to cover what was the truth being told all along.
"The genetic study team reached their conclusion after comparing the genomes of five living humans—from China, France, Papua New Guinea, southern Africa, and western Africa—against the available "rough draft" of the Neanderthal genome."
Source:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/...
The manipulative white male will say But Wait, they only compared 5 people's DNA out of 6 billion plus in the world???
OK, there was another study done in April 2010 that yielded the same results:
"The researchers arrived at that conclusion by studying genetic data from 1,983 individuals from 99 populations in Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania and the Americas. Sarah Joyce, a doctoral student working with Long, analyzed 614 microsatellite positions, which are sections of the genome that can be used like fingerprints.
She then created an evolutionary tree to explain the observed genetic variation in microsatellites. The best way to explain that variation was if there were two periods of interbreeding between humans and an archaic species, such as Homo neanderthalensis or H. heidelbergensis.
continued......
Dude, you are one racist black person.

216 Elite

“Mad Izm”

Since: Mar 08

Cleveland, OH

#5 Oct 26, 2010
This Jive Turkey wrote:
<quoted text> They didn't steal shit. Cause come right down to it, what have you got??? Nothin!! All those people live in primitive conditions since forever. The neaderthals had the bigger brain capcities. They neanderthals blood gave us the edge and made us the masters of our environment and of you. And stop trying to understand the white man's science. You ain't cut out for readin writin or arithmatic. You place is in the cotton field boy!
Only thing you caucausoids got from your neanderthal cousins was your barbaric and wicked nature,which is why your survival is based on others demise,now your time is closing..... which is why you are about to go extinct like them....

BAPF

216 Elite

“Mad Izm”

Since: Mar 08

Cleveland, OH

#6 Oct 26, 2010
Skilless1333 wrote:
<quoted text> Dude, you are one racist black person.
Thats your response tohruth about yourselves....

Your own scientists found out you come from a neanderthal animal.....

Your historic and present day violence, genocidal mixing and barbaric land grabs away from hue-manity proves you're an animal....

BAPF
moshi

Huntingdon, UK

#7 Nov 14, 2010
216 Elite wrote:
This is for you genociding IR garbage that are mixing out your melanated/afrikan genes with the caucasoid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =2Ati2wLZ9ygXX&feature=rec entf
**********
I knew there was a reason for the European's and other light skinned people's barbaric treatment of darker human beings throughout the world, their violent steal, conquer and destroy attitude.......
Wait just a cotton-picking minute, lol. You should read up on the history of the African continent. Those Bantu migrations didn't take place for charity. And when you've brushed up on that a glance at European history should tell you that the first and worst victims of white people were other white people. You could start with the Roman Empire, but let's fast-forward to a scene from WW1:

The Battle of Passchendaele, 1917. The British place 21 mines under the German trenches. At 3:10 am on June 7 they detonate, killing 10,000 German soldiers in half a minute. It was the largest man-made sound ever made to that date. No black people were harmed in the making of that piece of history.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#8 Nov 14, 2010
People keep making these claims as though this is fact. No one has proven the Neanderthal genome. The sample(s) of bones that were used to conduct the genome on Neanderthals have never been proven to be Neanderthal. There are no solid, in tact, and complete set of bones from a Neanderthal. The bone they used for testing was based on one scientist's guest that this, "Must be a Neanderthal's leg," because it is short in stature. Non-sense.
Happy to be a Neanderthal

Germany

#11 Jan 24, 2011
216 Elite wrote:
This is for you genociding IR garbage that are mixing out your melanated/afrikan genes with the caucasoid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =2Ati2wLZ9ygXX&feature=rec entf
**********
I knew there was a reason for the European's and other light skinned people's barbaric treatment of darker human beings throughout the world, their violent steal, conquer and destroy attitude.
I always wanted an answer to explain what led change in the protein 6,000-12,000 years ago which changed the skin color from a melanin rich brown to a pink sun abomination.
Seems their so-called attack on "Afrocentrics" was a mask to cover what was the truth being told all along.
"The genetic study team reached their conclusion after comparing the genomes of five living humans—from China, France, Papua New Guinea, southern Africa, and western Africa—against the available "rough draft" of the Neanderthal genome."
Source:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/...
The manipulative white male will say But Wait, they only compared 5 people's DNA out of 6 billion plus in the world???
OK, there was another study done in April 2010 that yielded the same results:
"The researchers arrived at that conclusion by studying genetic data from 1,983 individuals from 99 populations in Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania and the Americas. Sarah Joyce, a doctoral student working with Long, analyzed 614 microsatellite positions, which are sections of the genome that can be used like fingerprints.
She then created an evolutionary tree to explain the observed genetic variation in microsatellites. The best way to explain that variation was if there were two periods of interbreeding between humans and an archaic species, such as Homo neanderthalensis or H. heidelbergensis.
continued......
You are stupid, all people in the world expect Africans have neanderthal DNA not only white people. Neanderthals had 20% larger brains and that finally explains why black people are less intelligent. I'm so happy they found out that we are part Neanderthal?
Happy to be a Neanderthal

Germany

#12 Jan 24, 2011
The theory that early humans violently replaced Neanderthals was first proposed by French palaeontologist Marcellin Boule (the first person to publish an analysis of a Neanderthal) in 1912.

Another supporter of competitive replacement is Jared Diamond who points out in his book The Third Chimpanzee that the genocidal replacement of Neanderthals by modern humans is similar to modern human patterns of behavior that occur whenever people with advanced technology invade the territory of less advanced people.

That means Neanderthals were more peaceful, no wonder black people behave still like animals.
Beatrice

Louisville, KY

#13 Jan 24, 2011
216 Elite wrote:
This is for you genociding IR garbage that are mixing out your melanated/afrikan genes with the caucasoid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =2Ati2wLZ9ygXX&feature=rec entf
**********
I knew there was a reason for the European's and other light skinned people's barbaric treatment of darker human beings throughout the world, their violent steal, conquer and destroy attitude.
I always wanted an answer to explain what led change in the protein 6,000-12,000 years ago which changed the skin color from a melanin rich brown to a pink sun abomination.
Seems their so-called attack on "Afrocentrics" was a mask to cover what was the truth being told all along.
"The genetic study team reached their conclusion after comparing the genomes of five living humans—from China, France, Papua New Guinea, southern Africa, and western Africa—against the available "rough draft" of the Neanderthal genome."
Source:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/...
The manipulative white male will say But Wait, they only compared 5 people's DNA out of 6 billion plus in the world???
OK, there was another study done in April 2010 that yielded the same results:
"The researchers arrived at that conclusion by studying genetic data from 1,983 individuals from 99 populations in Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania and the Americas. Sarah Joyce, a doctoral student working with Long, analyzed 614 microsatellite positions, which are sections of the genome that can be used like fingerprints.
She then created an evolutionary tree to explain the observed genetic variation in microsatellites. The best way to explain that variation was if there were two periods of interbreeding between humans and an archaic species, such as Homo neanderthalensis or H. heidelbergensis.
continued......
Black males and black females = pure jungle apes.
TheAnswer

Garland, TX

#14 Jan 24, 2011
The Infusion of neanderthal DNA is what made modern humans by giving us larger brains. Again, science too often goes by political correctness. Those lacking neanderthal DNA are simply an evolved form of homo erectus.
beq

Fort Worth, TX

#15 Jul 27, 2011
No wonder they think they are better than anyone else because of their color..only a sub human would think that way....
Rob

Ogden, UT

#16 Aug 25, 2011
It seems as though all of you are quite intrigued by your own feelings of superiority.
When we consider that homo sapiens were vastly more inventive than neanderthals we immediately view the neanderthal as less evolved. However, modern study reveals that neanderthals were quite well equipped to use and design more highly developed tools and art through cultural diffusion. This indicates that they were quite similar in intelligence to their african counterparts. In other words you are seeing a slightly more advanced african culture coming into contact with another that, in spite of its lack of inventiveness, represented a people who were physically quite adapted to their environment.
If you look at the fact of the comparisons between individual genomes, it would appear that everything we non sub-saharan africans took from the neanderthal was a diversity of genes that are quite beneficial for survival in a colder, less hospitable evironment.
When it is considered that so little is left of the neaderthal in our genome it would indicate that interbreeding was actually quite rare, had little effect on cognitive abilities, and that what did remain a part of our genome was minutely advantageous considering our environment. Furthermore, being that homo sapiens interbred with neanderthals, evidence shows that the neanderthal was quite human; in fact the relationship between the two was closer than the relationship between the lion and the tiger.
YT is YAH

Stockton, CA

#17 Aug 25, 2011
216 Elite wrote:
This is for you genociding IR garbage that are mixing out your melanated/afrikan genes with the caucasoid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =2Ati2wLZ9ygXX&feature=rec entf
**********
I knew there was a reason for the European's and other light skinned people's barbaric treatment of darker human beings throughout the world, their violent steal, conquer and destroy attitude.
I always wanted an answer to explain what led change in the protein 6,000-12,000 years ago which changed the skin color from a melanin rich brown to a pink sun abomination.
Seems their so-called attack on "Afrocentrics" was a mask to cover what was the truth being told all along.
"The genetic study team reached their conclusion after comparing the genomes of five living humans—from China, France, Papua New Guinea, southern Africa, and western Africa—against the available "rough draft" of the Neanderthal genome."
Source:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/...
The manipulative white male will say But Wait, they only compared 5 people's DNA out of 6 billion plus in the world???
OK, there was another study done in April 2010 that yielded the same results:
"The researchers arrived at that conclusion by studying genetic data from 1,983 individuals from 99 populations in Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania and the Americas. Sarah Joyce, a doctoral student working with Long, analyzed 614 microsatellite positions, which are sections of the genome that can be used like fingerprints.
She then created an evolutionary tree to explain the observed genetic variation in microsatellites. The best way to explain that variation was if there were two periods of interbreeding between humans and an archaic species, such as Homo neanderthalensis or H. heidelbergensis.
continued......
So that's where I get my brute strength and finely tuned gut instincts from?

* Raises club in the air*
Saddened1234

Brooklyn, NY

#18 Sep 11, 2011
It makes me very concerned when I see such hateful racial comments on this website. I must say, if Europeans are smarter, inventive, gentle, and generally more superior, then why all of the hateful comments toward the "brown" person who started this post? If the initial poster, this "brown" person, is spewing rubbish, then rise above the hateful comments! Take your rightful place by "design" and address the racial comments calmly and intelligently. I challenge you Europeans to be compassionate. I challenge you to actually be superior without using force and cruelty.

Larger brain capacity in the skull does not result in higher intelligence. Look it up!
GeneralButtnaked

Markham, Canada

#19 Oct 31, 2011
haha, its kind of funny as an asian sitting here and watching blacks and whites argue. Blacks say whites are part cavemen/animals, while the whites say the blacks are part chimps. Its really entertaining. I agree, whites do look cavemanish with their cavemen eyebrow ridges and hair. In all honesty, blacks dont look like chimps. Then again, I am biased because whites have done alot more barbaric damage to this world than anyone else.
GeneralButtnaked

Markham, Canada

#20 Oct 31, 2011
Saddened1234 wrote:
It makes me very concerned when I see such hateful racial comments on this website. I must say, if Europeans are smarter, inventive, gentle, and generally more superior, then why all of the hateful comments toward the "brown" person who started this post? If the initial poster, this "brown" person, is spewing rubbish, then rise above the hateful comments! Take your rightful place by "design" and address the racial comments calmly and intelligently. I challenge you Europeans to be compassionate. I challenge you to actually be superior without using force and cruelty.
Larger brain capacity in the skull does not result in higher intelligence. Look it up!
I agree, europeans are definitly not compassionate or gentle, and the smartest 5 countries based on IQ scores are not even white! Remember the holacuast, the crusades, the killing of native americans, slavery, the world wars? If there were no europeans, 90% of the wars going on in the world would never have happened. The europeans give guns to africans to kill each other, because it benifits them. If the europeans did not colonize africa, there wouldnt be the kind of wars going on there. Whatever, it is pointless to argue, the population of europeans worldwide is shrinking at an exponential rate, soon they will die out just like the animals that they descended from. The white oppressed world will soon be gone. We as the people of color will laugh all the way there.
GeneralButtnaked

Markham, Canada

#21 Oct 31, 2011
lastly, the article mentions how anyone who is non-african is neanderthal, that is complete bullshit IMO. First of all, I think it is because when it came to the time whites have to face the fact that they descended from some animal-like beast, they have to bring down everyone else with them. Which just goes to show how weak of a race they really are. First of all, neanderthals lived in europe not in the middle east or asia or austrailia, so when people migrated from africa to asia and austrailia, how can they have had the chance to commit beastiality?

Level 2

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#22 Nov 13, 2011
Dumb asses,I can't believe these (albino/neanderthal hybrids) think that the original neanderthal animal contributed larger brain size,when in fact the neanderthal only had a larger skull to make up for body mass.
This creature "the neanderthal" had a futile larnyx so it couldn't speak and I would imagine that the only language or form of communication it had were grunts,snarls,and hisses lol!..there were several other reasons as to why this animal didn't survive apart from lack of "verbal communication" it carried a host of abnormalities that Europeans are still born with today including- a.d.h.d,bipolar,autism,dementi a and this is only but a few of the issues this creature had.
Neanderthal had a larger brain case than modern human,and the dummies think they inherited an advantage well I beg to differ as whales,and elephants would be a hundred years ahead of humans (meaning me and ppl like me,these hybrids should no longer be considered humans ,but mere hybrids)in terms of technology.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Thanksgiving is a WHITES ONLY holiday! 2 min PolakPotrafi 252
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Well Well 1,457,602
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 6 min Barros 50,546
News The real reasons the U.S. became less racist to... 7 min Frogface Kate 113
Deport barros 2017 10 min Barros 32
Islam rules of engagement . 23 min Barros 123
Islam an empire of faith (Oct '12) 42 min dcool 7,983
3 White Teens Arrested in Gang Rape of 13 yo 7 hr Mick 34
More from around the web