How has Africa from the begining of t...

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#559 Jan 8, 2014
sam righteous wrote:
<quoted text>
The Blacks were before the Eurasians. The Blacks in these places are the orginal Africans who left African 60,000 years ago. The Eurasians, well we really don't know where they came from.
Look at this boy from Andman India. He still looks like his orginal ancestors from Africa
http://i38.tinypic.com/20apf5y.gif
You Eurasians came and tried to push out of our lands. That always been your modus operandum. You the devil!
Wrong, Afronazi fool.

Andamans are Eurasians. All the peoples of Eurasia are Eurasians, and always were. No Africans migrated around Eurasia.

Eurasian DNA already existed at the time of OOA. When they left Arabia, they had Y-DNA CF and D, mtDNA N and M, and those then produced offspring in various locations around Eurasia.

No way around the truth.

And call me “devil” to my face, boy. You won't like the result, you cowardly racist self-hating uneducated jackass. Go bray somewhere else.
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#560 Jan 8, 2014
sam righteous wrote:
<quoted text>
The Blacks were before the Eurasians. The Blacks in these places are the orginal Africans who left African 60,000 years ago. The Eurasians, well we really don't know where they came from.
Look at this boy from Andman India. He still looks like his orginal ancestors from Africa
http://i38.tinypic.com/20apf5y.gif
You Eurasians came and tried to push out of our lands. That always been your modus operandum. You the devil!
They boy on the link is definitely how the original inhabitants of Asia looked. The first Asian people who were Afroasiatic people. It's like looking at foot steps in the sand. Nice post.
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#561 Jan 8, 2014
*The boy in
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#562 Jan 8, 2014
http://www.lightstalkers.org/images/show/9236...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/...

http://www.lightstalkers.org/images/show/9241...

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Andamane...

Definitely the Africans of asia. This is complete proof that Africans migrated to Asia and became afroasiatic people. They look just like they can be related to an African in Africa right now with small physical features that are different. I see the Asian noise in some. The Asian eyes in others. Everyone has chocolate skin. Thick beaded hair. Afroasiatic people...
Tamika

Keswick, Canada

#564 Jan 8, 2014
Bunch of pakis on this forum: "why Pakistani girls love black guys" dissing us! They need to get a taste of their own medicine.
Take a look
Bengal123 | 5 min ago
Iceman83 wrote:
<quoted text>
nobody would talk like that about their husband well no practicing muslim pakistani girl.... for a minute i believed it ... but this last bit confirmed bogus story
She is a fake. What woman wants a black man for a husband anyway? So what if he is Muslim.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#565 Jan 8, 2014
Gaymoney wrote:
<quoted text>
They boy on the link is definitely how the original inhabitants of Asia looked. The first Asian people who were Afroasiatic people. It's like looking at foot steps in the sand. Nice post.
Afroasiatic! LOL!!!

That is the name of a language phylum, boy.

The people you think are “black” have Eurasian DNA types, boy.

Type D: Ainu.

Type C: all over Siberia and America

Those are the first to types to migrate around Eurasia.

You lose... they are Eurasians, not Africans or “Afroasiatics”, LOL!!!

Read a book, boy.
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#566 Jan 8, 2014
Gmoney | 1 min ago
http://www.lightstalkers.org/images/show/9236 ...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/ ...

http://www.lightstalkers.org/images/show/9241 ...

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Andamane ...

Definitely the Africans of asia. This is complete proof that Africans migrated to Asia and became afroasiatic people. They look just like they can be related to an African in Africa right now with small physical features that are different. I see the Asian noise in some. The Asian eyes in others. Everyone has chocolate skin. Thick beaded hair. But all having so called Eurasian DNA. Afroasiatic people...
Reply
Report this post
Tamika

Keswick, Canada

#567 Jan 8, 2014
Here is another post of them disrespecting us.

Bengal123 | 7 min ago
Blacks remind me of some species in the animal kingdom where the adult male makes a family, only for it to leave the mother and the young'uns behind for another female, so leaving them to fend for themselves.

I should add lol. We can probably tell by their behaviour, blacks are the closest humanoid relative to the ape. It's about time they did less ape-ing and finally started behaving like humans. Maybe all the rest of us humans should do them a favour and mix with them so they can become civilised. I'll start the ball rolling. I'll take a black wife.
Reply
Report this post
trollslayer

Hammond, IN

#569 Jan 8, 2014
Gmoney wrote:
<quoted text>
Indeed... And that link you posted is of indigenous people. Not slaves who are on foreign land.
WELL a part of the game when certain PPL. try to alter history....is to pretend that when Africans are found in a area they must be "slaves". There are isolated Blacks in Russia who "they" say were brought there as "slaves".
____

Con't
trollslayer

Hammond, IN

#571 Jan 8, 2014
Gmoney wrote:
http://www.lightstalkers.org/i mages/show/923621
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/...
http://www.lightstalkers.org/images/show/9241...
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Andamane...
Definitely the Africans of asia. This is complete proof that Africans migrated to Asia and became afroasiatic people. They look just like they can be related to an African in Africa right now with small physical features that are different. I see the Asian noise in some. The Asian eyes in others. Everyone has chocolate skin. Thick beaded hair. Afroasiatic people...
Yes I am familiar with Afroasiatic people of direct ancient African descent. Good job of bringing them back to our attention.
trollslayer

Hammond, IN

#572 Jan 8, 2014
Gmoney wrote:
<quoted text>
You must've been raised by a pack of females because you act like a little bytch. A whole lot of female tendencies and no life is what I see in you. I'm sure others will concur. Get out of your Eurocentric fairy tale boy. Those Eurasians are new. African been in the Maghreb and have always been in the Maghreb. This scientific haplogroup bullshyt story is equivalent to the bullshyt story of thanksgiving. Just another bullshyt cover up so everyone thinks Europeans/white Semites have dominion over every part of this earth. The Maghreb is African. It has and always will be Africa. The Eurasians there now are invaders. People who came thousands of years ago and pushed the original population south. The same way they did in India and the same way they did in america. It's the trademark of a divided and conquered nation and that's why you can't escape that simple fact that the Eurasians are new invaders. The result of dividing and conquering a nation always leaves a trail. The proof is in the pudding butt boy. It's evident that these Eurasians you mention, came to Africa and had many wars with the original population. Other African civilizations nearby also note these events.
TRUTH

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#573 Jan 9, 2014
Look at photos of southern Eurasians, label them "Afroasiatic"... and with what evidence?

Their DNA is 100% Eurasian. They are Eurasians.

How desperate you Afronazis are to claim everyone on earth, and as always, with no evidence, no science, no knowledge.

You are CULTISTS, not scholars.
sam righteous

United States

#574 Jan 9, 2014
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, Afronazi fool.
Andamans are Eurasians. All the peoples of Eurasia are Eurasians, and always were. No Africans migrated around Eurasia.
Eurasian DNA already existed at the time of OOA. When they left Arabia, they had Y-DNA CF and D, mtDNA N and M, and those then produced offspring in various locations around Eurasia.
No way around the truth.
And call me “devil” to my face, boy. You won't like the result, you cowardly racist self-hating uneducated jackass. Go bray somewhere else.
I don't care about all that dna crap. The markers may change but these people came out of Africa and remianed in the tropics in south asia, thats why they still look the same. Others went north and became albinized mutants and later a scourge on planet Earth! You have nothing to be proud of, you lying vile peice of human scum!
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#575 Jan 9, 2014
sam righteous wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't care about all that dna crap. The markers may change but these people came out of Africa and remianed in the tropics in south asia, thats why they still look the same. Others went north and became albinized mutants and later a scourge on planet Earth! You have nothing to be proud of, you lying vile peice of human scum!
Amen to that

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#576 Jan 9, 2014
sam righteous wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't care about all that dna crap. The markers may change but these people came out of Africa and remianed in the tropics in south asia, thats why they still look the same. Others went north and became albinized mutants and later a scourge on planet Earth! You have nothing to be proud of, you lying vile peice of human scum!
Having a hissy fit, boy? Of course, since you have no knowledge and can't stand up to mine.

They're all Eurasians. The tropical south Asians have the same DNA types which are all over Eurasia. They do not have African DNA. They are Eurasians.

You're stupid, boy.
sam righteous

United States

#577 Jan 9, 2014
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
Having a hissy fit, boy? Of course, since you have no knowledge and can't stand up to mine.
They're all Eurasians. The tropical south Asians have the same DNA types which are all over Eurasia. They do not have African DNA. They are Eurasians.
You're stupid, boy.
Your system of reckoning is BS. People's haplotype will change over time even in Africa! But you can't deny that they came out of Africa, and they still look like African, and they preceded the arrival of lighter skin peoples in Asia which is common knowledge. So what the hell is the point in calling them Eurasians??? Too bad they still look Black huh? Lol!

And you are the stupid one. People in Africa have DNA from all over. Some have Haplogroup T, G and R but that doesn't make them any less African, likewise many Europeans have E clades and they are still considered Europeans. So your reasoning sucks just like your dishonest and racist personality. I question your right to exist!
Gmoney

Alexandria, VA

#578 Jan 9, 2014
sam righteous wrote:
<quoted text>
Your system of reckoning is BS. People's haplotype will change over time even in Africa! But you can't deny that they came out of Africa, and they still look like African, and they preceded the arrival of lighter skin peoples in Asia which is common knowledge. So what the hell is the point in calling them Eurasians??? Too bad they still look Black huh? Lol!
And you are the stupid one. People in Africa have DNA from all over. Some have Haplogroup T, G and R but that doesn't make them any less African, likewise many Europeans have E clades and they are still considered Europeans. So your reasoning sucks just like your dishonest and racist personality. I question your right to exist!
I love it... And this is real right here. This is his perception of historical events I have been trying to bring to light since the beginning. He is not addressing the people, their identity with these haplogroups. He is addressing their regional location and maybe their eating habits. Wake up everyone. This guys a charlatan.
sam righteous

United States

#579 Jan 9, 2014
Gmoney wrote:
<quoted text>
I love it... And this is real right here. This is his perception of historical events I have been trying to bring to light since the beginning. He is not addressing the people, their identity with these haplogroups. He is addressing their regional location and maybe their eating habits. Wake up everyone. This guys a charlatan.
Yes, he is foucsing on the notion that some mutation of Y-DNA is beleived to have occured when African people reached West Asia or wherever (the when and where of much of this is still disputed). Therefore he thinks this justifies him calling those with said mutation, Eurasian! Despite the fact that they probably still looked like thier recent ancestors and probably spoke a related language.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#580 Jan 9, 2014
sam righteous wrote:
<quoted text>
Your system of reckoning is BS. People's haplotype will change over time even in Africa! But you can't deny that they came out of Africa, and they still look like African, and they preceded the arrival of lighter skin peoples in Asia which is common knowledge. So what the hell is the point in calling them Eurasians??? Too bad they still look Black huh? Lol!
And you are the stupid one. People in Africa have DNA from all over. Some have Haplogroup T, G and R but that doesn't make them any less African, likewise many Europeans have E clades and they are still considered Europeans. So your reasoning sucks just like your dishonest and racist personality. I question your right to exist!
You're uneducated. That is clear. You're a bombastic dullard.

You don't get it, since you have no education in these matters.

Skin color and other observable traits are trivial. Dark skin doesn't make a person African. Such traits evolve (change) quickly in new environments.

We can tell who is an OOA descendant by their DNA. The people who left evolved different haplogroups. The people in Asia you call “black” are still Eurasians.

The fact that some Eurasians have gone into Africa and some Africans gone into Eurasians doesn't change this.

I'm no racist. Come question my right to exist in person, you confused little angry petulant dropout.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#581 Jan 9, 2014
Gmoney wrote:
<quoted text>
I love it... And this is real right here. This is his perception of historical events I have been trying to bring to light since the beginning. He is not addressing the people, their identity with these haplogroups. He is addressing their regional location and maybe their eating habits. Wake up everyone. This guys a charlatan.
Wrong as always, boy.

I'm discussing human migrations and relationships as understood by anthropologists. This is based on genetics as well as archaeological evidence.

All of it is known to me, but not to you. You know nothing of it, and so you can make up nonsense stories and pretend you know what went on. You do not. None of it, obviously.

Real evidence cannot be ignored. By attempting to ignore it, you prove yourself a fraud and a pseudo-intellectual.

You couldn't make it through an Intro to Physical Anthro course (which I've taught), yet you presume to argue in here! LOL!!!

How amusing to watch the uneducated babblers babbling.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
White men = the #1 race traitors (Aug '12) 2 min roxiepet 43
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min VetnorsGate 1,582,507
Blacks weren't designed to be Smart 15 min El Rey del Mundo 13
Power of Master Lee for President. 38 min The Power Of Mast... 23
Did Jesus Have Dreadlocks? (Aug '07) 52 min Clookingforlove 537
Is there any intelligence at all among the blac... 1 hr Clookingforlove 38
Antifa traitors planning Nationwide riots in No... 1 hr El Rey del Mundo 10
Tomi Lehren dating a Black Man!!!! 2 hr Hmm the meanie 124
News Trump's lack of moral compass leaves America on... 4 hr KIP 222
News Republicans have courted racists for years. Why... 5 hr Tony 109
Rape by Cop 5 hr The Power Of Mast... 39
More from around the web