Will Bush attack Syria?
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

MAX--

“LEGALIZE MEXICANS”

Level 5

Since: Oct 09

TO TAKE THE BLACKS JOBS

#1 Aug 29, 2013
Britain says no.......along with China and Russia

Without asking congress?

Damm Bush just doesn't get it
Cogito Ergo Sum

Harrisburg, PA

#3 Aug 29, 2013
With his walking cane?

MAX--

“LEGALIZE MEXICANS”

Level 5

Since: Oct 09

TO TAKE THE BLACKS JOBS

#4 Aug 29, 2013
Symbol Of America wrote:
Get off crack.
LOL

Well..........

O=BOMB=A......blames Bush for everything

Is this clown actually going to attack a 2nd country for no good reason?

What national security interest of the United States or any of its allies is being threatened by Syria?

Othuga..........

“What do the stars say......”

Since: May 11

...explore outside the milkway

#5 Aug 29, 2013
He first said that the U.S wasn't going to invade Syria.

But if he lets them, then I think it would be for the reason of fighting the syrian regime who are attacking innocent civilians with chemical weapons. He might just want to help the innocent syrian civilians.

Kind of like how the U.N tried to help the tutsi's in Rwanda fight against the hutu's.

MAX--

“LEGALIZE MEXICANS”

Level 5

Since: Oct 09

TO TAKE THE BLACKS JOBS

#6 Aug 30, 2013
Carmiana wrote:
He first said that the U.S wasn't going to invade Syria.
But if he lets them, then I think it would be for the reason of fighting the syrian regime who are attacking innocent civilians with chemical weapons. He might just want to help the innocent syrian civilians.
Kind of like how the U.N tried to help the tutsi's in Rwanda fight against the hutu's.
The UN..........

Not alone..........

This Obama sure loves war..........
Masud_S_Hoghughi __

London, UK

#7 Aug 30, 2013
as if dey aint got enuff on dey plate.........gnomesayin...... .
too much monkey business

UK

#8 Aug 30, 2013
Carmiana wrote:
He first said that the U.S wasn't going to invade Syria.
But if he lets them, then I think it would be for the reason of fighting the syrian regime who are attacking innocent civilians with chemical weapons. He might just want to help the innocent syrian civilians.
Kind of like how the U.N tried to help the tutsi's in Rwanda fight against the hutu's.
and the USA will do it alone - the British will NOT help. perhaps he should have shown our Queen, PM's, and our traditions and heroes more respect? really , you could have had him and Michelle house trained before letting him loose on really important and experienced people.
too much monkey business

UK

#9 Aug 30, 2013
MAX-- wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
Well..........
O=BOMB=A......blames Bush for everything
Is this clown actually going to attack a 2nd country for no good reason?
What national security interest of the United States or any of its allies is being threatened by Syria?
Othuga..........
well, we all know Bush killed all the dinosaurs and started Global warming!
Skiff Sun Tzu

Athens, GA

#11 Aug 30, 2013
"The British aren't coming!!!!"
"The British aren't coming!!!!"

HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!
Skiff Sun Tzu

Athens, GA

#12 Aug 30, 2013
Imposter of Masud_S_Hoghughi__ wrote:
Ooooooooook Ooooook Ahhhhhhhhh Ahyeeeeeeeeee Uuuuuuuungk!!!!!!
You best be glad you limey Brits don't want none of Obama's war or else you'll be going.

“What do the stars say......”

Since: May 11

...explore outside the milkway

#13 Aug 30, 2013
MAX-- wrote:
<quoted text>
The UN..........
Not alone..........
This Obama sure loves war..........
I just saw him on the news, and he stated that the troops weren't going to do hand to hand combat. Since he's been in office he hasn't fought one war, even now that he has the opportunity to he isn't going to. He actually brought more soldiers home than what bush has.

Personally,even though I feel bad for the thousands of people who have died from these chemical attacks, I don't think that war is going to be the answer because it will just make things worse. If the U.S gets involved then eventually Syria's allies will get involved which will possibly peak a world war.
Masud_S_Hoghughi __

London, UK

#14 Aug 30, 2013
Carmiana wrote:
<quoted text>
I just saw him on the news, and he stated that the troops weren't going to do hand to hand combat. Since he's been in office he hasn't fought one war, even now that he has the opportunity to he isn't going to. He actually brought more soldiers home than what bush has.
Personally,even though I feel bad for the thousands of people who have died from these chemical attacks, I don't think that war is going to be the answer because it will just make things worse. If the U.S gets involved then eventually Syria's allies will get involved which will possibly peak a world war.
wow........you're brilliant..........y don't they just put u in charge.......
Trouble

Brooklyn, NY

#15 Aug 30, 2013
Carmiana wrote:
He first said that the U.S wasn't going to invade Syria.
But if he lets them, then I think it would be for the reason of fighting the syrian regime who are attacking innocent civilians with chemical weapons. He might just want to help the innocent syrian civilians.
Are people really this gullible? really? Sometimes i think they putting something in the food or water to make people in this country stupid. Why would any one think U.S goes to war to help "civilians?" The chemical weapons, if it was used, is done by the CIA to give reasons to attack Syria. Syrian government is not attacking civilians just like saddam never had those dam weapons we said he had before we bombed them..its the same shyt all over again and you sheep continue believing same lies like you all some robots who can't think.
Skiff Sun Tzu

Athens, GA

#16 Aug 30, 2013
Carmiana wrote:
<quoted text>
I just saw him on the news, and he stated that the troops weren't going to do hand to hand combat. Since he's been in office he hasn't fought one war, even now that he has the opportunity to he isn't going to. He actually brought more soldiers home than what bush has.
Personally,even though I feel bad for the thousands of people who have died from these chemical attacks, I don't think that war is going to be the answer because it will just make things worse. If the U.S gets involved then eventually Syria's allies will get involved which will possibly peak a world war.
Not o the faint-hearted:

Terrifying video reveals shocking incendiary bomb attack on school playground that killed at least ten Syrian children and left scores more with horrific burns
BBC Panorama footage shows children and adults caked in 'napalm-like' substance following attack in northern Syria
Many left with burns to more than 50 percent of their bodies
Victims seen shaking uncontrollably while treated in basic hospital
British medic in Syria said:'We feel like we just don't matter'
Disturbing film revealed just hours after MPs voted against military action in Syria, following chemical attack near Damascus

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-24066...

Level 4

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#17 Aug 30, 2013
MAX-- wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
Well..........
O=BOMB=A......blames Bush for everything
Is this clown actually going to attack a 2nd country for no good reason?
What national security interest of the United States or any of its allies is being threatened by Syria?
Othuga..........
It has nothing to do with any single president, idiot. It's all about the failing dollar and resources. Syria is wanting to use gold instead of the dollar and if they do, everyone will follow suit. It means the market crashing. It means the European Union crashing. You bankrolled your ascent with African gold and slaves and that shit has only lasted for so long. The party is over.
Trouble

Brooklyn, NY

#18 Aug 30, 2013
Triceroy wrote:
<quoted text>
It has nothing to do with any single president, idiot. It's all about the failing dollar and resources. Syria is wanting to use gold instead of the dollar and if they do, everyone will follow suit. It means the market crashing.
Yup, thats what every U.S war has been about: money, power, resources. Gadafi and saddam hussein were going to drop the dollar for gold also, thats why they're boyh dead. Yey you have some fools always jumping on the warmonging bandwagon, believing America goes to war to "help civilians". This is a repeat of the same crap back in 2003 when the lied about weapons they said saddam had.

MAX--

“LEGALIZE MEXICANS”

Level 5

Since: Oct 09

TO TAKE THE BLACKS JOBS

#19 Aug 30, 2013
Triceroy wrote:
<quoted text>
It has nothing to do with any single president, idiot. It's all about the failing dollar and resources. Syria is wanting to use gold instead of the dollar and if they do, everyone will follow suit. It means the market crashing. It means the European Union crashing. You bankrolled your ascent with African gold and slaves and that shit has only lasted for so long. The party is over.
Israel should feel safer to attack Iran after O BOMB a does his thing
Anti-Chaos

San Francisco, CA

#20 Aug 30, 2013
The U.S. has started way to many wars in the past couple of decades and if we keep playing with fire we will get burned..(World War)

Level 4

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#21 Aug 30, 2013
Anti-Chaos wrote:
The U.S. has started way to many wars in the past couple of decades and if we keep playing with fire we will get burned..(World War)
It's already too late.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#23 Aug 30, 2013
Triceroy wrote:
<quoted text>
It has nothing to do with any single president, idiot. It's all about the failing dollar and resources. Syria is wanting to use gold instead of the dollar and if they do, everyone will follow suit. It means the market crashing. It means the European Union crashing. You bankrolled your ascent with African gold and slaves and that shit has only lasted for so long. The party is over.
What a load. We heard this same BS about Libya. It was about the economy, the gold, the water... lol.

Oh right, Muz don't really massacre each other in droves, not in Syria, not in Egypt, not in Iraq, not in Afghanistan, not in Iran, no it never happens, it's always the CIA in some plot to keep black people down.

You're a clown.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
ABOLISH THE MLK HOLIDAY ASAP. Lets Do This Alre... 7 min god bless dixieland 63
do white women prefer black men? (Apr '16) 11 min Neutral 72
Colored boy holding mudshark wife hostage shot ... 12 min Ugly monkeys 2
I love black women and hate white women 14 min fwe 10
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 18 min carmino seranni 1,640,199
is donald trump just white trash 20 min anonz 67
Great Morning Beautiful Melenated people!!! 29 min THX warns Mudsharks 8
Can America Become 80% White Again? 1 hr alfie 600
Jewish Supremacists And Their Shabbot Goy CUCKS... 2 hr KIR SUCKA 27
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 3 hr el rey de los cam... 36,456
Three Words to Describe the Blacks 4 hr Paul 67
More from around the web